What this volume is about
Article outline
- Leading ideas and main concepts
- Part 1.Logic and philosophical background
- Part 2.Impersonal constructions and types of copula
- Part 3.From logic content to linguistic form
- Part 4.The logic-linguistics relation across languages
- Part 5.Lexical links to attitudinality
-
Notes
-
References
References (29)
References
Brentano, Franz. 1874. Psychologie
vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bühler, Karl 1934[2011]. Theory
of Language: The Representational Function of Language, 2nd rev.
edn [Foundations of Semiotics 25], trans. Donald Fraser Goodwin, in collaboration with Achim Eschbach; with a preface by Werner Abraham. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in
English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Brennan, Susan E. 1991. Grounding in
communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared
Cognition, Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds), 127–149. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of
ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hatch, Rebecca. 2014. Theticity
in Tiriyó: An Empirical Investigation. BA thesis, University of Oregon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heidegger, Martin. 1912[1978]. Frühe
Schriften (1912–1916), Martin Heidegger,
Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Klostermann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irwin, Patricia. 2012. Unaccusativity
at the Interfaces. PhD dissertation, New York University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kučanda, Dubravko. 1990. On
the subject of existential there
. In Working
with Functional Grammar: Descriptive and Computational Applications, Mike Hannay & Elseline Vester (eds), 73–86. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The
categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of
Language 9: 153–185.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ladusaw, William. 1994. Thetic
and categorical, stage and individual, weak and
strong. In Proceedings from SALT 4, Mandy Harvey & Lynn Santelmann (eds), 220–229. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lotze, Rudolf Hermann. 1843[1989]. Logik. Erstes Buch: Vom
Denken (Reihe Logik), with an introduction by Georg Misch; newly edited
by G. Gabriel [Philosophische
Bibliothek
421]. Hamburg: Meiner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marty, Anton. 1884–1897. Über
subjectlose Sätze and das Verhältnis der Grammatik and Psychologie [Sieben Aufsätze, 1884 and
1894/95 in der Vierteljahrschrift for wissenschaftliche Philosophie
erschienen]; Über Scheidung von grammatischem, logischem und psychologischem Subject resp.
Praedicat. (Zwei Aufsätze, appeared 1897 in Archiv for systematische
Philosophie
, Vol. 3, 174–190 and 294–333).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard. 2010. Über
thetische and categoricale Äußerungen im Spanischen (Ha muerto Franco vs. Franco ha muerto). <[URL]> (19 March 2020).
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The
Raising of
Predicates. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onoe, Keisuke. 1973. Bunkaku
to ketsubun no waku – ‘wa’ to ‘ga’ no yoohoo o megutte (Sentence kernel and sentence frame – especially about the use of
“wa” and “ga”). Gengo Kenkyu (Journal of the Linguistic Society of
Japan) 63: 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Craig. 2012. Information
structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and
Pragmatics 5(6): 1–69.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. 1907. Vom Ich als Prinzip der
Philosophie oder über das Unbedingte im menschlichen Wissen. In Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling: Werke, Band 1. Leipzig: Cott.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmitz, Kenneth L. 1974. Enriching the
copula. The Review of
Metaphysics 27(3): 495–512 (
A
Commemorative Issue: Thomas Aquinas
).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigwart, Christoph. 1888. Die
Impersonalien. Eine logische
Untersuchung. Freiburg: Mohr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common
ground. Linguistics and
Philosophy 25: 701–721. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanaka, Shin. 2020. B-grade
subjects” and theticity. In Thetics and
Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262], Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss & Yasuhiro Fujinawa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Daniel. 2018. Copular
and Existential Sentences in Biblical Hebrew. PhD
dissertation, University of the Free State Bloemfontein, South Africa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika. 2001. Die
Syntax der dritten Konstruktion: Eine repräsen-tationelle Analyse zur Monosententialität von “zu”-Infinitiven im
Deutschen [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik
63]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zimmermann, Albert. 1986. Einleitung
zu Thomas von Aquin (1256–1259): Von der Wahrheit (De veritate (Quaestio
I)). Lateinisch- Deutsch [Philosophische Bibliothek
384]. Hamburg: Meiner.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.