Chapter published in:
Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 3582
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1998Parameterizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Âmbar, Manuela
1988Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito verbo em portugues. Lisboa: University of Lisbon dissertation.Google Scholar
1994‘Aux-to-Comp’ and lexical restrictions on verb movement. In Paths towards Universal Grammar, Luigi Rizzi, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock & Roberto Zanuttini (eds), 1–24. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1997Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14], Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.), 151–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
1995Null Subjects. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2000Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In Essays in Portuguese Comparative Syntax, João Costa (ed.), 31–93. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In Romance Inversion, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 20–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63(1): 2–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019pro as a minimal nP: Toward a unified approach to pro-drop. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3): 487–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar & De Cat, Cecile
2019Intervention effects in wh-chains: The combined effect of syntax and processing. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar, Duarte, Eugénia & Kato, Mary
2005Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 11–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boskovič, Zelko
1996Selection and the categorial status of infinitival complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 269–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1977On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thom Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Gugliermo
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cunha, Luís & Purificafição, Silvano
2008Algumas evidências de temporalidade no infinitivo simples. In Textos Seleccionados. XXIII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, Sónia Frota & Ana Lúcia Santos (eds), 179–191. Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2005French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua 108: 1195–1219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1992Resumptive Chains and Restrictive Relative Clauses, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Duarte, Inês
1987A construção de topicalizaçãona grammatica do português: Regência, ligação e condições sobre movimento, dissertação de doutoramento, Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
2018Comments on complementation in Portuguese. In Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17], Ana Lúcia Santos & Anabela Gonçalves (eds), 243–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka
1992On obviation. In Lexical Matters, Anna Szabolcsi & Ivan Sag (eds), 85–109. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo
2000Argumentos nulos em português brasileiro. MA thesis, Unicamp, Campinas.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Sag, Ivan
2001Interrogative Investigations. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Madalena, Ana Lúcia Santos & Inês Duarte
2014(Pseudo-)Inflected infinitives and Control as Agree. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Leuven 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6], Karen Lahousse & Stefania Marzo (eds), 161–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grano, Thomas
2015Control and Restructuring. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1999Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Culicover, Peter
2003The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79(3): 517–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary
1999Strong pronouns, weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11: 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1971Fact. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda
2015On the temporal orientation of intensional subjunctives in spanish. In Sentence and Discourse, Jacqueline Guéron (ed.), 23–44. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2000Elements of Control. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 811–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015A Two-tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madeira, Ana
1994On the Portuguese inflected infinitive. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 6, John Harris (ed.), 179–203. London: University College London.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2002Clitics. Lexicalization patterns of the so-called 3rd person dative. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 117–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria
1994Clíticos na história do português. PhD dissertation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James
1996On the scope of verb movement in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 47–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Modesto, Marcello
2000Null subjects without rich agreement. In Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter, Mary Kato & Esmeralda Negrão (eds), 147–174. Madrid: Iberoamericana. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese and Finnish: They are not derived by movement. In New Horizons in the Analysis of Control and Raising, William D. Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds), 231–248. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Topic prominence and null subjects. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 375–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009What Brazilian Portuguese says about control: Remarks on Boeckx and Hornstein. Syntax 13(1): 78–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese and the theory of control. In Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17], Ana Lúcia Santos & Anabela Gonçalves (eds), 59–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2019Remarks on finite control and hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 18(1): 4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ordónez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela
1999Left-dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrísio
2006The Minimalist Syntax of Defective Domains: Gerunds and Infinitives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 98]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
2004Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis. In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 73: 83–112.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan
1994Head-driven Phrase Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1997Langage et cognition: Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul
1997The semantics of mood, complementation, and conversational force. Natural Language Semantics 8: 167–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
1987Case Theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 85–109.Google Scholar
1994Affective operators and clause structure in European Portuguese and European Spanish. Ms, University of California Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
1996Towards an unification of topic constructions. Ms, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
1998Definite/zero alternations in Portuguese: Towards a unification of topic constructions. In Romance linguistics: Theoretical perspectives. Selected papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVII), Irvine, 20–22 February, 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 160], Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds), 197–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 282–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene
2004Impoverished Morphology and A-movement out of Case-domains. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan & Pollard, Carl
1991An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2013Portuguese, Russian and the theory of control. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Northeast Linguistics Society, Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds), 115–126. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2018Control of inflected infinitives in European Portuguese. In Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and Acquisition [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17], Ana Lúcia Santos & Anabela Gonçalves (eds), 29–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2002The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives with Nominative Subjects. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
2007Romance infinitives with subjects, subjunctive obviation and control. In Coreference, Modality, and Focus: Studies on the Syntax Semantics Interface [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 191–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
1986On the referential properties of embedded finite clause subjects. In Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Ivonne Bordelois, Heles Contreras & Karen Zagona (eds), 183–196. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric
1992A preverbal landing site for quantificational operators. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 319–344.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2003Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar