Cover not available
Part of
The Syntax of Information-Structural Agreement
Johannes Mursell
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 268] 2021
► pp. 261–278

References

Aboh, Enoch Oladé
2010 Information structuring begins with the numeration. Iberia 2:12–42.Google Scholar
Adger, David
2003 Core Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, Robert M. W. & Onishi, Masayuki
2001 Introduction. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language, 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 1–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
1999 Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21:435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2004 Ergativity and Word order in Austronesian Languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith
1983 Anaphora, cataphora, and topic focusing: Functions of the object prefix in Swahili. In Current Approaches to African Linguistics, Ivan R. Dihoff (ed.), 323–335. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Altmann, Hans
1976 Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Gradpartikelprobleme. Zur Beschreibung von gerade, genau, eben, ausgerechnet, vor allem, insbesondere, zumindest, wenigstens. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1972 How to get ’even’. Language 48: 893–905. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus
2010 Desintegration und Interpretation. Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29:1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos
2018 Focus projection theories. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 185–203. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Asarina, Alya & Jeremy Hartman
2011a Genitive subject licensing in Uyghur subordinate clauses. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistic (WAFL), Andrew Simpson (ed.), 17–31. Cambridge MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Asarina, Alya & Hartman, Jeremy
2011b Uyghur genitive subjects and the phase impenetrability condition. Presented at CUNY Syntax supper, February 2011.
Ashton, Eric Ormerod
1944 Swahili Grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John Frederick
2020 The scrambling paradox. Linguistic Inquiry 51(4):635–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.Google Scholar
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008 The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 On the status of object markers in Bantu languages. Rutgers University. [URL]
Baker, Mark C. & Bobaljik, Jonathan D.
2015 On inherent and dependent theories of ergative case. In Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds), 111–135. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bárány, András
2015 Differential Object Marking in Hungarian and the Morphosyntax of Case and Agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bassi, Itai & Longenbaugh, Nicholas
2019 Against Tanglewood by focus movement: A reply to Erlewine and Kotek (2018). Linguistic Inquiry 51(3): 579–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baumann, Stefan & Riester, Arndt
2012 Referential and lexical givenness: Semantic, prosodic and cognitive aspects. In Prosody and Meaning, Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds), 119–163. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Coreference, lexical givenness and prosody in German. Lingua 136:16–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bax, Anna & Diercks, Michael
2012 Information structure constraints on object marking in Manyika. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30:185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1996 Directionality and Logical Form. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z.
2008 Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
2006 Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, Otto
1932 Deutsche Syntax. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band IV: Wortstellung. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bell, Sarah
1978 Two differences in definiteness in Cebuano and Tagalog. Oceanic Linguistics 17:1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2001 Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005 Past-participle agreement. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 493–521. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
1983 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2005 Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Keine, Stefan
2016 Long distance agreement. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 2291–2321. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2016 Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics and Pragmatics 9:1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2019 Checking up on (φ-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50: 527–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bliss, Heather
2009 Structuring information in Blackfoot: Against an A-bar-agreement analysis of cross-clausal agreement. In Proceedings of the 2008 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference, Susie Jones (ed.). [URL]> (4 February 2021).
Bloomfield, Leonard
1917 Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 3: 2–4.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D.
2002 A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and covert movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20:197–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Where’s Phi? Agreement as a postsyntactic operation. In Phi Theory: Phi-features across Modules and Interfaces, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Börjesson, Kristin & Müller, Gereon
2020 Long distance agreement and locality: A reprojection approach. In Smith, Mursell & Hartmann (eds), 283–317.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2003 Agree, phases, and intervention effects. Linguistic Analysis 33:54–96.Google Scholar
2007 On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 589–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Takahashi, Daiko
1998 Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Gosse, Hendriks, Petra & Hoeksema, Jack
2007 Focus particles inside prepositional phrases: A comparison of Dutch, English, and German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Phil & MacKenzie, Marguerite
2002 Altruism, A-bar movement, and object agreement in Innu-aimûn. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Sam A.
1987 Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewâ. Language 63: 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breul, Carsten
2004 Focus Structure in Generative Grammar. An Integrated Syntactic, Semantic and Intonational Approach [Linguisik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 68]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brody, M.
1997 Perfect chains. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 139–167. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2001 Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2001 QR obeys superiority: Frozen scope and ACD. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 233–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 Topic. In Focus – Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2003 On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics & Philosophy 26: 511–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Focus projection and default prominence. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Unalternative semantics. In Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney, & Carol Rose Little (eds), 550–575. Chicago IL: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
2016 Intonation and Meaning. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina
1995 Is it [only Rock’n Roll] or just like it? In Proceedings of the Fourteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), José Camacho, Lina Choueiri, & Maki Watanabe (eds), 63–77. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2001 The syntax of focus sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 229–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cena, Resty M.
1977 Patient primacy in Tagalog. Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Chicago.
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
1976 Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–350.Google Scholar
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Problems of projection: Extensions. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honor of Adriana Belletti [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223], Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Haman & Simona Matteini (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Some puzzling foundational issues: The reading program. Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2019: 263–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977 Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colley, Justin & Privoznov, Dmitry
2019 On the topic of subjects. Talk given at NELS50 at MIT.
Collins, James N.
2016 Composition and definiteness without articles: A case study in Tagalog. In NELS 46: Proceedings of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. I, Cristopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds), 227–241. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2017 Structure Sensitve Interpretation: A Case Study in Tagalog. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
2019 Definiteness determined by syntax. A case study in Tagalog. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:1367–1420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Zegrean, Iulia
2012 Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. In Main Clause Phenomena. New Horizons [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 190], Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica & Bale, Alan
2014 The interaction of person and number in Mi’gmaq. Nordlyd 40: 85–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2004 Non-canonical applicatives and focalization in Tswana. Paper presented at the Symposium Syntax of the World’s Languages, Leipzig.
Cruschina, Silvio
2019 Focus fronting in Spanish: Mirative implicature and information structure. Probus 31:119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta
2020 Agreement across the board: Topic agreement in Ripano. In Smith, Mursell & Hartmann (eds), 235–270.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina
2011 Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Angio, Sara
2007 Negative polarity items in inverse scope and topicalized clauses. Swarthmore College, Dept. of Linguistics. [URL]> (4 February 2021).
Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus
2020 From the Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim. [URL]> (4 February 2021).
De Guzman, Videa P.
1988 Ergative analysis for Philippine languages: An analysis. In Studies in Austronesian Linguistics, Richard McGinn (ed.), 323–345. Athens OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1992 Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly & Jelinek, Eloise
1995 Distributing arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006 Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J.
2009 Linear disorder in Bantu reduplication. In Workshop on the Division of Labor between Morphology and Phonology and Fourth Network Meeting, 16–17 January. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Drubig, Hans Bernhard
1994 Island Constraints and the Syntactic Nature of Focus and Association of Focus [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Vol. 51]. Heidelberg: Das Wissenschaftliche Zentrum der IBM Deutschland.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2017 The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to Their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio
2012 Illocutionary force of non-root sentences. Talk given at University of Venice, March.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
2014 Movement out of Focus. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Kotek, Hadas
2018 Focus association by movement: Evidence from Tanglewood. Linguistic Inquiry 49: 441–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Ibnbari, Lena & Taube, Sharon
2013 Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136:145–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2006 On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In Form, Structure, and Grammar: A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 137–159. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Lenertová, Denisa
2011 Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29:169–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Féry, Caroline
1993 German Intonational Patterns. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, Ines, Hartmann, Katharina, Reineke, Brigitte, Schwarz, Anne & Zimmermann, Malte
2010 Subject focus in West African languages. In Information Structure. Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann & Carolin Féry (eds), 234–257. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Foley, William
1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the Third Lexical Functional Grammar Conference.
Foley, William & Van ValinJr., Robert
1984 Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2012 A Grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 Floating agreement and information structure: The case of Sanzhi Dargwa. Studies in Language 40(1):1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert
2006 Phase theory and tree adjoining grammar. Lingua 116:145–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frantz, Donald G.
