Cover not available
Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 237–255

Contact-induced phenomena in the Alps

| Universiteit Utrecht
| Università di Verona
The main question underlying this chapter is to what extent language contact can affect syntactic structure. To tackle this issue we examine two relevant phenomena found in two minority languages spoken in the region Trentino-Alto Adige/South Tyrol: clitic climbing in Dolomitic Ladin and the use of the Romance complementizer ke in Cimbrian. Both phenomena are usually considered as the result of a contact-induced change influenced by the neighbouring Italo-Romance varieties. However, it is shown that the rising of clitic climbing is a language-internal process which is only accelerated by the contact with Italian. Similarly, the lexical borrowing of the complementizer ke in Cimbrian does not entail that its syntactic properties are also borrowed.
Keywords: language contact, Ladin, Cimbrian, clitic climbing, complementizer
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Clitic climbing in Romance
  • 3.Clitic climbing as a contact phenomenon?
    • 3.1Clitic climbing in the varieties surrounding Dolomitic Ladin
    • 3.2Discussion of the data and analysis
  • 4.Cimbrian
    • 4.1The double complementizer system in Cimbrian: The state of the art
    • 4.2The unexpected pattern ke + subjunctive
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowldgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.251.11cas
References (44)
References
Anderlan-Obletter, Amalia. 1991. La rujeneda dla oma. Gramatica dl ladin de Gherdëina. Urtijëi: Istitut pedagogich ladin.Google Scholar
Bacher, Josef. 1905. Die deutsche Sprachinsel Lusern. Innsbruck: Verlag der Wagner’schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung. Reprint: 1976. Wien: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.Google Scholar
Bacher, Nikolaus. 1833. Versuch einer Deütsch-Ladinischen Sprachlehre. Ms, published by Lois Craffonara (ed.), 1995. Ladinia 19: 1–304.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1999. Final complementizers in hybrid languages. Journal of Linguistics 35: 233–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1986. Punti di sintassi comparata dei dialetti italiani settentrionali. In Raetia antiqua et moderna. W.Th. Elwert zum 80. Geburtstag, Günter Holtus & Kurt Ringger (eds), 457–479. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Reprinted in Benincà, Paola. 1994. La variazione sintattica. Studi di dialettologia romanza, 105–138. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1985/86. L’interferenza sintattica: di un aspetto della sintassi ladina considerato di origine tedesca. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 5: 3–15.Google Scholar
. 1995. Il friulano dalle origini al Rinascimento. In Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, Band II.2, Günter Holtus et al. (eds), 42–61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bidese & Rakesh, Yoon, James. 1991. On the composition of COMP and parameters of V2. In The Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Dawn Bates (ed.), 41–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Casalicchio, Jan & Cordin, Patrizia. 2016. Il ruolo del contatto tra varietà tedesche e romanze nella costruzione ‘verbo più locativo’. Vox Romanica 75: 116–142. Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Padovan, Andrea & Tomaselli, Alessandra. 2012. A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 90: 1–21.Google Scholar
. 2014. The syntax of subordination in Cimbrian and the rationale behind language contact. Language Typology and Universals 67(4): 489–510.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Tomaselli, Alessandra. 2018. Developing pro-drop: the case of Cimbrian. In Null Subjects in Generative Grammar: A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds), 52–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 519–557.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Cognola, Federica. In press. Parametrising subject-finite verb inversion across V2 languages. On the role of Relativised Minimality at the vP edge. In Rethinking Verb Second, Theresa Biberauer, Sam Wolfe & Rebecca Woods (eds). Oxford/New York: OUP.
. 2018. V2 and (micro)-variation in two Rhaeto-Romance varieties of Northern Italy. In Advances in Italian Dialectology. Sketches of Italo-Romance grammars, Roberta D'Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds), 72–105. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Cordin, Patrizia. In preparation. A Grammar of Central Trentino. Leiden: Brill.
Casalicchio, Jan & Padovan, Andrea. 2018. Das Zweifache Komplementierersystem im Zimbrischen. Romanische Entlehnung und Eigenentwicklung. In Deutsch als Minderheitensprache in Italien. Theorie und Empirie kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandels [Special Issue of Germanistische Linguistik], Stefan Rabanus (ed.), 183–210. Special issue of Germanistische Linguistik.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cordin, Patrizia. 2016. Linguistic contact, bilingualism and multiple grammars. Talk given at the AThEME consortium meeting, Verona, 15–16 September.
Foulet, Lucien. 1928. Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français. Paris: Honoré ChampionGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel. 2016. A phase-theoretic approach to cliticization in Romance. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 9(1): 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallmann, Peter, Siller-Runggaldier, Heidi & Sitta, Horst. 2013. Sprachen im Vergleich. Deutsch – Ladinisch – Italienisch. Der einfache Satz. Bulsan: Istitut Pedagogich Ladin.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Poletto, Cecilia. 2009. The hybrid complementizer system of Cimbrian. In Proceedings XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Vincenzo Moscati & Emilio Servidio (eds), 181–194. Siena: Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi Cognitivi sul Linguaggio.Google Scholar
. 2011. Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. In Studies on German-Language Islands [Studies in Language Companion Series 123], Michael T. Putnam (ed.), 301–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.) 2010. The Handbook of Language Contact. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
Kolmer, Agnes. 2005. L’elemento da come espletivo della posizione del soggetto enclitico pronominale nel Cimbro di Luserna (Trentino). In L’influsso dell’italiano sulla grammatica delle lingue minoritarie. Problemi di morfologia e sintassi. Atti del Convegno Internazionale – Costanza, 8.–11.10.2003, Walter Breu (ed.), 55–78. Rende: Università della Calabria.Google Scholar
. 2012. Pronomina und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Untersuchungen zum grammatischen Wandel einer deutschen Minderheitensprache in romanischer Umgebung. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Lardschneider, Archangelus. 1909. Versuch einer Syntax des Grödnerischen. Dissertation, University of Vienna.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1978. Doubl-Infl. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 3: 173–206.Google Scholar
. 1979. Postille alla regola di ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 4: 213–228.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1981. Semantic interpretation vs. lexical governance. Language 57: 841–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padovan, Andrea, Tomaselli, Alessandra, Bergstra, Myrthe, Corver, Norbert, Etxepare, Ricardo & Dold, Simon. 2016. Minority languages in language contact situations: Three case studies on language change. Us Wurk, tydskrift foar Frisistyk 65: 146–174.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Giovan Battista. 1977. Carta dei dialetti d'Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1976a. Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1: 1–54.Google Scholar
. 1976b. La Montée du Sujet, le si impersonnel et une règle de restructuration dans la syntaxe italienne. Recherches Linguistiques 4: 158–184.Google Scholar
. 1978. A restructuring rule in Italian Syntax. In Recent Transformational Studies on European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 113–158. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1997. Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–460.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Vanelli, Laura. 2006. Nuova grammatica italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2004. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 638–668. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silva-Corbalán, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2002. Evidential contexts. Ms, University of Maryland.
[Vian, Joseph A.] 1864. Gröden, der Grödner und seine Sprache. Bozen: Wohlgemuth.Google Scholar