Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 111–120

Chapter 7
Micro‑ and macro-variation

From pronominal allomorphies to the category of irreality/non-veridicality

| University of Florence
Manzini and Savoia (2005, 2017) argue that morphophonology is involved in enclisis/proclisis alternations only in so far as it externalizes the syntactico-semantic category of non-veridicality, as outlined here in Section 1. In Section 2 we review typological literature reporting that the irrealis category governs the alternation between different pronominal series cross-linguistically. This evidence potentially fulfills a prediction issuing from the treatment of Romance. What is more, comparison between treatments of Romance microvariation and of typological macrovariation reveals a propensity to treat the former in terms of morphophonological organization and the latter in terms of conceptual systems. If Manzini and Savoia are correct, efforts at defining opposed notions of macro‑ and micro-parametrization are not warranted by the evidence (Section 3).
Keywords: clitics, modality, microvariation, parameters, Romance
Article outline
  • 1.Enclisis/proclisis alternations in Romance
  • 2.Realis/irrealis alternations in the typological debate
  • 3.Microvariation and macroparameters
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.07rit
References (16)
References
Bafile, Laura. 1993. Fonologia prosodica e teoria metrica: Accento, cliticizzazione e innalzamento vocalico nel napoletano. PhD dissertation, Università di Firenze.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2014. Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Grammatical Complexity, Frederick Newmeyer & Laurel Preston (eds), 103–127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Repetti, Lori. 2008. The phonology and syntax of subject clitics in Interrogative Sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 523–563.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1995. The realis-irrealis distinction in Caddo, the Northern Iroquoian languages, and English. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 349–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2012. Descriptive notions vs. grammatical categories: Unrealized states of affairs and ‘irrealis’. Language Sciences 34: 131–146.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2011. Negative and positive polarity items. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1660–1712. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
. 2000. Parameters and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, 3 Vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2011. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Enclisis/proclis alternations in Romance: Allomorphies and (re)ordering. Transactions of the Philological Society 115: 98–136.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Sansò, Andrea. 2012. What do languages encode when they encode reality status? Language Sciences 34: 99–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordonez, Francisco & Repetti, Lori, 2014. On the morphological restrictions of hosting clitics in Italian and Sardinian dialects. L’Italia Dialettale LXXV: 173–198.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon, 1996. On the prosodic representation of clitics. In Interfaces in Phonology, Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), 102–127. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1990. Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages. Journal of Linguistics 26: 363–401.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Manzini, Maria Rita
2019. Parameters and the design of the Language Faculty. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.