Chapter published in:
Beyond Emotions in Language: Psychological verbs at the interfaces
Edited by Bożena Rozwadowska and Anna Bondaruk
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 263] 2020
► pp. 213244
References

References

Armstrong, G.
(2012) ‘Internalization’ as a grammatically relevant notion in Spanish. Paper presented at Coloquio de Gramática Generativa 22. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, March 21–23, 2012.
(2013) Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive se constructions in Spanish. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(2), 81–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V., Bocci, G., & Cruschina, S.
(2015) Focus fronting and its implicatures. In E. Aboh, A. Hulk, J. Schaeffer, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2013: Selected papers from Going Romance, Amsterdam 2013 (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bondaruk, A.
(2020) The syntax of accusative and dative Experiencers in Polish. In B. Rozwadowska & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Beyond Emotions in Language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosse, S., & Bruening, B.
(2011) Benefactive versus experiencer datives. In M. B. Washburn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 69–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
Bosse, S., Bruening, B., & Yamada, M.
(2012) Affected experiencers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1185–1230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campos, H.
(1999) Transitividad e intranstividad. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 1519–1574). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008) On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contreras, H.
(1983) El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S.
(2012) Discourse-related features and functional projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo, M. C.
(2003)  Datives at large (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
(2010a) La estructura de expresiones con verbos livianos y experimentante. Cuadernos de la ALFAL, 1, 194–206.Google Scholar
(2010b) Some dative subjects are born, some are made. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 26–37). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(1997) Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Miguel, E., & Fernández-Lagunilla, M.
(2000) El operador aspectual ‘se’. Revista Española de Lingüística, 30(1), 13–44.Google Scholar
Demonte, V.
(1987) Prepositions, c-command, and predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(1), 147–157.Google Scholar
(1994) La ditransitividad en español: Léxico y sintaxis. In V. Demonte (Ed.), Estudios de lingüística de España y México (pp. 115–150). México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Á.
(2005) Manual de gramática del español. Buenos Aires: La isla de la luna.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A., & Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L.
(2016a) Extraction from gerunds and the internal syntax of verbs. Linguistics, 54, 1307–1354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Extraction out of adjectival secondary predicates in English and Spanish: A nanosyntactic account. Questions and Answers in Linguistics, 3(2), 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A., Jiménez-Fernández, A. L., & Tubino-Blanco, M.
(2017). ‘What's up’ with datives? In R. Lopez, J. Avelar, & S. Cyrino (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 12. Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil (pp. 29–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R.
(2020) Agents, states and passives in Spanish psych verbs. In B. Rozwadowska & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Beyond Emotions in Language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O.
(1999) Two types of impersonal sentences in Spanish: Locative and dative subjects. Syntax, 2(2), 101–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, O., & Mendikoetxea, A.
(2011) Non-selected dative subjects in anticausative constructions. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 96(1), 87–127.Google Scholar
Folli, R., & Harley, H.
(2005) Flavours of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual enquiries (pp. 95–120). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á.
(2007)  Phase Theory and parametric variation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Greenberg, J.
(1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, R.
(2006) A reinterpretation of quirky-subjects and related phenomena in Spanish. In J.-P. Y. Montreuil & C. Nishida (Eds.), New perspectives in Romance linguistics (pp. 127–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, S.
(1999) Los dativos. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 1855–1930). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L., Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Radford, A.
(2014) Deconstructing the subject condition in terms of cumulative constraint violation. The Linguistic Review, 31 (1), 73–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, H.
(1995)  Subjects, events, and licensing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Hernanz, M. L., & J. M. Brucart
(1987) La sintaxis 1. Principios generales. La oración simple. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J.
(1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L.
(2009) The low periphery of double object constructions in English and Spanish. Philologia Hispalensis, 23, 179–200.Google Scholar
(2010) Discourse-agreement features, phasal C and the edge: A minimalist approach. Diacrítica – Language Sciences Series, 24(1), 25–49.Google Scholar
(2015a) When focus goes wild: An empirical study of two syntactic positions for information focus. Linguistics Beyond and Within, 1, 119–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Towards a typology of focus: Subject position and microvariation at the discourse-syntax interface. Ampersand: An International Journal of General and Applied Linguistics, 2, 49–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Prepositions and islands: Extraction from dative and accusative DPs in psych verbs. In J. Emonds & M. Janevobá (Eds.), Language use and linguistic structures, (Vol. 5, 155–172). Olomouc: Palacký University Press.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Miyagawa, S.
(2014) A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua, 145, 275–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Rozwadowska, B.
(2016) The information structure of Dative Experiencer psych verbs. In B. Cetnarowska, M. Kuczok, & M. Zabawa (Eds.), Various dimensions of contrastive studies (pp. 100–121). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
(2017) On subject properties of datives in psych predicates. A comparative approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica/Academica, 64(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Saab, A.
(2016) Subextraction from DOM DPs: New evidence from Río de la Plata Spanish. Paper delivered at Romania Nova VIII, Buenos Aires.
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Tubino Blanco, M.
(2019) Causativity in Southern Peninsular Spanish. In Á. J. Gallego (Ed.), The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects (pp. 181–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H., & Park, M.-K.
(2003) The EPP and the subject condition under sluicing. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 649–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, J.
(2004) Spanish reflexive pronouns: A null preposition hypothesis. In V. Chand, A. Kelleler, A. J. Rodríguez, & B. Schmeiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 528–540). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2016) Spanish aspectual se as an indirect object reflexive: The import of atelicity, bare nouns, and leísta PCC repairs. Probus, 29(1), 73–117.Google Scholar
Masullo, P.
(1992) Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish vs. Icelandic”. NELS, 23, 303–317.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A.
(2006) The interpretation of German datives and English ‘have’. In D. P. Hole, W. Abraham, & A. Meinunger (Eds.), Datives and other cases: Between argument structure and event structure (pp. 185–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S., & Tsujigka, T.
(2004) Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A.
(2014)  Les fronteres de la (in)transitivitat (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Pujalte, M., & Saab, A.
(2011) Dativos agregados y movimiento-A: Un argumento en favor de la teoría de control por movimiento. Cuadernos de la Alfal, 3, 200–215.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, L.
(2002)  Introducing arguments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
(2008) Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rákosi, G.
(2006) Dative experiencer predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F.
(2008) The syntax of (anti-)causatives. External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Two types of external argument licensing: The case of causers. Studia Linguistica, 66, 128–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strozer, J.
(1976)  Clitics in Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California.
Tubino-Blanco, M.
(2007)  Preverbal datives are not quirky subjects (Unpublished master thesis) University of Arizona.
(2011) Causatives in minimalism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J.
(1995) Aspects of the theory of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–123.Google Scholar
Willim, E.
(2020) The Polish impersonal middle with a dative as a syntactically-derived experience construction. In B. Rozwadowska & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Beyond Emotions in Language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bondaruk, Anna
2020.  In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263],  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.