Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 4162
References
Andersen, Henning
1980Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Historical Morphology, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 1–50. Berlin: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Markedness theory – the first 150 years. In Markedness in Synchrony and Diachrony, Olga Tomić (ed.), 11–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1998Isomorphism and monotonicity: Or the disease model of morphology. In Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, Steven Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds), 411–418. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Azaretti, Emilio
1982L’evoluzione dei dialetti liguri esaminata attraverso la grammatica storica del ventimigliese. Sanremo: Casablanca.Google Scholar
Bender, Byron W
1998Markedness and iconicity. Some questions. In Case, Typology and Grammar: In Honor of Barry J. Blake [Typological Studies in Language 38], Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds), 57–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2005 [1989]Lineamenti di grammatica friulana. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 31–76. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Vanelli, Laura
2005 [1975]Morfologia del verbo friulano: Il presente indicativo. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 273–271. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Benincà Paola & Vanelli, Laura
2016Friulian. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 139–153. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2016The minimal sign. In The The Cambridge Handbook of Morphology, Gregory Stump & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 50–69. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul
2000How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998How lexical semantics constrains inflectional allomorphy. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geraart Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999The Origins of Complex Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002Umlaut as signans and signatum: synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geraart Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), 1–23. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Basic terminology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 5–23. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010The Evolution of Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew & Cameron-Faulkner, Thea
2000Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 813–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve
1987The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, Brian McWhinney (ed.), 1–33. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crocco-Galeas, Grazia
1998The Parameters of Natural Morphology. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1987Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology [Studies in Language Companion Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav
2005Do affixes have meaning? Polarity in the Toten dialect of Norwegian meets morphological theory. Yearbook of Morphology 2005: 27–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The No Blur Principle meets Norwegian dialects. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 278–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Antoine
1953Morphologie historique du latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fanti, Renata
1939Note fonetiche e morfologiche sul dialetto di Ascrea. L’Italia Dialettale 15: 111–133.Google Scholar
Francescato, Giuseppe
1965A propos du -i final atone en frioulan. Revue de Linguistique Romane 29: 238–248.Google Scholar
Gartner, Theodor
1892Die Mundart von Erto. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 16: 183–209.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iliescu, Maria
1969Sur l’origine de la désinence de la première personne du singulier de l’indicatif présent dans les langues romanes. Bulletin de la Société Roumaine de Linguistique Romane 6: 61–66.Google Scholar
1970Le présent de l’indicatif et du subjunctif en frioulan et la morphologie comparée. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 15: 335–343.Google Scholar
Iliescu, Maria & Mourin, Charles
1991Les analogies dans le système verbal du frioulan. In Festschrift für Giovan Battista Pellegrini, Johann Kramer (ed.), 175–194. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971[1939]Signe zéro. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson (ed.), 211–219. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam & Alessandra Lombardi
2014The development of the southern subjunctive: Morphological loss and syntactic gain. In Diachrony and Dialects, Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds), 25–47. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
1999Il futuro CANTARE-HABEO nell’Italia meridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 80: 67–114.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2011Morphological persistence. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 155–215. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2016Inflectional morphology. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 497–512. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcato, Gianna & Ursini, Flavia
(1998)Dialetti veneti. Grammatica e storia. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Giuseppe
1952Lineamenti di grammatica friulana. Udine: Società filologica friulana G.I. Ascoli.Google Scholar
Maschi, Roberta
2000Morfologia storica del friulano: l’Evoluzione del sistema verbale dal XIV al XVII secolo. Ce fastu? 76: 197–228.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter
1991 2 Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, Mair
2005Parluma ‘d Còiri: Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte. Savona: Società savonese di Storia Patria.Google Scholar
Pelliciardi, Ferdinando
1977Grammatica del dialetto romagnolo. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, Dressler, Wolfgang U., Gardani, Francesco & Luschützky, Hans Christian
2014Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Morphology and Meaning. Selected Papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 327], Franz Rainer, Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanga, Glauco
1987Lingua e dialetti di Bergamo e delle valli. Bergamo: LubrinaGoogle Scholar
Sihler, Andrew
1995New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Inflectional Paradigms: Content and Form at the Syntax-Morphology Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
2005 [2002]La posizione del friulano nel dominio romanzo. In Linguistica friulana, Paola Benincà & Laura Vanelli (eds), 19–30. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
2007Processi analogici nella flessione verbale. La reazione del sistema morfologico del friulano al cambiamento storico. In Dialetto, Memoria & Fantasia, Gianna Marcato (ed.), 51–60. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Vicario, Federico
2011Lezioni di linguistica friulana. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ulrich
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto
1974Veneto. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar