Cover not available
Part of
The Determinants of Diachronic Stability
Edited by Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert and Melissa Farasyn
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254] 2019
► pp. 11–38

Chapter 2
Gender stability, gender loss

What didn’t happen to German

ORCID logo | University of Cambridge
This paper investigates the factors which have led to the diachronic stability of gender as a three-way category in German. Old High German and Old English are contrasted to show how phonological, morphological and semantic changes contribute to a reinforcement of gender as a grammatical category in German, while in English it suffers attrition and loss. The early restructuring of the pronominal declension through analogical pattern generalization is shown to combine gender and case marking in ways which allow the three-way distinction to become more salient over time. The resulting cohesion within noun phrases and gender marking on targets, particularly through the interaction of gender and case marking in the high-frequency nominative and accusative cases, gives gender marking a role in communication. As a result the cognitive effort of acquiring gender pays off and the three-way distinction remains stable.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gender assignment and its distribution in OE and OHG
    • 2.1Methodological issues
    • 2.2Frequency distribution
    • 2.3Word formation and gender assignment in OHG
  • 3.Nominal inflection
  • 4.Gender targets
    • 4.1Demonstrative pronouns > definite articles
    • 4.2Adjectives
    • 4.3Relativizers
  • 5.Case and gender interactions
  • 6.Case and gender in acquisition
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Corpora and dictionaries
  • References
Published online: 20 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.254.02wat
References (64)
Corpora and dictionaries
Bech, Kristin. n.d. Guidelines for the morphological and syntactic annotation of Old English. <[URL]>
Bosworth-Toller = Bosworth, Joseph. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. Ed. Thomas Northcote Toller and Others. Comp. Sean Christ & Ondřej Tichý. Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, 21 Mar. 2010. Web. 5 Nov. 2013. <[URL]>
Köbler, Gerhard. 2014. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch (6th edn). <[URL]>
PROIEL (Pragmatic Resources in Old Indo-European Languages) = Haug, Dag T. T. & Jøhndal, Marius L. 2008. Creating a parallel treebank of the Old Indo-European Bible translations. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTech 2008), Caroline Sporleder & Kiril Ribarov (eds), 27–34. proiel-webapp version 1.8.2, proiel version 1.0.1.Google Scholar
RKA = Referenzkorpus Altdeutsch (RKA). <[URL]> (18 January 2018).
Linde, Sonja. Manual for the Referenzkorpus Altdeutsch . <[URL]> (22 December 2017).
References
Bentz, Christian & Winter, Bodo. 2013. Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 1–27.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm & Reiffenstein, Ingo. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik, I: Laut- und Formenlehre (15th edn). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr., Rolf H. 2009. An Introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the Principle of Contrast. Language 70(4): 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco, Linde, Sonja & Ruette, Tom. 2017. Relative clauses in Old High German: A corpus-based statistical investigation of their syntactic and information-structural properties. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29(2): 101–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Number of genders. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (15 January 2018).
. 2013b. Systems of gender assignment. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (15 January 2018).
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1980. The diachrony of the gender system in English and Dutch. In Historical Morphology, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 97–111. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2003. Naturalness and morphological change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 461–471. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden 2017. = Die deutsche Rechtschreibung, 27th edn. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Duke, Janet. 2009. The Development of Gender as a Grammatical Category. Five Case Studies from the Germanic Languages. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Froschauer, Regine. 2003. Genus im Althochdeutschen. Eine funktionale Analyse des Mehrfachgenus althochdeutscher Substantive. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gallée, Johan Hendrik. 1993. Altsächsische Grammatik, 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnisch, Rüdiger. 2001. Grundform und Stamm-Prinzip in der Substantivmorphologie des Deutschen. Synchronische und diachronische Untersuchung eines typologischen Parameters. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Hoberg, Ursula. 2004. Grammatik des Deutschen im europäischen Vergleich. Das Genus des Substantivs. Amades – Arbeitspapiere und Materialien zur deutschen Sprache 3/04. Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Richard M. Hogg (ed.), 67–167. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard M. & Fulk, Robert D.. 2011. A Grammar of Old English, Vol 2: Morphology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jobin, Bettina. 2011. Change in German(ic) gender morphology. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 317–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1988. Grammatical Gender in English: 950–1250. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 2011. Inflectional classes, morphological restructuring, and the dissolution of Old English grammatical gender. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 709–727. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Kitson, Peter. 1990. On Old English nouns of more than one gender. English Studies 71: 185–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Thomas. 2007. Von der semantischen zur morphologischen Steuerung. Zum Wandel der Adjektivdeklination in althochdeutsche und mittelhochdeutscher Zeit. In Beiträge zur Morphologie. Germanisch, Baltisch, Ostseefinnisch [ NOWELE, Supplement Vol. 23], Hans Fix (ed.), 193–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Thomas, Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter (eds). 2009. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, Teil III: Wortbildung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1982. Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache [ Linguistische Arbeiten 122]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, Klaus-Michael & Zubin, David A.. 1984. Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte 93: 26–50.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Sebastian & Damaris Nübling. 2011. The interaction of gender and declension. Folia Linguistica 45(2): 355–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 23–155. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 1999. Gender in Old High German. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 237–257. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. Derivation als Grammatikalisierungsbrücke für den Aufbau von Genusdifferenzierungen im Deutschen. In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah de Groodt (eds), 11–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liuzza, Roy M. (ed.) 1994 and 2000. The Old English Version of the Gospels, 2 Vols [Early English Text Society 304, 314]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Masser, Achim (ed.). 1994. Tatian: die lateinischdeutsche Tatianbilingue. Stiftsbibliothek St Gallen Cod. 65. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markus, Manfred. 1988. Reasons for the loss of gender in English. In Luick Revisited. Papers read at the Luick-Symposium at Schloss Liechtenstein, Dieter Kastovsky, Gero Bauer & Jacek Fisiak (eds), 241–258. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko. 2004. Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2002. What happened to English? Diachronica 19: 217–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Helmut. 1964. Deutsche Sprachstatistik. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Montanari, Elke. 2014. Grammatical gender in the discourse of multilingual children’s acquisition of German. In Linguistik Online 64(2). <[URL]>
Müller, Natascha. 2011. Gender and number in acquisition. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 351–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oehler, Heinz (ed.) 1966. Grundwortschatz Deutsch. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Paddock, Harold. 1991. The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Dialects of English. Studies in Grammatical Variation, Peter Trudgill & Jack K. Chambers (eds), 29–46. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Charles Leslie. 1957. An Old English Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ratkus, Artūras. 2018. Weak adjectives need not be definite: The evidence of variation in Gothic. Indogermanische Forschungen 123: 27–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Inger. 1977. Ein Frequenzwörterbuch der deutschen Zeitungssprache, Bd. 2. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Ruoff, Arno. 1981. Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmons, Joseph B. 1992. The evolution of gender assignment from OHG to NHG. In Recent Developments in Germanic Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 93], Rosina Lippi-Green (ed.), 81–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. A History of German. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Splett, Jochen. 1993. Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, Donald. 1986. Two principles and some rules for gender in German inanimate nouns. Word 37(3): 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Great Gender Shift and the attrition of neuter nouns in West Germanic: The example of German. In New Insights in Germanic linguistics II, Irmengard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds), 201–224. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Steinmeyer, Elias. 1916. Die kleineren althochdeutschen Sprachdenkmäler. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra. 2006. “Ich hab da nen kleines Problem!”: Zur neuen Kurzform des indefiniten Artikels im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 73: 176–193.Google Scholar
. 2011. Nominal abstracts and gender in Modern German: A ‘quantitative’ approach towards the function of grammar. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 461–494. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 2011. German gender in children’s second language acquisition. In Gender in Grammar and Cognition, Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 511–544. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Werner, Martina. 2012. Genus, Derivation und Quantifikation. Zur Funktion der Suffigierung und verwandter Phänomene im Deutschen. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Hartmann, Frederik
2022. Lexical and sublexical effects on diachronic stability and instability of phonological systems. Lingua 273 ► pp. 103308 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.