Chapter published in:
Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 197222


Baker, Mark
2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn
2011BE-ing Default: The Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2019Checking up on (phi-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50: 527–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brodahl, Kristin Klubbo
2016Zu deutschen Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 1 als Kern: Eine syntaktisch-semantische Untersuchung. MA thesis, NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
2018Zur Syntax und Semantik adverbialer Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 1 im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 46 (4): 289–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2009Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–255. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin
1990Thematic Theory in Syntax and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decisions and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburg PA: University of Pittsburg Press.Google Scholar
2005Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin M.
1996Som-predikativer. MA thesis, NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine & Haug, Dag
(eds) 2012Big Events, Small Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Silke
2004Towards an Optimal Theory of Reflexivization. PhD dissertation, Tübingen University.Google Scholar
2006Matrix unloaded: Binding in a local derivational approach. Linguistics 44: 913–935. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Locality, control, and non-adjoined islands. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 82. 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Silke & Høyem, Inghild Flaate
2021Adjunct control in German, Norwegian, and English. Ms, University of Stuttgart & NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
Flaate, Inghild
2007Die als-Prädikative im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner & Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2015Syntactic and prosodic integration and disintegration in peripheral adverbial clauses and in right dislocation/afterthought. In Syntactic Complexity across Interfaces, Andreas Trotzke & Josef Bayer (eds), 75–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2012Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Lohndal, Terje
2010Negative concord and (multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Glyn
2009The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 139]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1999A plea for implicit anaphora. In Atomism and Binding, Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds), 183–203. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken
2001Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 67–80.Google Scholar
Høyem, Inghild Flaate
2015Zum Kontrollproblem adverbialer Infinitive im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 43(2): 159–183.Google Scholar
2018Adjunktkontrolle im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 255: 347–395.Google Scholar
2019Ereigniskontrollierte Adjunkte im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 47(3): 507–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Høyem, Inghild Flaate & Brodahl, Kristin Klubbo
2019Über den Kontrollstatus deutscher Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 2 als Kern. Deutsche Sprache 47(2): 98–124.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo
1986Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 582–622.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1991Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 189–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2000Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Control in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard
1988Subjects and the θ-criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2014Phrase Structure and Argument Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita
1983On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.Google Scholar
1986On binding and control theory. In Proceedings of NELS 16, Stephen Berman, Jae-Wong Choe & Joyce McDonough (eds), 322–337. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin
1999Adverbiale im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Pütz, Herbert
1988Über Objektsprädikative: Neuere Ableitungen, Bedeutungsvielfalt, Abgrenzung. In Gedenkschrift an Ingerid Dal, John Ole Askedal, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Karl Erich Schöndorf (eds), 182–201. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas
1987Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 267–310.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives: External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim
2009On the implicitness of arguments in event passives. In Proceedings of NELS 38, Anisa Schardl, Martin Walkow & Muhammad Abdurrahman (eds), 365–374. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew
1995The Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives of Result in English. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
2002Locality and control with infinitives of result. Natural Language Semantics 10: 167–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1974Rule Ordering in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1985PRO and subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 297–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2011On agree and merge. Lecture Notes, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2012There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar