Cover not available
Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 63–78

The Inflected Construction in the dialects of Sicily

Parameters of microvariation

| Ca’ Foscari University of Venice

Sicilian dialects display an instance of verbal Pseudo-Coordination (V1[TAM.Agr] a V2[TAM.Agr]), here referred to as the Inflected Construction or IC (cf. Cardinaletti and Giusti 2001, 2003), that can occur in very different configurations. Aim of this paper is to discuss the following parameters of microvariation, by providing new data from recent fieldwork: (i) the restriction of the IC to some V2s; (ii) the possibility for the IC to occur across moods and tenses and to display complete paradigms for person features; (iii) the reduction of go as V1, and of other possible V1s, to a prefix-like invariable form. In the paper, three major types of IC are identified: Type 1 IC is only possible in some persons of the indicative present and in the 2sg of the imperative; Type 2 IC features the extension of the paradigm to other simple tenses of the indicative; Type 3 IC displays a full-fledged paradigm in the indicative (3 simple tenses), subjunctive and imperative.

Keywords: Inflected Construction, Pseudo-Coordination, Sicilian dialects, motion verbs, restructuring verbs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Type 1: The IC in Marsalese
  • 3.Restrictions on V2 in the dialect spoken in Palermo
  • 4.Type 2: The indicative preterite IC in Deliano
  • 5.Type 3: The IC in the dialects of eastern Sicily
  • 6.Other configurations of Inflected Construction
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.251.03dic
References
Accattoli, Matilde & Todaro, Giuseppina
2017 Verbes de mouvement et grammaticalisation: Le cas du sicilien vaffazzu. In Normes et grammaticalisation: Le cas des langues romanes, Malinka Velinova (ed.), 187–210. Sofia: CU “Romanistika”.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994 Morphology by Itself. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia
1896 Un problema di sintassi comparata dialettale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 14: 453–468.Google Scholar
1901 Appendice all’articolo ‘Un problema di sintassi comparata dialettale’. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 15: 221–225.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2012 Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics (COPiL) 6: 267–294.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Richard Janda & Brian Joseph (eds), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1993 The sentential complementation of Salentino: A study of a language without infinitival clauses. In Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Adriana Belletti (ed), 28–98. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Carden, Guy & Pesetsky, David
1977 Double-verb constructions, markedness, and a fake coordination. In Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 82–92. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
2001 Semi-lexical motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. In Semi-lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds), 371–414. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Motion verbs as functional heads. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 31–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
To appear. Multiple agreement in southern Italian dialects. In Linguistic Variations: Structure and Interpretation – Studies in Honor of M. Rita Manzini, Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds) Berlin De Gruyter
Cruschina, Silvio
2013 Beyond the stem and inflectional morphology: An irregular pattern at the level of periphrasis. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 262–283. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò
2015 Syntactic constructions with motion verbs in some Sicilian dialects: A comparative analysis. MA thesis, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò & Giusti, Giuliana
2015 A protocol for the Inflected Construction in Sicilian dialects. Annali di Ca’ Foscari, Serie Occidentale 49: 393–422.Google Scholar
2018 Dimensions of variation: The Inflected Construction in the dialect of Delia (Caltanissetta). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14: Selected papers from the 46th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Stony Brook, NY Lori Repetti & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), 54–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Thornton, Anna
1991 Doppie basi e binarismo nella morfologia italiana. Rivista di Linguistica 3 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög
2014 Pseudo-coordination in Swedish with gå ‘go’ and the ‘surprise effect’. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 26–50.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1997 Asyndetic complementation in Neapolitan dialect. The Italianist 17: 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 From coordination to subordination: The grammaticalization of progressive and andative aspect in the dialects of Salento. In Coordination and Subordination. Form and Meaning. Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014, Fernanda Pratas, Sandra Pereira & Clara Pinto (eds), 157–184. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Leone, Alfonso
1973 Vattel’a pesca, vieni a piglialo. Lingua Nostra 34: 11–13.Google Scholar
1978 Sullo scadimento semantico di andare. Lingua Nostra 39: 50–54.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2004 When lexemes become allomorphs – On the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica 38: 227–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2005 I dialetti Italiani e Romanci: Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Pitrè, Giuseppe
1993[1875] Fiabe, novelle e racconti popolari siciliani, Vol. I–IV. Catania: Clio.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969 Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol. 3: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy
1971 Caught in the act. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 254–263. Chicago IL: CLS.
Sornicola, Rosanna
1976 Vado a dire o vaiu a ddico problema sintattico o problema semantico?. Lingua Nostra 37(3/4): 65–74.Google Scholar
Sorrento, Luigi
1950 Sintassi romanza: Ricerche e prospettive. Milan: Istituto editoriale cisalpino.Google Scholar
Sorrisi, Fabrizio
2010 Le costruzioni flesse con va + verbo lessicale in palermitano. In Quaderni di lavoro ASIt, 11. Studi sui dialetti della Sicilia, Jacopo Garzonio (ed.), 111–120. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Stefanini, Ruggero
1970 Imperativo per infinito in fiorentino. Lingua Nostra 31: 19–20.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna
2007 Is there a partition in the present indicative of Italian irregular verbs? Annali Online di Ferrara - Lettere 2: 43–61.Google Scholar
Wilson, Imogen
1999 Paratactic complementation in Sicilian. M.Phil. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
1996 Pseudocoordination is subordination. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58: 29–54.Google Scholar
2007 The Syntax of Tenselessness. Tense/Mood/Aspect-agreeing Infinitivals. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008 Creating surprise in complex predication. Nordlyd 35: 163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar