Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 127–138

Chapter 6
Subject drop in how come questions in English

| Kanda University of International Studies
In this paper, I will discuss a novel phenomenon which has not previously been discussed in the literature on how come questions – namely the fact that they can exhibit subject drop in diary-style English. I will first introduce Haegeman’s (1990) analysis of diary English with special attention to subject drop. I will next show some facts that how come questions can exhibit subject drop in diary-style English and suggest a mechanism responsible for subject drop in diary English. It will be shown that the same mechanism is used to license the null subject in Old English. I will further deal with a related but distinct question about the mechanism licensing an argumental element in the lower topic position in Old English, as opposed to Late Middle English. I will finally show that the same mechanism responsible for subject drop is used in licensing null Case in Japanese.
Keywords: subject drop, how come questions, diary-style English, Old English, Late Middle English, Japanese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject drop in how come questions in diary English
  • 3.Null Case particle in Japanese
  • 4.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.06end
References
Belletti, Adriana
2001 “Inversion” as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of IP and CP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2014 The fine structure of force: On the interaction of modal particles with illocutionary force and clause type. In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 103–140. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia
2012 Splitting up force. Evidence from discourse particles. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachael Nye (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter
1991 Topicalization, inversion and complementizers in English. In Going Romance and Beyond, Denis Delfitto, Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers & Frits Stuurman (eds), 1–45. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Dohi, Atsushi
2020 CP-internal discourse particles and the split ForceP hypothesis. Lingua 233. 68–87.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2007 Locality and Information Structure. A Cartographic Approach to Japanese [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Illocutionary force and modal particles in the syntax of Japanese. In Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 405–424. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Two ReasonPs. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 220–231. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Inter-speaker variation and subject drop in how come questions in English. The Syntax-Morphology Interface in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 19th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 99–114. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.Google Scholar
2018 Variation in wh-expressions asking for a reason. Special issue on Complementizers: Lexical vs. Functional Variation of Linguistic Variation 18(2): 299–314.Google Scholar
2020 Information structure, null case particle and sentence final discourse particle. In Discourse Particles and Information Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 213], Olivier Duplâtre & Pierre-Yves Modicom (eds), 224–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endo, Yoshio & Haegeman, Liliane
2014 Adverbial concord merging adverbial clauses. In Proceedings of FAJL 7: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 73], Shigeto Kawahara & Mika Igarashi (eds), 25–44. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
2019 Adverbial clauses and adverbial concord. In special collection on the Syntax of Adverbial Clauses of Glossa 4(1): 48, 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Justin
2005 The whys and how comes of presupposition and NPI licensing in questions. In John Alderete, Chung-hye Han & Alexei Kochetov (eds), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 138–145. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004 A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–190.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1990 Understood subjects in English diaries: On the relevance of theoretical syntax for the study of register variation. Multilingua 9: 157–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130: 88–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 Unspeakable sentences. Subject omission in written registers: A cartographic analysis. Special issue on Register Variation and Syntactic Theory, Diane Massam & Tim Stowell (eds), of Linguistic Variation 17(2): 229–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Stark, Elisabeth
2021 Register-specific subject omission in English and French and the syntax of coordination. In Germanic and Romance: Continuity and Variation, Sam Wolfe & Christine Mecklenborg Salvesen (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987 Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Foris, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
1995 Introduction. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 3–27. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfed
2017 Assertions and judgements, epistemics and evidentials. Paper presented at the Workshop Speech Acts: Meanings, Uses, Syntactic and Prosodic Realizations, Leibniz-ZAS Berlin, 29–31 May. https://​amor​.cms​.hu​-berlin​.de​/~h2816i3x​/Talks​/CommitmentEpistemicsHandout​.pdf> (26 January 2021).
Masunaga, Kiyoko
1988 Case deletion and discourse context. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, William Poser (ed.), 145–156. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010 Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse Configurational Languages, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2017 Agreement Beyond Phi. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nawata, Hiroyuki
2009 Clausal architecture and inflectional paradigm: The case of V2 in the history of English. English Linguistics 26: 247–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2018 Colloquial English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 On the position of ‘int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement. Moving On, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2014 Some consequences of criterial freezing: Asymmetries, anti-adjacency and extraction from cleft sentences. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 19–54. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1985 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Tomoyuki
2017 Eigosi-niokeru Kinoohantyuu-no Syutugen to Syoositu (The emergence and loss of functional categories in the history of English). Paper presented at the symposium of the English Literary Society of Japan held at Shizuoka University, Japan.