Control from inside
Evidence from Japanese
Traditional assumptions hold that the reference
of complement control PRO is dependent on the reference of a higher
argument and that the lexical properties of the embedding predicate
are mostly responsible for controller determination. Against such
views, this study argues for the possibility that the reference of
certain instances of PRO (PC PRO) derives from its own internal
structure. The insight comes from Japanese data where certain force
suffixes appear in the complements of attitude predicates. These
forces are proposed to arise from C-PRO indexical
(speaker/addressee) agreement. Similar views have been presented in
my previous works (Matsuda
2015a; b,
2017a; b, 2019), with some revisions along the way.
This paper provides new supporting data and presents my revised
framework.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 2.1Control as force embedding
- 2.2Partial control
- 2.3De se
- 2.4Nonbiunique selectional relations
- 2.5Forces in roots
- 3.Interim summary
- 4.Extension to English
- 4.1Subject, object and split control
- 4.2Partial control
- 5.How does the force arise clause-internally?
- 5.1A force-specific head?
- 5.2Indexical agreement
- 5.3Creating a de se/te property
- 6.Associative structure
- 7.Remaining issues and conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (60)
Adachi, Taro
2002 Isi-kanyu no
modaritii (Modality of intentions and
exhortations). In
Modaritii (
Modality) [
Sin
Nihongo Bunpoo Sensho 4],
Yoshio Nitta,
Takashi Masuoka &
Yukinori Takubo (eds), 18–41. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew
2004 Shifty
operators in changing
contexts.
Semantics and
Linguistic
Theory 14: 20–37.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C.
2008 The
Syntax of Agreement and
Concord. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, Hans
2007 Featuring
the subject in Dutch
imperatives. In
Imperative
Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies in Honour of Frits
Beukema [
Linguistik
Aktuell/Linguistics Today
103],
Wim van der Wurff (ed.), 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina
2003 On
finiteness as logophoric
anchoring. In
Temps
et point de vue,
Jacqueline Guéron &
Liliane Tamowski (eds), 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro
1990 Anaphora
and attitude de
se
. In
Semantics
and Contextual Expression,
Renate Bartsch,
Johan van Benthem &
Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 1–32. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crnič, Luka & Trinh, Tue
2009 Embedding
imperatives in
English.
Proceedings of Sinn
und
Bedeutung 13(1): 109–124.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cysouw, Michael
2003 The
Paradigmatic Structure of Person
Marking. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina
2002 Decomposing
pronouns.
Linguistic
Inquiry 33(3): 409–442.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farkas, Donka F.
1988 On
obligatory
control.
Linguistics and
Philosophy 11(1): 27–58.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fujii, Tomohiro
2006 Some
Theoretical Issues in Japanese
Control. PhD
dissertation, University of Maryland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fukui, Naoki
1986 A
Theory of Category Projection and Its
Applications. PhD
dissertation, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grano, Thomas
2012 Control
and Restructuring at the Syntax-Semantics
Interface. PhD
dissertation, The University of Chicago.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane
1979 Complement
selection and the
lexicon.
Linguistic
Inquiry 10(2): 279–326.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed
morphology. In
The
View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of
Sylvain Bromberg,
Kenneth Hale &
Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, Chung-Hye
2000 The
Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force
in Universal Grammar. New York NY: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harbour, Daniel
2016 Impossible
Persons. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002 Person
and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric
analysis.
Language 78(3): 482–526.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasegawa, Nobuko
2009 Agreement
at the CP level, clause types and the ‘person’ restriction
on the
subject. In
Proceedings
of the Workshop on Altaic Formal
Linguistics 5 [
MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics
58],
Ryosuke Shibagaki &
Reiko Vermeulen (eds), 131–152. Cambridge MA: MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, Irene
2008 Features
on bound
pronouns. In
Phi-Theory:
Phi-Features across Modules and
Interfaces,
Daniel Harbour,
David Adger &
Susana Béjar (eds), 35–56. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert
1999 Movement
and control.
Linguistic
Inquiry 30(1): 69–96.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Inoue, Kazuko
2007 Nihongo no moodaru no tokuchoo
saikoo (Revisiting the nature of modality in
Japanese). In
Nihongo no Syubun
Gensyoo (
Main
Clause Phenomena in
Japanese),
Nobuko Hasegawa (ed.), 227–260. Tokyo: Hituzi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jensen, Britta
2003 Syntax
and semantics of imperative
subjects.
Nordlyd: Tromsø
University Working Papers on Language &
Linguistics 31: 150–164.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika
2009 Making
a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of
pronouns.
Linguistic
Inquiry 40(2): 187–237.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuno, Susumu
1973 The
Structure of the Japanese
Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuno, Susumu
1988 Blended
quasi-direct discourse in
Japanese. In
Papers
from the Second International Workshop on Japanese
Syntax,
William J. Poser (ed.), 75–102. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1973 Where
epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from
Japanese. In
A
Festschrift for Morris Halle.
Stephen R. Anderson &
Paul Kiparsky (eds), 377–391. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2000 Elements
of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival
Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2004 The
scale of finiteness and the calculus of
control.
Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory 22(4): 811–877.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2008 Two
routes of control, evidence from case transmission in
Russian.
Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory 26(4): 877–924.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2015 Two-tiered
Theory of Control, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, Idan
2018 Direct
variable binding and agreement in obligatory
control. In
Pronouns
in Embedded Contexts at the Syntax-Semantics
Interface,
Pritty Patel-Grosz,
Patrick Georg Grosz &
Sarah Zobel (eds), 1–41. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewis, David
1979 Attitude
de dicto and de
se
.
The
Philosophical
Review 88(4): 513–543.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Madigan, Sean
2008 Obligatory
split control into exhortative complements in
Korean.
Linguistic
Inquiry 39(3): 493–502.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuda, Asako
2015a Controller
restrictions and embedded
force.
JELS: Papers from the
Conference and from the International Spring Forum of the
English Linguistic Society of
Japan 32: 77–83.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuda, Asako
2015b Complement
control without a DP
controller.
Journal of the
Ochanomizu University English
Society 5: 29–49.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuda, Asako
2017a Shifted
indexicals in partial
control.
JELS: Papers from
the Conference and from the International Spring Forum of
the English Linguistic Society of
Japan 34: 264–270.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuda, Asako
2017b Embedded
imperatives in
control.
English
Linguistics 33(2): 340–376.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsuda, Asako
2019 Person
in Partial Control. PhD
dissertation, Ochanomizu University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moriyama, Takuro
2000 Kihon-joho to sentaku-kankei tosite-no
modaritii (Modality as basic moods and selective
relations). In
Modaritii (
Modality) [
Nihongo no Bunpoo
3],
Takuro Moriyama,
Yoshio Nitta &
Hiroshi Kudo (eds), 3–78. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nitta, Yoshio
1991 Nihongo no Modaritii to
Ninshoo (
Modality and Person in
Japanese). Tokyo: Hituzi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oshima, David Yoshikazu
2006 Perspectives
in Reported Discourse. PhD
dissertation, Stanford University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pearson, Hazel
2013 The
Sense of Self: Topics in the Semantics of De
Se
Expressions. PhD
dissertation, Harvard University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Percus, Orin & Sauerland, Uli
2003a On
the LFs of attitude
reports.
Proceedings of Sinn
und
Bedeutung 7: 228–242.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Percus, Orin & Sauerland, Uli
2003b Pronoun
movement in dream
reports. In
Proceedings
of NELS 33,
Shigeto Kawahara &
Makoto Kadowaki (eds), 265–284. Cambridge MA: MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portner, Paul
2004 The
semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause
types.
Semantics and
Linguistic
Theory 14: 235–252.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul M.
1970 On
coreferential complement subject
deletion.
Linguistic
Inquiry 1(4): 439–500.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potsdam, Eric
1996 Syntactic
Issues in the English
Imperative. PhD
dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooryck, Johan
2000 Configurations
of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance
Languages. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlenker, Philippe
2003 A
plea for
monsters.
Linguistics and
Philosophy 26(1): 29–120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann
2010 On
EPP effects.
Studia
Linguistica 64(2): 159–189.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stiebels, Barbara
2007 Towards
a typology of complement control.
ZAS Papers in
Linguistics 47: 1–80.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uchibori, Asako
2000 The
Syntax of Subjunctive Complements: Evidence from
Japanese. PhD
dissertation, University of Connecticut.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ueda, Yukiko
2008 Person
restriction and syntactic structure of Japanese
modals.
Scientific Approaches
to
Language 7: 123–150.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vassilieva, Maria
2005 Associative
and Pronominal
Plurality. PhD
dissertation, SUNY Stony Brook.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vassilieva, Maria
2008 A
syntactic analysis of nominal and pronominal associative
plurals.
University of
Pennsylvania Working Papers in
Linguistics 14: 339–352.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wechsler, Stephen
2010 What
‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals,
self-ascription, and theory of mind.
Language 86(2): 332–365.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin
1980 Predication.
Linguistic
Inquiry 11(1): 203–238.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Pak, Miok & Portner, Paul
2012 A
syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on
imperative, promissive, and exhortative
subjects.
Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory 30(4): 1231–1274.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Landau, Idan
2024.
Noncanonical Obligatory Control.
Language and Linguistics Compass 18:3
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.