Cover not available
Part of
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 3–22

Chapter 1
On complement selection in Spanish and Japanese

| International Christian University
This paper focuses on some curious parallelism between Spanish and Japanese. In particular, it shows that complement clause selection in these languages can be captured by the semantic categories proposed by Lahiri (1991, 2002). It demonstrates that these two languages obey the exact same constraints on complement selection by examining Japanese data along the lines of Lahiri’s verbal classification. It also shows that the analysis of Japanese complementizers proposed by Saito (2010) should be extended to account for a wider range of Japanese data. This extended analysis is shown to be able to capture all the shared parallelisms between the two languages.
Keywords: complement selection, semantic category, utterance, proposition, question, complementizer
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Complementizers in Japanese
  • 3.Saito’s account for the C-comp -(no)-ka-to
  • 4.Verb classification based on semantic categories
    • 4.1 Lahiri (2002)
    • 4.2Class I verbs
    • 4.3Class II verbs
    • 4.4Class III verbs
    • 4.5Class IV verbs
    • 4.6Class V verbs
    • 4.7Class VI verbs
  • 5.Further parallelisms
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.02yos
References (18)
References
Chierchia, G., & Turner, R. 1988. Semantics and property theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 261–302.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1991. Belief and logical form. Mind and Language 6: 344–369.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, S. 1988. Blended quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, W. Poser (ed.), 75–102. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lahiri, U. 1991. Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed them. PhD dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
2002. Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Larson, R. & Ludlow, P. 1993. Interpreted logical forms. Synthese 95: 305–355.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plann, S. 1982. Indirect questions in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 13(2): 297–312.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. 1978. Topicalization and wh movement in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 9(4): 513–517.Google Scholar
1980. On left-dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11(2): 363–393.Google Scholar
1994. On indirect questions, commands, and Spanish quotative que . Linguistic Inquiry 25(3): 547–554.Google Scholar
Saito, M. 2010. On the nature of the complementizer to . Journal of Japanese Linguistics 26: 85–100.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Cartography and selection: Case studies in Japanese. In Beyond Functional Sequence: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, U. Shlonsky (ed.), 255–274. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. & Haraguchi, T. 2012. Deriving the cartography of the Japanese right periphery: The case of sentence-final discourse particles. Iberia 4(2): 104–123.Google Scholar
Suñer, M. 1991. Indirect questions and the structure of CP: Some consequences. In Current Studies in Spanish Linguistics, H. Campos & F. Martínez-Gil (eds.), 283–312. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1993. About indirect questions and semi-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(1): 45–77.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, R. 1980. A model theory for propositional attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(1): 47–70.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uchibori, A. 1997. Opacity and subjunctive complements in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 6, H. Sohn & J. Haig (eds.), 339–414. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Yamakoshi, K. 1997. Doubly filled COPM in Spanish and the cooccurrence of a question particle and a complementizer in Japanese. Ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar