Cover not available
Part of
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 343–370

Chapter 16
The status of schwa in Indonesian

Evidence from a naturalistic corpus

| Cornell University
| Cornell University
Cross-linguistically, the distribution of schwa is often different from other vowels. This is the case in Indonesian: While contrastive, schwa’s distribution is more restricted than the other vowels and the realization of schwa is variable. Most prior work on schwa in Indonesian has focused on Standard Indonesian; however as a formal standard, there are many normative aspects of pronunciation potentially affecting observed patterns. To understand actual patterns of usage, we investigate schwa in Jakarta Indonesian, an emerging colloquial variety spoken in Indonesia’s capital, based on a naturalistic spoken corpus. We conclude that observed patterns are due to optional deletion of underlying schwa conditioned by multiple factors including phonological and morphological structure, orthography, and stylistic factors.
Keywords: Indonesian, schwa, corpus phonology, vowel acoustics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Schwa cross-linguistically
  • 3.Accounts of schwa in (Standard) Indonesian
  • 4.Standard Indonesian vs. Colloquial Indonesian
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Research questions and factors
    • 5.2Data: Jakarta Field Station Corpus
    • 5.3Data: Phonological patterns investigated
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Realization of schwa
      • Reliability of transcription
      • Categorical or gradient realization
      • Insertion and/or deletion?
    • 6.2Factors affecting variability of schwa
      • Inter vs. intra speaker variation?
      • Phonological conditioning
      • Morphological and lexical factors
      • Stylistic and lexical factors
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.17coh
References (34)
References
Adisasmito, N. 1993. Syllable structure and the nature of schwa in Indonesian. Studies in Linguistic Sciences 23: 1–19.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. <[URL]> Google Scholar
Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49: 155–180.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bürki, A., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C., & Frauenfelder, U. 2011. Phonetic reduction vs. phonological deletion of French schwa: Some methodological issues. Journal of Phonetics 39: 279–288.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), 283–333. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, A. W. 2012. Variation: Where laboratory and theoretical phonology meet. In Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology, A. C. Cohn, C. Fougeron & M. K. Huffman (eds.), 62–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cohn, A. C. 1989. Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 167–216.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Truncation in Indonesian: Evidence for violable minimal words and AnchorRight. In Proceedings of NELS 34, Vol. 1, K. Moulton & M. Wolf (eds.), 175–189.Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2006. Is there gradient phonology? In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, G. Fanselow, C. Fery, R. Vogel & M. Schlesewsky (eds.), 25–44. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohn, A. C. & McCarthy, J. J. 1998. Alignment and parallelism in Indonesian phonology. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 12, 53–137.Google Scholar
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.Google Scholar
Ewing, M. C. 2005. Colloquial Indonesian. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, K. A. Adelaar & N. Himmelman (eds.), 227–258. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gil, D. & Tadmor, U. 2015. The MPI-EVA Betawi-Jakarta Database. A joint project of the Department of Linguistics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Center for Language and Culture Studies, Atma Jaya Catholic University.Google Scholar
Hall, N. 2006. Cross-linguistic patterns of vowel intrusion. Phonology 23: 387–429.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Vowel epenthesis. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), 1576–1596. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardjadibrata, R. 1978. Consonant clusters in Indonesian. In Second International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics: Proceedings. A. Wurm (Ed.), 165–180. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ikranagara, Kay. 1980. Melayu Betawi Grammar. NUSA Linguistic Studies in Indonesian and Languages in Indonesia, Vol. 9. Jakarta: Atma Jaya University.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M. & Raymond, W. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.) 229–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurniawan, F. 2015. Nasal assimilation in Jakarta Indonesian. Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA) 21 Conference Proceedings 149–165. Canberra: Australia National University.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Phonological Variation in Jakarta Indonesian: An Emerging Variety of Indonesian. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Ladd. D. R. 2014. Simultaneous Structure in Phonology. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapoliwa, H. 1981. A Generative Approach to the Phonology of Bahasa Indonesia. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australia National University.Google Scholar
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ELAN. <[URL]>
Patterson, D., LoCasto, P. & Connine, C. 2003. Corpora analyses of frequency of schwa deletion in conversational American English. Phonetica 60: 45–69.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sainz, S. 1992. A Noncyclic Approach to the Lexical Phonology of English. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 2011. Schwa. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), 628–642. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, J. N. 2003. The Indonesian Language: Its History and Role in Modern Society. Sydney NSW: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
2006. Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Stevens, A. & Schmidgall-Tellings, A. E. 2004. A Comprehensive Indonesian-English Dictionary. Athens OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Umeda, N. 1975. Vowel duration in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(2): 434–446.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Oostendorp M. 1998/2003. Schwa in phonological theory. Glot International 3(5): 3–9. Reprinted in Cheng, L. & Sybesma, R. (eds.). 2014. The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics [Studies in Generative Grammar 61], 431–461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Warner, N., Jongman, A., Cutler, A. & Mücke, D. 2001. The phonological status of Dutch epenthetic schwa. Phonology 18: 387–420.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Moore-Cantwell, Claire
2020. Weight and final vowels in the English stress system. Phonology 37:4 ► pp. 657 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.