Cover not available
Part of
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 125–138

Chapter 6
On the distribution of the discourse particles -yo in Korean and -ne in Japanese

| Chung-Ang University | Niigata University
| Chung-Ang University | Niigata University
The purpose of this paper is to provide a preliminary comparative study of the discourse particles -yo in Korean and -ne in Japanese, both of which show up fairly ubiquitously in sentence-medial positions. They appear to have very similar distributions, but a closer look at them reveals that they are systematically different. Elaborating on Yim and Dobashi’s (2015, 2016) prosodic analysis of -yo in Korean, we give a novel account of the distributional differences between -yo and -ne. We propose that -yo and -ne are attached to a phonological phrase and a prosodic word, respectively, in the course of syntax-phonology mapping that proceeds derivationally, and that they are realized as intonational phrases as a result of this derivational procedure.
Keywords: syntax-phonology interface, prosodic domains, sentence-medial discourse particles, Korean, Japanese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basic data
  • 3.An analysis
  • 4.Consequences
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.07yim
References (35)
References
Cho, Y. Y. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In The Phonology-syntax Connection, S. Inkelas & D. Zec (eds), 47–62. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2015. Problems of projections: Extensions. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223], E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds), 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobashi, Y. 2003. Phonological Phrasing and Syntactic Derivation. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
2009. Multiple spell-out, assembly problem, and syntax-phonology mapping. In Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations, J. Grijzenhout & B. Kabak (eds), 195–220. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Autonomy of prosody and prosodic domain formation: A derivational approach. Linguistic Analysis 38(3–4): 331–335.Google Scholar
Fuß, E. 2008. Word Order and Language Change: On the Interface between Syntax and Morphology. Habilitationsschrift, Johann-Wolfgang- Goethe Universität.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht, Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, S. 1934. Kokugoho yosetsu (The outlines of Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. 2005. Prosody-scope match and mismatch in Tokyo Japanese wh-questions. English Linguistics 22(2): 347–379.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Major phrase, focus intonation and multiple spell-out (MaP, FI, MSO). The Linguistic Review 24(2–3): 137–167.Google Scholar
2015. Syntax-phonology interface. In Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, H. Kubozono (ed.), 569–618. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jun, S- A. 1998. The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15: 189–226.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O. 1992. Korean Prosodic Phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Kim, C- T. 1983. {yo} chengca contaypepey tayhaye (On address-honorification of -yo ). Kalamwunhwa 2: 129–167.Google Scholar
Kim, H. Y. 1990. Voicing and Tensification in Korean: A Multi-face Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Kim, N- J. 1997. Tone, Segments, and Their Interaction in North Kyungsang Korean: A Correspondence Theoretic Account. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kim, M. & Yim, C. 2014. Mwuncwung/mwunmal ‘-yo’ey tayhan umsengcek thukseng Yenkwu (Phonetic characteristics of sentence medial vs. sentence final ‘-yo’ in Korean). Language Information 18: 27–50.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. & Selkirk, E. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24(2–3): 93–135.Google Scholar
Lee, C. & Park, S. 1991. -'Yo' ssuimuy kwucowa kinung (The structure and function of the mid-sentential -yo construction). Linguistic Journal of Korea 16: 361–389.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1987. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1968. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pak, M. 2008. The Postsyntactic Derivation and its Phonological Reflexes. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Poser, W. J. 1984. The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Sato, Y. & Dobashi, Y. 2016. Prosodic phrasing and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 47(2): 333–349.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tokizaki, H. & Dobashi, Y. 2013. Introduction to universal syntax and parametric phonology. Linguistic Analysis 38(3–4): 147–151.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H. 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus, and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Uyeno, T. Y. 1971. A Study of Japanese Modality – A Performative Analysis of Sentence Particles. PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Yim, C. 2012. Fragment answers containing -yo in Korean: New evidence for the PF deletion theory of ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 514–518.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. The unembeddable allocutive marker -yo in Korean and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Studies in Generative Grammar 26(4): 395–406.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yim, C., & Dobashi, Y. 2015. A derivational approach to prosodic -yo attachment in Korean. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 76 , 35–46.Google Scholar
Yim, C. & Dobashi, Y. 2016. A prosodic account of -yo attachment in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(3): 213–241.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, S. 2013. Interactive nature of the Korean honorific marker -yo . In Studies in Korean Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: Festschrift for Ho-min Sohn , S- O. Sohn, S. Cho & S- H. You (eds), 206–221. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar