Cover not available
Part of
Prepositions, Case and Verbal Prefixes: The case of Slavic
Petr Biskup
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 255] 2019
► pp. 211–228

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Goldberg, Adele E. 1996. Constraints on adjectival past participles. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), 17–30. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York-Essex Morphology Meeting 5, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2008. Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th WCCFL, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Rathert, Monika & von Stechow, Arnim. 2003. Introduction: The modules of perfect constructions. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), vii–xxxviii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetli & Mohanan, Tara. 2005. How to get rid of the COMP. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracey Holloway King (eds), 21–41. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John, M. 1971. The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2006. Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anstatt, Tanja. 2003. Das Verbalpräfix po- im Polnischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 62: 359–385.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban. 2006. Inner Aspect and Telicity: The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Leiden University [LOT Dissertation Series 142].Google Scholar
. 2007. Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. Cahiers Chronos 17: 197–213.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna, Gehrke, Berit & Hegedűs, Veronika. 2007. One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. In UiL OTS Yearbook 2006, Cem Keskin (ed.), 1–17. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Assmann, Anke, Edygarova, Svetlana, Georgi, Doreen, Klein, Timo & Weisser, Philipp. 2014. Case stacking below the surface: On the possessor case alternation in Udmurt. The Linguistic Review 31: 447–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga. 1999. Zero Morphology: A Study of Aspect, Argument Structure, and Case. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
. 2003. Perfectivity and prefixation in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 5–36.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Case: Its Principles and Parameters. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara. 1970. Adiektywizacja imiesłowów w języku polskim. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara, Hansen, Björn, Klemm, Wojtek, Lehmann, Volkmar & Satkiewicz, Halina. 2004. Grammatik des Polnischen. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Bąnk, Piotr. 2010. Gramatyka języka polskiego: Zarys popularny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid. 2005. There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics 22: 3–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1981. The syntax of “ne”: Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1: 117–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, Shane, Bhargava, Aditya, He, Hua & Kondrak, Grzegorz. 2010. Predicting the semantic compositionality of prefix verbs. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 293–303. Cambridge MA: MIT, Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2001. On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The ‘perfective = telic confusion’. In Semantic Interfaces. Reference, Anaphora and Aspect, Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds), 177–210. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1967. Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In To Honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. 1, 239–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1988. On the grammar of local prepositions. In Studia grammatica 29, Manfred Bierwisch, Wolfgang Motsch & Ilse Zimmermann (eds), 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1996. How much space gets into language? In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds), 31–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr. 2007. P(refixe)s and P(reposition)s. Ms, University of Leipzig.
. 2009a. Prefixes as prepositions and multiple cases. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 3–17. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2009b. The syntactic structure of PPs. In Czech in Formal Grammar, Mojmír Dočekal & Markéta Ziková (eds), 9–29. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2010. The syntax and semantics of prefixed adjectival participles. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
. 2011. Adverbials and the Phase Model [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 177]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Slavic prefixes and adjectival participles. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 271–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2015. On (non-)compositionality of prefixed verbs. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 59–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2016a. The non-identity reading in ATB constructions: The case of slavic. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
. 2016b. Prefixed adjectival participles. Linguistica Brunensia 64: 7–26.Google Scholar
. 2016c. Das Futur-Präfix po- . In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXIII. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Dresden, 18.-20. September 2014, Holger Kuße & Marina Scharlaj (eds), 9–26. Munich: Biblion Media.Google Scholar
. 2017. Decomposing prepositional cases in Russian and Polish. In Aspects of Slavic Linguistics: Formal Grammar, Lexicon, and Communication, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Marcel Guhl (eds), 50–68. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Case syncretism in Russian, Polish and Czech ATB constructions. In Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Cornell Meeting 2016, Wayne Browne, Miloje Despić, Naomi Enzinna, Robin Karlin, Simone De Lemos & Draga Zec (eds), 418–437. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Putnam, Michael. 2012. One P with two spell-outs: The ent-/aus-alternation in German. Linguistic Analysis 38: 69–109.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr, Putnam, Michael & Smith, Laura C. 2011. German particle and prefix verbs at the syntax-phonology interface. Leuvense Bijdragen 97: 106–135.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Zybatow, Gerhild. 2015. Verbal prefixation in Slavonic: A minimalist approach. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2. [HSK 40.2], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1492–1515. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bláha, Ondřej. 2008. Vyjadřování budoucnosti v současné češtině (se zřetelem k ostatním slovanským jazykům). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna. 2007. The nom/gen “subject” puzzle in Polish. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Sixth European Conference Held at Potsdam University, November 30-December 02, 2005, Peter Kosta & Lilla Schürcks (eds), 127–146. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna & Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota. 2012. Futures in Polish and Slovenian from the perspective of a force-dynamic model. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16: The Utrecht Meeting, 2011, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds), 85–98. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej. 1960. Prefiksalne pary aspektowe a semantyka prefiksalna czasownika rosyjskiego. Slavia Orientalis 9: 139–175.Google Scholar
. 1963. Prefiksacja czasownikowa we współczesnym języku rosyjskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 246–250.Google Scholar
Bondarko Aleksandr V. 1961. K voprosu o glagolach dviženija v češskom jazyke (formy tipa ponesu, poletím). Slavia 30: 527–547.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borik, Olga. 2002. Aspect and Reference Time. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University [LOT dissertation series].
. 2013. Past participle formation and the eventive/adjectival passive in Russian. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds), 115–132. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63: 87–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botwinik-Rotem, Irena. 2008. An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 331–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire & Aygen-Tosun, Gülşat. 2000. Titan's tensed prepositions. In Proceedings of the 36th Chicago Linguistics Society. Vol. 2, Arika Okrent & John P. Boyle (eds), 35–48. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Brecht, Richard D. 1985. The form and function of aspect in Russian. In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax, Michael S. Flier & Richard D. Brecht (eds), 9–34. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan. 2008. Irish prepositions: Agreement and impoverishment. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 105–113. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 363–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin & Al Khalaf, Eman. 2017. Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Ms, University of Delaware and University of Jordan. <[URL]>
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel & Ziková, Markéta. 2016. Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-Words Crosslinguistically. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Caponigro, Ivano & Pearl, Lisa. 2008. Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 365–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2000. Resultative adjectives in Polish. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 47–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On inherent inflection feeding derivation in Polish. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 153–183. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Jason H. 2011. The Prefix PO- and Aspect in Russian and Polish: A Cognitive Grammar Acccount. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.
Chvany Catherine V. 1986. Jakobson’s fourth and fifth dimensions: On reconciling the cube model of case meanings with the two-dimensional matrices for case forms. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & Jafmes S. Levine (eds), 107–129. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. Mapping spatial PPs: An introduction. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 3–25. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. 1977. The Structure of Jacaltec. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2008. Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko. 2006. Particles and a two component theory of aspect. In Event Structure and the Left Periphery of Hungarian, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 107–128. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, Kodýtek, Vilém, Kopřivová, Marie, Kováříková, Dominika, Sgall, Petr, Šulc, Michal, Táborský, Jan, Volín, Jan & Waclawičová, Martina. 2010. Mluvnice současné češtiny 1. Jak se píše a jak se mluví. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Karolinum.Google Scholar
Čechová, Marie, Dokulil, Miloš, Hlavsa, Zdeněk, Hrbáček, Josef & Hrušková, Zdeňka. 2000. Čeština – řeč a jazyk. Praha: ISV nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Damborský, Jiří. 1967a. Participium l-ové ve slovanštině. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
. 1967b. Neurčité a jmenné tvary slovesné v polštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2006. Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 977–1008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William & Dubinsky, Stanley. 1998. Sentential subjects as complex NPs: New reasons for an old account of subjacency. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Part 1: Papers from the Main Session, Catherine M. Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth S. Olson & Tamra Wysocki (eds), 83–94. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Miriam. 1997. The syntax of temporal relations. A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Proceedings of the 16th WCCFL, Emily Curtis, James Lyle & Gabriel Webster (eds), 145–159. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M. 2000. Parameters of Slavic Aspect: A Cognitive Approach. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2007. A prototype account of the development of delimitative po- in Russian. In Cognitive Paths into the Slavic Domain, Dagmar Divjak & Agata Kochańska (eds), 329–374. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 74–126. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila. 1999. Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2012. Voice. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 937–959. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Slabakova, Roumyana. 2005. Quantification and aspect. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 61–80. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Dostál, Antonín. 1954. Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Emil. 1983. Ke kodifikaci pravidel užívání přechodníků. Naše řeč 66: 180–192.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endresen, Anna, Janda, Laura A., Kuznetsova, Julia, Lyashevskaya, Olga, Makarova, Anastasia, Nesset, Tore & Sokolova, Svetlana. 2012. Russian ‘purely aspectual’ prefixes: Not so ‘empty’ after all? Scando-Slavica 58: 231–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel, Ulrich, Rytel-Kuc, Danuta, Cirko, Lesław, Dębski, Antoni, Gaca, Alicja, Jurasz, Alina, Kątny, Andrzej, Mecner, Paweł, Prokop, Izabela, Sadziński, Roman, Schatte, Christoph, Schatte, Czesława, Tomiczek, Eugeniusz & Weiss, Daniel. 1999. Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Band 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.Google Scholar
Ertl, Václav. 1925/1926. A. Mazon: Grammaire de la langue tchèque. Slavia 4: 772–805.Google Scholar
Fasske, Helmut. 1981. Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
. 2000. The quantization puzzle. In Events as Grammatical Objects, James Pustejovsky & Carol Tenny (eds), 3–60. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2003. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 55–101.Google Scholar
. 2005. On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Lexical aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, R. I. Binnick (ed.), 721–751. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fong, Vivienne. 1997. The Order of Things: What Directional Locatives denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Forsyth, James. 1970. A Grammar of Aspect. Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, George. 1996. An articulated theory of aspect and prefixation in Slavic. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The College Park Meeting 1994, Jindřich Toman (ed.), 97–122. Ann Arbor MI: Slavic.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit. 2008. Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. [LOT Dissertation Series 184].Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila. 2010. The argument structure of predicate adjectives in Russian. Russian Linguistics 34: 239–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giger, Markus. 2003. Resultativa im modernen Tschechischen unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der übrigen slavischen Sprachen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2009. Der Resultativ in den slavischen Sprachen. In Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 269–274. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gribanova, Vera. 2009. Phonological evidence for a distinction between Russian prepositions and prefixes. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 383–395. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2013. Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej. 1975. Zależności semantyczne między czasownikiem a wyrażeniem lokatywnym. Polonica I: 113–131.Google Scholar
Groves, Terab'ata R., Groves, Gordon W. & Jacobs, Roderick. 1985. Kiribatese: An Outline Description [Pacific Linguistics 64]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Gruet-Skrabalova, Hana. 2012. VP-ellipsis and the Czech auxiliary být (‘to be’). XLinguae 5: 3–15.Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata, Laskowski, Roman & Wróbel, Henryk. 1984. Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 1992. The verbal prefixes po- and pro- in Russian: Their meanings and uses. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 17: 111–123.Google Scholar
. 2012. Perfective and imperfective aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 781–802. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 2010. Adpositions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2004. Pre- and postverbal adverbials in OV and VO. Lingua 114: 779–808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia. 1993. Serial verbs in Loniu and an evolving preposition. Oceanic Linguistics 32: 111–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1999. State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elisabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Ray. 2007. Māori: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Passive participles across languages. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 151–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausenblas, Karel. 1963. Slovesná kategorie výsledného stavu v dnešní češtině. Naše řeč 46: 13–28.Google Scholar
Hay, Jen, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In Proceedings of SALT 9, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovich (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1935. La catégorie des cas: Etude de grammaire générale I. Acta Jutlandica 7: 1–184. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Horálek, Karel. 1955. Slovesné tvary typu ponesu, poletím . Naše řeč 38: 21–24.Google Scholar
Horecký, Ján, Buzássyová, Klára, Bosák, Ján a kolektív. 1989. Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Vydavatel’stvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek. 2008. Acquiring telicity crosslinguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 255–278. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Irmer, Matthias & Mueller-Reichau, Olav. 2018. Script knowledge and the felicity of phase particles in German adjectival passives. Journal of Semantics 35: 585–637. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V. 1962. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Formenlehre. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1973. Base rules for PPs. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacko, Jozef. 1973. Slovenská morfológia v škole. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1936/1971. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6 : 240–288. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 23–71. The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
. 1958/1971. Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. (Sostav russkix padežnyx form). In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, 127–156. s-Gravenhage: Mouton. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 154–183. The Hague: Mouton.)Google Scholar
Janaš, Pětr. 1976. Niedersorbische Grammatik für den Gebrauch der Sorbischen Erweiterten Oberschule. Budyšin: Domowina.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Lyashevskaya, Olga. 2012. Semantic profiles of five Russian prefixes: po-, s-, za-, na-, pro-. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21: 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe. 1997. On byt’ (and byti). In Formale Slavistik [Leipziger Schriften zur Kultur-, Literatur-, Sprach- und Übersetzungswissenschaft 7], Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 251–265. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Ichikawa, Yasuko, Kobayashi, Noriko & Yamamoto, Hilofumi. 2013. Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalakuckaja, Larisa P. 1971. Ad”ektivacija pričastij v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kaleta, Zofia. 1995. Gramatyka języka polskiego dla cudzoziemców. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr. 2004. Pasivum v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 65: 82–113.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr, Nekula, Marek & Rusínová, Zdenka (eds). 1995. Příruční mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne Richard. 2004. Here and there. In Lexique, Syntaxe et Lexique-Grammaire/Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar: Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 24], Christian Leclère, Éric Laporte, Mireille Piot & Max Silberztein (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds), 156–182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Rod. 1984. Semantic roles – the language speaker’s categories (in Kala Lagaw Ya). Papers in Australian Linguistics 16: 153–169.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1998. Partitive case and aspect. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 265–307. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1990. Überall und nirgendwo. Subjektive und objektive Momente in der Raumreferenz. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78: 9–42.Google Scholar
. 1991. Raumausdrücke. Linguistische Berichte 132: 77–114.Google Scholar
. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71: 669–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komárek, Miroslav. 1984. Prefixace a slovesný vid: K prefixům prostě vidovým a subsumpci. Slovo a slovesnost 45: 257–267.Google Scholar
. 2006. Příspěvky k české morfologii. Olomouc: Periplum.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda J. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman, Hilda J. Koopman (ed.), 204–260. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopečný, František. 1958. Základy české skladby. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
. 1959. Forma v syntaxi. Jazykovědné studie 4: 51–52.Google Scholar
. 1962. Slovesný vid v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
. 1973. Etymologický slovník slovanských jazyků. Slova gramatická a zájmena. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter & Frasek, Jens. 2004. Neakuzativita (ergativita) vs. neergativita v češtině, polštině a jiných slovanských jazycích na rozhraní morfologie a syntaxe. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 172–194. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Kracht, Marcus. 2002. On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 157–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The fine structure of spatial expressions. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 35–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
. 2000. Building statives. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Danya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Krchňavá, Kristina. 2010. Verbální a adjektivní participia v češtině. MA dissertation, Masarykova univerzita Brno.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. München: Fink.Google Scholar
. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt, Šlosar, Dušan & Bauer, Jaroslav. 1986. Historická mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald. 1991. A two-level approach to projective prepositions. In Approaches to Prepositions, Gisela Rauh (ed.), 127–167. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar. 2009. Aspekt und Tempus. In Slavische Sprachen – Slavic Languages [HSK 32.1], Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 526–556. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1993. Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1984. Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie: eine Untersuchung an Beispielen aus der Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2008. The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623–661.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop. 1997. Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13], Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkungen – Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35: 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words and things. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Mareš, Franz Wenzel. 1984. Die partielle Neutralisierung der markierten präpositionalen Rektion in der russischen und weissrussischen Gegenwartssprache. Wiener slawistischer Almanach 13: 197–209.Google Scholar
Markova, Angelina. 2011. On the nature of Bulgarian prefixes: Ordering and modification in multiple prefixation. Word Structure 4: 244–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markowski, Andrzej Bańko Mirosław, Bondkowska, Magdalena, Ciesielska Anna, Gogołkiewicz Marzena, Grzegółka-Maciejewska Agnieszka, Hoser Katarzyna, Jadacka Hanna, Kołodziejczyk Danuta, Kopczyńska Dorota, Metera Małgorzata, Nałęcz Alicja, Pakosz Barbara, Rudnicka Ewa, Salata Agnieszka, Sobol Elżbieta, Sulima Iwona, Witorska Alicja, Zawisławska Magdalena, Zdunek-Chojecka Grażyna & Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak Dorota. 2000. Nowy słownik poprawnej polszczyzny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij S. 1958. Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. Doklady 4 meždunarodnogo s”ezda slavistov Moskva 1958. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
1988. Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2002. On formal identity of Russian prefixes and prepositions. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 217–253.Google Scholar
. 2008. A case study of predication. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5, Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 213–239. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1988. Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see-through garb? Language 64: 583–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2002. Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 97–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The integration of directional PPs: Thoughts on the way to getting towards knowing if we are (be)coming or going. Paper presented at the Conference on the Syntax and Semantics of Spatial Prepositions, June 2–4, 2006, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.
. 2007. Particle verbs and argument structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 350–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 205], Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. Particle verb formation. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1 [HSK 40.1], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 434–449. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Event modifiers in (German) adjectival passives: Remarks on Gehrke (this issue). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 939–953. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Medová, Lucie. 2012. Anticausatives are derived unergatives. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 291–306. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Meltzer-Asscher, Aya. 2011. Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 815–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2006. Polyvalent cases, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Jackie Bunting, Sapna Desai, Robert Peachey, Chris Straughn & Zuzana, Tomkova (eds), 47–67. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz. 1926. Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen, Vol. IV: Syntax . Heidelberg: Carl Winters.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D. 1993. Complex Verb Formation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Młynarczyk, Anna Katarzyna. 2004. Aspectual Pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Mulder, René. 1992. The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
Müller, Gereon. 1995. A-Bar Syntax. A Study of Movement Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. A distributed morphology approach to syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Proceedings of the 12th Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Ottawa Meeting 2003, Olga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero & Danijlo Stojanovic (eds), 353–373. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1995. Extraction, lexical variation and the theory of barriers. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds), 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jachontov, Sergej Je. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol. 1988. The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Němec, Igor. 1954. O slovanské předponě po- slovesné. Slavia 23: 1–22.Google Scholar
. 1956. Kategorie determinovanosti a indeterminovanosti jako základ slovanské kategorie vidu. Slavia 25: 496–534.Google Scholar
. 1958. Vznik a vývoj vidu v souvislosti s vývojem tvoření slovesných kmenů. In Československé přednášky pro IV. mezinárodní sjezd slavistů v Moskvě. Praha, 137–150.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire. 2010. À to zu. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 161–195. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nossalik, Larissa. 2007. Slavic perfective prefixes: Are they telicity markers? In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Milica Radišić (ed.). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1995. Transfers of meanings. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübler, Norbert. 2004. Česká participia ze syntaktického hlediska. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Peter Karlík (eds), 384–390. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Oertle, Simon. 2016. Die slavischen Verbalpräfixe und Präpositionen: Polysemie und Grammatikalisierung. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paducheva, Elena. 1998. On non-compatibility of partitive and imperfective in Russian. Theoretical Linguistics 24: 73–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila, Benešová, Eva & Sgall, Petr. 1971. Čas a modalita v češtině. Praha: Universita Karlova.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina B. 2008. The place of PLACE in Persian. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 305–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim. 2003. Perfect readings in Russian. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann & Stolte, Heinz. 1962. Kurze deutsche Grammatik: Auf Grund der fünfbändigen deutschen Grammatik. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen. 1950. Odvodzovanie slovies podl’a slovesného vidu. Slovo a tvar 4: 88–93.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen, Ružička, Jozef & Štolc, Jozef. 1967. Slovenská gramatika. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladatel’stvo.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2000. On accusative adverbials in Russian and Finnish. In Adverbs and Adjunction, Artemis Alexiadou & Peter Svenonius (eds), 155–176. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 369–395. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2006. Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 433–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT. Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2004. Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 495–539. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Probes, goals and syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed.), 25–61. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Petr, Jan (ed.). 1986a. Mluvnice češtiny 1. Fonetika – Fonologie – Morfonologie a morfemika – Tvoření slov. Praha: Academia.
(ed.). 1986b. Mluvnice češtiny, II: Tvarosloví. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar. 1975. Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J. 1994. Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Mercè Gonzàles (ed.), 491–506. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
1995. An Ontology for Event Semantics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Pitz, Anneliese P. 1994. Nominal Signs in German. PhD dissertation, Trondheim University.
Przybylska, Renata. 2002. Polisemia przyimków polskich w świetle semantyki kognitywnej. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2004. Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 323–361.Google Scholar
2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Irene. 1996. Zustand? Passiv? – Überlegungen zum sogenannten „Zustandspassiv“. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15: 231–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Partizipien und semantische Struktur. Zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Tübingen: Staufenburg.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rejzek, Jiří. 2001. Český etymologický slovník. Voznice: Leda.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2013. Lardil “case stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 16: 42–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C. 1978. A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Amsterdam: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C. 1990. Functional prepositions. In Unity in Diversity, Pinkster, Harm & Genée Inge (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2007. Case in spatial adpositional phrases: The dative-accusative alternation in German. In Pitar Mos: A Building with a View. Festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei Avram, Larisa Avram & Isac Dana (eds), 1–23. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press,Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C. & Huijbregts, Riny. 2002. Location and locality. In Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds), 339–364. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 1999. A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 1011–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Syntactic change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia. 2004. Superlexical vs. lexical prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes : 255–278.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructing Perfectivity in Russian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena. 2003. Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL 4, Potsdam, 28–30 November 2001, Peter Kosta, Joanna Błaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist & Marzena Żygis (eds), 859–872. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Willim, Ewa. 2004. The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39: 125–142.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1984. Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rusínová, Zdena. 1984. Tvoření staročeských adverbií. Brno: Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně.Google Scholar
Rytel-Schwarz, Danuta, Jurasz, Alina, Cirko, Lesław & Engel, Ulrich. 2012. Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Bd. 4: Die unflektierbaren Wörter. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H. 1951. The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti . Word 7: 96–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Schooneveld Cornelis H. 1959. The so-called „préverbes vides“ and neutralization. In Dutch Contributions to the Fourth International Congess of Slavicists: Moscow, September 1958, 159–161. S-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H. 1986. Jakobson’s case system and syntax. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds), 373–385. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht [OTS Dissertation Series].
. 1997. The role of the internal argument in the Russian aspectual system. In Formale Slavistik, Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 229–239. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Sekaninová, Ella. 1980. Sémantická analýza predponového slovesa v ruštine a slovenčine. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Skibicki, Monika. 2007. Polnische Grammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Skoumalová, Zdena. 1968. O komplexní analýzu verbální prefixace. In Kapitoly ze srovnávací mluvnice ruské a české 3. O ruském slovese, Alexandr Vasiljevič Isačenko (ed.), 153–231. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W. 1920/1974. Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves into Merge. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
von Stechow, Arnim. 1996. The different readings of wieder “again”. Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Spatial prepositions in interval semantics. Paper presented at the Semantics Network Worskhop, Barcelona, September 2006.
. 2007. Syntactic and lexical causativization: cause and become again. Draft 10.1.2007. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 1996. Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln. Berlin: Akademie.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 265–302. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara & Wunderlich, Dieter. 1994. Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32: 913–968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroik, Thomas S. 1996. Minimalism, Scope, and VP Structure. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2003. Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. In Nordlyd 31: Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 431–445.Google Scholar
. 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32(2): Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 205–253.Google Scholar
. 2006. The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd 33: 49–77.Google Scholar
. 2007. Adpositions, particles, and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric J. Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giogos Spathas (eds), 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Projections of P. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriёtte. 2012. Verbal aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 753–780. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Szober, Stanisław. 1957. Gramatyka języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Szucsich, Luka. 2007. Die (Ohn)Macht zur Veränderung: (Morpho)Syntaktische Eigenschaften von Präfixen in slavischen Sprachen. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik XIV, Ljudmila Geist & Grit Mehlhorn (eds), 177–196. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2014. Restriktionen bei mehrfacher Prä- und Suffigierung. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXI. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Göttingen, 13.-15. September 2012 [Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 180], Hagen Pitsch (ed.), 199–217. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek. 2011. Modal Existential Wh-Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen [LOT Dissertation Series 269].Google Scholar
Šlosar, Dušan. 1981. Slovotvorný vývoj českého slovesa. Brno: Univerzita Jana Purkyně.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold. 1986. Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Šmilauer, Vladimír. 1969. Novočeská skladba. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Štícha, František. 1986. Systémový a funkční status konstrukcí s n/t-ovými participii v současné češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 47: 177–185.Google Scholar
Švedova, Natal’ja Ju. (ed.). 1970. Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
. (ed.). 1980. Russkaja grammatika. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi. 2010. The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 343–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Tarald & Medová, Lucie. 2007. The Czech locative chameleon. Nordlyd 34(2): Special issue on Space, Motion, and Result, 200–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei. 2007. Measuring individuals, partitioning events: Semantics of cumulative verbs in Russian. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Peter Kosta & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 529–544. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. Intermediate prefixes in Russian. In Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds), 423–445. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Tichonov, Aleksandr N. 1964. Čistovidovye pristavki v sisteme russkogo vidovogo formoobrazovanija. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1: 42–52.Google Scholar
Timofeev, Kirill A. 1966. O funkcijax glagol’noj pristavki po- v russkom jazyke. In Voprosy jazyka i literatury 1: 29–41. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Tokarski, Jan. 2001. Fleksja polska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Trávníček, František. 1923. Studie o českém vidu slovesném. Praha: Česká akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
. 1951. Mluvnice spisovné češtiny II. Skladba. Praha: Slovanské nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max. 1976. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Večerka, Radoslav. 1999. Das Präfix po- als Morphem des imperfektiven Futurs in den altkirchenslavischen Denkmälern. In Festschrift für Klaus Trost zum 65. Geburtstag. Die Welt der Slaven, Vol. 5, Ernst Hansack, Walter Koschmal, Norbert Nübler & Radoslav Večerka (eds), 301–305. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2006. Staroslověnština v kontextu slovanských jazyků. Olomouc, Praha: Euroslavica.
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999. Aspectual Issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila. 2008. The extended verbal projection in Czech: Three variants of the verb be . In Formal Description of Slavic Languages. The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003, Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds), 555–569. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila & Karlík, Petr. 2004. Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 49: 163–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor V. 1947. Russkij jazyk (grammatičeskoe učenie o slove). Moskva, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveščenija RSFSR.
. 1952. Grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Walinska de Hackbeil, Hanna. 1986. The Roots of Phrase Structure: The Syntactic Basis of English Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Weinsberg, Adam. 1973. Przyimki przestrzenne w jȩzyku polskim, niemieckim i rumuńskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Gdaňsk: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel. 1977. Syntax und Semantik polnischer Partizipialkonstruktionen im Rahmen einer generativ-transformationellen Sprachbeschreibung. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Culicover, Peter W. 1980. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1967. On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 2231–2249. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiese, Bernd. 2004. Über Lokalisationssysteme. Zur Struktur des Inventars der deutschen Lokalpräpositionen mit Berücksichtigung finno-ugrischer Lokalkasussysteme. Ms, Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Wiland, Bartosz. 2012. Prefix stacking, syncretism, and the syntactic hierarchy. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 307–324. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wróbel, Henryk. 2001. Gramatyka języka polskiego: podręcznik akademicki. Kraków: Od nowa.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 1987. An investigation of lexical composition: The case of German be-verbs. Linguistics 25: 283–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29: 591–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. On German um: Semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics 31: 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Lexical decomposition in Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds), 307–327. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Herweg, Michael. 1991. Lokale und Direktionale. In Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [HSK 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 758–785. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yadroff, Michael & Franks, Steven. 2001. The origin of prepositions. In Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Luka Szucsich (eds), 69–79. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Šmelёv, Aleksej D. 1997. Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii. München: Otto Sagner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2001a. Lexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions. In Semi-Lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 505–549. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Particle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2002. Movement within a spatial phrase. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Gunter Radden (eds), 47–63. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ilse. 2009. Satzmodus. In The Slavic Languages. An International Handbook of their Structure, their History and their Investigation, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 484–509. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zinova, Yulia & Filip, Hana. 2015. Biaspectual verbs: A marginal category? In Logic, Language, and Computation. 10th International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, TbiLLC 2013, Gudauri, Georgia, September 23–27, 2013, Martin Aher, Daniel Hole, Emil Jeřábek & Clemens Kupke (eds), 310–332. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 739–779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Aspect of a typology of direction. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 79–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žaucer, Rok. 2009. A VP-Internal/Resultative Analysis of 4 “VP-External” Uses of Slavic Verbal Prefixes. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.
. 2012. The syntax of perdurative-prefixed verbs (and the VP-internal/VP-external prefix distinction). In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 339–355. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar