Cover not available
Part of
Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 111–126

Chapter 5
Uncovering the left periphery of Etruscan

Some theoretical insights

| Beijing Language and Culture University
| CISAP Università degli Studi di Cagliari

In this paper, we attempt to address a Restprache like Etruscan by means of theoretical tools. This work approaches the syntax of Etruscan and proposes a number of descriptive generalizations on its clausal structure. Despite the intrinsic difficulty represented by the fragmentary data, we provide some theory-driven insights to detect pragmatic/semantic effects based on syntax. After having presented the theoretical insights related to word order reorderings and syntacticization, we shall discuss qualitative data from Etruscan. We observe that modifications of the “canonical” word order might be related to interpretative properties. Following the criterial approach of scope-discourse semantics, we propose that the movement of the verb in Etruscan adjacent to the fronted XP is the strategy to realize the activated criterial position in the left periphery. In the last part, we also discuss attested complementizers and their mapping within the syntactic architecture.

Keywords: left periphery, Etruscan, syntacticization, criterial approach, scope-discource semantics, complementizers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cartography and syntacticisation as formal tools
    • 2.1Cartography and reordering
    • 2.2Linguistic variability in activating criterial positions
  • 3.Reorderings in Etruscan
    • 3.1Some notes on the syntax of Etruscan
    • 3.2“Speaking objects” and reorderings: A criterial approach
  • 4.Uncovering further portions of the left periphery: Relatives and imperatives
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.05sam
References
Aboh, Enoch O.
2004 The Morphosyntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Leftward focus versus rightward focus: The Kwa-Bantu conspiracy. SOAS Working Papers Linguistics 15: 81–104.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, Luciano
1982 Le “iscrizioni parlanti” dell’Italia antica. In Lingue e iscrizioni dell’Italia antica, Aldo Prosdocimi (ed.). Florence: Leo S. Olschki editore.Google Scholar
1986 Sull’etrusco della stele di Lemno e su alcuni aspetti del consonantismo etrusco. Archivio Glottologico Italiano LXXI: 15–46.Google Scholar
2013 The Etruscan language. In The Etruscan World, Jean MacIntosh Turfa (ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017 Labeling (Romance) causatives. In Elements of Comparative Syntax: Theory and Description, Enoch O. Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskás & Manuela Schönenberger (eds), 13–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Locality in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2017 On the syntax and pragmatics of some clause-peripheral positions. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 33–48. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benucci, Franco
1997 Sintassi del verbo e deittici clitici nelle iscrizioni sudpicene. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 22: 37–92.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015 Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8], Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2013 The Syntax–Prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canuti, Massimiliano
2008 Basco ed Etrusco, due lingue sottoposte all’influsso indoeuropeo. Pisa: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
1982 On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1(3): 247–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A’ Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2010 The cartography of syntactic structures. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2012 Latin Embedded Clauses: The Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005 Order of subject, object and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 330–333. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Hapelmath, Martin
2013 The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://​wals​.info/
Durrleman, Stephanie, Hippolyte, Loyse, Zufferey, Sandrine, Iglesias, Katia & Hadjikhani, Nouchine
2015 Complex syntax in autism spectrum disorders: A study of relative clauses. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 50(2): 260–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Facchetti, Giulio M.
2002 Appunti di morfologia etrusca, con un’appendice sulla questione delle affiinità genetiche dell’etrusco, Florence: Leo S. Olschki editore.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2000 The Syntax of Early English [Cambridge Syntax Guides]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100] Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009 Relativised relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacomelli, Gabriella
1963 La lingua fallisca, Florence: L.S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1975 Research on language universals. Annual Review of Anthropology 4(1): 75–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2008 Generalized Minimality. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Gulordava, Kristina & Merlo, Paola
2015 Diachronic trends in word order freedom and dependency length in dependency-annotated corpora of Latin and Ancient Greek. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015), Joakim Nivre & Eva Hajičová (eds), 121–130. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Markus
2006 Die frühlateinischen Inschriften und ihre Datierung: Eine linguisticsh-archäologisch-paläographische Untersuchung. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison
2002 Variation and syntactic theory. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack T. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 267–282. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986 Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976 Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 247–301. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kidwai, Ayesha
2000 XP-adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012 When data meet theory: The case of the placiti cassinesi. In Linguistics and Philology in the Twenty-first Century [Special Issue of the Transactions of the Philological Society 109], Sylvia Adamson & Wendy Bennett (eds), 213–219. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martini, Karen, Belletti, Adriana, Centorrino, Santi & Maria Garaffa
2019 Syntactic complexity in the presence of an intervener: The case of an Italian speaker with anomia. Aphasiology 34(8): 1016–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meiser, Gerhardt
(ed.) 2014 Etruskische Texte, Editio Minor, 2 Vols. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola
2016 Quantitative computational syntax: Some initial results. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 2(1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallottino, Massimo
2002 Etruscologia, 7th edn. Milan: Urlico Hoepli.Google Scholar
Poccetti, Paolo
2008 Identità ed identificazione del latino. Orale e scritto. In Una storia della lingua latina, Paolo Poccetti, Diego Poli & Carlo Santini (eds). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva
2000 Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of A’-Positions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut
1973 La struttura della lingua. In Le ricerche epigrafiche e linguistiche sull’etrusco, problemi prospettive programmi. Atti del colloquio sul Tema, Florence, 28–30 settembre 1969, Mauro Christofani (ed.), 46–49, 54, 56. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
1981 Pyrgi Texte uns etrskische Grammatik. In Akten des Kolloquiums zum Thema Die Gottin von Pyrgi. Archeologische, linguistische und religionsgeschichtliche Aspekte. Tuebingen, 16–17 gennaio 1979 [Biblioteca di Studi Etruschi 1], Aldo Neppi Modona & Friedhelm Prayon (eds), 83–98. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
1998 Rätisch und Etruskisch. In Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Vorträge und Kleiner Schriften 68, Wolfgang Meid (ed.). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2005 Etruscan. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, Roger D. Woodard (ed.), 943–966. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2008 Etruscan (Chapter 7). In The Ancient Languages of Europe, Roger D. Woodard (ed.), 141–64. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3], Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving On, Lisa L. S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25(1): 197–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2017 The left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds) 1–30. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Cinque, Guglielmo
2016 Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe
2019 A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 257]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe & Merlo, Paola
2019 Intervention effects in object relatives in English and Italian: a study in quantitative computational syntax. In Proceedings of the first workshop on quantitative syntax (Quasy, Syntaxfest 2019), Xinying Chen & Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho (eds), 46–56. Stroudsburg PA: ACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
2000 Remarks on the complementizer layer of standard Arabic. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Third conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1996 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 202], Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm & Ur Shlonsky (eds), 325–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Si, Fuzhen
2011 Syntacticization of pragmatic information at sentential and noun phrase levels (语用信息在句子和名词短语层面的句法化), Journal of Yili Normal University（Social Science Edition）- 伊犁师范学院学报（社会科学版）2: 92–95.Google Scholar
2018 A cartographic study of light verb constructions. Yuwen Xuexi (Linguistic Research) 1: 11–17.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros & Fanselow, Gisbert
2010 Focus in Georgian and the expression of contrast. Lingua 120: 1370–1391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanford, Emily & Delage, Hélène
2019 Complex syntax and working memory in children with specific learning difficulties. First Language 40(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001  Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
1995 Focusing in Modern Greek. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Rizzi, Luigi & Franck, Julie
2016 Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179: 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wachter, Rudolf
2010 The origin of epigrams on ‘speaking objects’. In Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram, Manuel Baumbach, Andrej Petrović & Ivana Petrovic (eds), 250–260. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wallace, Rex E.
2008 Zikh Rasna: A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. Ann Arbor MI: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014 Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wylin, Koem
2000 Il verbo etrusco. Ricerca morfosintattica delle forme usate in funzione verbale [Studia Philologica 20]. Roma: L’erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar