Chapter published in:
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 4162
References

References

Andersen, Henning
1980Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Historical Morphology, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 1–50. Berlin: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Markedness theory – the first 150 years. In Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony, Olga Tomić (ed.), 11–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1998Isomorphism and monotonicity: Or the disease model of morphology. In Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, Steven Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds), 411–418. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Azaretti, Emilio
1982L’evoluzione dei dialetti liguri esaminata attraverso la grammatica storica del ventimigliese. Sanremo: Casablanca.Google Scholar
Bender, Byron W.
1998Markedness and iconicity. Some questions. In Case, Typology and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J. Blake [Typological Studies in Language 38], Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds), 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2005 [1989]Lineamenti di grammatica friulana. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 31–76. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Vanelli, Laura
2005 [1975]Morfologia del verbo friulano: Il presente indicativo. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 273–271. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Benincà Paola & Vanelli, Laura
2016Friulian. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 139–153. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2016The minimal sign. In The The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Gregory Stump & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 50–69. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul
2000How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998How lexical semantics constrains inflectional allomorphy. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geraart Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999The Origins of Complex Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002Umlaut as signans and signatum: synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geraart Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), 1–23. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Basic terminology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 5–23. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew & Cameron-Faulkner, Thea
2000Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 813–835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve
1987The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Brian McWhinney (ed.), 1–33. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crocco-Galeas, Grazia
1998The Parameters of Natural Morphology. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1987Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2005Do affixes have meaning? Polarity in the Toten dialect of Norwegian meets morphological theory. Yearbook of Morphology 2005: 27–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The No Blur Principle meets Norwegian dialects. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 278–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Antoine
1953Morphologie historique du latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fanti, Renata
1939Note fonetiche e morfologiche sul dialetto di Ascrea. L’Italia Dialettale 15: 111–133.Google Scholar
Francescato, Giuseppe
1965A propos du -i final atone en frioulan. Revue de Linguistique Romane 29: 238–248.Google Scholar
Gartner, Theodor
1892Die Mundart von Erto. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 16: 183–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, Maria
1969Sur l’origine de la désinence de la première personne du singulier de l’indicatif présent dans les langues romanes. Bulletin de la Société Roumaine de Linguistique Romane 6: 61–66.Google Scholar
1970Le présent de l’indicatif et du subjunctif en frioulan et la morphologie comparée. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 15: 335–343.Google Scholar
Iliescu, Maria & Mourin, Charles
1991Les analogies dans le système verbal du frioulan. In Festschrift für Giovan Battista Pellegrini, Johann Kramer (ed.), 175–194. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971[1939]Signe zéro. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson (ed.), 211–219. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam & Alessandra Lombardi
2014The development of the southern subjunctive: Morphological loss and syntactic gain. In Diachrony and Dialects, Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds), 25–47. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
1999Il futuro CANTARE-HABEO nell’Italia meridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 80: 67–114.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2011Morphological persistence. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 155–215. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2016Inflectional morphology. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 497–512. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcato, Gianna & Ursini, Flavia
(1998)Dialetti veneti. Grammatica e storia. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Giuseppe
1952Lineamenti di grammatica friulana. Udine: Società filologica friulana G.I. Ascoli.Google Scholar
Maschi, Roberta
2000Morfologia storica del friulano: l’Evoluzione del sistema verbale dal XIV al XVII secolo. Ce fastu? 76: 197–228.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter
1991 2 Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Mair
2005Parluma ‘d Còiri: Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte. Savona: Società savonese di Storia Patria.Google Scholar
Pelliciardi, Ferdinando
1977Grammatica del dialetto romagnolo. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gardani, Francesco & Luschützky, Hans Christian
2014Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Morphology and Meaning. Selected Papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327], Franz Rainer, Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanga, Glauco
1987Lingua e dialetti di Bergamo e delle valli. Bergamo: LubrinaGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew
1995New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Inflectional Paradigms: Content and Form at the Syntax-Morphology Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
2005 [2002]La posizione del friulano nel dominio romanzo. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 19–30. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
2007Processi analogici nella flessione verbale. La reazione del sistema morfologico del friulano al cambiamento storico. In Dialetto, Memoria & Fantasia, Gianna Marcato (ed.), 51–60. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Vicario, Federico
2011Lezioni di linguistica friulana. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ulrich
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto
1974Veneto. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar