Chapter 1
Cartography and V2 languages
Article outline
- 1.1The cartography of syntactic structures
- 1.1.1Brief history of cartography
- 1.1.2Towards a cartographic map
- 1.1.3Cartographic guidelines
- 1.1.3.1Morphosyntactic features and functional heads
- 1.1.3.2Criterial approach and transparency at the interfaces
- 1.1.3.3Locality principles
- 1.2The cartography of the CP: Evidence from Italian
- 1.2.1Brief history of the fine structure of the Left Periphery (Rizzi 1997, 2001, 2004)
- 1.2.1Complementizers
- 1.2.1.1Force Phrase (ForceP)
- 1.2.1.2IntP
- 1.2.1.3Finitess Phrase (FinP)
- 1.2.1.4Co-occurrence of complementizers
- 1.2.2Landing sites for internally merged elements
- 1.2.2.1Focus Phrase (focP)
- 1.2.2.2Topic Phrase (TopP)
- 1.2.2.3Digression of interest: Topic vs. Focus
- 1.2.2.4Modifier Phrase (ModP)
- 1.2.2.5Question embedded Phrase (QembP)
- 1.2.3A cartography of cartographic positions
- 1.3Verb second languages in generative grammar: An overview
- 1.3.1A brief history of V2: Pre-cartographic analyses
- 1.3.2Theoretical foundation of the recent analyses of V2 and a typology of V2
- 1.3.2.1V2-to-Fin
- 1.3.2.2V3 orders: Diagnostics for a typology
- 1.3.2.3V2-to-Force
- 1.3.3The theory-internal drawbacks of recent analyses
- 1.3.3.1V-to-Fin drawbacks: Non criterial movement and cartography
- 1.3.3.2V-to-Fin drawbacks: One feature, one head
- 1.3.3.3V-to-Fin drawbacks: Locality and the ‘bottleneck effect’
- 1.3.3.4V-to-Fin drawbacks: Base-generations in TopicP and patterns of dependency
- 1.3.3.5V-to-Force drawbacks: SpecForceP and criterial freezing
- 1.3.3.6V-to-Force drawbacks: Transparency at the interfaces
- 1.3.3.7V-to-Force drawbacks: The behaviour of scene setters
- 1.4The quest for new landing sites for the verb in V2 environments
-
Notes