Cover not available
Part of
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 287–302

Chapter 13
The inexorable spread of 〈ou〉 in Romanized Japanese

| Komatsu University
When the Japanese government adopted new guidelines for representing words in kana (basically moraic phonograms) in 1946, a few mismatches between spelling and modern Tokyo pronunciation remained. One was using 〈う〉 (u) as the default representation for the second half of the long vowel /oH/ (/H/ = length). In official romanization, /ou/ is 〈ou〉 and /oH/ is 〈ō〉, 〈ô〉, or 〈oo〉, but the most popular romanization for /oH/ is now 〈ou〉, partly because most computer users input Japanese text by typing romanization that matches kana spelling. This paper will propose that kana spelling, abetted by romanized input, might induce future speakers to adopt /ou/ as the underlying form in many words that, for now, still have /oH/.
Keywords: kana spelling reform, long vowels, romanization, spelling pronunciation, word processing
Article outline
  • 1.Kana
  • 2.Long vowels and vowel sequences
  • 3. Kana spelling reform
  • 4.Disparity between /ou/ and /ei/
  • 5.Romanization(s)
  • 6.Word processing
  • 7.The future
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.14van
References (30)
References
Bloch, Bernard. 1950. Studies in colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics. Language 26: 86–125.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunka-chō. 1986. Gendai kana-zukai (naikaku kokuji, naikaku kunrei). Tokyo: Bunka-chō.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke. 2010. A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. 2009. The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hachiya, Kiyoto. 2007. Rōmaji. In Nihongo-gaku kenkyū jiten, Y. Hida et al. (eds.), 383–385. Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Hepburn, J. C. 1867. A Japanese and English Dictionary with an English and Japanese Index. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1872. A Japanese-English and English-Japanese Dictionary, 2nd edn. Shanghai: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1886. A Japanese-English and English-Japanese Dictionary, 3rd edn. Tokyo: Z. P. Maruya & Co. (Maruzen).Google Scholar
Hirayama, T. 1998. Zen-Nihon no hatsuon to akusento. In Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten, NHK Hōsō Bunka Kenkyūjo (ed.), 123–173. Tokyo: Nihon Hōsō Shuppankai.Google Scholar
Katsumata, S. (ed.). 1954. Kenkyusha’s New Japanese-English Dictionary, 3rd edn. Tokyo: Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, H. 1950. ‘Gooku’ to ‘gōku’: Hikionsetsu no teishō. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 27(1): 46–59.Google Scholar
Koizumi, T. 1978. Nihongo no seishohō. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. 1989. The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech 32: 249–278.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, H. & Honma, T. 2002. Onsetsu to mōra. Tokyo: Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar
Labrune, L. 2012. The Phonology of Japanese. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1952. Morphophonemics of Standard Colloquial Japanese [Language Dissertation No. 47]. Baltimore MD: Linguistic Society of America.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masuda, K. (ed.). 1974. Kenkyusha’s New Japanese-English Dictionary, 4th edn. Tokyo: Kenkyūsha.Google Scholar
Nakano, Maki. 2011. Kindai kana-zukai kaitei-shi kara mita ‘tenji kana-zukai’ ni tsuite. In Nihongo Gakkai 2011-nendo Shunki Taikai Yokō-shū, 91–98.Google Scholar
Nihon Tenji Toshokan (ed.). 1996. Hajimete tenji o yomu anata e. Tokyo: Enpawamento Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
Rōmaji-kai (ed.). 1885. Rōmaji nite Nihongo no kakikata. Tokyo: Rōmaji-kai.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. 1985. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Seeley, C. 1991. A History of Writing in Japan. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sproat, R. 2000. A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tanahashi, H. 2012. Gakkō ni okeru hyōki no hi-nichijōsei. In Nihongo moji, hyōki no muzukashisa to omoshirosa, 27–34. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkūyjo.Google Scholar
Terao, Y. 2002. Ii-machigai wa dōshite okoru? Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Vance, T. J. 2008a. Romanization and phonemicization of Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13, M. Endo Hudson, P. Sells & S.-A. Jun (eds.), 81–91. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2008b. The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2011. Rendaku in Sino-Japanese: Reduplication and coordination. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 19, H. Sohn, H. M. Cook, W. O'Grady, L. Serafim & S. Y. Cheon (eds.), 465–479. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. & Inokuchi, Y. (eds.). 1962. Meiji ikō kokuji mondai shoan shūsei. Tokyo: Fuzama Shobō.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vance, Timothy J.
2023. A misleading syllable-based generalization about Japanese SJ+/zu/ compounds. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.