Cover not available
Part of
Arabic Dislocation
Ali A. Alzayid
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 271] 2022
► pp. 219–237

Bibliography

Abbott, B
(2004) Definiteness and indefiniteness. In The handbook of pragmatics, pages 122–152. R. Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds).Google Scholar
Abd al Ra’uf, H
(1998) Subject, theme and agent in Modern Standard Arabic. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Abe, J
(2004) On directionality of movement: A case of Japanese right dislocation. In Proceedings of the 58th Conference: The Tohoku English Literary Society, pages 54–61. Citeseer.Google Scholar
(2015) The in-situ approach to sluicing, volume 222. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Make short answers shorter: Support for the in situ approach. Syntax, 19(3):223–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abels, K
(2012) The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(1):229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) On “sluicing” with apparent massive pied-piping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 37(4):1205–1271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abels, K. and Neeleman, A
(2009) universal 20 without the LCA. In Merging features: computation, interpretation, and acquisition., pages 60–80. Oxford University Press. Brucart, M. Gavarró, A. and Solá, J. (eds.). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, E. O
(2010) Information structuring begins with the numeration. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2 (1), 12–42.Google Scholar
Ackema, P. and Neeleman, A
(2004) Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation, volume 6. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackema, P. and Szendrői, K
(2002) Determiner sharing as an instance of dependent ellipsis. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 5(1–3):3–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G
(2004) Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effects, volume 59. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D. and Ramchand, G
(2005) Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic inquiry, 36(2):161–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aelbrecht, L
(2010) The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Balushi, R. A
(2011) Case in standard Arabic: The untraveled paths. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.
Albukhari, J
(2016) The syntax of elliptical constructions in Jordanian Arabic. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Alexiadou, A
(2006) Left dislocation (including CLLD). In Everaert & van Riemsdijk (eds.), 668–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, T
(1999) Syntax of discourse functions in Greek: a non-configurational approach. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh.
(2006) Resumption in relative clauses. Natural language & linguistic theory, 24(1):57–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Binding illusions and resumption in Greek. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 57:34–48.
Alexopoulou, T., Doron, E., and Heycock, C
(2004) Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. In Peripheries, pages 329–358. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, T. and Keller, F
(2007) Locality, cyclicity, and resumption: At the interface between the grammar and the human sentence processor. Language, pages 110–160.Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, T. and Kolliakou, D
(2002) On linkhood, topicalization and clitic left dislocation. Journal of Linguistics, 38(2):193–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Algryani, A
(2017) Ellipsis in Arabic fragment answers. Order and structure in syntax II, page 319.Google Scholar
Algryani, A. M. K
(2012) The syntax of ellipsis in Libyan Arabic: a generative analysis of sluicing,VP ellipsis, stripping and negative contrast. PhD thesis, Newcastle University.
Almeida, D. A. d. A. and Yoshida, M
(2007) A problem for the preposition stranding generalization. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(2):349–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almor, A
(1999) Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological review, 106(4):748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alzaidi, M
(2014) Information structure and intonation in Hijazi Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Amer, A
(2015) On agreement affixes, incorporated pronouns, and clitics in standard arabic. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 28.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E
(1994) Clitic dependencies in modern Greek. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Salzburg.
(1997) Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. Materials on left dislocation, pages 151–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999a) Conditions on clitic doubling in Greek. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, pages 761–798.Google Scholar
(1999b) On experiencers. In Studies in Greek syntax, pages 67–93. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics, volume 54. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2006) Clitic doubling. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, pages 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E., Van Riemsdijk, H., and Zwarts, F
(1997) Materials on left dislocation, volume 14. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androulakis, A
(2001) Clitics and doubling in Greek. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics, 5:85–111.
Aoun, J
(1981) The Formal Nature of Anaphoric Relations. PhD thesis, MIT.
(1993) The syntax of doubled arguments. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca“ Julio de Urquijo”, 27(3):709–730.Google Scholar
(1999) Clitic-doubled arguments. In Beyond principles and parameters, pages 13–42. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J. and Benmamoun, E
(1998) Minimality, reconstruction, and movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(4):569–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J. and Choueiri, L
(2000) Epithets. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18(1):1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J., Choueiri, L., and Hornstein, N
(2001) Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic inquiry, 32(3):371–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J. and Li, Y.-h. A
(2003) Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, J. E., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L
(2010) The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arregi, K
(2003) Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(1):4.
(2010) Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28(3):539–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, G
(1981) Structure de la phrase verbale en Arabe Standard. Etudes Arabes Saint-Denis, 1(2):1–367.Google Scholar
Baker, M. C
(1996) The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) The syntax of agreement and concord, volume 115. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakir, M
(2011) Against the split-cp hypothesis. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXII–XXIII, pages 187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakir, M. J
(1980) Aspects of clause structure in Arabic: A study in word order variation in literary arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Indiana-Bloomington.
Banfield, A
(1973) Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of language, 10(1):1–39.Google Scholar
Barbiers, S., Koeneman, O., and Lekakou, M
(2010) Syntactic doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of Linguistics, 46(1):1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, P
(2000) Clitics a window into the null subject property”. In Portuguese Syntax.Google Scholar
Barros, M
(2014) Sluicing and identity in ellipsis. PhD thesis, Rutgers University.
Barros, M., Elliott, P., and Thoms, G
(2014) There is no island repair. Ms. Rutgers/UCL/University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Beaver, D. I., Roberts, C., Simons, M., and Tonhauser, J
(2017) Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3:265–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beermann, D., LeBlanc, D., and van Riemsdijk, H
(1997) Rightward movement, volume 17. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A
(2001) Inversion as focalization. Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, 60:90.Google Scholar
Benincà, P. and Munaro, N
(2011) Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 5. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E. and Lorimor, H
(2006) Featureless expressions: When morphophonological markers are absent. Linguistic inquiry, 37(1):1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biloa, E
(2013) The syntax of Tuki: a cartographic approach, volume 203. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. L
(1998) Information status and noncanonical word order in English, volume 40. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleam, T. M
(1999) Le´ ista Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Boeckx, C
(2003) Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding, volume 63. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Aspects of the syntax of agreement. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Syntactic islands. Cambridae University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D
(1989) Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford university press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolotin, N
(1997) Arabic speakers and parasitic gaps. Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series 4, pages 273–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boone, E
(2014) The syntax and licensing of gapping and fragments. LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Borer, H
(1984) Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž
(2007) On the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic inquiry, 38(4):589–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouzouita, M
(2014) Left dislocation phenomena in old Spanish: An examination of their structural properties. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 214:23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S. A
(1987) Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language, pages 741–782.Google Scholar
Brody, M
(1995) Focus and checking theory. Approaches to Hungarian, 5:29–44.Google Scholar
Bruening, B
(2001) Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Brunetti, L
(2003) A unification of focus. PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Firenze.
(2004) Are there two distinct foci in Italian? Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 23(2):1–33.Google Scholar
Büring, D
(2003) On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and philosophy, 26(5):511–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N
(1999) Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. The clause in English, 45:33–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadiot, P
(1992) Matching syntax and pragmatics: a typology of topic and topic-related constructions in Spoken French. Linguistics, 30(1):57–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J
(2003) The coarse structure of the center periphery. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A
(2002) Against optional and null clitics. right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia linguistica, 56(1):29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M
(1999) The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. Clitics in the languages of Europe, 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F
(1995) The generic book. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, L
(1982) Dialogue games: An approach to discourse analysis. PhD thesis, MIT.
Carnie, A
(2011) Syntax: A generative introduction. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Casielles, E
(2006) Big questions, small answers. The syntax of nonsententials, pages 117–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casielles-Suárez, E
(2004) The syntax-information structure interface: Evidence from Spanish and English. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, C
(1999) A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica, 53(1):40–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus, 12(1):93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, C. and Chierchia, G
(1999) Reconstruction in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics interface. In WCCFL XVII Proceedings, pages 132–146.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C. and Donati, C
(2015) Don’t move that remnant too much! In Remnant Movement. Ed, by Grewendorf, G. pp. 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
(1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, topics, and point of view. Subject and topic.Google Scholar
Chambers, A
(1998) The chambers dictionary. Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Chao, W. and Sells, P
(1983) On the interpretation of resumptive pronouns. In Proceedings of NELS, volume 13, pages 47–61.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1971a) Deep structure, surface structure and semantic. In D.Steinberg and L.Jacobovits (eds.) Semantics.Google Scholar
(1971b) Some empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(1976) Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic analysis, pages 303–351.Google Scholar
(1977) On wh-movement. formal syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132.Google Scholar
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. MIT press.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Green-wood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. MIT press.Google Scholar
(2000) Minimalist inquiries: The framework (mitopl 15). Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, pages 89–155.Google Scholar
(2001) Derivation by phase. In Michael Ken-stowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., pages 1–52.Google Scholar
(2008) On phases. Current Studies in Linguistics Series, 45:133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., and Ott, D
(2019) Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, pages 229–261.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H
(1993) The theory of principles and parameters. Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, pages 506–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, S
(2006) Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, volume 31, pages 73–93.Google Scholar
Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., and McCloskey, J
(2011) Sluicing (:) between structure and inference. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, pages 31–50.Google Scholar
Cinque, G
(1977) The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic inquiry, 8(2):397–412.Google Scholar
(1983) Topic Constructions in Some European languages and Connectedness. In K. Ehlich and H. Van Riemsdijk (eds.) Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text. Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature.Google Scholar
(1990) Types of Ā-Dependencies. MIT press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(1995) Italian syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. in Materials on Left Dislocation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. and Krapova, I
(2008) Clitic reduplication constructions in Bulgarian. Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages., pages 257–287. John Benjamins Publishing.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L
(2009) The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford Handbook of linguistic analysis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) The cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford Handbook of linguistic analysis.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. and Erteschik-Shir, N
(2002) Topic, focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language Semantics, 10(2):125–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Constant, N
(2014) Contrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Corbett, G. G
(2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, A. and Dobrovie-Sorin, C
(2008) Clitic doubling, complex heads and interarboreal operations. Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, pages 289–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S
(2010) Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua, 120(1):50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. S
(2005) Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cat, C
(2002) French dislocation. PhD thesis, University of York.
(2004) On the impact of French subject clitics on the information structure of the sentence. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. eds. Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Petra Sleeman, 33–46.Google Scholar
(2005) French subject clitics are not agreement markers. Lingua, 115(9):1195–1219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) French dislocation: Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Vries, M
(2007a) Dislocation and backgrounding. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 24(1):235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Invisible constituents? parentheses as b-merged adverbial phrases. Parentheticals, pages 203–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a) The left and right periphery in Dutch. The linguistic review, 26(2–3):291–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Specifying coordination an investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In Language and linguistics: Emerging trends, ed. Cynthia R. Dreyer, 37–98.Google Scholar
(2012a) Parenthetical main clauses–or not? On appositives and quasi-relatives. Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, pages 177–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Unconventional mergers. Ways of structure building, pages 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Locality and right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 30(1):160–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Dislocatie zonder ‘copying rules’. In Black Book: A Festschrift in honor of Frans Zwarts, pages 349–362. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Dehé, N. and Kavalova, Y
(2007) Parentheticals, volume 106. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., Sleeman, P
., et al. (2004) Dislocation. Handbook of French semantics, pages 501–528.Google Scholar
Demirdache, H
(1991) Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structures. PhD thesis, MIT.
(1997) Dislocation, resumption and weakest crossover. Materials on left dislocation, pages 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, H. and Percus, O
(2011) Resumptives, movement and interpretation. Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces, 5:367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diesing, M
(1992) Indefinites. MIT press.Google Scholar
Dikken, M. d., Meinunger, A., and Wilder, C
(2000) Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia linguistica, 54(1):41–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. and Hellan
(1999) Clitics and Bulgarian clause structure. Clitics in the languages of Europe, pages 469–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C
(1990) Clitic doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic inquiry, 21(3):351–397.Google Scholar
Doron, E
(1982) On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Texas Linguistics Forum, pages 1–48.Google Scholar
Downing, L. J
(2011) The prosody of ‘dislocation’in selected Bantu languages. Lingua, 121(5):772–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilam, A
(2011) Explorations in the informational component. Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania University.
El Zarka, D
(2013) On the interaction of information structure and prosody: the case of Egyptian Arabic. Habilitationsschrift, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria.Google Scholar
Elbourne, P
(2001) E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics, 9(3):241–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, P. D
(2005) Situations and individuals, volume 90. MIT press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Emonds, J
(2004) Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries, pages 75–120. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, M
(1991) The semantics of specificity. Linguistic inquiry, pages 1–25.Google Scholar
Endo, Y
(1996) On right dislocation. MIT Working papers in Linguistics.
Endriss, C
(2009) Exceptional wide scope. In Quantificational Topics, pages 107–185. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, E
(1983) Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and philosophy, pages 5–34.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N
(1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface, volume 3. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Information structure and (in) definiteness. In Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, pages 23–51. Brill.Google Scholar
Escobar, Á
(1995) Lefthand satellites in Spanish. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
(1997) Clitic left dislocation and other relatives. Materials on left dislocation, 14:233–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. T
(1991) The representation of disjunct constituents. Language, pages 726–762.Google Scholar
Eubank, L
(1989) Parameters in L2 learning: Flynn revisited. Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht), 5(1):43–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, G
(1980) Pronouns. Linguistic inquiry, 11(2):337–362.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A
(1993) Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Key features and parameters in Arabic grammar, volume 182. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldhausen, I
(2010) Sentential form and prosodic structure of Catalan. John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J
(2013) How left is right? locating Romance CLRD. A Handout for a paper presented at XXIII CGG, Madrid.
Fernández-Sánchez, J
(2016) Topics at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 5(2):111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Right dislocation as a biclausal phenomenon: evidence from Romance languages. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
(2020) Right Peripheral Fragments: Right dislocation and related phenomena in Romance, volume 258. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiengo, R. and May, R
(1994) Indices and identity. MIT press.Google Scholar
Fominyam, H. and Šimík, R
(2017) The morphosyntax of exhaustive focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 35(4):1027–1077. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortin, C
(2007) Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
Fox, D
(1999) Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(2):157–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. and Sauerland, U
(1996) Illusive scope of universal quantifiers. In NELS Proceedings, volume 26, pages 71–86. University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M
(2000) The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian, volume 50. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality. In Romance languages and linguistic theory, pages 99–118.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M. and Hinterhölzl, R
(2007) Types of topics in German and Italian. On information structure, meaning and form, pages 87–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M. and Ramaglia, F
(2013) (pseudo) clefts at the syntax-prosody-discourse interface. In Cleft structures, pages 97–138. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, W
(2004) Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of German. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 9:203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gary, J. O. and Gamal-Eldin, S. M
(1982) Cairene Egyptian Colloquial Arabic, volume 6. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gecség, Z. and Kiefer, F
(2009) A new look at information structure in Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27(3):583–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, J. and Sag, I
(2000) Interrogative investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Givón, T
(1979) On understanding grammar. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, G
(2008) The left clausal periphery: Clitic left-dislocation in Italian and left-dislocation in German. Shaer et al. 2009, pages 49–94.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J
(2019) A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the preposition stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. and Lipták, A
(2014) Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax, 17(3):189–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, J. E
(2015) On appositives. LOT.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K
(2000) Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
(2003) Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies, volume 66. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guilliot, N. and Malkawi, N
(2007) Reconstruction without movement. Coreference, Modality, and Focus: Studies on the Syntax-Semantics Interface, pages 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. M
(1975) The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J
(2000) The formal semantics of clitic doubling. Journal of Semantics, 16(4):315–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) interface conditions and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2002) Constraint interaction at semantics/pragmatics interface. Meaning through language contrast, 1:335.Google Scholar
Gyuris, B
(2009) The semantics and pragmatics of the contrastive topic in Hungarian. Lexica.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L
(1991) Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. Aspects of modern English linguistics.Google Scholar
(1994) Introduction to government and binding theory. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, A
(2019) Fragments. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A
(1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of linguistics, 3(2):199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamlaoui, F. and Szendroi, K
(2017) The syntax-phonology mapping of intonational phrases in complex sentences: A flexible approach. Glossa, 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I
(1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic inquiry, 7(3):391–428.Google Scholar
Harizanov, B
(2014) Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(4):1033–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, J. D
(2008) Morphology at the interfaces: Reduplication and noun incorporation in Uto-Aztecan, volume 117. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A
(1983) Word order universals, volume 3. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Heestand, D., Xiang, M., and Polinsky, M
(2011) Resumption still does not rescue islands. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(1):138–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I
(1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.
Heycock, C
(2006) Embedded root phenomena. The Blackwell companion to syntax, pages 174–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heycock, C. and Kroch, A
(1999) Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic inquiry, 30(3):365–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J
(1980) Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(4):679–708.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, P. and Sag, I. A
(2010) Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 86(2):366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoji, H. and Fukaya, T
(2001) On island repair and CM vs. non-CM constructions in English and Japanese. In Handout of presentation presented at Kaken workshop on ellipsis, Kyoto.Google Scholar
Holes, C
(1990) Gulf Arabic. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N
(2001) Move!: A minimalist theory of construal. Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K
(2005) Understanding minimalism. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, J
(2000) Interfaces vs. the computational system in the syntax of focus. In In Interface strategies, pages 183–206. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
(2010) “discourse features”, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua, 120(6):1346–1369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J
(1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, MIT.
Huang, J., Li, Y.-H. A., and Li, Y
(2009) The syntax of Chinese. University of Cambridge Press, 10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, S
(1995) Clitics and island effects. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, 2(1):3.
Jaber, A
(2014) On genericity and definiteness in Modern Standard Arabic. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jackendoff, R. S
(1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janse, M
(2008) Clitic doubling from Ancient to Asia Minor Greek. Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, pages 165–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B
(1996) Partial agreement and coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, pages 661–676.Google Scholar
Johnson, K
(2019) Gapping and stripping. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.Google Scholar
Kallulli, D
(2000) Direct object clitic doubling in Albanian and Greek. Clitic phenomena in European languages, pages 209–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R
(1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, volume 25. MIT press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S
(1975) French syntax: The transformational cycle, volume 30. MIT press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2000) On the left edge in UG: A reply to McCloskey. Syntax, 3(1):44–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kechagias, A
(2011) Regulating word order in modern Greek: verb initial and non-verb initial orders & the conceptual-intentional interface. PhD thesis, UCL (University College London).
Kenesei, I
(1986) On the logic of word order in Hungarian. In Topic, focus, and configurationality, pages 143–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. and Merchant, J
(2000) Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18(1):89–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S
(2001) Chain composition and uniformity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(1):67–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. K
(2015) Speech, Variation, and Meaning: The Effects of Emotional Prosody on Word Recognition. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Kimura, H
(2010) A wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English Linguistics, 27(1):43–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, K. and Gyuris, B
(2003) Apparent scope inversion under the rise fall contour. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 50(3–4):371–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, K. É
(1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2):245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluck, M., Ott, D., and De Vries, M
(2015) Parenthesis and ellipsis: crosslinguistic and theoretical perspectives, volume 121. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D
(1983) Variables and the bijection principle. The Linguistic Review, 2(2):139–160.Google Scholar
Koster, J
(2000) Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms., University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Kramer, R
(2014) Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2):593–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M
(2008) Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4):243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Questions. In von Heusinger, K. Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2pp, pages 1742–1785.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. and Musan, R
(2012) Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. The expression of information structure, 5:1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruijff-Korbayová, I. and Steedman, M
(2003) Discourse and information structure. Journal of logic, language and information, 12(3):249–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, S
(1978) Danwa no Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Kupula Ross, M
(2012) Clitic left dislocation as agreement–A movement approach. [URL].Google Scholar
Kural, M
(1997) Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic inquiry, pages 498–519.Google Scholar
Laca, B
(1990) Generic objects: some more pieces of the puzzle. Lingua, 81(1):25–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahne, A
(2005) Die linke satzperipherie im okzitanischen. Master’s thesis, University of Jena.
Laka, I
(1990) Negation in syntax–on the nature of functional categories and projections. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lalami, L
(1996) Clitic left dislocation in Moroccan Arabic. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4, pages 115–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1988) Presentational cleft constructions in Spoken French. Clause combining in grammar and discourse, pages 135–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents, volume 71. Cambridge university press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Dislocation. Language typology language universals: An international handbook, 2:1050–1078.Google Scholar
Langacker, R
(1969) On pronominalization and the chain of command. Modern studies in English, ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–86.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K
(1988) On the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry, 19(3):335–391.Google Scholar
Larsson, E
(1979) La dislocation en français. etude de syntaxe générative.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H
(2001) When can you save a structure by destroying it? In NELS Proceedings, pages 301–320.Google Scholar
(2003) Minimalist investigations in linguistic theory. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M
(1984) On the nature of proper government. 235–289. Linguistic Inquiry.Google Scholar
(1992) Move α. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. and Stowell, T
(1991) Weakest crossover. Linguistic inquiry, 22(4):687–720.Google Scholar
Law, A
(2003) Right dislocation in Cantonese as a focus-marking device. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics, 15:243–275.
Lebeaux, D
(1988) Language acquisition of the form of grammar. PhD thesis, Umass University.
Lechner, W
(2004) Ellipsis in comparatives, volume 72. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, J. A
(2002) Warlpiri: theoretical implications. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Leonetti, M
(2007) Clitics do not encode specificity. In Proceedings of the workshop Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages, pages 111–139.Google Scholar
(2008) Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking. Probus, 20(1):33–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) On contrastive readings in the interpretation of NPs/DPs. Arbeitspapier Nr. 127, page 99.Google Scholar
Leung, T
(2014) The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(2):332–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, J
(2005) Does wh-in-situ license parasitic gaps? Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2):298–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, A
(1995) Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López, L
(2009) A derivational syntax for information structure, volume 23. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Dislocations and information structure. In The Oxford handbook of information structure.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Ritz, J., Stede, M., and Zeldes, A
(2016) Corpus linguistics and information structure research. The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Oxford University Press. URL [URL], 1.Google Scholar
Lyassi, N
(2012) Standard Arabic Left-dislocation without Movement: Evidence for the presence of a Hanging Topic Left-dislocation Construction. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(4):590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R
(1994) Syntactic dependencies and their properties: a note on strong islands. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 6:205–218.
Marantz, A
(1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D
(1970) English as a VSO language. Language, pages 286–299.Google Scholar
(1993) Gapping with shared operators. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, volume 19, pages 245–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, J
(1990) Resumptive pronouns, Ā-binding, and levels of representation in Irish. In The syntax of the modern Celtic languages, pages 199–248. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) On the right edge in Irish. Syntax, 2(3):189–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Resumption. The Blackwell companion to syntax, pages 94–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNally, L
(1998) On recent formal analyses of topic. In The Tbilisi symposium on language, logic, and computation: Selected papers, volume 14, pages 147–160. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Merchant, J
(2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2004a) Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and philosophy, 27(6):661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek linguistics, 24:471–481.Google Scholar
(2006) Small clauses: A sententialist perspective. in Progovac et al. 2006, pages 73–91.Google Scholar
(2019) Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In The Oxford handbook of ellipsis.Google Scholar
Michelle, G. and Michaelis, L
(2001) Topicalization and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(11):1665–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M
(1992) Is basic word order universal. Pragmatics of word order flexibility, 22:15–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S
(2010) Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement–based and discourse configurational languages. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Molnár, V
(2002) Contrast–from a contrastive perspective. In Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective, pages 147–161. Brill Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J
(1973) Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, pages 719–751.
Moutaouakil, A
(1989) Pragmatic functions in a functional grammar of Arabic. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, G
(1995) A-bar syntax: A study in movement types. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, A
(2016) Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa, 1(1):1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Toward a unified theory of wh-in-situ and islands. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26(2):189–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musabhien, M
(2008) Case, agreement and movement in Arabic: a minimalist approach. PhD thesis, Newcastle University.
Neeleman, A. and Szendrői, K
(2004) Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(1):149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, A., Titov, E., Van de Koot, H., and Vermeulen, R
(2009) A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. Alternatives to cartography, 1551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I
(1986) Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J
(2009) On split CPs and the ‘perfectness’ of language. In Dislocated elements in discourse, pages 122–148. Routledge.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, J
(2000) Covert movement and parasitic gaps. In PROCEEDINGS-NELS, volume 30, pages 541–556.Google Scholar
Nolda, A
(2004) Topics detached to the left: On’left dislocation’,’hanging topic’, and related constructions in german. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics, volume 35, pages 423–448. DOI logo
Nunes, J
(2004) Linearization of chains and sideward movement, volume 43. MIT press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nykiel, J
(2013) Clefts and preposition omission under sluicing. Lingua, 123:74–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obiedat, N
(1994)  The presentation of thematic structure in the translation of English and Arabic political discourse . PhD thesis, Durham University.
Onea, E
(2016) Potential questions at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E
(1999) Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of spanish. Lingua, 107(1–2):39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osman, M. H
(1990) Bound anaphora in Egyptian Arabic. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics I, pages 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, D
(2014) An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(2):269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic Variation, 15(2):225–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Do fragments need to move? In A handout for a paper presented in Syn/Sem Reading Group. University of Ottawa 25/11/2016, pages 1–10.
(2016b) Ellipsis in appositives. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 1(1):34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The syntax and pragmatics of dislocation: A non-templatic approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 CLA Conference. Toronto: Ryerson University.Google Scholar
Ott, D. and De Vries, M
(2012) Thinking in the right direction: An ellipsis analysis of right-dislocation. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 29(1):123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) A biclausal analysis of right-dislocation. In Proceedings of NELS, volume 43, pages 41–54.Google Scholar
(2016) Right-dislocation as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(2):641–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, D. and Onea, E
(2015) On the form and meaning of appositives. In Proceedings of NELS, volume 45, pages 203–212.Google Scholar
Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V
(2016) Deletion in clausal ellipsis: remnants in the middle field. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference, volume 22, pages 225–234.Google Scholar
(2017) Constraints on clausal ellipsis are pragmatic, not syntactic. [URL].Google Scholar
(2018) Particales and deletion. Linguistic inquiry, 49(2):393–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, J
(1994a) Focus in Standard Arabic. Linguistics in Potsdam, 1:65–92.Google Scholar
(1994b) Verb movement and word order in Arabic. In Verb movement, 41:72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory AND History OF Linguistic Science Series 4, pages 9–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouhalla, J. and Shlonsky, U
(2002) Themes in Arabic and Hebrew syntax, volume 53. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owens, J
(1990) Early Arabic Grammatical Theory-Studies in the History of the Language Sciences. Amsterdam-Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pablos, L
(2006) Pre-verbal structure building in Romance languages and Basque. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland.
Park, M. K. and Kim, S. W
(2009) The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and delete. The linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 17(4):25–53.Google Scholar
Payne, D. L
(1992) Pragmatics of word order flexibility, volume 22. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A
(2004) Topic and focus as linear notions: evidence from Italian and Russian. Lingua, 114(3):325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D
(1987) Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. The representation of (in) definiteness, 98:98–129.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I
(1987) The theory of empty categories and the prodrop parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of linguistics, 23(2):289–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I., Varlokosta, S., Georgiafentis, M., and Kotzoglou, G
(2004) Moving from theta-positions: pronominal clitic doubling in Greek. Lingua, 114(8):963–989. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philippova, T
(2014) P-omission under sluicing,[P clitic] and the nature of P-stranding. Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden.Google Scholar
Poletto, C. and Pollock, J.-Y
(2004) On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, 2:251–296.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M
(1999) A review of information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. language, 75(4):567–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E
(2001) Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(3):583–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y
(1989) Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic inquiry, 20(3):365–424.Google Scholar
Popper, K
(1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books. New York.Google Scholar
Portner, P. and Yabushita, K
(1998) The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, pages 117–157.Google Scholar
Postal, P
(1966) On so-called pronouns in English. In Nineteenth Monograph on Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
(1971) Crossover phenomena. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M
(1993) Remarks on weak crossover effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(3):539–556.Google Scholar
Preminger, O
(2009) Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(4):619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Agreement as a fallible operation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Prince, E. F
(1981) Topicalization, focus-movement, and yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation. In Annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics society, volume 7, pages 249–264.Google Scholar
(1998) On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In The limits of syntax, pages 281–302. Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L
(2006) The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. The syntax of nonsententials: Multidisciplinary perspectives, pages 33–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeve, M
(2016) Fragments, truncated clefts and island-sensitivity. In Ellipsis Across Borders Conference 2016, pages 1–10.Google Scholar
Reich, I
(2007) Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. On information structure, meaning and form, pages 467–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T
(1981) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics in pragmatics and philosophy i. Philosophica anc Studia Philosophica Gandensia Gent, 27(1):53–94.Google Scholar
(1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Routledge.Google Scholar
(1991) Elliptic conjunctions–non-quantificational LF. In The Chomskyan Turn, edited by A. Kasher, 360–384.Google Scholar
Repp, S
(2010) Defining ‘contrast’as an information-structural notion in grammar. Lingua, 6(120):1333–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezac, M
(2010) the ϕ-agree versus the ϕ-feature movement: Evidence from floating quantifiers. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3):496–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, N
(2014) A-bar movement. The Routledge handbook of syntax, pages 167–191.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax, volume 11. Dordrecht, Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) On the status of subject clitics in Romance. Studies in Romance linguistics, pages 391–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Relativized minimality. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Residual V2 and the WH-criterion. ms. Université de Genève.Google Scholar
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, pages 281–337. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Relativized minimality effects. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 4:89–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Locality and left periphery. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, 3:223–251.Google Scholar
Roberts, C
(1996/2012) Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5:6–1.Google Scholar
Rochemont, M. S
(1986) Focus in generative grammar. J. Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M
(1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural language semantics, 1(1):75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Topic accents on quantifiers. Reference and quantification: The Partee effect, page 303.Google Scholar
Ross, J
(1969) Guess who. In 5th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 5), pages 252–286.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R
(1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
Rouveret, A
(2002) How are resumptive pronouns linked to the periphery? Linguistic variation yearbook, 2(1):123–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio Alcalá, C
(2014) Syntactic constraints on topicalization phenomena. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,.
Ryding, K. C
(2005) A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge university press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safir, K
(1984) Multiple variable binding. Linguistic Inquiry, pages 603–638.Google Scholar
(1999) Vehicle change and reconstruction in Ā-chains. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4):587–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Weak crossover. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, pages 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sailor, C. and Thoms, G
(2014) On the non-existence of non-constituent coordination and non-constituent ellipsis. In Proceedings of WCCFL, volume 31, pages 361–370. Citeseer.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. M
(2009) Paradoxes. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, M
(2006) Resumptive prolepsis: A study in indirect A’-dependencies. LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
(2017) Reconstruction and Resumption in Indirect A ‘-Dependencies: On the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and Beyond, volume 117. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, V
(2006) When right dislocation meets the left-periphery.: A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus. Lingua, 116(6):836–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) The interaction of focus, givenness, and prosody: A study of Italian clause structure, volume 57. OUP Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P
(2003) Clausal equations (a note on the connectivity problem). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(1):157–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmerling, S. F
(1976) Aspects of English sentence stress. University of Texas Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Zioga, P
(1994) The syntax of clitic doubling in Modern Greek. PhD thesis, University of Southern California.
Schütze, C. T
(2001) On the nature of default case. Syntax, 4(3):205–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E
(2005) Comments on intonational phrasing in english. Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian languages, 9:11–58.Google Scholar
(2011) The syntax-phonology interface. The handbook of phonological theory, page 435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, P
(1984) Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. PhD thesis, MIT.
Shaer, B., Cook, P., Frey, W., and Maienborn, C
(2009) Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaer, B. and Frey, W
(2004) ‘integrated’and‘non-integrated’left-peripheral elements in German and English. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, 465–502.Google Scholar
Sharvit, Y
(1999) Resumptive pronouns in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 17(3):587–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, J.-Y
(2005) Wh-constructions in Korean: A lexical account. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 25.
Shlonsky, U
(1992) Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic inquiry, 23(3):443–468.Google Scholar
(1997) Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative Semitic syntax. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Remarks on the complementizer layer of Standard Arabic. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Third conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, 1996, volume 202, page 325. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logo
Soltan, U
(2007) On formal feature licensing in minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic morphosyntax. PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
Soltan, U. M
(1996) A contrastive and comparative syntactic analysis of deletion phenomena in English and Standard Arabic. Unpublished MA Dissertation. Ain Shams University.
Sportiche, D
(1992) Clitics, voice, and spec-head licensing. Glow Newsletter, 28:46–47.Google Scholar
(1996) Clitic constructions. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, pages 213–276. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stainton, R. J
(1998) Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness“ in isolation”, and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, pages 311–340.Google Scholar
(2005) In defense of non-sentential assertion. Semantics versus pragmatics, pages 383–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C
(1978) Assertion. In Pragmatics, pages 315–332. Brill.Google Scholar
Starke, M
(2001) Move Dissolves into Merge: a Theory of Locality. PhD thesis, Université de Genève.
Sturgeon, A
(2008) The Left Periphery: The interaction of syntax, pragmatics and prosody in Czech, volume 129. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M
(1982) Syntax and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types. Georgetown Univ School of Language.Google Scholar
(1988) The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6(3):391–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Left dislocations with and without epithets. Probus, 18(1):127–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, P
(1998) Clefts in Scandinavian: an investigation. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 10:163–190.
Szabolcsi, A
(1994) All quantifiers are not equal: The case of focus. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 42(3/4):171–187.Google Scholar
Takita, K
(2014) Pseudo-right dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic constructions. Lingua, 140:137–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, H
(2001) Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics, 37(3):551–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tancredi, C
(1992) Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition. PhD thesis, MIT.
Taraldsen, K. T
(1986) Som and the binding theory. In Topics in Scandinavian syntax, pages 149–184. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellier, C
(1989) Head-internal relatives and parasitic gaps in Mooré. Current approaches to african linguistics, 6:298–318.Google Scholar
Thoms, G
(2010) ‘Verb floating’and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. Linguistic variation yearbook, 10(1):252–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, H
(2007) The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomioka, S
(2007) Pragmatics of LF: Japanese and Korean wh-interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9):1570–1590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, H
(2015) Intonation phrases and speech acts. Parenthesis and ellipsis: Cross-linguistic and theoretical perspectives, pages 301–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truswell, R
(2011) Events, phrases, and questions. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M
(1992) Focussing in modern Greek. ms. University College, London.Google Scholar
(1995) Focusing in modern Greek. Discourse configurational languages, 176:206.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J
(1995) Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic inquiry, 26(1):79–123.Google Scholar
Vallduví, E
(1990) The informational component. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
(1992) The informational component. New York: Garland Pub.Google Scholar
Valmala, V
(2007) The syntax of little things. In 17th colloquium on generative grammar, girona.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, J
(2009) Alternatives to cartography, volume 100. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) The syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, J. and Merchant, J
(2013) Ellipsis phenomena. Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, pages 701–745. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, J. and Temmerman, T
(2019) The Oxford handbook of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, H
(1997) Left dislocation. In Materials on left dislocation, pages 1–10.Google Scholar
Vat, J
(1983) Left dislocation, connectedness, and reconstruction. On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania: Papers from the 3rd Groningen Grammar Talks (3e Groninger Grammatikgespräche), Groningen, January 1981, 3:133. DOI logo
(1997) ’left dislocation connectedness and reconstruction. Materials on left dislocation, 14:67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, C. H. M. and Eid, M
(2005) Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Brill.Google Scholar
Vicente, L
(2019) Sluicing and its subtypes. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J
(2015) The syntax of multiple-que sentences in Spanish: Along the left periphery . John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalba, X
(2000) The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,.
Von Stechow, A
(1981) Topic, focus and local relevance. In Crossing the boundaries in linguistics, pages 95–130. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wahba, W. B
(1995) Parasitic gaps in Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics VII: Papers from the Seventh Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pages 59–68. DOI logo
Ward, G. L. and Prince, E. F
(1991) On the topicalization of indefinite nps. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(2):167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, T
(1972) Anaphoric relations in English. PhD thesis, MIT.
Weir, A
(2014) Fragments and clausal ellipsis. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
Williams, E
(1997) Blocking and anaphora. Linguistic inquiry, pages 577–628.Google Scholar
Williams, E. S
(1977) Discourse and logical form. Linguistic inquiry, pages 101–139.Google Scholar
Yim, C
(2013) Bi-clausal evidence for right dislocation in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 17(4):25–39.Google Scholar
Yuan, B. and Dugarova, E
(2012) Wh-topicalization at the syntax-discourse interface in English speakers L2 Chinese grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4):533–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, J
(2004) Left dislocation in Zulu. Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg.Google Scholar
Zeller, J. K
(2005) On clitic left dislocation in Zulu. Rudiger Koppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A
(1994) The syntax of nominative clitics in Standard and Advanced French. Paths towards universal grammar, pages 453–472.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L
(1998) Prosody, focus, and word order. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwart, J.-W
(2001) Backgrounding (‘right-dislocation’) in Dutch. Ms., University of Groningen.Google Scholar