Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 257293
References (53)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical Plurals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York Working Papers – Special Issue York-Essex Morphology Meeting May 2009, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: University of York.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew. 2017. Beware Occam’s syntactic Razor: Morphotactic analysis and Spanish mesoclisis. <[URL]> (25 november 2017).
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia. 1873. Trascrizioni e altri additamenti elementari. Archivio Glottologico Italiano I: XLII–LIV.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Benedetta & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2017. Le vocali toniche nelle varietà friulane, ladine e romance. Ladinia, XLI: 53–80.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Rezac, Milan. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 35–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1998. Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In Theoretical Advances on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 157], José Lema & Esthela Trevino (eds), 71–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On absolute and contextual syncretism. In The Bases of Inflectional Identity, Andrew Nevins & Asaf Bachrach (eds), 156–205. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-(in)completeness. Syntax 4: 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘Semantic Parameter’. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Gallego, Ángel & Ott, Dennis. To appear. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Generative Syntax: Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges, Ángel Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds). Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics.
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, Joao & Figueiredo Silva, Cristina. 2002. Notes on nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 17–29.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola, Lutz, Marten & Sybesma, Rint. 2011. The point of Bantu, Chinese and Romance nominal classification. Italian Journal of Linguistics 23: 251–299.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Calisto & Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2016. Semantic gender diversity and its architecture in the grammar of Arabic. Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 8: 154–199.Google Scholar
Ferrari Bridgers, Franca. 2008. A unified syntactic analysis of Italian and Luganda nouns. In The Bantu-Romance Connection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131], Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds), 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vaux, Bert. 1998. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert & Lisi Oliver (eds), 223–240. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Harris, James & Halle, Morris. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–621.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2010a. Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen (2008) [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2005. Noun class, gender, and the lexicon/syntax/morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences 43: 102–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011a. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Reducing ‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation 11: 76–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011c. (Definite) denotation and case in Romance. In Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 3],Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs & Tobias Scheer (eds), 149–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2011d. Mesoclisis in the imperative: Phonology, morphology or syntax? Lingua 121: 1101–1120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. From Latin to Romance: Case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus 26(2): 217–248.Google Scholar
2017a. N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej & Anna Bondaruk (eds), 213–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017b. Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural -a . In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Joseph Emonds & Markéta Janebova (eds), 263–282. Olomouc: Palacky University OlomoucGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–25.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Arregi, Karlos. 2005. Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 43–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percus, Orin. 2011. Gender features and interpretation: A case study. Morphology 21: 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio VII: 47–66.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968[1949]. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Salvioni Carlo. 1902. Il plurale del femminili di 1° declinazione esposto per -a ed -an in qualche varietà alpina di Lombardia. Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, Serie II 35.851: 905–919.Google Scholar
Savoia Leonardo M. 2015. I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Steriopolo, Olga & Wiltschko, Martina. 2010. Distributed Gender hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Philip Dudchuk, Serge Minor & Ekaterina Pshehotskaya (eds), 155–172. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997. Vº-to-Iº movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 189–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Manzini, Maria Rita, Leonardo M. Savoia & Benedetta Baldi
2021. Chapter 8. -ŋ plurals in North Lombard varieties. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357],  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects. Probus 33:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects. Probus 33:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.