References
Adger, D., & Ramchand, G. (2003). Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 325–360. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adger, D., & Ramchand, G. (2006). Psych nouns and predication. In C. Davis, A.-R. Deal, & Y. Zabbal (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 36 (pp. 89–102). Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2004). Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 116–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Sevdali, C. (2014). Opaque and transparent datives, and how they behave in passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 17, 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2015). External arguments in transitivity alternations. A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antonyuk, S. (2015).
Quantifier scope and scope freezing in Russian
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sony Brook University.
Arad, M. (1998). Psych-notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 203–223.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Babby, L. (1989/2002). Subjectless external subcategorization, and the Projection Principle. Zbornik Matice Srpske za Filologiju i Lingvistiku, 32, 7–40 (reprinted in Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10, 341–388).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2012). Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In L. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, & C. Poletto (Eds.), Functional heads and the cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 7, pp. 129–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, H. (2004). Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 84–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biały, A. (2005). Polish psychological verbs at the lexicon-syntax interface in cross-linguistic perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Błaszczak, J. (2007).
Phase syntax: The Polish genitive of negation
(Habilitation dissertation). Universität Potsdam.
Bondaruk, A. (2013). Copular clauses in English and Polish. Structure, derivation and interpretation. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., & Szymanek, B. (2007). Polish nominativeless constructions with dative Experiencers: Form, meaning and structure. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 4, 61–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., & Rozwadowska, B. (2018a). Heterogeneity of states in Polish stative passives. In W. Guz, & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Canonical and non-canonical structures in Polish (pp. 33–53). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., & Rozwadowska, B. (2018b). Stative and eventive passives of Subject Experiencer verbs in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(4), 437–467. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., & Rozwadowska, B. (2019). Stative and eventive passives with Subject and Object Experiencer verbs in Polish. In A. Bondaruk & K. Jaskuła (Eds.), All around the word. Papers in honour of Bogdan Szymanek on his 65th birthday (pp. 47–78). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., Rozwadowska, B., & Witkowski, W. (2017a). Passivization of Polish Object Experiencer verbs vs. the unaccusativity hypothesis (Part 1). Studies in Polish Linguistics, 12(2), 57–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., Rozwadowska, B., & Witkowski, W.. (2017b). Passivisation of Polish Object Experiencer verbs vs. the unaccusativity hypothesis (Part 2). Studies in Polish Linguistics, 12(3), 123–144.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brame, M. (1977). Alternatives to the tensed S and specified subject condition. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 381–411. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruening, B. (2014). Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 32, 363–422. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bunčić, D. (2015). “To mamy wpajane od dziecka” – a recipient passive in Polish? Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 60(3), 411–431. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A Government and Binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büring, D. (2004). Crossover situations. Natural Language Semantics, 12, 23–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cetnarowska, B. (2000). The unergative/unaccusative distinction in Polish. In P. Bański & A. Przepiórkowski (Eds.), Proceedings of GLiP-1 (pp. 35–46). Warszawa: IPIPAN.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cetnarowska, B. (2002). Unaccusativity mismatches and unaccusativity diagnostics from derivational morphology. In P. Boucher & M. Plénat (Eds.), Many morphologies (pp. 48–81). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheung, Chi-Han C., & Larson, R. K. (2015). Psych verbs in English and Mandarin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 127–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale. A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 134–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2015). Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honor of Adriana Belletti (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Á. J. Gallego & D. Ott (Eds.), Generative syntax: Questions, crossroads, and challenges. Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2019. (pp. 229–261). Retrieved from <[URL]> (18 June 2017). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Citko, B. (2014). Phase Theory. An introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Citko, B., Germain, A., & Witkoś, J. (2018). If you cannot agree, move on! On labels and non-nominative subjects. Glossa, 3(1), 28, 1–46.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to passive in English. Syntax, 8, 81–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuervo, M. C. (2003).
Datives at large
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Cuervo, M. C. (2010). Some dative subjects are born, some are made. In C. Borgonovo, M. Espaňol-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 26–37). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Despić, M. (2011).
Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.
Despić, M. (2013). Binding and the structure of NP in Serbo-Croatian. Linguistic Inquiry, 44, 239–270. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Despić, M. (2015). Phases, reflexives and definiteness. Syntax, 18(3), 201–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dziwirek, K. (1994). Polish subjects. New York, NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 355–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Everaert, M. (1991). Nominative anaphors in Icelandic: Morphology or syntax. In W. Abraham, W. Kosmeijer, & E. J. Reuland (Eds.), Issues in Germanic syntax (pp. 277–305). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R. (2017). Datives and stativity in psych predicates. Retrieved from <[URL]> (20 April, 2020).
Fábregas, A., Jiménez Fernández, Á. L., & Tubino-Blanco, M. (2017). What’s up with dative Experiencers? In R. E. V. Lopes, J. Ornelas de Avelar, & S. M. L. Cyrino (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil (pp. 29–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, D., & Sauerland, U. (1996). Illusive scope of universal quantifiers. In K. Kusumoto (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 26 (pp. 71–85). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frąckowiak, E. (2015).
Understanding situation and viewpoint aspect in Polish through dative anticausative constructions and factual imperfectives
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa.
Germain, A. (2017).
Non-nominative subjects in Russian and Lithuanian: Case, argument structure and anaphor binding
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington.
Giorgi, A. (1984). Toward a theory of long distance anaphors: A GB approach. The Linguistic Review, 3, 307–361. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gogłoza, A. (2018). Peeling of subject case: Marked subjects in Polish. In A. Bloch-Rozmej, & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Studies in formal linguistics: Universal patterns and language specific parameters (pp. 91–111). Berlin: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gogłoza, A., & Łęska, P. (2018). Binding by objects in Polish DOCs and please-type double object unaccusatives – Testing theoretical accounts. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(4), 509–540. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grafmiller, J. (2013).
The semantics and syntactic choice. An analysis of English emotion verbs
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Haegeman, L. (1986). The double object construction in West Flemish. The Linguistic Review, 5, 281–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haider, H. (1985). The case of German. In J. Toman (Ed.), Studies in German grammar (pp. 65–101). Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, N. (1995). Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwata, S. (1995). The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis, 1–2, 95–120.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez Fernández Á. L., & Rozwadowska, B. (2016). The information structure of Dative Experiencer psych verbs. In B. Cetnarowska, M. Kuczok, & M. Zabawa (Eds.), Various dimensions of contrastive studies (pp. 100–122). Katowice: Wydawinctwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez Fernández Á. L., & Rozwadowska, B. (2017). On subject properties of datives in psych verbs: A comparative approach. Acta Linguistica Academica, 64(2), 233–256. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johanessen, J. B. (1993).
Coordination. A minimalist approach
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo.
Johanessen, J. B. (1998). Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurczyk, R. (2015). The logical-semantic content of subject: A configurational view from syntax and LF. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 51(1), 89–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibort, A. (2004).
Passive and passive-like constructions in English and Polish
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge.
Kim, K. (2011). High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives. Lingua, 121, 487–510. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, K. (2017). Non-oblique syntax for a dative experiencer in Korean. Linguistic Research, 34(1), 77–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klimek, D., & Rozwadowska, B. (2004). From psych adjectives to psych verbs. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 39, 59–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1982). Variables and the Bijection Principle. The Linguistic Review, 2, 139–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koster, J. (1978). Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, A. (2000). Building statives. Proceedings of Berkley Linguistics Society, 26, 385–399. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kučerová, I. (2012). Grammatical marking of givenness. Natural Language Semantics, 20(1), 1–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, I. (2000). Elements of control. Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, I. (2010a). The locative syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, I. (2010b). The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 357–388. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laskowski, R. (1998). Kategorie morfologiczne języka polskiego – Charakterystyka funkcjonalna [Morphological categories of Polish – Functional characteristics]. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, & H. Wróbel (Eds.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. [Grammar of the contemporary Polish language. Morphology] (pp. 151–221). Warszawa: PWN.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavine, J., & Franks, S. (2008). On accusative first. In A, Antonenko, J. F. Bailyn, C. Y. Bethin, & J. Toman (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 16 (pp. 231–247). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, D. (2009). Where does Binding Theory apply? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Legate, J. (2008). Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 55–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luchkina, T., & Ionin, T. (2015). The effect of prosody on availability of inverse scope in Russian. In M. Szajbel-Keck, R. Burns, & D. Kavitskaya (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, UC Berkley (pp. 418–437). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maling, J. (1984). Non-bounded reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7, 211–241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, A. (1984). On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure. Events and participants. Lingua, 130, 152–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín, R., & McNally, L. (2011). Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 467–502. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGinnis, M. (1998).
Locality in A-movement
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Miechowicz-Mathiasen, K., & Scheffler, P. (2008). A corpus-based analysis of the peculiar behavior of the Polish verb podobać się
. In J. Witkoś & G. Fanselow (Eds.), Elements of Slavic and Germanic grammars. A comparative view (pp. 89–111). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munn, A. B. (1987). Coordinate structure and X-bar Theory. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(1), 121–140.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikolaeva, L. (2014).
The secret life of pronouns
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Pesetsky, D. (1982).
Paths and categories
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, D. (2010). Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de O A Petersen, M. C. (2016).
On Experiencers and minimality
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation) University of Maryland.
Pitteroff, M., & Schäfer, F. (2019). Implicit control cross-linguistically. Language, 95(1), 136–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poole, E. (2016). Deconstructing subjecthood. Retrieved from <[URL]> (20 April, 2020).
Postal, P. (1971). Cross-over phenomena. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rákosi, G. (2006). Dative Experiencer predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT Publications,![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramchand, G. (2008). First phase syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 47–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T. (2001). Experiencing derivations. A paper presented at SALT 11, New York. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1990). On the anaphor-agreement effect. Rivista di Linguistica, 2, 27–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–339). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, B. (2012). On the onset of psych eventualities. In E. Cyran, H. Kardela, & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Sound, structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann (pp. 533–554). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, E. F., Šereikaitè M., & Pitteroff, M. (2018). The structural nature of non-structural case: On passivization and case in Lithuanian. Proceedings of LSA, 3.31, 1–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slioussar, N. (2007). Grammar and information structure. A study with reference to Russian. Utrecht: LOT Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sundaresan, S. (2014). Revisiting the anaphor agreement effect: A new pattern from Tamil. In A. Assmann, S. Bank, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, & E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Topics at InfL (pp. 499–526). Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szajbel-Keck, M. (2015).
Secondary predication in Polish
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.
Tajsner, P. (2008). Aspects of the grammar of focus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Temme, A. (2014). German psych-adjectives. In A. Machicao, A. Nolda, & A. Sioupi (Eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie: Untersuchungen zu Randbereichen in Sprache und Grammatik (pp. 131–156). Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Temme, A., & Verhoeven, E. (2017). Backward binding as a psych effect: A binding illusion? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 36(2), 279–308. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiland, B. (2016). Le charme discret of remnant movement: crossing and nesting in Polish OVS sentences. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 11(3), 133–165.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, E. (2006). Subjects of different heights. In J. Lavine (Ed.), Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, The Princeton Meeting 2005 (pp. 409–418). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willim, E. (1989). On word order: A government-binding study of English and Polish. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J. (1993). The theory of X-binding and some aspects of scrambling in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 28, 153–180.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J. (2003). Movement and reconstruction: Questions and Principle C effects in English and Polish. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J. (2008). On the correlation between A-type scrambling and lack of weak crossover effects. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 44, 297–327.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J. (2013). Visser’s Generalization and c-command condition on control. In A. Bondaruk, & A. Malicka-Kleparska (Eds.), Ambiguity. Multifaceted structures in syntax, morphology and phonology (pp. 317–345). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J., Łęska, P., & Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, D. (2017). Positioning the dative and accusative arguments through binding. Paper presented at Linguistics Beyond and Within Conference, 18–19 October, 2017, Lublin.
Witkoś, J., Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, D., & Łęska, P. (2018a). Binding as Agree and Index Raising: The case of Polish accusative object Experiencers. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(4), 469–507. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J., Łęska, P., Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, D., Gogłoza, A., & Meyer, R. (2018b). Datives and accusatives as binders in a grammar of subject-oriented reflexives. Paper presented at FASL conference, Stanford, May 4–6 2018.
Wood, J., & Marantz, A. (2017). The interpretation of external arguments. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco, & Á. Gallego (Eds.), The verbal domain (pp. 255–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woolford, E. (1993). Symmetric and asymmetric passives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, 679–728. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woolford, E. (1997). Four-way cases systems: Ergative, nominative, objective and accusative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 181–227. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woolford, E. (1999). More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(2), 257–287. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zabrocki, T. (1981). Lexical rules of semantic interpretation. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. A. Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zoerner, C. E. (1995).
Coordination: The syntax of andP
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.
Zribi-Hertz, A. (1989). A-type binding and narrative point of view. Language, 65, 695–727. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Żychliński, S. (2013).
On some aspects of the syntax of Object Experiencers in Polish and English
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Adam Mickiewicz University.