Cover not available
Part of
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 107–134

Chapter 4
Brazilian double subjects and sentence structure

| Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina | CNPq
This research investigates syntactic, semantic, and prosodic evidence of double subject sentences in Brazilian Portuguese. The paper verifies whether (i) such constructions can be analyzed as left dislocation; (ii) the pre-verbal subject behaves as a topic; (iii) the subject has the same behavior as the dislocated object with the resumption of the pronoun; (iv) the resumptive pronoun that resumes the pre-verbal subject is a clitic (a nucleus, weak pronoun) or a strong pronoun, filling the position of specifier. Cartography is the theoretical background (Rizzi 1997, 2001; Cardinaletti 1997, 2004; Rizzi & Shlonsky 2006, 2007). The paper concludes that there are two distinct sentence structures in BP: a left dislocated topic, and a simple double subject.
Keywords: double subjects, topic, cartography, subject positions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject doubling in Brazilian Portuguese
    • 2.1Current positions on the status of double subject sentences
    • 2.2A new hypothesis and some questions
  • 3.The cartography of subject positions
  • 4.A cartography analysis of the double subject sentences
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.260.04qua
References (82)
References
Barbosa, Pilar, Duarte, Maria Eugênia & Kato, Mary. 2005. Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese, In Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, v. 4 (2), p. 11-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahtchevanova, Mariana & van Gelderen, Elly. 2016. The interaction between the French subject and object cycles. In Cyclical Change Continued [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 113–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null Subjects. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Psych verbs and Ɵ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Chesi, Cristiano. 2012. Subject islands and the subject criterion. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 25–53. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Cordin, Patrizia. 1989. Two Italian dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In The Null Subject Parameter [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15], Osvaldo A. Jaeggli & Ken J. Safir (eds), 111–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra. 2009. Estratégias de Focalização em Português Brasileiro – Uma Abordagem Cartográfica. PhD dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Britto, Helena. 1998. Deslocados à esquerda, resumptivo sujeito, ordem SV e a codificação sintática de juízos categórico e tético no Português do Brasil. Ms, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2006. Do subjects have a place in spanish. In New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics, Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 275], Jean-Pierre Montreuil & Chiyo Nishida (eds), 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Null Subjects. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The null subject parameter revisited: The evolution from null subject Spanish and Portuguese to Dominican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. In The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds), 27–48. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–65. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Variation in the syntax of subjects. Paper presented in Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais (NEG), UFSC-Florianópolis.
. 2014. Cross-linguistic variation in the syntax of subjects. Inf Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 82–107. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 41–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Costa, João. 2001. Spec, IP ou Deslocado? Prós e contras das duas análises dos sujeitos pré-verbais. DELTA 17(1): 283–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. PB e PE: Orientação para o discurso importa? Estudos da Língua(gem) – Estados diacrônicos e sincrônicos da Língua Portuguesa 8(1): 123–143.Google Scholar
Costa, João & Duarte, Inês. 2002. Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 159–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João, Duarte, Inês & Silva, Cláudia Rodrigues. 2006. Construções de redobro em português brasileiro: sujeitos tópicos vs soletração do traço pessoa. Revista leitura, Maceió, n. 33, p. 135-145.Google Scholar
De Cat, Cecile. 2003. French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of New York.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia. 1993. Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: A trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. In Português Brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrônica, Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds), 107–128. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
. 1995. A perda do princípio “Evite pronome” no Português Brasileiro. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
. 2000. The loss of the “avoid pronoun” principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, Mary A. Kato & Esmeralda Negrão (eds), 17–36. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia & Soares da Silva, Humberto. 2016. Microparametric variation in Spanish and Portuguese: The null subject parameter and the role of the verb inflectional paradigm. In: Kato, M. ORDONEZ, Francisco (Orgs). The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America. Oxford University Press, p. 1-26.Google Scholar
Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina. 1996. A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: Frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas, São Paulo: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Fuchsberger, Gabriel. 2018. Some considerations on the generic reference subject in Brazilian Portuguese: a cartographic approach. Poster presented in the 12th Workshop on Formal Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth. 2000. The Change from Pronoun to Clitic to prefix and the Rise of Null Subjects in Spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte. 2001. Ensaios sobre as gramáticas do português. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary A. 1998. Tópicos como predicados alçados. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 34: 67–76.Google Scholar
