Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 111126
References
Aboh, Enoch O.
2004The Morphosyntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Leftward focus versus rightward focus: The Kwa-Bantu conspiracy. SOAS Working Papers Linguistics 15: 81–104.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, Luciano
1982Le “iscrizioni parlanti” dell’Italia antica. In Lingue e iscrizioni dell’Italia antica, Aldo Prosdocimi (ed.). Florence: Leo S. Olschki editore.Google Scholar
1986Sull’etrusco della stele di Lemno e su alcuni aspetti del consonantismo etrusco. Archivio Glottologico Italiano LXXI: 15–46.Google Scholar
2013The Etruscan language. In The Etruscan World, Jean MacIntosh Turfa (ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2017Labeling (Romance) causatives. In Elements of Comparative Syntax: Theory and Description, Enoch O. Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskás & Manuela Schönenberger (eds), 13–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Locality in Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2017On the syntax and pragmatics of some clause-peripheral positions. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds), 33–48. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benucci, Franco
1997Sintassi del verbo e deittici clitici nelle iscrizioni sudpicene. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 22: 37–92.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8], Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2013The Syntax–Prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canuti, Massimiliano
2008Basco ed Etrusco, due lingue sottoposte all’influsso indoeuropeo. Pisa: Fabrizio Serra Editore.Google Scholar
Cinque, G.
1982On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1(3): 247–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of A’ Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2010The cartography of syntactic structures. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2012Latin Embedded Clauses: The Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005Order of subject, object and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, M. Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 330–333. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Hapelmath, Martin
2013The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://​wals​.info/
Durrleman, Stephanie, Hippolyte, Loyse, Zufferey, Sandrine, Iglesias, Katia & Hadjikhani, Nouchine
2015Complex syntax in autism spectrum disorders: A study of relative clauses. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 50(2): 260–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Facchetti, Giulio M.
2002Appunti di morfologia etrusca, con un’appendice sulla questione delle affiinità genetiche dell’etrusco, Florence: Leo S. Olschki editore.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
2000The Syntax of Early English [Cambridge Syntax Guides]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100] Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009Relativised relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giacomelli, Gabriella
1963La lingua fallisca, Florence: L.S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1975Research on language universals. Annual Review of Anthropology 4(1): 75–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2008Generalized Minimality. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Gulordava, Kristina & Merlo, Paola
2015Diachronic trends in word order freedom and dependency length in dependency-annotated corpora of Latin and Ancient Greek. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2015), Joakim Nivre & Eva Hajičová (eds), 121–130. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Markus
2006Die frühlateinischen Inschriften und ihre Datierung: Eine linguisticsh-archäologisch-paläographische Untersuchung. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison
2002Variation and syntactic theory. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack T. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 267–282. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Remarkable subjects in Malagasy. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 247–301. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kidwai, Ayesha
2000XP-adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battaye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–167. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012When data meet theory: The case of the placiti cassinesi. In Linguistics and Philology in the Twenty-first Century [Special Issue of the Transactions of the Philological Society 109], Sylvia Adamson & Wendy Bennett (eds), 213–219. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martini, Karen, Belletti, Adriana, Centorrino, Santi & Maria Garaffa
2019Syntactic complexity in the presence of an intervener: The case of an Italian speaker with anomia. Aphasiology 34(8): 1016–1042. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meiser, Gerhardt
(ed.) 2014Etruskische Texte, Editio Minor, 2 Vols. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola
2016Quantitative computational syntax: Some initial results. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 2(1): 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallottino, Massimo
2002Etruscologia, 7th edn. Milan: Urlico Hoepli.Google Scholar
Poccetti, Paolo
2008Identità ed identificazione del latino. Orale e scritto. In Una storia della lingua latina, Paolo Poccetti, Diego Poli & Carlo Santini (eds). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva
2000Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of A’-Positions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 33]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut
1973La struttura della lingua. In Le ricerche epigrafiche e linguistiche sull’etrusco, problemi prospettive programmi. Atti del colloquio sul Tema, Florence, 28–30 settembre 1969, Mauro Christofani (ed.), 46–49, 54, 56. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
1981Pyrgi Texte uns etrskische Grammatik. In Akten des Kolloquiums zum Thema Die Gottin von Pyrgi. Archeologische, linguistische und religionsgeschichtliche Aspekte. Tuebingen, 16–17 gennaio 1979 [Biblioteca di Studi Etruschi 1], Aldo Neppi Modona & Friedhelm Prayon (eds), 83–98. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
1998Rätisch und Etruskisch. In Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Vorträge und Kleiner Schriften 68, Wolfgang Meid (ed.). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2005Etruscan. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages, Roger D. Woodard (ed.), 943–966. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2008Etruscan (Chapter 7). In The Ancient Languages of Europe, Roger D. Woodard (ed.), 141–64. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3], Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving On, Lisa L. S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25(1): 197–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Cartography, criteria, and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 10], Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 314–338. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2017The left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds) 1–30. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Cinque, Guglielmo
2016Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2007Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe
2019A Criterial Approach to the Cartography of V2 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 257]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe & Merlo, Paola
2019Intervention effects in object relatives in English and Italian: a study in quantitative computational syntax. In Proceedings of the first workshop on quantitative syntax (Quasy, Syntaxfest 2019), Xinying Chen & Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho (eds), 46–56. Stroudsburg PA: ACL. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
2000Remarks on the complementizer layer of standard Arabic. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Third conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1996 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 202], Jacqueline Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm & Ur Shlonsky (eds), 325–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Si, Fuzhen
2011Syntacticization of pragmatic information at sentential and noun phrase levels (语用信息在句子和名词短语层面的句法化), Journal of Yili Normal University(Social Science Edition)- 伊犁师范学院学报(社会科学版)2: 92–95.Google Scholar
2018A cartographic study of light verb constructions. Yuwen Xuexi (Linguistic Research) 1: 11–17.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros & Fanselow, Gisbert
2010Focus in Georgian and the expression of contrast. Lingua 120: 1370–1391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, Emily & Delage, Hélène
2019Complex syntax and working memory in children with specific learning difficulties. First Language 40(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001 Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
1995Focusing in Modern Greek. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Rizzi, Luigi & Franck, Julie
2016Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179: 76–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wachter, Rudolf
2010The origin of epigrams on ‘speaking objects’. In Archaic and Classical Greek Epigram, Manuel Baumbach, Andrej Petrović & Ivana Petrovic (eds), 250–260. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wallace, Rex E.
2008Zikh Rasna: A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. Ann Arbor MI: Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wylin, Koem
2000Il verbo etrusco. Ricerca morfosintattica delle forme usate in funzione verbale [Studia Philologica 20]. Roma: L’erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar