Chapter published in:
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 107–134

Chapter 4
Brazilian double subjects and sentence structure

| Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina | CNPq
This research investigates syntactic, semantic, and prosodic evidence of double subject sentences in Brazilian Portuguese. The paper verifies whether (i) such constructions can be analyzed as left dislocation; (ii) the pre-verbal subject behaves as a topic; (iii) the subject has the same behavior as the dislocated object with the resumption of the pronoun; (iv) the resumptive pronoun that resumes the pre-verbal subject is a clitic (a nucleus, weak pronoun) or a strong pronoun, filling the position of specifier. Cartography is the theoretical background (Rizzi 1997, 2001; Cardinaletti 1997, 2004; Rizzi & Shlonsky 2006, 2007). The paper concludes that there are two distinct sentence structures in BP: a left dislocated topic, and a simple double subject.
Keywords: double subjects, topic, cartography, subject positions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject doubling in Brazilian Portuguese
    • 2.1Current positions on the status of double subject sentences
    • 2.2A new hypothesis and some questions
  • 3.The cartography of subject positions
  • 4.A cartography analysis of the double subject sentences
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 08 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.260.04qua
References
Barbosa, Pilar, Duarte, Maria Eugênia & Kato, Mary
2005 Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese, In Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, v. 4 (2), p. 11-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahtchevanova, Mariana & van Gelderen, Elly
2016 The interaction between the French subject and object cycles. In Cyclical Change Continued [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 113–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
1995 Null Subjects. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1988 Psych verbs and Ɵ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Chesi, Cristiano
2012 Subject islands and the subject criterion. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 25–53. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Cordin, Patrizia
1989 Two Italian dialects and the Null Subject Parameter. In The Null Subject Parameter [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15], Osvaldo A. Jaeggli & Ken J. Safir (eds), 111–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra
2009 Estratégias de Focalização em Português Brasileiro – Uma Abordagem Cartográfica. PhD dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Britto, Helena
1998 Deslocados à esquerda, resumptivo sujeito, ordem SV e a codificação sintática de juízos categórico e tético no Português do Brasil. Ms, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Camacho, José
2006 Do subjects have a place in spanish. In New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics, Vol. I: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 275], Jean-Pierre Montreuil & Chiyo Nishida (eds), 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Null Subjects. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 The null subject parameter revisited: The evolution from null subject Spanish and Portuguese to Dominican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. In The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds), 27–48. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997 Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004 Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–65. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012 Variation in the syntax of subjects. Paper presented in Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais (NEG), UFSC-Florianópolis.
2014 Cross-linguistic variation in the syntax of subjects. Inf Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 82–107. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999 The typology of structural deficiency: A case of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 41–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Costa, João
2001 Spec, IP ou Deslocado? Prós e contras das duas análises dos sujeitos pré-verbais. DELTA 17(1): 283–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 PB e PE: Orientação para o discurso importa? Estudos da Língua(gem) – Estados diacrônicos e sincrônicos da Língua Portuguesa 8(1): 123–143.Google Scholar
Costa, João & Duarte, Inês
2002 Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 159–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, João, Duarte, Inês & Silva, Cláudia Rodrigues
2006 Construções de redobro em português brasileiro: sujeitos tópicos vs soletração do traço pessoa. Revista leitura, Maceió, n. 33, p. 135-145.Google Scholar
De Cat, Cecile
2003 French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of New York.Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia
1993 Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: A trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. In Português Brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrônica, Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds), 107–128. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
1995 A perda do princípio “Evite pronome” no Português Brasileiro. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
2000 The loss of the “avoid pronoun” principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, Mary A. Kato & Esmeralda Negrão (eds), 17–36. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia & Soares da Silva, Humberto
2016 Microparametric variation in Spanish and Portuguese: The null subject parameter and the role of the verb inflectional paradigm. In: Kato, M. ORDONEZ, Francisco (Orgs). The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America. Oxford University Press, p. 1-26.Google Scholar
Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina
1996 A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: Frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas, São Paulo: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Fuchsberger, Gabriel
2018 Some considerations on the generic reference subject in Brazilian Portuguese: a cartographic approach. Poster presented in the 12th Workshop on Formal Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, Bonnibeth
2000 The Change from Pronoun to Clitic to prefix and the Rise of Null Subjects in Spoken Swiss French. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte
2001 Ensaios sobre as gramáticas do português. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary A.
1998 Tópicos como predicados alçados. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 34: 67–76.Google Scholar
2015 Expletivos nulos e construções de tópico/sujeito no português brasileiro. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 57(1): 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary
2001 Nomes e pronomes na aquisição. Letras de hoje (125), Porto Alegre, v. 36/3, p. 101-112.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary A. & Negrão, Esmeralda
2000 Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2001 Pronouns and their antecedents. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel Epstein & Daniel Seely (eds), 133–166. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
1996 The Focus Operator and Information Focus. In Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 3,2. Budapest University.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa
1986 Subject in Japanese and English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
1991 The position of subjects. Lingua 85: 211–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A.
1994 Morphosyntactic variation. In: Beals et al. (orgs.). Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol 2 . 180-201.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S-Yuki
1972 The Categorical and The Thetic Judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153-85.Google Scholar
1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Linguisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47. Reprinted in Poser, William J. (ed.) 1988 Japanese Syntax, 103–144. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William
1994 Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong. In: M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (edSALT IV: 220-29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Man-Ki
2016 Spanish clitic left dislocation as a non-quantificational A’-movement. Language Research 52(2): 283–310.Google Scholar
Lunguinho, Marcus Vinícius & Medeiros Junior, Paulo
2009 Inventou um novo tipo de sujeito: características sintáticas e semânticas de uma estratégia de indeterminação do sujeito no português brasileiro. Revista de Estudos em Língua e Literatura, v. 23, 147-191.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Savoia, Leonardo Maria
2005 I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, 3 Vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James
1997 Subjecthoodand subject positions. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
1990 Nominative pronouns reduction in Brazilian Portuguese. University of Maryland. Ms.Google Scholar
2004 Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1997 Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, University of New York.Google Scholar
Pilati, Eloisa & Naves, Rozana
2013 Desenvolvendo a hipótese da cisão da categoria pronominal no português brasileiro. In Estudos e Pesquisas em Teoria da Gramática, Maria Denilda Moura & Marcelo Sibaldo (eds), 233–253. Maceió: EDUFAL.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrísio
2007 The subject, it is here! The varying structural positions of preverbal subjects. DELTA 23: 113–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pontes, Eunice
1987 O tópico no português brasileiro. Campinas: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–474.Google Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra
2005 Focalização do Sujeito no Português Brasileiro. Master dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
2009 Estratégias de Focalização em Português Brasileiro – Uma Abordagem Cartográfica. PhD dissertation, UFSC, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
2017 A arquitetura da sentença no Português Brasileiro: Considerações sobre Sujeito e Tópico. Revista Letras, Curitiba, UFPR 96: 196–218.Google Scholar
2018 A cartografia das posições de sujeito nas sentenças com redobro em português brasileiro. Communication presented in Encontro Nacional do Grupo de Trabalho de Teoria da Gramática da ANPOLL . Florianópolis.
2019 Um novo olhar sobre as sentenças com redobro em Português Brasileiro. Revista Anpoll 1(48): 52–63.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quarezemin, Sandra & Cardinaletti, Anna
2017 Non-topicalized preverbal subjects in Brazilian Portuguese, compared to Italian. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale 51: 383–409.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 On the position of int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2005 On some properties of subjects and topics. In Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 203–224. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In On Wh-Movement, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2014 Some consequences of criterial freezing: Asymmetries, anti- adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 19–45. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018a Subjects, Topics and the interpretation of pro. In From Sounds to Structures: Beyond the Veil of Maya [Studies in Generative Grammar 135], Roberto Petrosino, Pietro Cerrone & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 510–530. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006 Satisfying the subject criterion by a non subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341–361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010 Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
1983 The Syntactic Forms of Predication. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés
2016 On the notion of partial (non-) pro-drop in Romance. In The Morphosyntax Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds), 49–77. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saccon, Graziella
1993 Post-verbal Subjects. A Study Based on Italian and its Dialects. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2000 The locus of case and agrément. In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65:65-108.Google Scholar
Silva, Cláudia
2006 Duplicação de sujeitos pré-verbais no francês, no inglês e no português brasileiro: Uma análise não-unificada. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 14(2): 185–210. Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur.
2000 Subject positions and copular constructions. In Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert & Eric Reuland (eds.), Interface strategies, 325–347. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1988 A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 425–449.Google Scholar
Souza, Elizete Maria
2007 O uso do pronome ‘eles’ como recurso de indeterminação do sujeito. MA thesis, Faculdade de Letras da UFMG, Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
2003 The lexical preverbal subject in a Romance Null Subject language. In A Romance Perspective on Language Knowledge and Use: Selected Papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Chicago, 19–22 April, 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 238], Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis Lópes & Richard Cameron (eds), 341–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995 Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Vitral, Lorenzo & Ramos, Jânia
2006 Gramaticalização: uma abordagem formal. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras FALE/UFMG.Google Scholar