Cover not available
Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 131–154

The morphosyntax-semantics interface and the Sicilian Doubly Inflected Construction

 | CLLE-ERSS (CNRS & Université de Toulouse II Jean Jaurès)
 | CLLE-ERSS (CNRS & Université de Toulouse II Jean Jaurès)
We examine the Doubly Inflected Construction of Sicilian (DIC, Cruschina 2013; also known as Inflected Construction, Cardinaletti and Giusti 2001, 2003), in which a motion verb V1 is followed by an event verb V2, both verbs being inflected for the same person and TAM features. We propose to regard DIC as a Serial Verb Construction and analyze it in terms of an operation of lexical concatenation, whereby V1 and V2 are semantically composed as lexical verbs denoting spatio-temporally contiguous events and displaying argument sharing, to yield a complex predicate denoting concatenated events. The data we consider crucially include the causative motion verb ‘send’ and bring out a mismatch between the person features realized on V1 and V2 and semantic interpretation. We show how our analysis allows for a principled account of the morphology-semantics mismatch. The semantic analysis is implemented in a neo-Davidsonian framework (Parsons 1990).
Keywords: Doubly Inflected Construction, serial verb constructions, motion verbs, morphosyntax-semantics mismatch, event semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Main properties of DIC
    • 2.1Morphosyntactic properties
      • 2.1.1Feature Matching
      • 2.1.2No intervening elements
      • 2.1.3No syntactic dependency
    • 2.2Semantic properties
    • 2.3No grammaticalization of V1 as a tense/aspect marker
  • 3.Serialization of events
    • 3.1Definition and properties of Serial Verb Constructions
    • 3.2The empty marker
    • 3.3No idiomaticity
    • 3.4Argument sharing
    • 3.5Feature Matching
    • 3.6Single event
  • 4.The analysis
    • 4.1DIC with the causative motion verb mannari
  • 4.2Formal analysis
    • 4.2.1Morphosyntax
    • 4.2.2Semantics
      • 4.2.3Application of the analysis to some examples
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.251.07tod
References (25)
References
Accattoli, Matilde & Todaro, Giuseppina. 2017. Verbes de mouvement et grammaticalisation: Le cas du sicilien vaffazzu. In Normes et grammaticalisation: Le cas des langues romanes, Malinka Velinova (ed.), 187–210. Sofia: CU “Romanistika”.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in a typological perspective. In Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–87. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2011. Multi-verb constructions: setting the scene. In Multi-verb Constructions: A View from the Americas, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Pieter C. Muyske (eds), 1–26. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, Ayo. 1974. On serial verbs and verbal status. Journal of West African Languages 9 (1): 17–48.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nick, Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike & Ameka, Felix K. 2007. Principles of event encoding: The case of motion events. Language 83(3): 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nick, Essegbey, James & Kita, Sotaro. 2011. The Macro-Event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 43–67. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana. 2001. ‘Semi-lexical’ motion verbs in Romance and Germanic. In Semi-lexical Categories: The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words, Norbert Corver & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds), 371–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Motion verbs as functional heads. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 31–49. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2013. Beyond the stem and inflectional morphology: An irregular pattern at the level of periphrasis. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John C. Smith (eds), 262–283. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo N. 2015. Syntactic Constructions with Motion Verbs in Some Sicilian Dialects: A Comparative Analysis. MA thesis, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia.
Di Caro, Vincenzo N. & Giusti, Giuliana. 2015. A protocol for the Inflected Construction in Sicilian dialects. Annali di Ca’ Foscari 49: 393–422.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1997. Grammatical structures in verb serialization. In Complex Predicates, Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds), 289–354. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 2008. Features on bound pronouns. In Phi Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, David Adger, Susana Bejar & Daniel Harbour (eds), 35–56. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Erfurt: University of Erfurt.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria R. & Leonardo M. Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara. 1989. Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk & Bradley Music (eds), 342–65. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol. 3: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Schlenker, Philippe. 1999. Propositional Attitudes and Indexicality: A Cross-Categorial Approach. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sornicola, Rosanna. 1976. Vado a dire, vaiu a ddicu: problema sintattico o problema semantico? Lingua Nostra 37(3): 65–74.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 1996. Pseudocoordination is subordination. In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58: 29–54.Google Scholar
. 2007. The Syntax of Tenselessness. Tense/Mood/Aspect-agreeing Infinitivals. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò
2022. Preterite indicative Pseudo-Coordination and morphomic patterns. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Giusti, Giuliana & Anna Cardinaletti
2022. Theory-driven approaches and empirical advances. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Giusti, Giuliana, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro & Daniel Ross
2022. Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Del Prete, Fabio & Giuseppina Todaro
2020. Building complex events. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.