2015. Expletivos nulos e construções de tópico/sujeito no português brasileiro. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 57(1): 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary. 2001. Nomes e pronomes na aquisição. Letras de hoje (125), Porto Alegre, v. 36/3, p. 101-112.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary A. & Negrão, Esmeralda. 2000. Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2001. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel Epstein & Daniel Seely (eds), 133–166. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1996. The Focus Operator and Information Focus. In Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 3,2. Budapest University.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. Subject in Japanese and English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. 1994. Morphosyntactic variation. In: Beals et al. (orgs.). Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol 2 . 180-201.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S-Yuki. 1972. The Categorical and The Thetic Judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153-85.Google Scholar
. 1988. Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47. Reprinted in Poser, William J. (ed.). 1988. Japanese Syntax, 103–144. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong. In: M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (edSALT IV: 220-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Man-Ki. 2016. Spanish clitic left dislocation as a non-quantificational A’-movement. Language Research 52(2): 283–310.Google Scholar
Lunguinho, Marcus Vinícius & Medeiros Junior, Paulo. 2009. Inventou um novo tipo de sujeito: características sintáticas e semânticas de uma estratégia de indeterminação do sujeito no português brasileiro. Revista de Estudos em Língua e Literatura, v. 23, 147-191.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Savoia, Leonardo Maria. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, 3 Vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1997. Subjecthoodand subject positions. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 1990. Nominative pronouns reduction in Brazilian Portuguese. University of Maryland. Ms.Google Scholar
. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of New York.Google Scholar
Pilati, Eloisa & Naves, Rozana. 2013. Desenvolvendo a hipótese da cisão da categoria pronominal no português brasileiro. In Estudos e Pesquisas em Teoria da Gramática, Maria Denilda Moura & Marcelo Sibaldo (eds), 233–253. Maceió: EDUFAL.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrísio. 2007. The subject, it is here! The varying structural positions of preverbal subjects. DELTA 23: 113–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontes, Eunice. 1987. O tópico no português brasileiro. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–474.Google Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra. 2005. Focalização do Sujeito no Português Brasileiro. Master dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
. 2009. Estratégias de Focalização em Português Brasileiro – Uma Abordagem Cartográfica. PhD dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
. 2017. A arquitetura da sentença no Português Brasileiro: Considerações sobre Sujeito e Tópico. Revista Letras, Curitiba, UFPR 96: 196–218.Google Scholar
. 2018. A cartografia das posições de sujeito nas sentenças com redobro em português brasileiro. Communication presented in Encontro Nacional do Grupo de Trabalho de Teoria da Gramática da ANPOLL. Florianópolis.
. 2019. Um novo olhar sobre as sentenças com redobro em Português Brasileiro. Revista Anpoll 1(48): 52–63.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2017. Non-topicalized preverbal subjects in Brazilian Portuguese, compared to Italian. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale 51: 383–409.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. On the position of int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2005. On some properties of subjects and topics. In Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 203–224. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In On Wh-Movement, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. Some consequences of criterial freezing: Asymmetries, anti- adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 19–45. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. Subjects, Topics and the interpretation of pro. In From Sounds to Structures: Beyond the Veil of Maya [Studies in Generative Grammar 135], Roberto Petrosino, Pietro Cerrone & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 510–530. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2006. Satisfying the subject criterion by a non subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341–361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan. 1983. The Syntactic Forms of Predication. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés. 2016. On the notion of partial (non-) pro-drop in Romance. In The Morphosyntax Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds), 49–77. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saccon, Graziella. 1993. Post-verbal Subjects. A Study Based on Italian and its Dialects. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2000. The locus of case and agrément. In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65:65-108.Google Scholar
Silva, Cláudia. 2006. Duplicação de sujeitos pré-verbais no francês, no inglês e no português brasileiro: Uma análise não-unificada. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 14(2): 185–210. Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2000. Subject positions and copular constructions. In Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert & Eric Reuland (eds.), Interface strategies, 325–347. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 425–449.Google Scholar
Souza, Elizete Maria. 2007. O uso do pronome ‘eles’ como recurso de indeterminação do sujeito. MA thesis, Faculdade de Letras da UFMG, Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 2003. The lexical preverbal subject in a Romance Null Subject language. In A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use: Selected Papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Chicago, 19–22 April, 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis Lópes & Richard Cameron (eds), 341–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Vitral, Lorenzo & Ramos, Jânia. 2006. Gramaticalização: uma abordagem formal. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras FALE/UFMG.Google Scholar