1978 Copying from complements in Blackfoot. In Linguistic Studies of Native Canada, Eung-Do Cook & Johnathan Kaye (eds), 89–110. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2007 Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. An interface approach to the linking of null pronouns. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Ramaglia, Francesca
2012 Phasing contrast at the interfaces: A feature-compositional approach to topics. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 55–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004 Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of German left dislocation. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 203–233. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J.
2014 Deriving feature inheritance from the copy theory of movement. The Linguistc Review 31: 41–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna
1988 Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis. In Studies in Austronesian Linguistics, McGinn (ed.), 295–321. Athens OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998 Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)Veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976 Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 149–188. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983 Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón (ed.), 5–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2005 The discourse configurationality of scrambling. In The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, Joachim Sabel & Mamoru Saito (eds), 75–135. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Sabel, Joachim
1999 Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus multiple specifiers. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17: 1–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline
1980 On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637–678.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, Eithne, Hung, Henrietta & Travis, Lisa
1992 Spec of IP and Spec of VP: Two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, Malcom
1971 Comparative Bantu, Vol. 2: Bantu Prehistory, Inventory and Indexes. London: Gregg International.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1999 Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache [Technical Report], InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures 11. [URL]> (5 February 2020).
Haegeman, Liliane
2012 Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
2012 Complementizer agreement and the relation between C and T. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 441–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ürögdi, Barbara
2010 Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 111–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haida, Andreas
2007 The Indefiniteness and Focusing of Wh-Words. PhD dissertation, Humboldt University Berlin.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Rosengren, Inger
1998 Scrambling [Sprache & Pragmatik 49]. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
2002 On the Dagur object relative: Some comparative notes. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11: 109–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Jakob
2010 On the syntax an morphology of double agreement in Lavukaleve. In 2 in Agreement [Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 88], Sebastian Bank, Doreen Georgi & Jochen Trommer (eds), 197–225. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hardt, Daniel & Romero, Maribel
2004 Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. Semantics 21: 375–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2013 Getting morphemes in order: Merger, affixation and head movement. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 44–75. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina & Zimmermann, Malte
2007 Exhaustivity marking in Hausa: A reanalysis of the particle nee/cee. In Focus Strategies in African Languages: The Interaction of Focus and Grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic, Enoch O. Aboh, Katharina Hartmann & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 241–263. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009 Morphological focus marking in Gùrùntùm (West Chadic). Lingua 119: 1340–1365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Long distance agreement in Godoberi (Daghestanian) complement clauses. Folia Linguistica 33: 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1991 On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality. Journal of Linguistics 27: 405–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heck, Fabian, & Juan Cuartero
2012 Long distance agreement in relative clauses. In Local Modelling of Non-local Dependencies in Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss, & Gereon Müller (eds), 49–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982 The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Keupdjio, Hermann, Lam, Zoe Wai-Mai, Osa-Gómez, Adriana & Wiltschko, Martina
2014 How to do things with particles. In Proceedings of CLA 2014, Laura Teddiman (ed), [URL]> (5 February 2021).
Henderson, Brent Mykel
2006 The Syntax and Typology of Bantu Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
2002 Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19: 245–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus
1991 The Philippine challenge to universal grammar. Arbeitspapier, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft 15:1–59. [URL]> (5 February 2021).
Hoeksema, Jack
2000 Negative polarity items: Triggering, scope and c-command. In Negation and Polarity, Laurence R. Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 115–146. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hole, Daniel
2004 Focus and Background Marking in Mandarin Chinese. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 A distributed syntax for evaluative ‘only’ sentences. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34: 43–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence Robert
1969 A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 98–107. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1999 Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C-T James
1982 Move wh in a language without wh-movement. The Linguistic Review 1: 369–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2009 How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson
2014 Introduction. Linguistics 52(2): 271–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Issah, Samuel A.
2019 On the Structure of A-bar Constructions in Dagbani: Perspectives of Wh-questions and Fragment Answers. PhD dissertation, Goethe-University Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1983 Fokus und Skalen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik. Linguistische Berichte 91: 25–58.Google Scholar
1986 The syntax of focus and adverbials. In Topic, Focus, and Configurationality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 4], Werner Abraham & Sjaak de Meij (eds), 103–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil Achuthan
2001 IP-internal topic and focus phrases. Studia Linguistica 55: 39–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenks, Peter
2018 Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49: 501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L.
2010 Discourse-agreement features, phasal C and the edge: A minimalist approach. Diacritica 24: 25–49.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014 A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Spyropoulos, Vassilios
2013 Feature inheritance, vP phases and the information structure of small clauses. Studia Linguistica 67: 185–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana & Kučerová, Ivona
2017 Towards an information structure analysis of ergative patterning in the Inuit language. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds), 397–419. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Joswig, Andreas
1996 Die grammatischen Rollen des Objekts im Swahili. Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln Arbeitspapiere 26:1–67.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2002 Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit
1990 Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 273–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2000 Direct object clitic doubling in Albanian and Greek. In Clitic Phenomena in European Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 30], Frits Beukema & Marcel den Dikken (eds), 209–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Clitic doubling as differntial object marking. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 38: 161–171.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans
1981 A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Jeroen A. G. Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen & Martin B. J. Stokhof (eds), 189–222. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2009 Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35:1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard & Pollock, Jean-Yves
2001 New thoughts on stylistic inversion. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 107–162. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Khalilova, Zaira
2008 Long-distance agreement in Khwarshi. In Proceedings of LingO 2007, Miltiadis Kokkonidis (ed.), 116–124. Oxford: Faculty of Linguistics, Philology,and Phonetics, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
2009 A Grammar of Khwarshi. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É.
1995 Introduction. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 3–28. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & von Stechow, Arnim
1982 Intonation und Bedeutung von Fokus [Sonderforschungsbereich, 99: Linguistik]. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jacklin
2008 Subject case and Agr into types of Turkish RCs. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistic (WAFL) [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 56], Cedric Boeckx & Suleiman Ulutas (eds). Cambridge MA: MIT, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth
2014 Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krapova, Ilyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
2005 On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 171–197.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1991 The representation of focus. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 825–835. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1992 A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Swahili. In Syntax. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 1397–1418. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1998a Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–129. Ithaca NY: Cornell University. [URL]> (5 February 2021) DOI logo
1998b Scope inversion under the rise-fall contour in German. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 75–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Association with focus phrases. In The Architecture of Focus, Valeria Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, Paul
1993 Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991a Gradpartikeln. In Semantik. Ein Internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 786–803. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991b The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993 Focus particles. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 978–987. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Latrouite, Anja
2011 Voice and Case in Tagalog: The Coding of Prominence and Orientation. PhD dissertation, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2005 Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementiser system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103: 339–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2005 Phases and cyclic agreement. In Perspectives on Phases [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49], Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds), 147–156. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Juergen
1977 Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel
2004 Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3:75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Theodore
2019 On the nature of differential object marking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37: 167–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1989 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1991 In defence of the correspondence hypothesis: Island effects and parasitic consructions in logical form. In Logical Form and Linguistic Structure: Cross-linguistic Perspectives, C.-T. James Huang & Robert May (eds), 149–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
López, Luis
2009 A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maclachlan, Anna & Nakamura, Masonori
1994 Case checking and specificity in Tagalog. The Linguistic Review 14: 307–333.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2002 Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 157–200. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991 Case and licensing. In Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Germán Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds), 234–253. Columbus OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Marten, Lutz & Kula, Nancy C.
2012 Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. South African Journal of African Languages 30: 237–253.Google Scholar
Maw, Joan
1974 Swahili Style. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
1976 Focus and morphology of the Swahili verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 39: 389–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Tom
2004 The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Meinunger, André
1999 Topicality and agreement. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. II: Case Studies [Studies in Language Companion Series 42], Michael Darnell, Edith Moravscik, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan & Kathleen Wheatly (eds), 203–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2006 Polyvalent case, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 42, Jacqueline Bunting, Sapna Desai, Robert Peachey, Christopher Straughn & Zuzana Tomkova (eds), 57–76. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
2019 Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds), 19–45. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010 Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2011 Genitive subjects in Altaic and specification of phase. Lingua 121: 1265–1282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Agreement beyond Phi. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnárfi, László
2002 Focus and antifocus in modern Afrikaans and West Germanic. Linguistics 40: 1007–1130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
1993 Zur Pragmatik und Grammtik des Topik-Begriffes. In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Marga Reis (ed.), 155–203. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murrell, Paul
2012 The applicative construction and object symmetry as a parameter of variation in Kiswahili and Maragoli. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30: 255–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mursell, Johannes
2016 Syntactic association with focus – an agreement-based approach. In Console XXIV: Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, Kate Bellamy, Elena Karvovskaya & George Saad (eds), 324–351. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.Google Scholar
2018 Object marking in Swahili is topic agreement. Jezikoslovlje 19: 427–455.Google Scholar
2020 Long distance agreement and information structure. In Smith, Mursell & Hartmann (eds), 251–281.Google Scholar
Mursell, Johannes & Repp, Sophie
2019 Encoding varieties of topic and focus: The role of contrast and information status. Talk given at the annual meeting of the German Linguistic Society (DGfS) in Bremen.
Mursell, Johannes & Tan, Jennifer
2019 Ang-marking and Givenness in Tagalog. In Console XXVII: Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, Astrid van Alem, Mirella De Sisto, Elisabeth J. Kerr & Joanna Wall (eds), 150–174. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2003 Mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31: 29–62.Google Scholar
2005 Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung. Linguistische Berichte 203: 29–62.Google Scholar
2014 Deutsche Syntax deklarativ. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar für das Deutsche. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Masonori
1996 Economy of Chain Formation. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Naylor, Paz Buenaventura
1995 Subject, topic and Tagalog syntax. In Subject, Voice and Ergativity, David C. Bennett, Theodora Bynon & B. George Hewitt (eds). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta
2004 Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35:149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van der Koot, Hans
2008 Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11: 137–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2004 Derivations without the Activity Condition. In Perspectives on Phases [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49], Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds), 287–310. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
2011 Phonologically conditioned allomorph selection. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 4: Phonological Interfaces, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngonyani, Deo S.
2016 Pairwise combinations of Swahili applicative with other verb extensions. Nordic Journal of African Studies 25: 52–71.Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve
2000 The Swahili object marker: Syntax, semantics and mythology. In Proceedings of the World Congress of African Linguistics, Leipzig 1997, H. Ekkehard Wolff & Orin D. Gensler (eds), 679–691. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Nuger, Justin
2016 Building Predicates. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurse, Derek & Philippson, Gérard
2003 Introduction. In The Bantu Languages, Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds), 1–12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Obata, Kazuko
2003 A Grammar of Bilua. A Papuan Language from the Solomon Islands [Pacific Linguistics 50]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Ostrove, Jason
2018 When Phi-agreement Targets Topics: The View from San Martin Peras Mixtec. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Oxford, Will
2014 Multiple instances of agreement in the clausal spine: Evidence from Algonquian. In Proceedings of WCCFL 31, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 335–343. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H.
1991 Topic, focus and quantification. In Proceedings of SALT 1, Steven Moore & Adam Wyner (eds), 159–187. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud
2002 Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics 3: 695–714.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Whitman, John
2017 Topic prominence. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 4473–4504. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1982 Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup’ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Languages 6(1):75–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusativity hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Jeri J. Jaeger, Anthony C. Woodbury, Farrell Ackermann, Christine Chiarelio, Orin D. Gensler, John Kingston, Eve E. Sweetser, Henry Thompson & Kenneth W. Whistler (eds), 157–190. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2007 The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David A.
2007 Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2006 Old Italian scrambling: The low left periphery of the clause. In Form, Structure, and Grammar: A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 209–229. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 On V2 types. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (ed.), 154–165. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2003 Non-canonical agreement is canonical. Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 279–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds), 308–332. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Potsdam, Eric
2001 Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 583–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Yean-Ives
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2009 Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 That’s not how you agree: A reply to Zeijlstra. The Linguistic Review 30: 491–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Agreement and its Failures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preminger, Omer & Polinsky, Maria
2015 Agreement and semantic concord: A spurious unification. Ms, University of Maryland. [URL]> (7 February 2021)
Prince, Ellen
1981 Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–256. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quek, Yihui & Hirsch, Aron
2017 Severing focus form and meaning in Standard and Colloquial Singapore English. In Proceedings of NELS 47, Vol. 3, Andrew Lamont & Katarina Tetzloff (eds), 15–25. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea
2002 The Structure of Tagalog: Specificity, Voice, and the Distribution of Arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea & Richards, Norvin
2005 Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistc Inquiry 36: 565–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2017 The event domains. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds), 233–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Reich, Ingo
2004 Association with focus and choice functions – A binding approach. Research on Language and Computation 2: 463–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Lawrence, & Liao, Hsiu-Chuan
2004 A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 5(2):433–490.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1995 Wer glaubst du hat Recht? On so-called extractions from verb-second clauses and verb-first parenthetical constructions in German. Sprache & Pragmatik 36: 27–83.Google Scholar
2005 On the syntax of so-called focus sensitive particles. A reply to Büring & Hartmann 2001. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 ”Weil-V2”-Sätze und (k)ein Ende? Anmerkungen zur Analyse von Antomo & Steinbach (2010). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 32: 221–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga & Rosengren, Inger
1997 A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch. Journal of Semantics 14: 237–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2016 Contrast: Dissecting an ilusive information-structural notion and its role in grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 270–290. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc D.
2007 On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2000 Another look at Tagalog subjects. In Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 49], Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips & Lisa Travis (eds), 105–115. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, Frank & Soehn, Jan-Philipp
2006 Braucht niemanden zu scheren: A survey of NPI licensing in German. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Müller Stefan (ed.), 421–440. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Riedel, Kristina
2009 The Syntax of Object Marking in Sambaa: A Comparative Bantu Perspective. PhD dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986 Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
2003 Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010 Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rochemont, Michael
1978 A Theory of Stylistic Rules in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachussets.Google Scholar
1986 Focus in Generative Grammar [Studies in Generative Linguistic Analysis 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Givenness. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 41–64. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachussetts.Google Scholar
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
1991 Heads, projections, and category determination. In Views on Phrase Structure, Katherine Leffel & Denis Bouchard (eds), 97–112. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1905 On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, Joseph
2009 Existential sentences in Tagalog. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27: 675–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Word order and prosodic-structure constraints in Tagalog. Syntax 17: 40–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Specificity and objecthood in Tagalog. Journal of Linguistics 52: 639–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Joachim
2002 A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands. The Linguistic Review 19: 271–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Deriving linear order in OV/VO languages: Evidence from Oceanic languages. In Topics in Oceanic Morphosyntax, Claire Moyse-Faurie & Joachim Sabel (eds), 27–65. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Syntactic effects of verbal morphology in Malagasy. Talk given at the Syntax Colloquim, Goethe-University, Frankfurt.
Sabel, Joachim & Jochen Zeller
2006 Wh-question formation in Nguni. In Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, John M. Mugane, John P. Hutchinson & Dee A. Worman (eds), 271–283. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1976 The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li, 493–518. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1996 The Subject in Tagalog: Still None of the Above [UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15]. Los Angeles CA: Department of Linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe
1972 Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
1999 Givenness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scontras, Gregory & Nicolae, Andreea C.
2016 Saturating syntax: Linkers and modification in Tagalog. Lingua 149: 17–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Dimitriadis, Alexis
1997 The discourse function of object marking in Swahili. In CLS 33: Papers from the Main Session, April 17–19, 1997, Kora Singer, Randall Eggert & Gregory Anderson (eds), 373–389. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1995a The prosodic structure of words. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds), 439–469. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
1995b Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed.), 550–569. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 331–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sener, Serkan
2008 Non-canonical case licensing is canonical: Accusative subjects of CPs in Turkish. Ms, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner
2004 ‘Integrated’ and ‘non-integrated’ leftperipheral elements in German and English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 465–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shanon, Benny
1976 On the two kinds of presuppositions in natural language. Foundations of Language 14(2): 247–249.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1988 Voice in Philippine languages. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sikuku, Justine, Diercks, Michael & Marlo, Michael
2018 Pragmatic effect of clitic doubling: Two kinds of object markers in Lubusku. Linguistic Variation 18: 359–429. [URL].Google Scholar
Smeets, Liz & Wagner, Michael
2018 Reconstructing the syntax of focus operators. Semantics and Pragmatics 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Lawrence R.
1982 Labrador Inuktitut (Eskimo) and the theory of morphology. Studies in Language 6: 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peter W., Mursell, Johannes & Hartmann, Katharina
(eds) 2020 Agree to Agree: Agreement in the Minimalist Programme. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002 Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michael
2001 Move Dissolves into Merge: A Theory of Locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Stebbins, Tonya, Evans, Bethwyn & Terrill, Angela
2018 The Papuan languages of Island Melanesia. In The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area, Bill Palmer (ed.), 775–895. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
1991 Focussing and backgrounding operators. In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 37–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950 On referring. Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Wolfgang
2017 Against information structural heads: A relational analysis of German scrambling. Glossa 2: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan
2010 Fokuspartikeln innerhalb von DPn im Deutschen. In 40 Jahre Partikelforschung, Theo Harden & Elke Hentschel (eds), 169–181. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Surányi, Balázs
2016 Discourse-configurationality. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 422–441. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2002 Introduction. In Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 3–29. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Taglicht, Josef
1984 Message and Emphasis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher Damian
1992 Deletion, Deaccenting, and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela
1999 A Grammar of Lavukaleve: A Papuan Language of the Solomon Islands. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
2003 A Grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007 From the Bodleian Libraries University of Oxford on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL]> (8 February 2021).
Thiersch, Craig
1978 Topics in German syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2001 Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Marc Batin & Chris Collins (eds), 148–202. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torregrossa, Jacopo
2012 Towards a taxonomy of focus types. The case of information foci and contrastive foci in Italian. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 16:151–172.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2016 Focus, intonation and tonal height. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 165–185. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Urk, Coppe
2015 A Uniform Syntax for Phrasal Movement: A Dinka Bor Case Study. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael
2006 Association by movement. Natural Language Semantics 14: 297–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke
2009 Word Order and Information Structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2017 Flexibility in symmetry: An implicational relation in Bantu double object constructions. In Order and structure in syntax II: Subjecthood and argument structure, Michelle Sheehan & Laura R. Bailey (eds.), 115–152. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
2020 The AWSOM correlation in comparative Bantu object marking. In Smith, Mursell & Hartmann (eds), 185–216.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji
1979 The development of the Swahili object marker: A study of the interaction of syntax and discourse in discourse and syntax. Syntax and Semantics 12: 505–524.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The Universal Structure of Categories. Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wold, Dag E.
1996 Long distance selective binding: The case of focus. In Proceedings of SALT VI, Teresa Galloway & Justin Spence (eds), 311–328. Ithaca NY: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
1999 Animacy hierarchy effects on object agreement. In New Dimensions in African Linguistics and Languages [Trends in African Linguistics 3], Paul Kotey, (ed) 205–215. Trenton NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2003 Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Agree(ment): Looking up or looking down? Ms.Google Scholar
2016a Feature dependencies – The ups and downs of agree. Lecture notes from a course given at Institute of Linguistics, Cognition and Culture (NYI), St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
2016b The ups and downs of agree. Lecture notes from a course given at the Netherlands Graduate School in Linguistics, LOT Summer School, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1985 Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2014 On the uninterpretability of interpretable features. In Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [Language Faculty and Beyond 11], Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 109–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2012 Object marking in isiZulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30: 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Three types of object marking in Bantu. Linguistische Berichte 239: 347–367.Google Scholar
2015 Argument prominence and agreement: Explaining an unexpected object asymmetry in Zulu. Lingua 156: 17–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar
2011 Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua 121: 1651–1670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
2016 Nuclear stress and information structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 463–483. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 59: 502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar