Part of
The Determinants of Diachronic Stability
Edited by Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert and Melissa Farasyn
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254] 2019
► pp. 110
References (30)
References
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2012. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 267–294.Google Scholar
. 2015. Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7: 1–31.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt, Höder, Steffen & Kühl, Karoline (eds). 2014. Stability and Divergence in Language Contact: Factors and Mechanisms [Studies in Language Variation 16]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds), 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1990. On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17: 417–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enrique-Arias, Andrés. 2010. On language contact as an inhibitor of language change. In Continuity and Change in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 159], Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts & David Willis (eds), 97–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Granda, Germán. 1988. Notas sobre retenciones sintácticas en el español del Paraguay. Lexis: Revista de Lingüística y Literatura 12(1): 43–68.Google Scholar
. 1993. Calco funcional y retención por contacto: El elemento asertivo ‘luego’ (guaraní ‘voí’) del español paraguayo. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 9: 47–58.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2002. Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-Linguistic Factors, Mari Jones & Edith Harding-Esch (eds), 285–313. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. Chicago Linguistic Society 30: 180–201.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Language Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2012. On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319–334. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Salzmann, Martin. 2017. Reconstruction and Resumption in Indirect A’-Dependencies: On the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1995 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C. 2013. A unified theory of stable variation, syntactic optionality, and syntactic change. Paper presented at DiGS 15, University of Ottawa, 02 August 2013. <[URL]>
2016. Extraposition is disappearing. Language 92: e237–e256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C. & Fruehwald, Josef. 2013. Optionality is stable variation is competing grammars. Paper presented at 25th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Formal Ways of Analyzing Variation (FWAV) Workshop. SCL 25 Háskóli Íslands (University of Iceland), 15 May. <[URL]>
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles D. 2000. Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12: 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fedriani, Chiara & Maria Napoli
2023. The Missing Dative Alternation in Romance: Explaining Stability and Change in the Argument Structure of Latin Ditransitives. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:1  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Nevalainen, Terttu, Tanja Säily & Turo Vartiainen
2020. Comparative sociolinguistic perspectives on the rate of linguistic change. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.