Abbott, B. (2004). Definiteness
and indefiniteness. In The handbook of
pragmatics, pages 122–152. R. Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds).
Abd al Ra’uf, H. (1998). Subject,
theme and agent in Modern Standard Arabic. Psychology Press.
Abe, J. (2004). On
directionality of movement: A case of Japanese right
dislocation. In Proceedings of the 58th Conference: The Tohoku
English Literary
Society, pages 54–61. Citeseer.
Abe, J. (2016). Make
short answers shorter: Support for the in situ
approach. Syntax, 19(3):223–255.
Abels, K. (2012). The
Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic
Inquiry, 43(1):229–254.
Abels, K. (2019). On
“sluicing” with apparent massive pied-piping. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 37(4):1205–1271.
Abels, K. and Neeleman, A. (2009). universal
20 without the LCA. In Merging features: computation, interpretation,
and acquisition., pages 60–80. Oxford University Press. Brucart, M. Gavarró, A. and Solá, J. (eds.).
Aboh, E. O. (2010). Information
structuring begins with the numeration. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical
Linguistics, 2 (1), 12–42.
Ackema, P. and Neeleman, A. (2004). Beyond
morphology: Interface conditions on word
formation, volume 6. Oxford University Press.
Ackema, P. and Szendrői, K. (2002). Determiner
sharing as an instance of dependent ellipsis. The Journal of Comparative Germanic
Linguistics, 5(1–3):3–34.
Adger, D., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G. (2004). Peripheries:
syntactic edges and their
effects, volume 59. Springer Science & Business Media.
Adger, D. and Ramchand, G. (2005). Merge
and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic
inquiry, 36(2):161–193.
Al-Balushi, R. A. (2011). Case
in standard Arabic: The untraveled paths. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.
Albukhari, J. (2016). The
syntax of elliptical constructions in Jordanian Arabic. PhD
thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Alexiadou, A. (2006). Left
dislocation (including CLLD). In Everaert & van
Riemsdijk (eds.), 668–699.
Alexopoulou, T. (1999). Syntax
of discourse functions in Greek: a non-configurational approach. PhD
thesis, The University of Edinburgh.
Alexopoulou, T. (2006). Resumption
in relative clauses. Natural language & linguistic
theory, 24(1):57–111.
Alexopoulou, T. (2008). Binding
illusions and resumption in Greek. MIT Working Papers in
Linguistics, 57:34–48.
Alexopoulou, T., Doron, E., and Heycock, C. (2004). Broad
subjects and clitic left
dislocation. In Peripheries, pages 329–358. Springer.
Alexopoulou, T. and Keller, F. (2007). Locality,
cyclicity, and resumption: At the interface between the grammar and the human sentence
processor. Language, pages 110–160.
Alexopoulou, T. and Kolliakou, D. (2002). On
linkhood, topicalization and clitic left dislocation. Journal of
Linguistics, 38(2):193–245.
Algryani, A. (2017). Ellipsis
in Arabic fragment answers. Order and structure in syntax
II, page 319.
Algryani, A. M. K. (2012). The
syntax of ellipsis in Libyan Arabic: a generative analysis of sluicing,VP ellipsis, stripping and negative
contrast. PhD thesis, Newcastle University.
Almeida, D. A. d. A. and Yoshida, M. (2007). A
problem for the preposition stranding generalization. Linguistic
Inquiry, 38(2):349–362.
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase
anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological
review, 106(4):748.
Alzaidi, M. (2014). Information
structure and intonation in Hijazi Arabic. PhD
dissertation, University of Essex.
Amer, A. (2015). On
agreement affixes, incorporated pronouns, and clitics in standard arabic. SKY Journal of
Linguistics, 28.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (1994). Clitic
dependencies in modern Greek. Doctoral Dissertation, University of
Salzburg.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999a). Conditions
on clitic doubling in Greek. Empirical Approaches to Language
Typology, pages 761–798.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (1999b). On
experiencers. In Studies in Greek
syntax, pages 67–93. Springer.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The
syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from
clitics, volume 54. Walter de Gruyter.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2006). Clitic
doubling. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second
Edition, pages 1–56.
Androulakis, A. (2001). Clitics
and doubling in Greek. Reading Working Papers in
Linguistics, 5:85–111.
Aoun, J. (1981). The
Formal Nature of Anaphoric Relations. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Aoun, J. (1993). The
syntax of doubled arguments. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca“ Julio de
Urquijo”, 27(3):709–730.
Aoun, J. (1999). Clitic-doubled
arguments. In Beyond principles and
parameters, pages 13–42. Springer.
Aoun, J. and Benmamoun, E. (1998). Minimality,
reconstruction, and movement. Linguistic
Inquiry, 29(4):569–597.
Aoun, J. and Choueiri, L. (2000). Epithets. Natural
Language & Linguistic
Theory, 18(1):1–39.
Aoun, J., Choueiri, L., and Hornstein, N. (2001). Resumption,
movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic
inquiry, 32(3):371–403.
Aoun, J. and Li, Y.-h. A. (2003). Essays
on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of
wh-constructions. MIT press.
Aoun, J. E., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L. (2010). The
syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
Arregi, K. (2003). Clitic
left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in
Linguistics, 9(1):4.
Arregi, K. (2010). Ellipsis
in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 28(3):539–592.
Ayoub, G. (1981). Structure
de la phrase verbale en Arabe Standard. Etudes Arabes
Saint-Denis, 1(2):1–367.
Baker, M. C. (1996). The
polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. C. (2008). The
syntax of agreement and
concord, volume 115. Cambridge University Press.
Bakir, M. J. (1980). Aspects
of clause structure in Arabic: A study in word order variation in literary arabic. Doctoral
dissertation, University of Indiana-Bloomington.
Banfield, A. (1973). Narrative
style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of
language, 10(1):1–39.
Barbiers, S., Koeneman, O., and Lekakou, M. (2010). Syntactic
doubling and the structure of wh-chains. Journal of
Linguistics, 46(1):1–46.
Barbosa, P. (2000). Clitics
a window into the null subject property”. In Portuguese
Syntax.
Barros, M. (2014). Sluicing
and identity in ellipsis. PhD thesis, Rutgers University.
Barros, M., Elliott, P., and Thoms, G. (2014). There
is no island repair. Ms. Rutgers/UCL/University of Edinburgh.
Beaver, D. I., Roberts, C., Simons, M., and Tonhauser, J. (2017). Questions
under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of
Linguistics, 3:265–284.
Beermann, D., LeBlanc, D., and van Riemsdijk, H. (1997). Rightward
movement, volume 17. John Benjamins Publishing.
Belletti, A. (2001). Inversion
as focalization. Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal
Grammar, 60:90.
Benincà, P. and Munaro, N. (2011). Mapping
the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic
Structures, volume 5. Oxford University Press.
Benmamoun, E. and Lorimor, H. (2006). Featureless
expressions: When morphophonological markers are absent. Linguistic
inquiry, 37(1):1–23.
Bleam, T. M. (1999). Le´
ista Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD
thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Boeckx, C. (2008). Aspects
of the syntax of agreement. Routledge.
Boeckx, C. (2012). Syntactic
islands. Cambridae University Press.
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation
and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford university press.
Boone, E. (2014). The
syntax and licensing of gapping and
fragments. LOT, Utrecht.
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric
syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance
languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bošković, Ž. (2007). On
the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic
inquiry, 38(4):589–644.
Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S. A. (1987). Topic,
pronoun, and agreement in
Chicheŵa. Language, pages 741–782.
Brody, M. (1995). Focus
and checking theory. Approaches to
Hungarian, 5:29–44.
Bruening, B. (2001). Syntax
at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. PhD
thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Brunetti, L. (2003). A
unification of focus. PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Firenze.
Brunetti, L. (2004). Are
there two distinct foci in Italian? Southwest Journal of
Linguistics, 23(2):1–33.
Büring, D. (2003). On
D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and
philosophy, 26(5):511–545.
Cadiot, P. (1992). Matching
syntax and pragmatics: a typology of topic and topic-related constructions in Spoken
French. Linguistics, 30(1):57–88.
Camacho, J. (2003). The
coarse structure of the center periphery. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers
University.
Cardinaletti, A. (2002). Against
optional and null clitics. right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia
linguistica, 56(1):29–57.
Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M. (1999). The
typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. Clitics in
the languages of Europe, 8.
Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. (1995). The
generic book. University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, L. (1982). Dialogue
games: An approach to discourse analysis. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Carnie, A. (2011). Syntax:
A generative introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The
syntax-information structure interface: Evidence from Spanish and
English. Routledge.
Cecchetto, C. (1999). A
comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia
Linguistica, 53(1):40–67.
Cecchetto, C. (2000). Doubling
structures and
reconstruction. Probus, 12(1):93–126.
Cecchetto, C. and Chierchia, G. (1999). Reconstruction
in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics
interface. In WCCFL XVII
Proceedings, pages 132–146.
Cecchetto, C. and Donati, C. (2015). Don’t
move that remnant too much! In Remnant
Movement. Ed, by Grewendorf, G. pp. 179–200.
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness,
contrastiveness, definiteness, topics, and point of view. Subject and
topic.
Chambers, A. (1998). The
chambers dictionary. Allied Publishers.
Chao, W. and Sells, P. (1983). On
the interpretation of resumptive pronouns. In Proceedings of
NELS, volume 13, pages 47–61.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1971a). Deep
structure, surface structure and semantic. In D.Steinberg and L.Jacobovits (eds.) Semantics.
Chomsky, N. (1971b). Some
empirical issues in the theory of transformational grammar. Indiana University Linguistics
Club.
Chomsky, N. (1976). Conditions
on rules of grammar. Linguistic
analysis, pages 303–351.
Chomsky, N. (1977). On
wh-movement. formal syntax, ed. by Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures
on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some
concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. MIT press.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge
of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Green-wood Publishing Group.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The
minimalist program. MIT press.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist
inquiries: The framework (mitopl 15). Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of
Howard Lasnik, pages 89–155.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation
by phase. In Michael Ken-stowicz (ed.), Ken
Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., pages 1–52.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On
phases. Current Studies in Linguistics
Series, 45:133.
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., and Ott, D. (2019). Generative
grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, pages 229–261.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1993). The
theory of principles and parameters. Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary
research, pages 506–569.
Chung, S. (2006). Sluicing
and the lexicon: The point of no return. In In Proceedings of the
annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, volume 31, pages 73–93.
Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., and McCloskey, J. (2011). Sluicing
(:) between structure and inference. Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith
Aissen, pages 31–50.
Cinque, G. (1977). The
movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic
inquiry, 8(2):397–412.
Cinque, G. (1983). Topic
Constructions in Some European languages and Connectedness. In K. Ehlich and H. Van Riemsdijk (eds.) Connectedness
in Sentence, Discourse and Text. Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature.
Cinque, G. (1990). Types
of Ā-Dependencies. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
Cinque, G. (1995). Italian
syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs
and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2009). The
cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford Handbook of linguistic
analysis.
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2010). The
cartography of syntactic structures. Oxford Handbook of linguistic
analysis.
Cohen, A. and Erteschik-Shir, N. (2002). Topic,
focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals. Natural Language
Semantics, 10(2):125–165.
Constant, N. (2014). Contrastive
Topic: Meanings and Realizations. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
Cruschina, S. (2010). Syntactic
extraposition and clitic resumption in
Italian. Lingua, 120(1):50–73.
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. S. (2005). Simpler
syntax. Oxford University Press.
De Cat, C. (2002). French
dislocation. PhD thesis, University of York.
De Cat, C. (2004). On
the impact of French subject clitics on the information structure of the
sentence. In Romance Languages and Linguistic
Theory. eds. Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe, and Petra Sleeman, 33–46.
De Cat, C. (2005). French
subject clitics are not agreement
markers. Lingua, 115(9):1195–1219.
De Cat, C. (2007). French
dislocation: Interpretation, syntax, acquisition. Oxford University Press.
De Vries, M. (2009a). The
left and right periphery in Dutch. The linguistic
review, 26(2–3):291–327.
De Vries, M. (2009b). Specifying
coordination an investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In
Language and linguistics: Emerging trends, ed. Cynthia R. Dreyer, 37–98.
De Vries, M. (2012b). Unconventional
mergers. Ways of structure
building, pages 143–166.
De Vries, M. (2014). Dislocatie
zonder ‘copying rules’. In Black Book: A Festschrift in honor of
Frans Zwarts, pages 349–362. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Dehé, N. and Kavalova, Y. (2007). Parentheticals, volume 106. John Benjamins Publishing.
Delais-Roussarie, E., Doetjes, J., Sleeman, P., et al.. (2004). Dislocation. Handbook
of French semantics, pages 501–528.
Demirdache, H. (1991). Resumptive
chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structures. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. MIT press.
Dikken, M. d., Meinunger, A., and Wilder, C. (2000). Pseudoclefts
and ellipsis. Studia
linguistica, 54(1):41–89.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. and Hellan (1999). Clitics
and Bulgarian clause structure. Clitics in the languages of
Europe, pages 469–514.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1990). Clitic
doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic
inquiry, 21(3):351–397.
Doron, E. (1982). On
the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Texas Linguistics
Forum, pages 1–48.
Downing, L. J. (2011). The
prosody of ‘dislocation’in selected Bantu
languages. Lingua, 121(5):772–786.
Eilam, A. (2011). Explorations
in the informational component. Doctoral Dissertation, Pennsylvania
University.
El Zarka, D. (2013). On
the interaction of information structure and prosody: the case of Egyptian
Arabic. Habilitationsschrift, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria.
Elbourne, P. (2001). E-type
anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language
Semantics, 9(3):241–288.
Elbourne, P. D. (2005). Situations
and individuals, volume 90. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
Emonds, J. (2004). Unspecified
categories as the key to root
constructions. In Peripheries, pages 75–120. Springer.
Enç, M. (1991). The
semantics of specificity. Linguistic
inquiry, pages 1–25.
Endo, Y. (1996). On
right dislocation. MIT Working papers in Linguistics.
Endriss, C. (2009). Exceptional
wide scope. In Quantificational
Topics, pages 107–185. Springer.
Engdahl, E. (1983). Parasitic
gaps. Linguistics and
philosophy, pages 5–34.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The
dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information
structure: The syntax-discourse
interface, volume 3. Oxford University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, N. (2013). Information
structure and (in) definiteness. In Crosslinguistic studies on noun
phrase structure and
reference, pages 23–51. Brill.
Escobar, Á. (1995). Lefthand
satellites in Spanish. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
Espinal, M. T. (1991). The
representation of disjunct
constituents. Language, pages 726–762.
Eubank, L. (1989). Parameters
in L2 learning: Flynn revisited. Interlanguage studies bulletin
(Utrecht), 5(1):43–73.
Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic
inquiry, 11(2):337–362.
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues
in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Studies in natural language and linguistic
theory.
Fernández, J. (2013). How
left is right? locating Romance CLRD. A Handout for a paper presented at XXIII CGG,
Madrid.
Fernández-Sánchez, J. (2016). Topics
at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis–An International
Journal of Hispanic
Linguistics, 5(2):111–134.
Fernández-Sánchez, J. (2017). Right
dislocation as a biclausal phenomenon: evidence from Romance languages. PhD
thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Fiengo, R. and May, R. (1994). Indices
and identity. MIT press.
Fominyam, H. and Šimík, R. (2017). The
morphosyntax of exhaustive focus. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 35(4):1027–1077.
Fortin, C. (2007). Indonesian
Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD
thesis, University of Michigan.
Fox, D. (1999). Reconstruction,
binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic
Inquiry, 30(2):157–196.
Fox, D. and Sauerland, U. (1996). Illusive
scope of universal quantifiers. In NELS
Proceedings, volume 26, pages 71–86. University of Massachusetts.
Frascarelli, M. (2000). The
syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in
Italian, volume 50. Springer Science & Business Media.
Frascarelli, M. (2004). Dislocation,
clitic resumption and minimality. In Romance languages and linguistic
theory, pages 99–118.
Frey, W. (2004). Notes
on the syntax and the pragmatics of German. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The
syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 9:203.
Gary, J. O. and Gamal-Eldin, S. M. (1982). Cairene
Egyptian Colloquial
Arabic, volume 6. North-Holland.
Gecség, Z. and Kiefer, F. (2009). A
new look at information structure in Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 27(3):583–622.
Ginzburg, J. and Sag, I. (2000). Interrogative
investigations. Stanford: CSLI publications.
Givón, T. (1979). On
understanding grammar. Academic Press.
Grewendorf, G. (2008). The
left clausal periphery: Clitic left-dislocation in Italian and left-dislocation in
German. Shaer et al.
2009, pages 49–94.
Griffiths, J. (2019). A
Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the preposition stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without
movement. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics, 4(1).
Griffiths, J. and Lipták, A. (2014). Contrast
and island sensitivity in clausal
ellipsis. Syntax, 17(3):189–234.
Griffiths, J. E. (2015). On
appositives. LOT.
Grohmann, K. K. (2000). Prolific
peripheries: A radical view from the left. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
Guilliot, N. and Malkawi, N. (2007). Reconstruction
without movement. Coreference, Modality, and Focus: Studies on the Syntax-Semantics
Interface, pages 111–131.
Gundel, J. M. (1975). The
role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. New York: Garland.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2000). The
formal semantics of clitic doubling. Journal of
Semantics, 16(4):315–380.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2001). interface
conditions and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Walter de Gruyter.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2002). Constraint
interaction at semantics/pragmatics interface. Meaning through language
contrast, 1:335.
Gyuris, B. (2009). The
semantics and pragmatics of the contrastive topic in
Hungarian. Lexica.
Haegeman, L. (1991). Parenthetical
adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. Aspects of modern English
linguistics.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction
to government and binding theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hall, A. (2019). Fragments. The
Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.
Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes
on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of
linguistics, 3(2):199–244.
Hamlaoui, F. and Szendroi, K. (2017). The
syntax-phonology mapping of intonational phrases in complex sentences: A flexible
approach. Glossa, 2(1).
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I. (1976). Deep
and surface anaphora. Linguistic
inquiry, 7(3):391–428.
Harizanov, B. (2014). Clitic
doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 32(4):1033–1088.
Hawkins, J. A. (1983). Word
order
universals, volume 3. Elsevier.
Heestand, D., Xiang, M., and Polinsky, M. (2011). Resumption
still does not rescue islands. Linguistic
Inquiry, 42(1):138–152.
Heim, I. (1982). The
semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. University of Massachusetts at Amherst
dissertation.
Heycock, C. (2006). Embedded
root phenomena. The Blackwell companion to
syntax, pages 174–209.
Heycock, C. and Kroch, A. (1999). Pseudocleft
connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic
inquiry, 30(3):365–397.
Higginbotham, J. (1980). Pronouns
and bound variables. Linguistic
Inquiry, 11(4):679–708.
Hofmeister, P. and Sag, I. A. (2010). Cognitive
constraints and island
effects. Language, 86(2):366.
Hoji, H. and Fukaya, T. (2001). On
island repair and CM vs. non-CM constructions in English and
Japanese. In Handout of presentation presented at Kaken workshop on
ellipsis, Kyoto.
Holes, C. (1990). Gulf
Arabic. Psychology Press.
Hornstein, N. (2001). Move!:
A minimalist theory of construal. Blackwell Oxford.
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Understanding
minimalism. Cambridge University Press.
Horvath, J. (2000). Interfaces
vs. the computational system in the syntax of focus. In In Interface
strategies, pages 183–206. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Horvath, J. (2010). “discourse
features”, syntactic displacement and the status of
contrast. Lingua, 120(6):1346–1369.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical
relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Huang, J., Li, Y.-H. A., and Li, Y. (2009). The
syntax of Chinese. University of Cambridge
Press, 10.
Iatridou, S. (1995). Clitics
and island effects. University of Pennsylvania working papers in
linguistics, 2(1):3.
Jaber, A. (2014). On
genericity and definiteness in Modern Standard Arabic. PhD
thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic
interpretation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.
Johannessen, J. B. (1996). Partial
agreement and coordination. Linguistic
Inquiry, pages 661–676.
Johnson, K. (2019). Gapping
and stripping. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.
Kayne, R. (1994). The
Antisymmetry of Syntax, volume 25. MIT press.
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French
syntax: The transformational
cycle, volume 30. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
Kayne, R. S. (2000). On
the left edge in UG: A reply to
McCloskey. Syntax, 3(1):44–51.
Kechagias, A. (2011). Regulating
word order in modern Greek: verb initial and non-verb initial orders & the conceptual-intentional
interface. PhD thesis, UCL (University College London).
Kennedy, C. and Merchant, J. (2000). Attributive
comparative deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 18(1):89–146.
Kim, S. (2001). Chain
composition and uniformity. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 19(1):67–107.
Kim, S. K. (2015). Speech,
Variation, and Meaning: The Effects of Emotional Prosody on Word Recognition. PhD
thesis, Stanford University.
Kimura, H. (2010). A
wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English
Linguistics, 27(1):43–59.
Kiss, K. and Gyuris, B. (2003). Apparent
scope inversion under the rise fall contour. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 50(3–4):371–404.
Kiss, K. É. (1998). Identificational
focus versus information
focus. Language, 74(2):245–273.
Kluck, M., Ott, D., and De Vries, M. (2015). Parenthesis
and ellipsis: crosslinguistic and theoretical
perspectives, volume 121. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1983). Variables
and the bijection principle. The Linguistic
Review, 2(2):139–160.
Koster, J. (2000). Extraposition
as parallel construal. Ms., University of Groningen.
Kramer, R. (2014). Clitic
doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 32(2):593–634.
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic
notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 55(3–4):243–276.
Krifka, M. (2011). Questions. In von Heusinger, K. Semantics. An
international handbook of natural language
meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2pp, pages 1742–1785.
Krifka, M. and Musan, R. (2012). Information
structure: Overview and linguistic issues. The expression of information
structure, 5:1–44.
Kruijff-Korbayová, I. and Steedman, M. (2003). Discourse
and information structure. Journal of logic, language and
information, 12(3):249–259.
Kuno, S. (1978). Danwa
no
Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.
Kupula Ross, M. (2012). Clitic
left dislocation as agreement–A movement approach. [URL].
Kural, M. (1997). Postverbal
constituents in Turkish and the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic
inquiry, pages 498–519.
Laca, B. (1990). Generic
objects: some more pieces of the
puzzle. Lingua, 81(1):25–46.
Lahne, A. (2005). Die
linke satzperipherie im okzitanischen. Master’s
thesis, University of Jena.
Laka, I. (1990). Negation
in syntax–on the nature of functional categories and projections. PhD
thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information
structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse
referents, volume 71. Cambridge university press.
Lambrecht, K. (2001). Dislocation. Language
typology language universals: An international
handbook, 2:1050–1078.
Langacker, R. (1969). On
pronominalization and the chain of command. Modern studies in
English, ed. by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–86.
Larson, R. K. (1988). On
the double object construction. Linguistic
inquiry, 19(3):335–391.
Larsson, E. (1979). La
dislocation en français. etude de syntaxe générative.
Lasnik, H. (2001). When
can you save a structure by destroying it? In NELS
Proceedings, pages 301–320.
Lasnik, H. (2003). Minimalist
investigations in linguistic theory. Routledge.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M. (1984). On
the nature of proper
government. 235–289. Linguistic
Inquiry.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M. (1992). Move
α. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lasnik, H. and Stowell, T. (1991). Weakest
crossover. Linguistic
inquiry, 22(4):687–720.
Law, A. (2003). Right
dislocation in Cantonese as a focus-marking device. University College London Working Papers in
Linguistics, 15:243–275.
Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language
acquisition of the form of grammar. PhD thesis, Umass University.
Lechner, W. (2004). Ellipsis
in comparatives, volume 72. Walter de Gruyter.
Legate, J. A. (2002). Warlpiri:
theoretical implications. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Leonetti, M. (2007). Clitics
do not encode specificity. In Proceedings of the workshop
Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance
languages, pages 111–139.
Leonetti, M. (2008). Specificity
in clitic doubling and in differential object
marking. Probus, 20(1):33–66.
Leonetti, M. (2013). On
contrastive readings in the interpretation of NPs/DPs. Arbeitspapier Nr.
127, page 99.
Leung, T. (2014). The
preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati
Arabic. Linguistic
Inquiry, 45(2):332–340.
Lin, J. (2005). Does
wh-in-situ license parasitic gaps? Linguistic
Inquiry, 36(2):298–302.
Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis:
Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford University Press.
López, L. (2009). A
derivational syntax for information
structure, volume 23. Oxford University Press.
López, L. (2016). Dislocations
and information structure. In The Oxford handbook of information
structure.
Lüdeling, A., Ritz, J., Stede, M., and Zeldes, A. (2016). Corpus
linguistics and information structure research. The Oxford Handbook of Information
Structure, Oxford University Press. URL [URL], 1.
Lyassi, N. (2012). Standard
Arabic Left-dislocation without Movement: Evidence for the presence of a Hanging Topic Left-dislocation
Construction. International Journal of
Linguistics, 4(4):590.
Manzini, M. R. (1994). Syntactic
dependencies and their properties: a note on strong islands. UCL Working Papers in
Linguistics, 6:205–218.
Marantz, A. (1984). On
the Nature of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge.
McCawley, J. D. (1970). English
as a VSO
language. Language, pages 286–299.
McCawley, J. D. (1993). Gapping
with shared operators. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society, volume 19, pages 245–253.
McCloskey, J. (1990). Resumptive
pronouns, Ā-binding, and levels of representation in Irish. In The
syntax of the modern Celtic
languages, pages 199–248. Brill.
McCloskey, J. (1999). On
the right edge in
Irish. Syntax, 2(3):189–209.
McCloskey, J. (2006). Resumption. The
Blackwell companion to syntax, pages 94–117.
McNally, L. (1998). On
recent formal analyses of topic. In The Tbilisi symposium on
language, logic, and computation: Selected
papers, volume 14, pages 147–160. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Merchant, J. (2001). The
syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2004a). Fragments
and ellipsis. Linguistics and
philosophy, 27(6):661–738.
Merchant, J. (2004b). Resumptivity
and non-movement. Studies in Greek
linguistics, 24:471–481.
Merchant, J. (2006). Small
clauses: A sententialist perspective. in Progovac et al.
2006, pages 73–91.
Merchant, J. (2019). Ellipsis:
A survey of analytical approaches. In The Oxford handbook of
ellipsis.
Michelle, G. and Michaelis, L. (2001). Topicalization
and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited. Journal of
Pragmatics, 33(11):1665–1706.
Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why
agree? Why move? Unifying agreement–based and discourse configurational languages. MIT Press.
Molnár, V. (2002). Contrast–from
a contrastive perspective. In Information structure in a
cross-linguistic perspective, pages 147–161. Brill Rodopi.
Morgan, J. (1973). Sentence
fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée
Kahane, pages 719–751.
Moutaouakil, A. (1989). Pragmatic
functions in a functional grammar of Arabic. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Müller, G. (1995). A-bar
syntax: A study in movement types. Walter de Gruyter.
Murphy, A. (2016). Subset
relations in ellipsis
licensing. Glossa, 1(1):1.
Murphy, A. (2017). Toward
a unified theory of wh-in-situ and islands. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 26(2):189–231.
Musabhien, M. (2008). Case,
agreement and movement in Arabic: a minimalist approach. PhD
thesis, Newcastle University.
Neeleman, A. and Szendrői, K. (2004). Superman
sentences. Linguistic
Inquiry, 35(1):149–159.
Neeleman, A., Titov, E., Van de Koot, H., and Vermeulen, R. (2009). A
syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. Alternatives to
cartography, 1551.
Nespor, M. and Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic
phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2009). On
split CPs and the ‘perfectness’ of language. In Dislocated elements
in
discourse, pages 122–148. Routledge.
Nissenbaum, J. (2000). Covert
movement and parasitic
gaps. In PROCEEDINGS-NELS, volume 30, pages 541–556.
Nolda, A. (2004). Topics
detached to the left: On’left dislocation’,’hanging topic’, and related constructions in
german. In ZAS Papers in
Linguistics, volume 35, pages 423–448.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization
of chains and sideward
movement, volume 43. MIT press.
Nykiel, J. (2013). Clefts
and preposition omission under
sluicing. Lingua, 123:74–117.
Obiedat, N. (1994).
The
presentation of thematic structure in the translation of English and Arabic political
discourse
. PhD thesis, Durham University.
Onea, E. (2016). Potential
questions at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Brill.
Ordóñez, F. and Treviño, E. (1999). Left
dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of
spanish. Lingua, 107(1–2):39–68.
Ott, D. (2014). An
ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic
Inquiry, 45(2):269–303.
Ott, D. (2016a). Do
fragments need to move? In A handout for a paper presented in Syn/Sem
Reading Group. University of Ottawa. 25/11/2016, pages 1–10.
Ott, D. (2016b). Ellipsis
in appositives. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics, 1(1):34.
Ott, D. (2017). The
syntax and pragmatics of dislocation: A non-templatic
approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 CLA
Conference. Toronto: Ryerson University.
Ott, D. and De Vries, M. (2014). A
biclausal analysis of right-dislocation. In Proceedings of
NELS, volume 43, pages 41–54.
Ott, D. and De Vries, M. (2016). Right-dislocation
as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 34(2):641–690.
Ott, D. and Onea, E. (2015). On
the form and meaning of appositives. In Proceedings of
NELS, volume 45, pages 203–212.
Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V. (2016). Deletion
in clausal ellipsis: remnants in the middle field. In Proceedings of
the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics
Conference, volume 22, pages 225–234.
Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V. (2017). Constraints
on clausal ellipsis are pragmatic, not syntactic. [URL].
Ott, D. and Struckmeier, V. (2018). Particales
and deletion. Linguistic
inquiry, 49(2):393–407.
Ouhalla, J. (1994a). Focus
in Standard Arabic. Linguistics in
Potsdam, 1:65–92.
Ouhalla, J. (1994b). Verb
movement and word order in Arabic. In Verb
movement, 41:72.
Ouhalla, J. and Shlonsky, U. (2002). Themes
in Arabic and Hebrew
syntax, volume 53. Springer Science & Business Media.
Owens, J. (1990). Early
Arabic Grammatical Theory-Studies in the History of the Language
Sciences. Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
Pablos, L. (2006). Pre-verbal
structure building in Romance languages and Basque. Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Maryland.
Park, M. K. and Kim, S. W. (2009). The
syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and delete. The linguistic Association of Korea
Journal, 17(4):25–53.
Pereltsvaig, A. (2004). Topic
and focus as linear notions: evidence from Italian and
Russian. Lingua, 114(3):325–344.
Pesetsky, D. (1987). Wh-in-situ:
Movement and unselective binding. The representation of (in)
definiteness, 98:98–129.
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1987). The
theory of empty categories and the prodrop parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of
linguistics, 23(2):289–318.
Philippaki-Warburton, I., Varlokosta, S., Georgiafentis, M., and Kotzoglou, G. (2004). Moving
from theta-positions: pronominal clitic doubling in
Greek. Lingua, 114(8):963–989.
Philippova, T. (2014). P-omission
under sluicing,[P clitic] and the nature of P-stranding. Proceedings of ConSOLE
XXII. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden.
Poletto, C. and Pollock, J.-Y. (2004). On
the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of
syntactic
structures, 2:251–296.
Polinsky, M. (1999). A
review of information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse
referents. language, 75(4):567–582.
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. (2001). Long-distance
agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 19(3):583–646.
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb
movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic
inquiry, 20(3):365–424.
Popper, K. (1959). The
logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books. New York.
Portner, P. and Yabushita, K. (1998). The
semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics and
Philosophy, pages 117–157.
Postal, P. (1966). On
so-called pronouns in English. In Nineteenth Monograph on Languages and
Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.
Postal, P. (1971). Crossover
phenomena. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Postal, P. M. (1993). Remarks
on weak crossover effects. Linguistic
Inquiry, 24(3):539–556.
Preminger, O. (2009). Breaking
agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic
Inquiry, 40(4):619–666.
Preminger, O. (2011). Agreement
as a fallible operation. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Prince, E. F. (1981). Topicalization,
focus-movement, and yiddish-movement: A pragmatic
differentiation. In Annual meeting of the berkeley linguistics
society, volume 7, pages 249–264.
Prince, E. F. (1998). On
the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and
topicalization. In The limits of
syntax, pages 281–302. Brill.
Reeve, M. (2016). Fragments,
truncated clefts and island-sensitivity. In Ellipsis Across Borders
Conference 2016, pages 1–10.
Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics
and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics in pragmatics and philosophy i. Philosophica
anc Studia Philosophica Gandensia
Gent, 27(1):53–94.
Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora
and semantic interpretation. Routledge.
Reinhart, T. (1991). Elliptic
conjunctions–non-quantificational LF. In The Chomskyan Turn, edited
by A. Kasher, 360–384.
Repp, S. (2010). Defining
‘contrast’as an information-structural notion in
grammar. Lingua, 6(120):1333–1345.
Rezac, M. (2010). the
ϕ-agree versus the ϕ-feature movement: Evidence from floating quantifiers. Linguistic
Inquiry, 41(3):496–508.
Richards, N. (2014). A-bar
movement. The Routledge handbook of
syntax, pages 167–191.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues
in Italian
syntax, volume 11. Dordrecht, Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1986). On
the status of subject clitics in Romance. Studies in Romance
linguistics, pages 391–419.
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized
minimality. The MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. (1991). Residual
V2 and the WH-criterion. ms. Université de Genève.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of
grammar, pages 281–337. Springer.
Rizzi, L. (2001). Relativized
minimality effects. The handbook of contemporary syntactic
theory, 4:89–110.
Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality
and left periphery. Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic
structures, 3:223–251.
Roberts, C. (1996/2012). Information
structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and
Pragmatics, 5:6–1.
Rooth, M. (1992). A
theory of focus interpretation. Natural language
semantics, 1(1):75–116.
Rooth, M. (2005). Topic
accents on quantifiers. Reference and quantification: The Partee
effect, page 303.
Ross, J. (1969). Guess
who. In 5th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS
5), pages 252–286.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints
on variables in syntax. Doctoral
Dissertation, MIT.
Rubio Alcalá, C. (2014). Syntactic
constraints on topicalization phenomena. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,.
Ryding, K. C. (2005). A
reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge university press.
Safir, K. (1984). Multiple
variable binding. Linguistic
Inquiry, pages 603–638.
Safir, K. (1999). Vehicle
change and reconstruction in Ā-chains. Linguistic
inquiry, 30(4):587–620.
Safir, K. (2017). Weak
crossover. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second
Edition, pages 1–40.
Sailor, C. and Thoms, G. (2014). On
the non-existence of non-constituent coordination and non-constituent
ellipsis. In Proceedings of
WCCFL, volume 31, pages 361–370. Citeseer.
Sainsbury, R. M. (2009). Paradoxes. Cambridge University Press.
Salzmann, M. (2006). Resumptive
prolepsis: A study in indirect
A’-dependencies. LOT, Utrecht.
Salzmann, M. (2017). Reconstruction
and Resumption in Indirect A ‘-Dependencies: On the Syntax of Prolepsis and Relativization in (Swiss) German and
Beyond, volume 117. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Samek-Lodovici, V. (2006). When
right dislocation meets the left-periphery.: A unified analysis of Italian non-final
focus. Lingua, 116(6):836–873.
Samek-Lodovici, V. (2015). The
interaction of focus, givenness, and prosody: A study of Italian clause
structure, volume 57. OUP Oxford.
Schlenker, P. (2003). Clausal
equations (a note on the connectivity problem). Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 21(1):157–214.
Schmerling, S. F. (1976). Aspects
of English sentence stress. University of Texas Press..
Schneider-Zioga, P. (1994). The
syntax of clitic doubling in Modern Greek. PhD thesis, University of Southern California.
Schütze, C. T. (2001). On
the nature of default
case. Syntax, 4(3):205–238.
Selkirk, E. (2005). Comments
on intonational phrasing in english. Prosodies: With special reference to Iberian
languages, 9:11–58.
Selkirk, E. (2011). The
syntax-phonology interface. The handbook of phonological
theory, page 435.
Sells, P. (1984). Syntax
and semantics of resumptive pronouns. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Shaer, B., Cook, P., Frey, W., and Maienborn, C. (2009). Dislocated
elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic
perspectives. Routledge.
Shaer, B. and Frey, W. (2004). ‘integrated’and‘non-integrated’left-peripheral
elements in German and English. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Proceedings
of the dislocated elements workshop, 465–502.
Sharvit, Y. (1999). Resumptive
pronouns in relative clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 17(3):587–612.
Shin, J.-Y. (2005). Wh-constructions
in Korean: A lexical account. Toronto Working Papers in
Linguistics, 25.
Shlonsky, U. (1992). Resumptive
pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic
inquiry, 23(3):443–468.
Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause
structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic: An essay in comparative Semitic syntax. Oxford University Press.
Soltan, U. (2007). On
formal feature licensing in minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic morphosyntax. PhD
thesis, University of Maryland.
Soltan, U. M. (1996). A
contrastive and comparative syntactic analysis of deletion phenomena in English and Standard
Arabic. Unpublished MA Dissertation. Ain Shams
University.
Sportiche, D. (1992). Clitics,
voice, and spec-head licensing. Glow
Newsletter, 28:46–47.
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic
constructions. In Phrase structure and the
lexicon, pages 213–276. Springer.
Stainton, R. J. (1998). Quantifier
phrases, meaningfulness“ in isolation”, and ellipsis. Linguistics and
Philosophy, pages 311–340.
Stainton, R. J. (2005). In
defense of non-sentential assertion. Semantics versus
pragmatics, pages 383–457.
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. In Pragmatics, pages 315–332. Brill.
Starke, M. (2001). Move
Dissolves into Merge: a Theory of Locality. PhD thesis, Université de Genève.
Suñer, M. (1982). Syntax
and semantics of Spanish presentational sentence-types. Georgetown Univ School of Language.
Suñer, M. (1988). The
role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory, 6(3):391–434.
Suñer, M. (2006). Left
dislocations with and without
epithets. Probus, 18(1):127–158.
Svenonius, P. (1998). Clefts
in Scandinavian: an investigation. ZAS Papers in
Linguistics, 10:163–190.
Szabolcsi, A. (1994). All
quantifiers are not equal: The case of focus. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica, 42(3/4):171–187.
Takita, K. (2014). Pseudo-right
dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic
constructions. Lingua, 140:137–157.
Tanaka, H. (2001). Right-dislocation
as scrambling. Journal of
Linguistics, 37(3):551–579.
Tancredi, C. (1992). Deletion,
deaccenting and presupposition. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Taraldsen, K. T. (1986). Som
and the binding theory. In Topics in Scandinavian
syntax, pages 149–184. Springer.
Tellier, C. (1989). Head-internal
relatives and parasitic gaps in Mooré. Current approaches to african
linguistics, 6:298–318.
Thráinsson, H. (2007). The
syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge University Press.
Tomioka, S. (2007). Pragmatics
of LF: Japanese and Korean wh-interrogatives. Journal of
Pragmatics, 39(9):1570–1590.
Truckenbrodt, H. (2015). Intonation
phrases and speech acts. Parenthesis and ellipsis: Cross-linguistic and theoretical
perspectives, pages 301–349.
Truswell, R. (2011). Events,
phrases, and questions. Oxford University Press.
Tsimpli, I.-M. (1992). Focussing
in modern Greek. ms. University College, London.
Tsimpli, I.-M. (1995). Focusing
in modern Greek. Discourse configurational
languages, 176:206.
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects
of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic
inquiry, 26(1):79–123.
Vallduví, E. (1990). The
informational component. Doctoral dissertation, University of
Pennsylvania.
Vallduví, E. (1992). The
informational component. New York: Garland Pub.
Valmala, V. (2007). The
syntax of little things. In 17th colloquium on generative grammar,
girona.
Van Craenenbroeck, J. (2009). Alternatives
to cartography, volume 100. Walter de Gruyter.
Van Craenenbroeck, J. (2010). The
syntax of ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch dialects. Oxford University Press.
Van Craenenbroeck, J. and Merchant, J. (2013). Ellipsis
phenomena. Cambridge handbook of generative
syntax, pages 701–745.
Van Craenenbroeck, J. and Temmerman, T. (2019). The
Oxford handbook of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Van Riemsdijk, H. (1997). Left
dislocation. In Materials on left
dislocation, pages 1–10.
Versteegh, C. H. M. and Eid, M. (2005). Encyclopedia
of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Brill.
Vicente, L. (2019). Sluicing
and its subtypes. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis.
Villalba, X. (2000). The
syntax of sentence periphery. PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,.
Von Stechow, A. (1981). Topic,
focus and local relevance. In Crossing the boundaries in
linguistics, pages 95–130. Springer.
Wahba, W. B. (1995). Parasitic
gaps in Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics VII: Papers
from the Seventh Annual Symposium on Arabic
Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pages 59–68.
Ward, G. L. and Prince, E. F. (1991). On
the topicalization of indefinite nps. Journal of
Pragmatics, 16(2):167–177.
Wasow, T. (1972). Anaphoric
relations in English. PhD
thesis, MIT.
Weir, A. (2014). Fragments
and clausal ellipsis. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
Williams, E. (1997). Blocking
and anaphora. Linguistic
inquiry, pages 577–628.
Williams, E. S. (1977). Discourse
and logical form. Linguistic
inquiry, pages 101–139.
Yim, C. (2013). Bi-clausal
evidence for right dislocation in Korean. Studies in Generative
Grammar, 17(4):25–39.
Yuan, B. and Dugarova, E. (2012). Wh-topicalization
at the syntax-discourse interface in English speakers L2 Chinese grammars. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 34(4):533–560.
Zeller, J. (2004). Left
dislocation in Zulu. Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian
Senckenberg.
Zeller, J. K. (2005). On
clitic left dislocation in Zulu. Rudiger Koppe Verlag.
Zribi-Hertz, A. (1994). The
syntax of nominative clitics in Standard and Advanced French. Paths towards universal
grammar, pages 453–472.
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody,
focus, and word order. MIT Press.
Zwart, J.-W. (2001). Backgrounding
(‘right-dislocation’) in Dutch. Ms., University of Groningen.