Verbal Complement Clauses
A minimalist study of direct perception constructions
This monograph examines the syntax of bare infinitival and participial complements of perception verbs in English and other European languages, and investigates the general conditions under which verbal complement clauses are licensed. The introductory chapter is followed by an overview of the major syntactic and semantic characteristics of non-finite complements of perception verbs in English. The third chapter presents an analysis within the framework of Chomsky's (1995) Minimalist Program according to which event-denoting complements are minimally realised as projections of an aspectual head. In the next chapter, it is argued that verbs capable of licensing aspectual complement clauses must be able to function as a special type of control predicate, an assumption which is shown to account for a number of seemingly unrelated properties of the constructions under consideration. The final chapter examines syntactically reduced clausal complements from a cross-linguistic perspective, showing that Southern Romance languages differ from Germanic ones with respect to the availability of 'bare' aspectual complement clauses, a difference that is attributed to morphological properties of verbs in these languages.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 25] 1999. xiv, 278 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 21 October 2008
Published online on 21 October 2008
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. xi
-
Abbreviations and Symbols | p. xii
-
1. Perception Verbs and Generative Grammar | p. 1
-
2. Syntactic and semantic Characteristics of Noon-Finite Perception Complements in English | p. 16
-
3. The Structure of Direct Perception Complements | p. 90
-
4. The Event-Control Analysis | p. 128
-
5. Direct Perception Complements in Other European Languages | p. 204
-
6. Conclusion | p. 248
-
-
Subject Index | p. 267
-
Author Index | p. 275
Cited by (34)
Cited by 34 other publications
Casalicchio, Jan & Peter Herbeck
2024. Pseudorelative clauses, infinitives, and gerunds with Spanish perception verbs: A comparative view. Syntax 
Sheehan, Michelle & Sonia Cyrino
2024. Restrictions on Long Passives in English and Brazilian Portuguese: A Phase-Based Account. Linguistic Inquiry 55:4 ► pp. 769 ff.
Abusch, Dorit & Mats Rooth
2023. Pictorial free perception. Linguistics and Philosophy 46:4 ► pp. 747 ff.
MILLER, PHILIP
2023. Deicticthisand speaker containment. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
Ros García, Laura
2023. La negación de las nominalizaciones deverbales. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía
Ros García, Laura
2024. A syntactic analysis of <no + event deverbal nominalization> in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 41:2 ► pp. 287 ff.
D’Ambrosio, Justin & Daniel Stoljar
2021. Vendler’s puzzle about imagination. Synthese 199:5-6 ► pp. 12923 ff.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2020. The Syntax of Relative Clauses,
Enghels, Renata
2020. Linguistic Reflections of Object Perception Versus Event Perception. Agreement Ad Sensum in the Pronominal Infinitive Construction in Spanish. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Hamelin, Lise
2019. Jean-Charles Khalifa & Philip Miller (eds.), Perception et structures linguisti. Lexis
OGAWA, Yoshiki
2018. Diachronic Syntactic Change and Language Acquisition: A View from Nominative/Genitive Conversion in Japanese. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 24:2 ► pp. 91 ff.
Pearson, Matt
2018. Predicate raising and perception verb complements in Malagasy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:3 ► pp. 781 ff.
Alboiu, Gabriela & Virginia Hill
2016. Evidentiality and Raising to Object as A′‐Movement: A Romanian Case Study. Syntax 19:3 ► pp. 256 ff.
Rezac, Milan
2016. Gaps and stopgaps in Basque finite verb agreement*. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque [Language Faculty and Beyond, 13], ► pp. 139 ff.
Cuyckens, Hubert & Frauke D’hoedt
2015. Variability in Clausal Verb Complementation: the Case of Admit. In Perspectives on Complementation, ► pp. 77 ff.
Speyer, Augustin
2015. AcI and control infinitives: How different are they?. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Broccias, Cristiano
2014. Watching as-clauses in Late Modern English. In Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 159], ► pp. 137 ff.
Rezac, Milan, Pablo Albizu & Ricardo Etxepare
2014. The structural ergative of Basque and the theory of Case. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32:4 ► pp. 1273 ff.
Asano, Shin’ya & Hiroyuki Ura
2010. Mood and Case: with special reference to genitive Case conversion in Kansai Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
de Villiers, Jill G. & Peter A. de Villiers
2009. Complements Enable Representation of the Contents of False Beliefs: The Evolution of a Theory of Theory of Mind. In Language Acquisition, ► pp. 169 ff.
Kim, Min-Joo
2009. E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:2 ► pp. 345 ff.
Richardson, Kylie
2007. 6 Concluding Remarks. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. 226 ff.
Richardson, Kylie
2007. 5 Extensions of the Link between Case and Grammatical Aspect. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. 164 ff.
Richardson, Kylie
2007. 1 Introduction. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. 1 ff.
Tanaka, Tomoyuki
2007. The rise of lexical subjects in English infinitives. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
TANAKA, TOMOYUKI
2010. AGREEMENT, PREDICATION, AND THE RISE OF FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES IN NONFINITE CLAUSES. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 27:2 ► pp. 374 ff.
Radford, Andrew
2004. English Syntax,
Radford, Andrew
2004. Minimalist Syntax,
Radford, Andrew
2020. An Introduction to English Sentence Structure,
[no author supplied]
2007. Copyright Page. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2007. A Note on Transliteration. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. x ff.
[no author supplied]
2007. Abbreviations. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. viii ff.
[no author supplied]
2007. Appendix: Lexical case‐assigning base verbs in the Slavic languages. In Case and Aspect in Slavic, ► pp. 228 ff.
[no author supplied]
2013. Aspect marking. In Varieties of English, ► pp. 134 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General