Chapter published in:
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 253283
References

References

Aoun, J., & Li, A. Y. -H.
2003Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y., Perles, M., & Shamir, E.
1964On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. In Language and Information: Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.), Ch. 9, 116–150. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Blachman, N.
1968The amount of information that y gives about X. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-14(1): 27–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boston, M., Hale, J., Vasishth, S., & Reinhold Kliegl
2011Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(3): 301–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J., Vergara, M. De La Cruz-Pavía, I. & Laka, I.
(2010) Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition, 115(1), 79–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, B., Ning, A., Bi, H., & Dunlap, S.
(2008) Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. Acta Psychologica 129(1): 61–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z.
(2014) Animacy in sentence processing across languages: An information-theoretic prospective. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Chen, Z, & Hale, J.
Submitted. Structural and non-structural uncertainties in expectation-based sentence comprehension.
Chen, Z., Grove, K., & Hale, J.
2012Structural expectations in Chinese relative clause comprehension. In Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-29), J. Choi, E. A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz, & A. Trueman (eds.), 29–37. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Jäger, L., & Hale, J.
2012Uncertainty reduction as a predictor of reading difficulty in Chinese relative clauses. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics (IsCLL-13) Y. -O. Biq & L. Chen (eds.), 245–261. Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L. -S., & Sybesma, R.
2005A Chinese relative. In Organizing Grammar: Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, H. C. Broekhuis, N. Huybregts, R. Kleinhenz, U. Kleinhenz & J. Koster (eds.), 69–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chi, Z.
1999Statistical properties of probabilistic context-free grammars. Computational Linguistics 25(1): 131–160Google Scholar
Clifton, C., Juhasz, B., Ashby, J., Traxler, M. J., Mohamed, M. T., Williams, R. S., & Rayner, K.
2003The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 317–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, L., Coon, J., Pedro, P., Morgan, A., Polinsky, M., Tandet, G. & Wagers, M.
2015Ergativity and the complexity of extraction: A view from Mayan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(2): 417–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
2003Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Demberg, V.
2010Broad-coverage Model of Prediction in Human Sentence Processing. PhD Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Demberg, V. & Keller, F.
2008Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition 109(2): 193–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, M. & Singhapreecha, P.
2004Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax 7(1): 1–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S.
(2013) Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 475–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P. & MacDonald, M. C.
2008Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2): 161–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E.
1998Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium, A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita & W. O’Neil (eds.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. & Wu, H. -H. I.
2013Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(1–2): 125–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(ed 1983Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, J.
(2001) A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language Technologies, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 1–7, 2007. Stroudsburg PA: ACL.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(2): 101–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30(4): 643–672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Information-theoretical Complexity Metrics. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(9): 397–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, F. & Gibson, E.
2003Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90: 3–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Y., Li, J. & MacDonald, M.
2014Ambiguity affects Mandarin relative clause processing. Presented at The 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbus, OH, March 13–15.
Hsiao, Y. & MacDonald, M. C.
2013Experience and generalization in a connectionist model of Mandarin Chinese relative clause processing. Frontiers in Psychology 4(767).Google Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J.
1989Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control approach. In The Null Subject Parameter, O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (eds.), 185–214. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. -T. J, Li, A. Y. -H. & Li, Y.
2009The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: CUP .CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, T., & Dyer, C.
2013Distributions on minimalist grammar derivations. In Proceedings of the 13th Meeting on the Mathematics of Language, A. Kornai & M. Kuhlmann (eds.).Google Scholar
Jäger, L., Chen, Z., Li, Q., Lin, C. -J. C. & Vasishth, S.
2015The subject relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language 79–80: 97–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1998PCFG models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics 24: 613–632.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
1996A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science 20: 137–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J.
2008Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, 2d edn. New York NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A.
1992A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99: 122–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, N., Kluender, R., Kutas, M., & Polinsky, M.
2013Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data. Language 89: 537–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N., Lee, Y., Gordon, P. C., Kluender, R., & Polinsky, M.
2010Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of pre-nominal relative clauses in Korean. Language 86(3): 546–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N., Polinsky, M. & Kluender, R.
2006Subject preference in Korean. In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-25), D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (eds.), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Levy, R.
2008Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106: 1126–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. -J. C.
2008The processing foundation of head-final relative clauses. Language and Linguistics 9(4): 813–839.Google Scholar
2014Effect of thematic order on the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses. Lingua 140: 180–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. -J. C. & Bever, T.
2006Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (eds.), 254–260. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lin, C. -J. C., & Bever, T.
2011Garden path and the comprehension of head-final relative clauses. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Y. Hiroko, Y. Hirose & J. L. Packard (eds.), 277–297. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. & Garnsey, S.
2011Animacy and the resolution of temporary ambiguity in relative clause comprehension in Mandarin. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Y. Hiroko, Y. Hirose & J. L. Packard (eds.), 241–276. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Linzen, T. & Jaeger, F.
2016Uncertainty and expectation in sentence processing: Evidence from subcategorization distributions. Cognitive Science 40(6): 1382–1411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowder, M. W., Choi, W., Ferreira, F. & Henderson, J. M.
(2018) Lexical predictability during natural reading: Effects of surprisal and entropy reduction. Cognitive science, 42: 1166–1183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mak, W., Vonk, W. & Schriefers, H.
2002The influence of animacy on relative clauserProcessing. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1): 50–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mak, W., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H.
2006Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 466–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazuka, R. & Itoh, K.
1995Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path? In Japanese Sentence Processing, R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (eds.), 295–329. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, E. & Nakamura, M.
2003Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In The 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-22), G. Garding & M. Tsujimura (eds.), 342–355. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Nederhof, M. & Satta, G.
2008Computing partition functions of PCFGs. Research on Language and Computation 6(2): 139–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ou, T. -S.
2007 Suo relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 8(4): 913–937.Google Scholar
Pu, M. -M.
(2007) The distribution of relative clauses in Chinese discourse. Discourse Processes 43(1): 25–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, X., Shen, L. & Forster, K.
2012Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze task. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(4): 611–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H.
2007Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 53: 1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stabler, E.
1997 Derivational minimalism. In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, C. Retoré (ed.), 68–95. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staub, A.
2010Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition 116(1): 71–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y., Lee, S., & Chung, Y.
2007Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis and the Double Dependency Hypothesis. Brain and Language 101(1): 1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M., Morris, R. & Seely, R.
2002Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1): 69–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traxler, M., Williams, R., Blozis, S. & Morris, R.
2005Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53: 204–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, M. & Garnsey, S. M.
2008An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(5): 646–688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, S., Chen, Z., Li, Q. & Guo, G. -L.
2013Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLoS One 8(10)(e77006).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F.
2009Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin: Corpus and Behavioral Evidence. Phd dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Wu, F., Kaiser, E. & Andersen, E.
2011Subject preference, head animacy and lexical cues: A corpus study of relative clauses in Chinese. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Y. Hiroko, Y. Hirose & J. L. Packard (eds.), 173–193. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2012Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(10): 1489–1524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.
2014Evidence of the accessibility hierarchy in relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Language and Linguistics 15(3): 435–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xue, N., Jiang, Z., Zhong, X., Palmer, M., Xia, F., Chiou, F., & Chang, M.
(2010) Chinese Treebank 7.0. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Yun, J, Chen, Z., Hunter, T., Whitman, J. & Hale, J.
2015Uncertainty in processing relative clauses across East Asian languages. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24(2): 113–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yun, J., Whitman, J., & Hale, J. T.
2010Subject-object asymmetries in Korean sentence comprehension. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.).Google Scholar