Part of
Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 197222
References (52)
References
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn. 2011. BE-ing Default: The Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2019. Checking up on (phi-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50: 527–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brodahl, Kristin Klubbo. 2016. Zu deutschen Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 1 als Kern: Eine syntaktisch-semantische Untersuchung. MA thesis, NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
. 2018. Zur Syntax und Semantik adverbialer Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 1 im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 46 (4): 289–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2009. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27: 455–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–255. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin. 1990. Thematic Theory in Syntax and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decisions and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburg PA: University of Pittsburg Press.Google Scholar
Duden. 2005. Die Grammatik. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin M. 1996. Som-predikativer. MA thesis, NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine & Haug, Dag (eds). 2012. Big Events, Small Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Silke. 2004. Towards an Optimal Theory of Reflexivization. PhD dissertation, Tübingen University.Google Scholar
. 2006. Matrix unloaded: Binding in a local derivational approach. Linguistics 44: 913–935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Locality, control, and non-adjoined islands. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 82. 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Silke & Høyem, Inghild Flaate. 2021. Adjunct control in German, Norwegian, and English. Ms, University of Stuttgart & NTNU Trondheim.Google Scholar
Flaate, Inghild. 2007. Die als-Prädikative im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner & Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2015. Syntactic and prosodic integration and disintegration in peripheral adverbial clauses and in right dislocation/afterthought. In Syntactic Complexity across Interfaces, Andreas Trotzke & Josef Bayer (eds), 75–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Lohndal, Terje. 2010. Negative concord and (multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Glyn. 2009. The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 139]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1999. A plea for implicit anaphora. In Atomism and Binding, Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds), 183–203. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 67–80.Google Scholar
Høyem, Inghild Flaate. 2015. Zum Kontrollproblem adverbialer Infinitive im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 43(2): 159–183.Google Scholar
. 2018. Adjunktkontrolle im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 255: 347–395.Google Scholar
. 2019. Ereigniskontrollierte Adjunkte im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 47(3): 507–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Høyem, Inghild Flaate & Brodahl, Kristin Klubbo. 2019. Über den Kontrollstatus deutscher Partizipialkonstruktionen mit dem Partizip 2 als Kern. Deutsche Sprache 47(2): 98–124.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 582–622.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. Free Adjuncts and Absolutes in English: Problems of Control and Interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1995. Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 189–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1988. Subjects and the θ-criterion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, Terje. 2014. Phrase Structure and Argument Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita. 1983. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.Google Scholar
. 1986. On binding and control theory. In Proceedings of NELS 16, Stephen Berman, Jae-Wong Choe & Joyce McDonough (eds), 322–337. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1999. Adverbiale im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Pütz, Herbert. 1988. Über Objektsprädikative: Neuere Ableitungen, Bedeutungsvielfalt, Abgrenzung. In Gedenkschrift an Ingerid Dal, John Ole Askedal, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Karl Erich Schöndorf (eds), 182–201. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas. 1987. Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 267–310.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives: External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim. 2009. On the implicitness of arguments in event passives. In Proceedings of NELS 38, Anisa Schardl, Martin Walkow & Muhammad Abdurrahman (eds), 365–374. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Whelpton, Matthew. 1995. The Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives of Result in English. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
. 2002. Locality and control with infinitives of result. Natural Language Semantics 10: 167–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule Ordering in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 1985. PRO and subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 297–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2011. On agree and merge. Lecture Notes, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fischer, Silke & Inghild Flaate Høyem
2022. Adjunct control in German, Norwegian, and English. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 25:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.