Cover not available
Part of
A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2
Giuseppe Samo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 257] 2019
► pp. 195–210

References

Abb, Bernd
1994 Die Generierung deutscher Nominalstrukturen. Hamburger Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachproduktion 18.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus
2012 The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Beyond phrase-phrase interactions in the Left Periphery, Paper presented at WOLP, University of Oslo.
Aboh, Enoch O.
2004 The Morphosyntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Leftward focus versus rightward focus: The Kwa-Bantu conspiracy. SOAS Working Papers Linguistics 15: 81–104Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Lohndal, Terje & Lowell Sluckin, Benjamin
2017 V2, non-V2, and resumption: A comparison of American Norwegian and Kiezdeutsch. Talk held at MiMs project, October 5–6.
Andersen, Torben
1993 Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection. Phonology 10: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Auxiliary verbs in Dinka. Studies in Language 31: 89–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2005 Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Romansh (Rumantsch). In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 169–184. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axel, Katrin
2007 Studies on Old High German Syntax Left Sentence Periphery, Verb Placement and Verb-Second [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 112]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda & Del Gobbo, Francesca
2010 On the syntax of topic and focus in Chinese. In Mapping the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5], Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bader, Markus & Meng, Michael
1999 Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984 Comp in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 A note on targets of A’-movement in the left periphery of German sentences. In Form, Structure, and Grammar – A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 119–128. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Joseph
2012 From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn. In Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 13–28. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, Kristin
2001 Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD Dissertation, University of Bergen.
Belletti, Adriana
1990 Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Extending doubling to non-local domains: Complete vs. partial Copying + Deletion and related reconstructions issues. In Form, Structure, and Grammar – A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 129–136. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015 The focus map of clefts: Extraposition and predication. In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 42–59. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Labeling (Romance) causatives. In Elements of Comparative Syntax: Theory and Description, Enoch O. Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskás & Manuela Schönenberger (eds), 13–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122: 1053–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Functional heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 129–137. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 On the syntax and pragmatics of some clause-peripheral positions. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 33–48. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1983 Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 4: 3–19.Google Scholar
1995 Complement clitics in Medieval Romance. The Tobler-Mussafia Law. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds), 296–325, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics – Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds), 53–86. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Munaro, Nicola
(eds) 2010 Mapping the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia
2004 Topic, focus, and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Benucci, Franco
1997 Sintassi del verbo e deittici clitici nelle iscrizioni sudpicene. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 22: 37–92.Google Scholar
Berthelot, Frédérique
2017 Movement of and out of Subjects in French. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
Bhatt, Rakesh M.
1999 Verb Movement and the Syntax of Kashmiri. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
2012 Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015 Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8], Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010 Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2: 43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2002 Verb second in Afrikaans: Is this a unitary phenomenon? Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34: 19–69.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo
2008 Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Padovan, Andrea & Tomaselli, Alessandra
2014 The syntax of subordination in Cimbrian and the rationale behind language contact. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 67: 489–510.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenigildo, Tomaselli, Alessandra & Padovan, Andrea
2016 V2 and nominative case: The view from a German-based language- contact dialect in Italy. Talk presented at Rethinking Verb Second: Assessing the theory and data, Cambridge, 20–22 March.
Bierwisch, Manfred
1963 Die Syntax des deutschen Verbs. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Biloa, Edmond
2013 The Syntax of Tuki: A Cartographic Approach [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 203]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2013 The Syntax–Prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boekckx, Cedric & Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2005 Left dislocation in Germanic. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.) 139–152. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute
2006 When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research 22: 443–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2008 On the operator freezing effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 249–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne, Delva, Sara, Leuschner, Torsten
2016 A (very) imperfect sandwich: English should, German sollte, Dutch mocht/moest as grammaticalizing markers of conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28: 282–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 Topic. In Focus – Linguistic Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2013 Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax: The classical Armenian nominal declension. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 1015–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1990 Impersonal Constructions and Sentential Arguments in German. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
2004 Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009 On a (wh-)moved topic in Italian, compared to Germanic. In Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds), 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
1996 Problemi di sintassi tedesca. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Cognola, Federica
2014 On the left periphery of relaxed V2 languages: A comparison between Rhaetoromance and Mòcheno. Ms, University of Trento.
2016 V2 as parametrised minimality. Paper presented at Seminari del CISCL, University of Siena.
Cecchetto, Carlo
2000 Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12: 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
2012 “Perché” Rizzi is right. Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi in the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Siena: CISCL Publications, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1987 Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa
1991 On the Typology of Wh Questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Cheng, Lisa & Rooryck, Johan
2000 Licensing WH-in-situ. Syntax 31: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986 Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries. In Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Gallego, Ángel & Ott, Dennis
2017 Generative Grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Ms, MIT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, and University of Ottawa. To appear in Catalan Journal of Linguistics . [URL]
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1971 Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra
1982 Unbounded dependencies in Chamorro grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 39–78.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A’ Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017 A microparametric approach to the head-initial/head-final parameter. Linguistic Analysis 41(3–4): 309–366.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2010 The cartography of syntactic structure. STiL – Studies in Linguistics, Vol. 2, CISCL Working Papers .Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1984 Binding domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 14: 37–56.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica
2012 Syntactic Variation and Verb Second: A German Dialect in Northern Italy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 201]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth
2001 Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session, M. Adronis (ed.), 133–148. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012 Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Licensing focus movement: Distributional and interpretive properties. Talk held at the 1st SynCart workshop, Chiusi/Siena/Pienza/Montepulciano, University of Geneva and University of Siena.
Danckaert, Lieven
2012 Latin Embedded Clauses: The Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2009 Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21: 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Besten, Hans
1983 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of West Germania, Werner Abraham (ed.), 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1990 Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 41–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie
2008 The Syntax of Jamaican Creole – A Cartographic Perspective [Creole Language Library 29]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2007 Locality and Information Structure – A Cartographic Approach to Japanese [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Two ReasonPs: What are*(n’t) you coming to the United States for? In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 220–231. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endriss, Cornelia
2009 Quantificational Topics: A Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, Oskar
1886 Grundzüge der deutschen Syntax nach ihrer geschichtlichten Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2004 Münchhausen-style head movement and the analysis of verb second. Linguistics in Potsdam 22: 9–49.Google Scholar
Felfe, Marc
2012 Das System der Partikelverben mit “an”. Eine konstruktions-grammatiche Untersuchung [Sprache und Wissen]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2000 The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of Topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Puglielli, Annarita
2008 Focus in the Force-Fin system. Information structure in Cushitic languages. In Focus Strategies in African Languages: The Interaction of Focus and Grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 161–184. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004 A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–190.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Cornips, Leonie, Ganuza, Natalia, Nistov, Ingvild & Opsahl, Toril
2013 Urban vernaculars in contemporary northern Europe: Innovative variants of V2 in Germany, Norway and Sweden. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 119: 1–21.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009 Relativised relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2005 The Rise of Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganuza, Natalia
2008 Syntactic Variation in the Swedish of Adolescents in Multilingual Urban Settings: Subject-verb Order in Declaratives, Questions and Subordinate Clauses. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.
Garzonio, Jacopo
2005 Struttura informazionale e soggetti nulli in russo – Un approccio cartografico. PhD dissertation, University of Padua.
Georgopoulos, Carol
1985 Variables in Palauan Syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 59–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2012 The theory of syntax and the representation of indexicality. In Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7], Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 42–54. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Haroutyunian, Sona
2016 Focus in Modern Eastern Armenian. Talk held at SemRec, University of Geneva.
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio
1997 Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983 Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio
1980 Universali di Greenberg e grammatica generativa. Lingua e Stile 15: 371–87.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2002 Left Dislocation as a movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 31–81.Google Scholar
2005 The asymmetry of short and long wh-extraction in German. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 35 – 54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Gaps and parasitic gaps in Bavarian. In Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the Theory of Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220], Günther Grewendorf & Helmut Weiss (eds), 145–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 Double fronting in Bavarian left periphery. In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 232–254. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Poletto, Cecilia
2011 Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. In Studies on German Language Islands [Studies in Language Companion Series 123], Michael T. Putnam (ed.), 301–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Separable prefixes and verb positions in Cimbrian. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi in the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Siena: CISCL Publications, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1990 Scrambling theories. In Scrambling and Barriers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 5], Günther Grewendorf & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Weiss, Helmut
(eds) 2014 Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the Theory of Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2008 Generalized Minimality: Syntactic Underspecification in Broca’s Aphasia. PhD dissertation, Univerity of Utrecht.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
2000 Prolific Peripheries: A Radical View from the Left. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Günthner, Susanne
1996 From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions [Arbeitspapier Nr. 75], 1–40. Konstanz: Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz. [URL]Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2002 Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb-second in English. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David W. Lightfoot (ed.), 88–106. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991a Negative concord, negative heads. Working Papers OTS. University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
1991b On the relevance of clitic placement for the analysis of subjectinitial Verb Second in West Flemish. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 34: 29–66.Google Scholar
1994 Manuale di grammatica eenerativa: La teoria della Reggenza e del Legamento. Milano: Editore Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar
1996 Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP, 133–175.Google Scholar
1997 Negative inversion and the structure of CP. Paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, University of Wuppertal.
2006 Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Pleonastic tet in West Flemish and the cartography of subject positions. Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling 36: 277–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clauses Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8]. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Greco, Ciro
2016 Frame setters and the microvariation of subject-initial V2. [URL] (December 2016).
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia
2013 The syntactization of discourse. In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 370–390. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991 Negative Heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2010 The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haïk, Isabelle, Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
1985 Infl in mooré et le liage dans le système A’. Rapport de recherche du groupe de linguiste africaniste.
Haiman, John & Benincà, Paola
1992 The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison
2002 Variation and syntactic theory. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Peter T. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 267–282. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2006 Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015 Verb second. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 242–283. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar H.
2004 Stylistic fronting. Studia Linguistica 58: 88–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar H. & Wiklund, Anna L.
2009 General Embedded V2: Icelandic A, B, C, etc. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84: 21–51.Google Scholar
Hsu, Brian
2017 Verb second and its deviations: An argument for feature scattering in the left periphery. Glossa: A Journal of General Kinguistics 2: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1986 The syntax of focus and adverbials in German. In Topic, Focus, and Configurationality. Papers from the 6th Groningen Grammar Talks Groningen 1984 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 4], Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Meij (eds), 103–127, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil
2008 Topic, focus and adverb positions in clause structure. Nanzan Linguistics 4: 43–68.Google Scholar
Jivanyan, Hasmik & Samo, Giuseppe
2017 Parce-que in syntax – semantics – pragmatics interface. GG@G 10: 77–99.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Johannes G.
2002 S-adverbs in Icelandic and the Feature Theory of Adverbs. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 9: 73–89.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisimmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976 Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 247–301. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kidwai, Ayesha
2000 XP-adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É
1995 Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1998 Identificational focus vs. information focus. Language 74: 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Tibor
1995 Infinite Komplementation – Neue Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum [Linguistische Arbeiten 333]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda
2010 Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Mapping Spatial PPs [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6], Gugliemo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 26–73. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Szabolcsi, Anna
2000 Verbal Complexes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan
1975 Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–136.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
2008 On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. In Formal Descriptions of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference, Lepizig 2003, Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds), Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2001 Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9: 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1976 Subject, theme and the speaker’s empathy – A reexamination of relativization phenomena. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 417–444. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela
2017 A feature-based account of weak islands. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 11–39. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahne, Antje
2009 A multiple specifier approach to left-peripheral architecture. Linguistic Analysis 35: 73–108.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2008 Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs Move. Journal of Linguistics 44: 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Subject licensing in CP: The Neapolitan double-subject construction. In Mapping the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5], Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 257–296. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen
1977 Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Leu, Thomas
2015 Generalized x-to-C in Germanic. Studia Linguistica 69: 272–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The morphosyntax of German d in nominal, adjectival, and clausal environments. Talk held at “What is a word?” workshop, University of Zurich.
Lewis, David
1975 Adverbs of quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Edward Keenan (ed.), 3–15. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linder, Karl P.
1987 Grammatische Untersuchungen zur Charackteristik das Rätoromanischen in Graubünden. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lobke, Aelbrecht
2010 The syntax of ellipsis, EGG Summer School Classes 2010. [URL] (April 2015).
Lowell Sluckin, Benjamin
2017 Verb Third (V3) in Kiezdeutsch: The development of an (optional) subject position? Talk held at Manchester Forum in Linguistics.
2018 Information structure change in an emerging grammar: V1 and V3 in Kiezdeutsch. Talk held at Information Structure and Language Change, Université de Caen, Normandie.
Lutz, Uli
2014 Structures of “emphatic topicalization” in Bavarian. In Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the Theory of Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220], Günther Grewendorf & Helmut Weiss (eds), 113–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
2003 Word order and (remnant) VP movement. In Word Order and Scrambling, Simin Karimi (ed.), 217–237. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria R. & Savoia, Leonardo
2005 I dialetti Italiani e romanci. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric
2012 The Left Periphery in Old French. In Research in Old French: The State of the Art [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 88], Deborah L. Arteaga (ed.), 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Jim
1997 Subjecthood and subject positions. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 197–235. Dodrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinunger, A.
2004 On certain adverbials in the German “Vorfeld” and “Vor-vorfeld”. Sprache un Pragmatik 52: 64–78.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2010 Three kinds of ellipsis. In Context-Dependence, Perspective, and Relativity, François Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds), 141–192. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010 Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, Sabine
2009 V2 as a single-edge phenomenon. In Selected Papers from the 2006 Syntaxfest, Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Phoevos Panagiotidis (eds), 141–159. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2002 Dutch er revisited. Ms, University of Stuttgart.
Moritz, Luc
1989 Syntaxe de la négation de phrase en français et en anglais. Mémoire de licence, University of Geneva.
Müller, Gereon
2004 Verb-second as vP-first. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7: 179–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1993 Improper movement and unambiguous binding. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.Google Scholar
Müller, Stephan
2003 Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31(1): 29–62.Google Scholar
2005 Zur Analyse der deutschen Satzstruktur. Linguistische Berichte 201: 3–39.Google Scholar
2013 Datensammlung zur scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Ms.
Munaro, Nicola
2010 Towards a hierarchy of clause types. In Mapping the Left Periphery [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5], Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 125–162. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2011 Ingush Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein
2003 Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modifications. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Oetzel, Annette
1994 Die Nicht-Einhaltung der Inversion im Engadinischen und ihr Einfluss auf die Informationsstruktur. Annalas de la Societad Retorumanscha 153–171.Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis
2012 An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Lingbuzz. [URL] (December 2012).Google Scholar
2014 An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandar
2007 The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects evidence from Romance. Lingua 117: 1057–1079. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud
2005 Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33.Google Scholar
Pearce, Elizabeth
1999 Topic and focus in a head-initial language: Maori. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew
2005 The Malagasy subject/topic as an A’-element. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 381–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1987 Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 98–129. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999 Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Haeberli, Eric
2008 Structural variation in Old English root clauses. Language Variation and Change 20: 367–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1983 Germanic word order and the COMP/INFL parameter. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax, University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2000 The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002 The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. Syntactic Microvariation, Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics, 214–242.Google Scholar
2005 Sì and e as CP Expletives in Old Italian. In Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation, Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluïsa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca (eds), 206–235. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Prefissi separabili e posizione del verbo cimbro. In I preverbi. Tra sintassi e diacronia, Davide Bertocci (ed.), 107–127, Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
2014 Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 More than one way out: On the loss of V2, Ciclo di Webinari – Linguistic Connections. University of Padua 27 October 2017.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva
2000 Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of A’-positions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia
2008 Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C. & Svenonius, Peter
2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46: 152–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Tanya
1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
2013 „Weil-V2“-Sätze und (k)ein Ende? Anmerkungen zur Analyse von Antomo & Steinbach (2010). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32: 221–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut
2005 Etruscan. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, Roger Woodard (ed.), 943–966. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991 Residual verb second and the Wh-criterion. Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics 2.
1996 Residual verb second and the Wh criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman, (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giamapolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3], Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007 On some properties of criterial freezing. CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 1: 145–158.Google Scholar
2011 Minimality. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 220–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013a Introduction: Core computational principles in natural language syntax. Lingua 130: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25(1): 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013c Theoretical and comparative syntax: Some current issues. In The Language-Cognition Interface: Actes Du 19e Congrès International Des Linguistes Genève 22–27 Juillet 2013, Stephen R. Anderson, Jacques Moeschler & Fabienne Reboul (eds), 307–331. Geneva: Libraire Droz S.A.Google Scholar
2015a Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b Notes on labeling and subject positions. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond – Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223], Elisa di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds), 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 On the format and locus of parameters: The role of morphosyntactic features. Linguistic Analysis 41: 159–191.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2017 The left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds) 1–30, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Cinque, Guglielmo
2016 Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006 Satisfying the subject criterion by a non subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of Interpreation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans M. Gärtner (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2004 The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 297–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2015 Positions: A synchronic analysis and some diachronic consequences. Talk held at Traces of History Workshop, University of Oslo, 9 March 2015.
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2002 The extended projection principle as a condition on the tense dependency. In Subjects Expletives and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 125–155. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967 Constraints on variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rouveret, Alain
2004 Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en ancien Français. Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris XCIX: 181–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sailor, Craig
2016 Rethinking “Residual” V2. Talk presented at Rethinking Verb Second: Assessing the Theory and Aata, Cambridge, 20–22 March 2016.
Saito, Mamoru
2012 Sentence type and the Japanese right periphery. In Ten Years after Studies in Generative Grammar 112, Thomas E. Zimmerman & Günther Grewendorf (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe
2014 There can be only one: Cartography of V2 in Root Contexts. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale, University of Siena.
2018 A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
Sanfelici, Emanuela, Thiel Alexander, Trabandt, Corinna & Schulz, Petra
2015 The Janus face of German “V2 relative clauses”: Insights from acquisition. Talk presented at 41st Incontro Grammatica Generativa, Università per Stranieri of Perugia.
Schwartz, Bonnie D. & Vikner, Sten
1996 The verb always leave IP in V2 clauses. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 11–62. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schweikert, Walter
2005 The Order of Prepositional Phrases in the Structure of the Clause [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 83]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Servidio, Emilio
2012 Polarity particles in Italian fragment answers. Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi in the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Siena: CISCL Publications, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Scherrer, Yves
2011 Syntactic transformations for Swiss German dialects. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Algorithms and Resources for Modelling of Dialects and Language Varieties. Edinburgh (UK) – 31st July 2011, Jeremy Jancsary, Friedrich Neubarth & Harald Trost (eds), 30–38. Stroudsburg PA: The Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
(2000) Remarks on the complementizer layer of Standard Arabic. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Third conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1996 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 202], Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm & Ur Shlonsky (eds), 325 – 343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Extended projection and CP cartography. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique 27: 83–93.Google Scholar
2010 The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics 4: 417–429Google Scholar
2013 Subject positions, subject extraction, EPP and the subject criterion. Ms, University of Geneva.
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela
2011 Where’s “why”? Linguistic Inquiry 42: 651–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Si, Fuzhen
(ed.) 2017 Studies in Cartographic Syntax. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros & Fanselow, Gisbert
2010 Focus in Georgian and the expression of contrast. Lingua 120: 1370–1391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Anna M. Di Sciullo (ed.), 315–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stark, Elisabeth
1996 Voranstellungsstrukturen und topic -Markierung im Französischen mit einem Ausblick auf das Italienische. PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
2014 Frequency, form and function of cleft constructions in the Swiss SMS Corpus. In Frequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in Romance and Germanic: Contrastive, Corpus-Based Studies, Anna M. De Cesare (ed.), 325–344. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
To appear. Hanging topics and frames [in Romance languages]: Syntax, discourse, diachrony. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics, Francesco Gardani & Michele Loporcaro (eds) Oxford OUP
Starke, Michal
2001 Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
Stowell, Tim
1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Strawson, Peter F.
1964 Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30: 96–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2012 On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartographic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Venice.
Thráhinsson, Höskuldur
2007 The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra
1995 Cases of verb third in Old High German. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds), 345–369. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Torrence, Harold
2013 The Clause Structure of Wolof: Insights into the Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 198]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa D.
1984 Parameters and Effects in Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Tsai, Dylan W. T.
2015 The Cartography of Chinese Syntax [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 11]. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
1995 Focusing in Modern Greek. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tuller, Laurie
1985 Tense features and operators in Hausa. Rapport de Recherche du Groupe de Linguiste Africaniste, 493–516.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane
2006 The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 167–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & van Koppen Marjo
2002 Pronominal doubling and the structure of the left periphery in southern Dutch. In Syntactic Microvariation Electronic Publications in Linguistics (MIEPiL) II, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Suzanne van der Kleij (eds), 280–304. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute. [URL]Google Scholar
Van Urk, Coppe
2015 A Uniform Syntax for Phrasal Movement: A Case Study of Dinka Bor. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Van Urk, Coppe & Richards, Norvin
2015 Two components of long-distance extraction: Successive cyclicity in Dinka. Linguistic Inquiry 46: 113–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara S.
1997 Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Verb-Second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001 Verb Movement in Germanic and Optimality Theory. Habilitationsschrift, University of Tübingen.
Wali, Kashi & Koul, Omkar N.
1997 Kashmiri: A Cognitive-Descriptive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014 Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Language contact and V3 in Germanic varieties new and old. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 20(1): 49–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Rex E.
2008 Zikh Rasna: A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. New York: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2003 On the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in the Tromsø dialect. In Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistica, Vol. 3: Acquisition, Anne Dahl, Peter Svenonius & Marit Westergaard (eds).Google Scholar
2009 The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure, and Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit, Vangsnes Øystein & Lohndal, Terje
2012 Norwegian som: The complementizer that climbed to the matrix Left Periphery and caused Verb Second violations. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi in the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Siena: CISCL Publications, University of Siena.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike
2009 Grammatical innovation in multiethnic urban Europe: New linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua 119: 782–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna L., Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar H., Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg
2007 Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 203–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2015 Microvariation in Medieval Romance Syntax: A Comparative Study. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
2016 Towards a new typology of verb second systems. Talk presented at Rethinking Verb Second: Assessing the Theory and Data, Cambridge, 20–22 March 2016.
2017 Redefining the typology of V2 languages: The view from Romance and beyond. In Linguistic Variation, Christine Salvesen (ed.). Special Issue A Micro-Perspective on V2 in Germanic and Romance.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1997 Contrastive dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk Van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds), 119–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zompì, Stanislao
2017 Case Decomposition Meets Dependent-case Theories: A Study of the Syntax–Morphology Interface. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale, University of Pisa.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1992 Subject initial verb second in West Flemish: A reply to Haegeman. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 35: 72–91.Google Scholar
1993 Verb movement and complementizer agreement. In Papers on Case and Agreement [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18], Jonathan D. Bobaljik & Colin Phillips (eds), 296–341. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
1997 Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar