Noun Phrases in Article-less Languages

Uzbek and beyond

| International Burch University, Sarajevo
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027202239 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027262899 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This book is a theoretically oriented, comparative study of noun phrases and their semantic and morpho-syntactic properties. This is the first study that provides a comprehensive analysis of the nominal structure in Uzbek, and compares it with corresponding structures in other article and article-less languages. Uzbek nominals represent a fertile ground to test the universality of the DP hypothesis and to make an insightful contribution to an ongoing debate about the functional architecture of the nominal domain in languages with and without articles. The study shows that the ordering of various nominal suffixes in Uzbek reflects a rich functional structure, involving not only DP but also KP. The work also discusses elements such as determiners, demonstratives, quantifiers and adjectives, and positioning of these elements within the nominal domain. This study is especially useful for researchers interested in theoretical linguistics, comparative syntax and typology.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 253]  2019.  xiv, 182 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of tables
ix
List of abbreviations
xi–xii
Preface
xiii–xiv
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–38
Chapter 2. Perspectives on the DP-Hypothesis
39–71
Chapter 3. Determiners within the DP: Interpretation and architecture
73–107
Chapter 4. Functional projections within the nominal domain
109–166
Chapter 5. Conclusion
167–168
References
169–177
Name index
179
Subject index
181–182
References

References

Abney, S. P.
(1987) The English NP in its sentential aspect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Adger, D.
(2003) Core syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M.
(2007) Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Aljović, N.
(2000) Recherches sur la morpho-syntaxe du groupe nominal en serbo-croate [Research on morpho-syntax of the nominal group in Serbo-Croatian] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Paris VIII.
(2001) Le génitif de quantité en serbo‐croate [The genitive of quantity in Serbo-Croatian]. Verbum, XXIII(N° 2), 131–152.
(2002) Long adjectival inflection and specificity in Serbo-Croatian. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 31, 27–42. Crossref link
(2010) Syntactic positions of attributive adjectives. In P. Cabredo Hofherr & O. Matushansky (Eds.) Adjectives. Formal analyses in syntax and semantics (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 153) (pp. 29–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Aydemir, Y.
(2004) Are Turkish preverbal bare nouns syntactic arguments? Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 465–474. Crossref link
Aygen, G.
(1999) Specificity and subject-object positions / Scope interactions in Turkish (Unpublished manuscript). Harvard University.
(2002) Semantics of case: Syntactic implications of specificity and scope at a phrasal level (Unpublished manuscript). Harvard University.
(2003) Are there non-restrictive pre-relatives in Turkish? In C. Boeckx, C. Bowern, & J. Jasanoff (Eds.), Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 199–215.
Baker, M. C.
(1985) The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 373–416.
(1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2003) Nominalization, complementation and polysynthesis. Talk given at CASTL-kick-off Conference, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Baker, M. C., & Vinokurova, N.
(2010) Two modalities of case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28(3), 593–642. Crossref link
Baker, M.
(2013) On alignment types and types of Differential Object Marking. Paper presented at the Tromsø Conference on Differential Object Marking.
Bašić, M.
(2004) Nominal subextractions and the structure of NPs in Serbian and English (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Tromsø.
Beckwith, C. I.
(1998) Noun specification and classification in Uzbek. Anthropological Linguistics, 40(1), 124–140.
Belletti, A.
(1988) The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(1),1–34.
(1998) The Case of unaccusatives, Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 1–34.
Bittner, M. & Hale, K.
(1996) The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 1–68.
Bodrogligeti, A.
(2002) Modern literary Uzbek. Munich: Lincom.
Borthen, K.
(2003) Norwegian bare singulars (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). NTNU.
Bošković, Ž.
(2005) On the locality of LBE and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59, 1–45. Crossref link
Bošković, Ž. & Hsieh, I. C.
(2015) On the semantics of the NP-internal word order: Chinese vs Serbo-Croatian. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, ed. by Ziková, M., Caha, P & Dočekal, M., 101–120. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bošković, Ž.
(2007) On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory, Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 589–644. Crossref link
(2008) What will you have, DP or NP? In E. Elfner & M. Walkow (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 37.
(2009) More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica, 63,187–203. Crossref link
(2010) Phases beyond clauses (Unpublished manuscript). University of Conecticut, Storrs.
(2012) On NPs and clauses. In G. Grewendorf & T. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories (pp.179–242). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014) Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 45, 27–89. Crossref link
(2015) On second position clitics crosslinguistically (Unpublished manuscript). University of Connecticut.
Bošković, Ž., & Gajewski, J.
(2011) Semantic correlates of the NP/DP parameter. In S. Lima, K. Mullin, & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 39 (pp. 121–134). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
Bošković, Ž, & Hsieh, I-T. C.
(2013) On word order, binding relations, and plurality in Chinese noun phrases. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 8, 173–204.
Bošković, Ž., & Şener, S.
(2014) The Turkish NP. In P. Cabredo Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (Eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on nominal reference: With and without articles (pp. 102–140). Leiden: Brill.
Bossong, G.
(1985) Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen [Differential object marking in the New Iranian languages]. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Bowern, C.
(2004a) Bardi verb morphology in historical perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2004b) Diagnostic similarities and differences between Nyulnyulan and neighbouring languages. In C. Bowern & H. Koch (Eds.), Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 249) (pp. 295–318). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2006) Australian complex predicates. In Proceedings of the 32nd Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2, 190–198.
Bowers, J.
(1993) The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 591–656
Brugè, L.
(1996) Demonstrative movement in Spanish: A comparative approach. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 6(1), 1–53.
(2000) Categorie Funzionali del nome nelle lingue Romanze [Functional categories of the name in the Romance languages]. Milan: Cisalpino.
(2002) The positions of demonstratives in the extended nominal projection. In G. Cinque (Ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP (pp. 15–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brugè, L., & Giuliana, G.
(1996) On demonstratives. Paper presented at the 19th GLOW Colloquium, Athens. Printed in GLOW Newsletter, 36, 24–25.
Butt, M., & Geuder, W.
(2001) On the (semi)lexical status of light verbs. In N. Corver & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds), Semi-lexical categories: On the content of function words and the function of content words (pp. 323–370). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caruso, Z.
(2012) The syntax of nominal expressions in articleless languages: A split dp-analysis of Croatian nouns (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stuttgart.
Cheng, H. J.
(2013) Argument ellipsis, Classifier Phrases, and the DP Parameter. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
Chierchia, G.
(1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. Crossref link
Chomsky, N.
(1986b) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In M. Micheals & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
(2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2002) On language and nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2004) Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp.104–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Three factors in language design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, G.
(1994) On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J. Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths towards universal grammar (pp. 85–110). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
(1999) Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 315–332. Crossref link
Corver, N.
(1992) Left brunch extraction. Proceedings of NELS, 22, 67–84
Dede, M.
(1986) Definiteness and Referentiality in Turkish verbal sentences. In D.I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Typological Studies in Language 8 (pp.147–163).
Despić, M.
(2011) Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
(2013) Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian. Linguistic Inquiry, 44, 239–270. Crossref link
(2015) Phases, reflexives and definiteness. Syntax, 18(3), 201–234. Crossref link
de Hoop, H.
(1996) Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation. Groningen: Grodil.
Diesing, M.
(1992) Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C.
(2005) Noms nus et genericite [Bare nouns and genericity]. In C. Dobrovie-Sorin (ed.), Noms nus, nombre et types d’incorporation (pp. 129–157). Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Enç, M.
(1991) Semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.
Franks, S., & Pereltsvaig, A.
(2004) Functional categories in the nominal domain. In O. Arnaudova, W. Browne, M. L. Rivero, & D. Stojanovic (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, 12: The Ottawa Meeting (pp. 109–128). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Fukui, N.
(1988) Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: A case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics, 5, 249–270. Crossref link
van Geenhoven, V.
(1998) Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Giusti, G.
(1992) La sintassi dei sintagmi nominali quantifcati. PhD dissertation University of Venice.
(1993) La sintassi dei determinanti [The syntax of determiners]. Padova: UniPress.
(1995) A unified structural representation of (abstract) case and articles: Evidence from Germanic. In H. Haider, S. Olsen, & S. Vikner (Eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax (pp. 77–93). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
(1996) Is there a TopP and a FocP in the noun phrase? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 6(1), 105–128.
(1997) The categorial status of determiners. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), The new comparative syntax (pp.95–124). London: Longman.
(2002) The functional structure of noun phrases. A bare phrase structure approach. In G. Cinque (Ed.), Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 1, pp. 54–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gribanova, V.
(2013) Copular clauses, clefts, and putative sluicing in Uzbek. Language 89(4), 830–882. Crossref link
(2016) Uzbek differential argument marking. Datasets collected by 2011–2016. Stanford Digital Repository.
Grimshaw, J.
(1991) Extended projection (Unpublished manuscript). Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Grimshaw, J., & Mester, A.
(1988) Light verbs and theta-marking. Linquistic Inquiry, 19, 205–232.
Grohmann, K., & Panagiotidis, P.
(2005) An anti-locality approach to Greek demonstratives. In L. Brugè, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, W. Schweikert, & G. Turano (Eds.), Contributions to the 30th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (pp. 243–263). Venezia: Cafoscarina.
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J.
(1991) On the syntax of argument structure (Lexicon Project Working Papers 34). Cambridge, MA: Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.
Hale, K. & Keyser, J.
(1993) On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (Eds.), The View from Building 20: A Festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger, (pp. 53–108), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
(2002) Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Hankamer, G., & Knecht, L.
(1976) The role of the subject/non-subject distinction in determining the choice of relative clause participle in Turkish. In G. Hankamer & J. Aissen (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 6 (Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2) (pp.123–135). Boston, MA: Harvard University.
Hawkins, J. A.
(1978) Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.
Higginbotham, J.
(1987) Indefiniteness and predication. In E. Reuland & A. Meulen (Eds), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 43–70). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. S.
(1977) X’-syntax. A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jiang, L.
(2012) Nominal arguments and language variation. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard.
Johanson, L.
(1998) The structure of Turkic. In L. Johanson & E. A. Csato (Eds.), The Turkic languages. London: Routledge.
Kang, J.
(2014) On the absence of TP and its consequences: Evidence from Korean. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Kagan, O. & Pereltsvaig, A.
(2011) Syntax and Semantics of Bare NPs: Objects of Intensive Reflexive Verbs in Russian. In Bonami, O. & Cabredo Hofherr, P. (Eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8 (pp. 221–238).
Kallulli, D.
(1999) The comparative syntax of Albanian: On the contribution of syntactic types to propositional interpretation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham.
Kelepir, M.
(2001) Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Knecht, L. E.
(1986) Subject and object in Turkish. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Kornfilt, J.
(1984) Case marking, agreement and empty categories in Turkish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
(1986) The stuttering prohibition and morpheme deletion in Turkish. In A. Aksu Koç & E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Turkish Linguistics (pp. 59–83). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.
(1987) Beyond binding conditions: The case of Turkish. In H. Boeschoten & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Studies in Modern Turkish (pp.105–120). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
(1988) A typology of morphological agreement and its syntactic consequences. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory, 24(2), 117–134.
(1991) Some current issues in Turkish syntax. In H. Boeschoten & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Turkish linguistics today (pp. 60–92). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
(1995) Scrambling and incorporation in Turkish. In A. Alexiadou, N. Fuhrhop, P. Law, & S. Löhken (Eds.), FAS Papers in Linguistics 1 (pp. 29–42). Berlin: FAS.
(1996) On copular clitic forms in Turkish. In A. Alexiadou, N. Fuhrhop, P. Law, & S. Löhken (Eds.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 6 (pp. 96–114). Berlin: ZAS.
(1997) Turkish. Routledge, London and New York.
(1999) Partitive case in Turkish. Talk given at the 1st International Conference on Turkic Linguistics, Manchester University, April. Manchester, UK.
(2000) Some syntactic and morphological properties of relative clauses in Turkish. In A. Alexiadou, P. Law, A. Meinunger, & C. Wilder (Eds.), The syntax of relative clauses (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (pp. 121–159). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2001) Functional projections and their Subjects in Turkish clauses. In E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (Ed.), The verb in Turkish (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44) (pp.183–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2003) Subject case in Turkish nominalized clauses. In U. Junghanns & L. Szucsich (Eds.), Syntactic structures and morphological information (pp. 129–215). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2005) Asymmetries between pre-verbal and post-verbal scrambling in Turkish. In J. Sabel & M. Saito (Eds.), The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic and sources and diversity (pp.163–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2006) Agreement; The (unique and local) syntactic and morphological licenser of subject Case. In J. Costa & M. C. Figueiredo Silva (Eds.), Studies on Agreement (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 86) (pp. 141–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(2007) Verbal and nominalized finite clauses in Turkish. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 305–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2008) DOM and two types of DSM in Turkish. In H. de Hoop & P. de Swart (Eds.), Differential subject marking (pp. 79–111). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2009) Placement of agreement and subject licensing in Turkish/Turkic relative clauses. In S. Tatevosov (Ed.), Investigations into formal Altaic linguistics: Proceedings of WAFL 3 (pp. 68–87). Moscow: MAKS Press.
(2015) Turkish relative clauses: How exceptional are they from a Central Asian Turkic perspective? In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCall),1, 1–22.
Kornfilt, J., & Whitman, J.
(2013) Genitive subjects in TP nominalizations. In G. Iordachioaia (Ed.), Proceedings of JeNom 4 (Working Papers of the SFB 732) (pp. 39–72). Stuttgart: OPUS.
Kratzer, A.
(1995) Stage Level and Individual Level Predicates. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.) The Generic Book, (pp.125–175). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kripke, S.
(1972) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge MA: Harvard U. Press.
Lamontagne, G., & Travis, L.
(1986) The case filter and the ECP. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 3(2), 51–75.
(1987) The syntax of adjacency. In Proceedings of the 6th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp.173–186). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Leko, N.
(1999) Functional categories and the structure of the DP in Bosnian. In M. Dimitrova-Vulchanova & L. Hellan (Eds.), Topics in South Slavic syntax and semantics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 172) (pp. 229–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Lidz, J.
(1999) The morphosemantics of object case in Kannada (Unpublished manuscript). University of Pennsylvania.
Löbel, E.
(1989) Q as a functional category. In C. Bhatt, E. Löbel & C. Schmidt (Eds.), Syntactic phrase structure phenomena (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 6) (pp.133–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1993) On the parametrization of lexical properties. In G. Fanselow (ed.), The parametrization of Universal Grammar (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 8) (pp.183–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
(1994) KP/DP-syntax: Interaction of case marking with referential and nominal features. Theoretical Linguistics, 20, 38–70. Crossref link
Lobeck, A.
(1995) Ellipsis: Functional heads and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Longobardi, G.
(1994) Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–665.
(1996) The syntax of N-raising: A minimalist theory. Utrecht: OTS Working Papers.
(2001) The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters and problems. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 562–601). Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Lyons, C.
(1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Lyutikova, E., & Pereltsvaig, A.
(2013) Elucidating nominal structure in articleless languages: A case study of Tatar. In BLS Proceedings, 39, 123–136. Berkeley, CA: BLS. Crossref link
(2015) The Tatar DP. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 60, 289–325. Crossref link
Maciejewska, A.
(1996) The function and evolution of definite and indefinite articles (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Marelj, M.
(2011) Bound-variable anaphora and Left Branch Condition, Syntax 14: 205–29.
Marantz, A.
(1991) Case and licensing. Proceedings of ESCOL 8, G.F. Westphal, B. A. & H-R Chae (Eds.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, (pp.234–253).
Massam, D.
(2001) Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 153–197. Crossref link
(2012) Count and mass across languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Matthewson, L.
(1998) Determiner systems and quantificational strategies: Evidence from Salish. The Hague: HAG.
McIntyre, A.
(2001) Argument blockages induced by verb particles in English and German: Event modification and secondary predication. In N. Dehé & A. Wanner (Eds.), Structural aspects of semantically complex verbs (pp.131–164). Berlin: Peter Lang.
(2001) German double particles as preverbs. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Milsark, G.
(1974) Existential sentences in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Mithun, M.
(1984) The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60, 847–893. Crossref link
Neeleman, A., & Szendröi, K.
(2008) Case morphology and radical pro-drop. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (Linguistic Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132) (pp. 331–351). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Neeleman, A., & Weerman, F.
(1999) Flexible Syntax; A Theory of Case and Arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Nilsson, B.
(1985) Case marking semantics in Turkish. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Publications.
(1986) Object incorporation in Turkish. In A. Aksu-Koç & Erguvanli-Taylan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference (pp.113–128). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.
Osawa, F.
(1998) The emergence of the D system and the demise of morphological case in English. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 467–489.
Öztürk, B.
(2005) Case, referentiality and phrase structure (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Panagiotidis, P.
(2000) Demonstrative determiners and operators: The case of Greek. Lingua, 110, 717–742. Crossref link
Pereltsvaig, A.
(2001) On the nature of intra-clausal relations: A study of copular sentences in Russian and Italian (Unpublished PhD dissertation). McGill University.
(2006) Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24, 433–500. Crossref link
(2007) On the universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica, 61(1), 59–94. Crossref link
(2013) Noun phrase structure in article-less Slavic languages: DP or not DP? Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(3), 201–219. Crossref link
(2015) The functional structure of the nominal domain. In A. Fábregas, M. Putnam, & J. Mateu (Eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters (pp. 303–331). London: Bloomsbury.
Pereltsvaig, A., & Lyutikova, E.
(2014) Possessives within and beyond NP: Two ezafe-constructions in Tatar. In A. Bondaruk, G. Dalmi, & A. Grosu (Eds.), Advances in the syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217) (pp. 193–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Pesetsky, D.
(1982) Complementizer-trace phenomena and the nominative islands condition. The Linguistic Review, 1, 297–344. Crossref link
Pollock, J-Y.
(1989). Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.
Progovac, L.
(1998) Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics, 34, 165–179. Crossref link
Rahmatullayev, S.
(2006) Hozirgi adabiy O’zbek Tili. Tashkent: National University of Uzbekistan.
Rappaport, G.
(1998) The slavic noun phrase. Paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer Creek, Indiana.
Reuland, E.
(2007) Minimal versus not so minimal pronouns: feature transmission versus feature deletion. Ms., Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
(2011) Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L.
(1990) Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Runić, J.
(2014) A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Rubin, E.
(1994) Modification: A syntactic analysis and its consequences. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University
Rappaport, G.
(2001) Extraction from nominal phrases in polish and the theory of determiners. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 8(3), 159–98.
(2002) Numeral phrases in Russian: A minimalist approach. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10(1–2). 327–40.
Ritter, E.
(1991) Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and semantics, 25: Perspectives on phrase structure (pp. 37–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rutkowski, P.
(2002) Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje, 3(1–2), 159–170.
(2007) The Determiner Phrase Hypothesis as a tool of syntactic analysis of Polish nominal phrases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Warsaw University.
Safir, K.
(1982) Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Sapayev, Q.
(2009) Hozirgi O’zbek Tili. Toshkent: TDPU.
Schwarzchild, R.
(2002) Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics, 19, 289–314. Crossref link
Scott, G.
(2002) The syntax and semantics of adjectival modification (Unpublished doctoral disserataion). University of London.
Sezer, E.
(1972) Some observations on the genitive phrases in Turkish Nominalizations (Unpublished manuscript). Harvard University.
(1991) Topics in Turkish syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
Shlonsky, U.
(2004) The form of the Semitic noun phrase. Lingua, 114(12), 1465–1526. Crossref link
Siloni, T.
(1996) Hebrew noun phrases: Generalized noun raising. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and functional heads (pp. 239–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1997) Noun phrases and nominalizations. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Stowell, T. A.
(1991) Determiners in NP and DP. In K. Leffel & D. Bouchard (Eds.), Views on phrase structure (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Straughn, C. A.
(2011) Evidentiality in Uzbek and Kazakh (Unpublished doctoral disseration). The University of Chicago, IL.
Szabolcsi, A.
(1983) The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review, 3, 89–102. Crossref link
(1987) Functional categories in the noun phrase. In I. Kenesei (Ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 2: Theories and analyses (pp.167–91). Szeged: Jate Press.
Taylan, E. E.
(1984) The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(1986) Pronominal vs. zero representation anaphora in Turkish. In D. I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (Typological Studies in Language 8) (pp. 209–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Taylan, E. E., & Zimmer, K.
(1994) Case marking in Turkish indefinite object constructions. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistic Society, 20, 547–552. Crossref link
Takahashi, M.
(2011) Some theoretical consequences of Case-marking in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
Talić, A.
(2013) Extraordinary complement extraction. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8, 127–150
Trenkić, D.
(2004) Definiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua, 114, 1401–1427. Crossref link
Underhill, R.
1976Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Weerman, F., & Evers-Vermeul, J.
(2002) Pronouns and case. Lingua, 112, 301–338. Crossref link
Wiese, H.
(2012) Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns: A cross-linguistic account. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and mass across languages (pp. 54–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Willim, E.
(1998) On the DP-hypothesis in Polish, an articleless language. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Projections and Mapping: Studies in Syntax (pp. 137–158), Lublin: FOLIUM.
(2000) On the grammar of Polish nominals. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 319–346). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Zanon, K.
(2015) On hybrid coordination and quantifier raising in Russian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Indiana, Bloomington.
Zakiev, M. Z.
(1995) Tatarskaya grammatika, Tom III: Sintaksis [Tatar grammar, Vol. 3: Syntax]. Kazan: Akademiya Nauk Tatarstana.
Zlatić, L.
(1997) The structure of the Serbian noun phrase (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Texas at Austin.
(1998) Slavic noun phrases are NPs not DPs. Paper presented at the Workshop on Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax, Bloomington, Indiana, 8 June.
Živanovič, S.
(2008) The varieties of most: On different readings of superlative determiners. In Proceedings of FDSL 6.5, 337–354. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018046662