Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 307–319

Chapter 21
Some reflections on the syllabification of clusters

A view from the dialects of Italy

| University of Côte d’Azur & CNRS, BCL
Throughout different theoretical models it is generally agreed that syllable structure is only determined by the melodic composition of segments and predictions are made concerning the syllabification of clusters on the basis of their segmental content. This contribution draws attention on empirical data showing that the predictions are not always verified, arguing in favour of a refinement of the theoretical tools proposed so far to derive cluster syllabification.
Keywords: syllable theory, dialects of Italy, consonant clusters
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syllable theory and the syllabification of clusters
    • 2.1Predictions of current syllable theory
    • 2.2Diagnostics for syllabification
  • 3.Syllabification of clusters
    • 3.1Obstruent/sonorant syllabification
    • 3.2Obstruent cluster syllabification
    • 3.3Sonorant/obstruent syllabification
    • 3.4Sonorant cluster syllabification
  • 4.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.21pas
References (38)
References
Bhatt, Parth & Nikiema, Emmanuel. 2006. In The Structure of Creole Words, Parth Bhatt & Ingo Plag (eds), 85–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Anthony. 2015. Reconciling Indo-European Syllabification. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In Handbook of Phonological Theory, John Goldsmith (ed.) , 206–244. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cantineau, Jean. 1946. Les Parlers arabes du Hôrân: Notions générales, grammaires. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Coco, Francesco. 1970. Il dialetto di Bologna. Bologna: Forni.Google Scholar
Cooper, Adam I. 2015. Reconciling Indo-European Syllabification. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 1998. Syllable contact in Optimality Theory. Korean Journal of Linguistics 23: 181–211.Google Scholar
Dell, François & Elmedlaoui, Mohamed. 2002. Syllables in Tashlhiyt Berber and in Moroccan Arabic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fava, Elisabetta & Magno Caldognetto, Emanuela. 1976. Studio sperimentale delle caratteristiche elettroacustiche delle vocali toniche e atone in bisillabi italiani. In Studi di Fonetica e Fonologia, Raffaele Simone Ugo Vignuzzi & Giulianella Ruggiero (eds) , 35–79. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Giannelli, Luciano & Savoia, Leonardo M. 1978. L’indebolimento consonantico in Toscana. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 2: 25–58.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather. 2011. The representation of sC clusters. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 898–923, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Antony Dubach. 2003. Extrasyllabic consonants and onset wellformedness. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory, Caroline Féry, Ruben van de Vijver (eds), 238–253. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Introductory Phonology. Oxford. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Abad, May. 1989. Reduplication and syllabification in Ilokano. Lingua 77: 331–374.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Echchadli, Malika & El Ayachi, Souad. 1986. Les formes verbales de l’arabe marocain. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique 16(1): 61–98.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kreitmann, Rina. 2012. On the relations between [sonorant] and [voice]. In Consonant Clusters and Structural Complexity, Philip Hoole, Lasse Bombien, Marianne Pouplier Christine Mooshammer Barbara Kühnert, (eds), 33–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Syllable structure and sonority sequencing: Evidence from Emilian. In Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives, Selected papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 160], Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Miriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds), 155–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean 1996. CV as the only syllable type. In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds), 419–441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1993. Selezione dell'articolo e sillaba in italiano: un'interazione totale? Studi di grammatica italiana, XV,255–296.Google Scholar
. 2008. Lenition in Tuscan Italian (Gorgia Toscana). In Lenition and Fortition, Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds), 235–271. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morelli, Frida. 1999. The Phonotactics and Phonology of Obstruent Clusters in Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Parker, Stephen. 2002. Quantifying the Sonority Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Passino, Diana & Diego Pescarini. 2008. Il sistema vocalico del dialetto alto-meridionale di San Valentino in Abruzzo Citeriore con particolare riferimento agli esiti di Ū. Atti del XXVIII Congresso internazionale di linguistica e filologia romanza (Roma, 18-23 luglio 2016). edited by, Antonelli, Roberto, Videsott, Paul & Glessgen, Martin. BiLiRo 15 Société de Linguistique Romane / Strasbourg: Éditions de linguistique et de philologie. 484–497.Google Scholar
Proctor, Michael Ian. 2009. Gestural Characterization of a Phonological Class: The Liquids. PhD dissertation, University of Yale.Google Scholar
Pöchtraeger, Markus. 2001. Finnish Consonant Gradation. MA thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas. 2004. Syllabification and word division in Gothic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 16(2): 173–202.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savoia, Leonardo M. 2015. I dialetti italiani. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Language Sound Structure, Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), 107–136. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1881. Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1996. Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1982. Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 1997. Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar
Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti. 2017. Bogus clusters and lenition in Tuscan Italian: Implications for the theory of sonority. In Sonic Signatures, Geoff Lindsey & Andrew Nevins (eds), 278–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venneman, Theo. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change: With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian, and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Passino, Diana
2020. Positional factors in syllabification. Acta Linguistica Academica 67:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.