Agent control in passives in Romanian
We examine control by the external argument of
passives in Romanian. As copular passives generally disallow clausal
subjects, this issue only concerns reflexive-based passives
(so-called ‘se-passives’). Although it is difficult
to find unequivocal control instances in Romanian due to the gradual
replacement of infinitives by subjunctives and the
nominative-licensing potential of infinitives, there are some verbs
for which control can be assumed (aspectuals and ability modals).
These verbs allow se-passives, but in this case
se must be repeated on the infinitive or
subjunctive complement. We argue that this does not represent voice
agreement under restructuring, but rather an instance of control,
involving matching between the external arguments
of the matrix and the embedded se-verbs, for which
we propose generation in an argument position, SpecVoiceP. Romanian
‘se-passives’ are analyzed as a construction
halfway between actives and passives, having a nominative theme
(with which T agrees) but also a projected external argument.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Control with agents of passives across languages
- 2.Control with implicit agents of passives in Romanian
- 3.Towards an account: Why some analyses don’t work
- 4.Our analysis
- 4.1On the structure of ‘se-passives’: Halfway between actives and passives
- 4.2Control in se-passives
- 4.3Comparing our account with an alternative analysis of control
in Romanian
- 4.4Summary
- 5.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (35)
References
Alboiu, Gabriela. 2007. Moving
forward with Romanian backward Control and
Raising. In New
Horizons in the Analysis of Control and
Raising, William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds), 187–211. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnastopoulou, Elena, Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Marchiş, Mihaela. 2010. No
objections to backward
Control. In Control
as Movement, Norbert Hornstein & Maria Polinsky (eds), 89–117. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2015. External
Arguments in Transitivity
Alternations. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosque, Ignacio & Gallego, Ángel. 2011. Spanish
double passives and related
structures. Linguística.
Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do
Porto 6(1): 9–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruening, Benjamin. 2013.
By
phrases in passives and
nominals. Syntax 16(1): 1–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard. 1993. The
theory of principles and
parameters. In Syntax:
An International Handbook of Contemporary
Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, & Theo Vennemann (eds), 506–569. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 1997. The
double subject construction in Romanian. Notes on the syntax
of the subject. Revue
Roumaine de
Linguistique 42(3–4): 101–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 1998. Remarks
on the syntax and the interpretation of Romanian middle
passive se
sentences. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique 43: 317–342.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornilescu, Alexandra. 2019. On
the passivization of clausal
argument. Talk given at
the International Workshop The
Syntax and Semantics of Internal Arguments, University of
Bucharest, 24–25
October.
Cotfas, Maria Aurelia. 2012. On
the Syntax of the Romanian Subjunctive. Control and
Obviation. PhD
dissertation, University of Bucharest.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cotfas, Maria Aurelia. 2017. On
the left periphery of independent subjunctives in Romanian:
Topics, foci and complementizer
deletion. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique 62(3): 253–278.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1994. The
Syntax of
Romanian. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal
se constructions in Romance and the
passivization of
unergatives. Linguistic
Inquiry 29(3): 399–438. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Giurgea, Ion. 2018. Voice:
§2. Se-verbs. Ms, draft for a chapter of
A Rerefence Grammar of Romanian, II:
The VP and the
Sentence
, Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin & Ion Giurgea (eds). <[URL]> (24 January 2021).
Dragomirescu, Adina. 2011. The
subject of supine clauses in Romanian and
A-chains. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique 56(4): 371–392.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Folli, Raffaella. 2002. Resultatives:
Small clauses or complex
VPs. In Romance
Languages and Linguistic Theory
2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic
Theory 232], Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds), 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giurgea, Ion. 2017. Romanian se-verbs: how much we can unify and how much is to be assigned to the lexicon. Talk given at the Cambridge Workshop on Voice, University of Cambridge, May 22–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giurgea, Ion. 2019. On
the person constraint on Romanian
se-passives. In Agreement,
Case and Locality in the Nominal and Verbal
Domains, Ludovico Franco, Mihaela Marchis Moreno & Matthew Reeve (eds), 95–129. Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herbeck, Peter. 2014. (Backward)
Control and clitic climbing. On the deficiency of non-finite
domains in Spanish and
Catalan. In ConSOLE
XXI: Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the Student
Organization of Linguistics in
Europe, Martin Kohlberger, Kate Bellamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds), 123–145. Leiden: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Virginia. 2003. Reduced
CP fields and
phases. University of
Bucharest Working Papers in
Linguistics 5(1): 44–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, Maria. 2009. Loss
of Infinitival Complementation in Romanian. Diachronic
Syntax. PhD
dissertation, University of Florida.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labelle, Marie. 2008. The
French reflexive and reciprocal
se. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory 26: 833–876. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan. 2015. A
Two-tiered Theory of
Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice
and v. Lessons from
Acehnese. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lødrup, Helge. 2014. Long
passives in Norwegian: Evidence for complex
predicates. Nordic Journal of
Linguistics 37(3): 367–391. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Maddox, Matthew L. 2018. Passive
se in Romanian and Spanish. A subject
cycle. Journal of
Linguistics 54: 389–427. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case
and
licensing. In Proceedings
of the Eighth Eastern States Conference of
Linguistics, Germán F. Westphal, Benjamin Ao & He-Rakh Chae (eds), 234–253. Columbus OH: Ohio State University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ordóñez, Francisco. 2009. Backwards
or in situ? Infinitival overt subjects in
Romance. Paper presented at
the 19th Colloquium on
Generative Grammar,
UPV-EHU.
Pitteroff, Marcel & Schäfer, Florian. 2019. Implicit
control
crosslinguistically. Language 95(1): 136–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rezac, Milan. 2011. Phi-features and the modular architecture of language. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Urk, Coppe. 2013. Visser’s generalization: The syntax of control and the passive. Linguistic Inquiry 44.168–78. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, Fredericus T. 1973. A historical syntax of the English language, vol. 3. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wurmbrand, Susi & Shimamura, Koji. 2017. The
features of the voice domain: Actives, passives, and
restructuring. In The
Verbal Domain, Roberta d’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds), 179–204. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Portner, Paul & Pak, Miok. 2019. Imperatives
and politeness. Talk given
at the 45th Incontro di
Grammatica Generativa, University of
Padua, 21–23
February.