Cover not available
Part of
Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 223–258

Adjunct control and the poverty of the stimulus

Availability vs. evidence

| Ulster University

Subject control in non-finite adjuncts is observed across languages (as in ‘John called Mary after drawing a picture’). Research on the acquisition of adjunct control has generally focused on the relevant grammatical components and when they are acquired. This paper considers these components in the context of the linguistic input to ask how control in adjuncts is acquired. Although adjunct control is available in the input, the instances themselves do not provide evidence for abstract syntactic relations. Implications are considered for linguistic dependencies and the evidence in the input.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is evidence?
    • 2.1Considerations for the input
      • 2.1.1The input: Timeframe
      • 2.1.2The input: Sources of evidence
      • 2.1.3The input: Signal to noise
    • 2.2Considerations for grammatical competence
  • 3.Availability
  • 4.Evidence
    • 4.1Direct observation
      • 4.1.1Attachment height
        • 4.1.1.1Lexical learning (Cairns et al. 1994)
        • 4.1.1.2Adjunct misanalysis (Adler 2006)
        • 4.1.1.3Binding across clauses
      • 4.1.2C-command by the controller
    • 4.2Generalization from similar structures
      • 4.2.1Complement control
      • 4.2.2Finite adjuncts
  • 5.Universal grammar
    • 5.1Role of the input
      • 5.1.1Finiteness
      • 5.1.2Complementizers
    • 5.2Competence and acquisition
    • 5.3Predictions for the input
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Other types of control
    • 6.2Other dependencies
    • 6.3Role of the argument of the poverty of the stimulus
    • 6.4Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.08ger
References
Adania, Flavia & Stegenwaller-Schütz, Maja & Niesel, Talea
2017 The peaceful co-existence of input frequency and structural intervention effects on the comprehension of complex sentences in German-speaking children. Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adani, Flavia, van der Lely, Heather K., Forgiarini, Matteo & Guasti, Maria Teresa
2010 Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 120(9): 2148–2166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adler, Allison Nicole
2006 Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ambridge, Ben
2019 Against stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First Language 40(5–6): 509–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, Ben, Pine, Julian Mark, Rowland, Caroline F. & Young, Chris R.
2008 The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition 106(1): 87–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arunachalam, Sudha, Escovar, Emily, Hansen, Melissa & Waxman, Sandra R.
2011 Verb learning from syntax alone at 21 months. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Nick Danis, Kate Mesh & Hyunsuk Sung (eds), 21–24. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Carol L.
1979 Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 533–581.Google Scholar
Banbury, Simon P., Macken, William J., Tremblay, Sébastien & Jones, Dylan M.
2001 Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors 43(1): 12–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2017 Internal grammar and children’s grammatical creativity against poor inputs. Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert C.
1985 The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Robyn & Coltheart, Veronika
1996 Effects of irrelevant sounds on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 49(2): 398–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broihier, Kevin & Wexler, Kenneth
1995 Children’s acquisition of control in temporal adjuncts. In Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26], Carson Schütze, Jennifer Ganger & Kevin Broihier (eds), 193–220. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Cairns, Helen S., McDaniel, Dana, Hsu, Jennifer R. & Rapp, Michele
1994 A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language 70(2): 260–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chien, Yu-Chin & Wexler, Kenneth
1990 Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1(3): 225–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures [Studies in Generative Grammar 9]. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Conroy, Anastasia, Takahashi, Eri, Lidz, Jeffrey & Phillips, Colin
2009 Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3): 446–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courage, Mary & Cowan, Nelson
2008 The Development of Memory in Infancy and Childhood. Hove: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Nelson
2001 The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1): 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & McKee, Cecile
1985 The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 15, Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe & Joyce McDonough (eds), 94–110. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Thornton, Rosalind
1998 Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feigenson, Lisa
2007 Continuity of format and computation in short-term memory development. In Short-and Long-Term Memory in Infancy: Taking the First Steps towards Memory, Lisa M. Oakes & Patricia J. Bauer (eds), 51–74. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fisher, Cynthia, Gertner, Yael, Scott, Rose M. & Yuan, Sylvia
2010 Syntactic bootstrapping. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(2): 143–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet D.
1989 Learning the periphery. In Learnability and Linguistic Theory, Robert J. Matthews & William Demopoulos (eds), 129–154. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 How to obey the Subset Principle: Binding and locality. In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Binding, Dependencies and Learnability, Barbara Lust, Gabriella Hermon & Jaklin Kornfilt (eds), 429–451. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert
1998 Structural complexity and the time course of grammatical development. Cognition 66(3): 249–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana, & Rizzi, Luigi
2009 Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1): 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, Annie, Mease, Tara M. & Lidz, Jeffrey
2016 Discontinuous development in the acquisition of filler-gap dependencies: Evidence from 15- and 20-month-olds. Language Acquisition 23(3): 234–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerard, Juliana
2016 The Acquisition of Adjunct Control: Grammar and Processing. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerard, Juliana, Lidz, Jeffrey, Zuckerman, Shalom & Pinto, Manuela
2017 Similarity-based interference and the acquisition of adjunct control. Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The acquisition of adjunct control is colored by the task. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gertner, Yael, Fisher, Cynthia & Eisengart, Julie
2006 Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science 17(8): 684–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, E. Mark
1967 Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10(5): 447–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, Helen
1981 Children’s grammar of complement-subject interpretation. In Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Susan Tavakolian (ed.), 139–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 The nominal analysis of children’s interpretations of adjunct pro clauses. Language 77(3): 494–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, Helen & Behne, Dawn
1992 Development in control and extraction. In Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Weissenborn, Helen Goodluck & Thomas Roeper (eds), 151–171. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Johnson, Marcus
2001 Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27(6): 1411–1423.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, & Johnson, Marcus
2004 Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language 51(1): 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, Johnson, Marcus, & Lee, Yoonhyoung
2006 Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32(6): 1304–1321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., & Lowder, Matthew W.
2012 Complex sentence processing: A review of Theoretical Perspectives on the Comprehension of Relative Clauses: Review of Complex Sentence Processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(7): 403–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Jeffrey
2018a Adjunct Control: Syntax and Processing. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
2018b Non-subject control of temporal adjuncts. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 54. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2008 Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 403–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations. In Corpus-linguistic Applications, Stefan T. Gries, Stefanie Wulff & Mark Davies (eds), 197–212. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane & Pinker, Steven
1989 Positive and negative evidence in language acquistion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2): 341–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef
1989 The language learner: A trigger-happy kid? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2): 342–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
2017 Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2000 Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics, Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 129–169. New York NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Henry & Crain, Stephen
1982 Relative acquisition. Language Development 1: 245–274.Google Scholar
Harrigan, Kaitlyn, Hacquard, Valentine & Lidz, Jeffrey
2019 Hope for syntactic bootstrapping. Language 95(4): 642–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinz, Jeffrey & Riggle, Jason
2011 Learnability. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 5 Volume Set, Vol. 1, Chapter 2, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 54–78. Malden MA: Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Nayudu, Aarti & Sheehan, Michelle
2009 Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi*. Studia Linguistica 63(1): 59–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Jennifer R., Cairns, Helen S. & Fiengo, Robert. W.
1985 The development of grammars underlying children’s interpretation of complex sentences. Cognition 20(1): 25–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. James
1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 531–574.Google Scholar
Huang, Yi T., Zheng, Xiaobei, Meng, Xiangzhi & Snedeker, Jesse
2013 Children’s assignment of grammatical roles in the online processing of Mandarin passive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 69(4): 589–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janke, Vikki
2018 Discourse effects on older children’s interpretations of complement control and temporal adjunct control. Language Acquisition 25(4): 366–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janke, Vikki & Bailey, Laura R.
2017 Effects of discourse on control. Journal of Linguistics 53(3): 533–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janke, Vikki & Perovic, Alexandra
2017 Contrasting complement control, temporal adjunct control and controlled verbal gerund subjects in ASD: The role of contextual cues in reference assignment. Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempe, Vera & MacWhinney, Brian
1999 Processing of morphological and semantic cues in Russian and German. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(2): 129–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kush, Dave & Dillon, Brian
2020 Principle B Constrains the Processing of Cataphora: Evidence for Syntactic and Discourse Predictions Open Science Framework. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung & Sturt, Patrick
2014 The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 73: 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2021 A Selectional Theory of Adjunct Control. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 A Two-tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Adjunct control depends on Voice. In A Pesky Set: Papers for David Pesetsky, Claire Halpert, Hadas Kotek & Coppe van Urk (eds), 93–102. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey & Gagliardi, Annie
2015 How nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annu. Rev. Linguist 1(1): 333–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukyanenko, Cynthia, Conroy, Aanastasia, & Lidz, Jeffrey
2014 Is she patting Katie? Constraints on pronominal reference in 30-month-olds. Language Learning and Development 10(4): 328–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lust, Barbara, Eisele, Julie, & Mazuka, Reiko
1992 The Binding Theory module: Evidence from first language acquisition for Principle C. Language 68(2): 333–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: The Database, Vol. 2. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Wexler, Kenneth
1987 Parameters, Binding Theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18(3): 413–444.Google Scholar
Mateu, Victoria E.
2016 Intervention Effects in the Acquisition of Raising and Control: Evidence from English and Spanish. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana, Cairns, Helen S. & Hsu, Jennifer R.
1991 Control principles in the grammars of young children. Language Acquisition 1(4): 297–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKee, Cecile
1992 A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition 2(1): 21–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Toben H., Newport, Elissa L. & Bever, Thomas G.
