Cover not available
Part of
Beyond Emotions in Language: Psychological verbs at the interfaces
Edited by Bożena Rozwadowska and Anna Bondaruk
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 263] 2020
► pp. 113–140

Chapter 4
Initiators, states and passives in Spanish psych verbs

| University of Tromsø – Norway’s Arctic University
| CNRS (UMR STL 8163 & Université de Lille
The goal here is twofold: the first one is to point out the existence of at least two classes of Object Experiencer psychological verbs (henceforth, OEPV) in Spanish with respect to their passive behavior, casting doubt on Landau (2010), who proposes that passivization of OEPVs correlates with the availability of pseudo-passives in a language. The second one is to argue that passives of OEPVs match the aspectual and argumental properties of verbs in such a way that the verbs which do not satisfy the condition that passives must involve events in Spanish must build those events through a repetitive, pluractional interpretation.
Keywords: psych predicates, onset boundary, passives, pluractionality, agentivity
Article outline
  • 1.The problem
  • 2.Class 1 (acosar): Verbs that allow passive in an unrestricted way
  • 3.Class 2 (sorprender ‘surprise’): Verbs that only admit non-specific passives
  • 4.The two subclasses in group 3 (enfadar and aburrir): Verbs that reject the passive form
  • 5.Analysis
  • 6. How to obtain an eventive process if there is none
  • 7. Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.263.04fab
References
Acedo-Matellán, V.
(2016) The morphosyntax of transitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, T.
(1992) The syntax of Norwegian passive constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alarcos, E.
(1970) Estudios de gramática funcional del español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Arad, M.
(1998) VP-structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. London: University College London.Google Scholar
(1999) What counts as a class? The case of psych verbs. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 35, 1–23.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
(1988) Psych-verbs and Theta Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., & Lenci A.
(2011) Habituality, pluractionality and imperfectivity. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 852–881). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brucart, J. M.
(1990) Pasividad y atribución en español: Un análisis generativo. In V. Demonte, & V. Garza (Eds.), Estudios de lingüística de España y de México (pp. 179–208). México: Colegio de México. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G.
(2011) Habitual and generic aspect. In R. Binnick (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect (pp. 828–852). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R.
(2015) Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review, 32(2), 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish. Linguistics, 55(3), 451–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, H.
(1996) Psychological predicates and the syntax-semantics interface. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 131–147). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
García Pardo, A.
(2018)  The morphosyntax of the Spanish verb phrase (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Gómez Torrego, L.
(1988) Perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
(1990) Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landau, I.
(2002) A typology of psych passives. In The Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, NELS 32 (pp. 271–286). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
(2010) The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lázaro Carreter, F.
(1980) Estudios de lingüística. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Marín, R.
(2010) Spanish adjectives within bounds. In P. Cabredo & O. Matushansky (Eds.), Adjectives. Formal analyses in syntax and semantics (pp. 307–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín, R., & McNally, L.
(2005) The Aktionsart of Spanish reflexive psychological verbs and their English counterparts. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 9 ), pp. 212–225). Nijmegen: NCS.Google Scholar
(2011) Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 467–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meinschäfer, J.
(2006) Event-oriented adjectives and the semantics of deverbal nouns in Germanic and Romance: The role of boundedness and the mass/count distinction. In A. Thorton & M. Grossmann (Eds.), La formazione delle parole (pp. 355–368). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Navas Ruiz, R.
(1987) Usos de ‘ser’ y ‘estar’. Madrid: SGEL.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
(1995) Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñón, C.
(1997) Achievements in an event semantics. In A. Lawson & E. Cho (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 7 (pp. 273–296). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
(1991) The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 21, 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L.
(2000) On stativity and causation. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects (pp. 417–442). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G.
(2008) First phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothmayr, A.
(2009) The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, B.
(2003) Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In P. Kosta, J. Błaszczak, J. Frasek, L. Geist, & M. Żygis (Eds.), Investigations into formal Slavic linguistics (pp. 859–872). Berlin: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
(2012) On the onset of psych eventualities. In E. Cyran, H. Kardela, & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Sound structure and sense (pp. 533–554). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F.
(2008) The syntax of anticausatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tenny, C.
(1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Valin, R., & R. LaPolla
(1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning and functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Bondaruk, Anna
2020. Chapter 5. The syntax of accusative and dative Experiencers in Polish. In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L.
2020. Chapter 6. The information structure of high and low datives and their psychological import. In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Rozwadowska, Bożena
2020. Chapter 2. Polish psych verbs as non-achievements. In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.