Chapter published in:
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 730
References
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010aIs Topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.Google Scholar
2010bTopics, phases, and contexts of interpretation. Presentation at the GLOW33 Workshop on Recursivity of Information Structure, 12 April, University of Potsdam.
Boeckx, Cedric
2010What Principles and Parameters got wrong. Ms, ICEA-UAB.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax. Case studies in Semitic and Romance Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1986Some properties of the Italian pronominal system: An analysis based on the notion of thema as subject of predication. In Tema-Rema in Italiano, Harro Stammerjohann (ed.), 25–36. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic’ parameter. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta. Contemporary Issues in Natural Language Semantics: an interview with Gennaro Chierchia
in press. To appear in DELTA.
Chomsky, Noam
1977On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–133. San Francisco CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Constant, Noah
2014Contrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. https://​scholarworks​.umass​.edu​/dissertations​_2​/171> (5 December 2019).
Frascarelli, Mara
2012The interpretation of discourse categories: Cartography for a crash-proof syntax In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 180–191. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai
1994Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/jA3N2IwN​/fintel​-1994​-thesis​.pdf> (5 December 2019).
Fox, Danny
2003On logical form. In Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 82–123. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 40–70. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2006Aspects of Modality. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1978Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie – Modalwörter – Konditionalsätze. Königstein im Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
1991Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 639–650. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1973Counterfactuals. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
May, Robert
1985Logical Form. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marques, Rui
2012Covert modals and (non-)implicative readings of too/enough constructions. In Covert Patterns of Modality, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 238–266. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard
1970English as a formal language. In Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, Bruno Visentini (ed.), 188–221. Milan: Edizioni di Communità.Google Scholar
1973The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Approaches to Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, Jaako Hintikka, Julian Moravcsik & Patrick Supper (eds), 221–242. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortari, Cezar & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2014Operadores modais: sistemas formais e línguas naturais. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem 12: 159–185.Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin
2016Modification. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2004Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation. In Language Variation Yearbook, Vol. 4, Pierre Pica, Johan Rooryck & Jeroen van Craenenbroek (eds), 181–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1994Zero Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Scarduelli, Jacqueline
2008Explicando as diferenças semânticas entre ter que e deve: Uma proposta em semântica de mundos possíveis. Alfa. Revista de Linguística 52: 215–236.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3: Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014Some consequences of criterial Freezing: asymmetries, anti-adjacency, and extraction from cleft sentences. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9: Functional Structure from Top to Toe, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 19-45. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy
1981Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2008AdvPs aspectuais, habituais como modalizadores inerentes: Um estudo translinguístico. MA thesis, Unicamp, Campinas.Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquile & Quadros Gomes, Ana
2017Habitual aspectual adverbs: A class of modal adverbs? Ms.Google Scholar