2002 The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science 26(4): 393–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, Letitia
1990 Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language 17(2): 357–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nairne, James S.
1988 A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall. Memory & Cognition 16(4): 343–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990 A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition 18(3): 251–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L.
2016 Statistical language learning: Computational, maturational, and linguistic constraints. Language and Cognition 8(3): 447–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Emma & Pearl, Lisa
2018 Do you really mean it? Linking lexical semantic profiles and the age of acquisition for the english passive. In The Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Wm. G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko (eds), 288–295. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2019 Using developmental modeling to specify learning and representation of the passive in English children. In Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 43, Megan M. Brown & Brady Dailey (eds), 469–482. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2014 Adjunct Control and edge features. In Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [Language Faculty and Beyond 11], Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 79–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, Akira & Lidz, Jeffrey
2015 Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 22(2): 158–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orfitelli, Robyn M.
2012 Argument Intervention in the Acquisition of A-movement. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Parker, Daniel, Lago, Sol & Phillips, Colin
2015 Interference in the processing of adjunct control. Frontiers in Psychology 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Lisa
2019 Poverty of the stimulus without tears. University of California, Irvine. (Preprint).Google Scholar
Pearl, Lisa & Sprouse, Jon
2013a Computational models of acquisition for islands. In Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 109–131. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Syntactic islands and learning biases: Combining experimental syntax and computational modeling to investigate the language acquisition problem. Language Acquisition 20(1): 23–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B. & Regier, Terry
2011 The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition 118(3): 306–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Laurel, Feldman, Naomi & Lidz, Jeffrey
2017 Learning an input filter for argument structure acquisition. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL 2017), Ted Gibson, Tal Linzen, Asad Sayeed, Martin van Schijndel & William Schuler (eds), 11–19. Valencia: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin
2013 On the nature of island constraints, II: Language learning and innateness. In Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 132–158. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Susan
1979 Formal models of language learning. Cognition 7(3): 217–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Language Learnability and Language Development, with new commentary by the author, Vol. 7. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2020 Waiting for Universal Grammar. In Current Controversies in Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Adam J. Lerner, Simon Cullen & Sarah-Jane Leslie (eds), 29–43. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Scholz, Barbara C.
2002 Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 18(1–2): 9–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Gahl, Susanne
2004 Learning the unlearnable: The role of missing evidence. Cognition 93(2): 147–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Dick, Frederic & Elman, Jeffrey L.
2007 Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57(3): 348–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholz, Barbara C. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2006 Irrational nativist exuberance. In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science, Robert Stainton (ed), 59–80. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, Sandhya
2014 Making sense of silence: Finiteness and the (OC) pro vs. pro distinction: Commentary on Kissock (2013). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(1): 59–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Megan
2015 Competence and Performance in the Development of Principle C. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Megan, Fetters, M., & Lidz, Jeffrey
2012 Parsing for Principle C at 30 months. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 13, Alia K. Biller, Esther Y. Chung & Amelia E. Kimball (eds), 581–593. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tavakolian, Susan
1981 The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Susan Tavakolian (ed), 167–187. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
1999 Bayesian modeling of human concept learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11, Michael J. Kearns, Sara A. Solla, & David A. Cohn (eds), 59–68. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Joshua B., & Griffiths, Thomas L.
2001 Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4): 629–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2009 Constructing a Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Julie A., & Johns, Clinton L.
2012 Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension: Interference in comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4): 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Felix H. & Trueswell, John C.
2019 Spotting Dalmatians: Children’s ability to discover subordinate-level word meanings cross-situationally. Cognitive Psychology 114(101226). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warren, Teresa & Gibson, Edward
2002 The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85 (1): 79–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English. Language and Cognitive Processes 20(6): 751–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth
1990 On unparsable input in language acquisition. In Language Processing and Language Acquisition, Lyn Frazier & Jill De Villiers (eds), 105–117. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Some issues in the growth of control. In Control and grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Uptal Lahiri, & James Higginbotham (eds), 253–295. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Arbitrary control instead of obligatory control in temporal adjuncts in Child Grammar: An ATTRACT analysis. In Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation, Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds), 691–716. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Chien, Yu-Chin
1985 The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24: 138–149.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Manzini, M. Rita
1987 Parameters and learnability in Binding Theory. In Parameter Setting, Thomas Roeper & Edwin Williams (eds), 41–76. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1992 Adjunct Control. In Control and Grammar, Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Uptal Lahiri, & James Higginbotham (eds) 297–322. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Guobin
1992 Discourse anaphora in Chinese: A rhetorical predicate account. In York Papers in Linguistics 16, Steve J. Harlow & Anthony R. Warner (eds), 185–202.Google Scholar
Xu, Fei & Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
2007 Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 114(2): 245–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gerard, Juliana
2022. The extragrammaticality of the acquisition of adjunct control. Language Acquisition 29:2 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.