Cover not available
Part of
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 7–30

Informal formal conversation on Syntax-Semantics

| University of Massachusetts at Amherst
| Collège de France, Paris
| Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina/CNPq
| Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
| Macau University of Science and Technology
Article outline
  • 1.Opening remarks
  • 2.Left periphery and the semantics of topic
  • 3.Speech reports and freezing effects
  • 4.Epistemology of linguistics
  • 5.Cinque’s hierarchy
  • 6.Universal grammar, principles and parameters
  • 7.Syntax, semantics and cognition
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.260.01kra
References (37)
References
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara. 2010a. Is Topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Topics, phases, and contexts of interpretation. Presentation at the GLOW33 Workshop on Recursivity of Information Structure, 12 April, University of Potsdam.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. What Principles and Parameters got wrong. Ms, ICEA-UAB.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax. Case studies in Semitic and Romance Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 1986. Some properties of the Italian pronominal system: An analysis based on the notion of thema as subject of predication. In Tema-Rema in Italiano, Harro Stammerjohann (ed.), 25–36. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic’ parameter. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta. Contemporary Issues in Natural Language Semantics: an interview with Gennaro Chierchia. in press. To appear in DELTA.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–133. San Francisco CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Constant, Noah. 2014. Contrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. <[URL]> (5 December 2019).
Frascarelli, Mara. 2012. The interpretation of discourse categories: Cartography for a crash-proof syntax In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 180–191. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. <[URL]> (5 December 2019).
Fox, Danny. 2003. On logical form. In Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 82–123. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 40–70. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1978. Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Königstein im Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
. 1991. Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marques, Rui. 2012. Covert modals and (non-)implicative readings of too/enough constructions. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 238–266. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1970. English as a formal language. In Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, Bruno Visentini (ed.), 188–221. Milan: Edizioni di Communità.Google Scholar
. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Approaches to Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, Jaako Hintikka, Julian Moravcsik & Patrick Supper (eds), 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mortari, Cezar & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta. 2014. Operadores modais: sistemas formais e línguas naturais. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem 12: 159–185.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2016. Modification. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2004. Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation. In Language Variation Yearbook, Vol. 4, Pierre Pica, Johan Rooryck & Jeroen van Craenenbroek (eds), 181–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1994. Zero Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Scarduelli, Jacqueline. 2008. Explicando as diferenças semânticas entre ter que e deve: Uma proposta em semântica de mundos possíveis. Alfa. Revista de Linguística 52: 215–236.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3: Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014. Some consequences of criterial Freezing: asymmetries, anti-adjacency, and extraction from cleft sentences. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9: Functional Structure from Top to Toe, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 19-45. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2008. AdvPs aspectuais, habituais como modalizadores inerentes: Um estudo translinguístico. MA thesis, Unicamp, Campinas.Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquile & Quadros Gomes, Ana. 2017. Habitual aspectual adverbs: A class of modal adverbs? Ms.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Staps, Camil & Johan Rooryck
2023. The interpretation of [+distal] in demonstratives and complementizers. Linguistics 61:5 ► pp. 1195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.