“Descriptive complements” are manner adverbials
Thomas Ernst | University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Dartmouth
College
The Mandarin “descriptive complement”
construction (e.g. Ta pao-de kuai “S/he runs fast”)
is often analyzed as a verb plus a syntactic complement, but I argue
that the postverbal de-phrase is in fact a manner adverbial. Several
facts about the construction, including morphological and
cooccurrence restrictions, do not help decide the issue. Rather, two
strong arguments support its adjunct status. First, taking these
phrases as complements would require all Mandarin verbs to
optionally select for a manner expression, a dubious proposition.
Second, doing so would violate a widely-assumed universal
restriction on argument structure (to at most three arguments).
Finally, several putative arguments for complement status are shown
to be either invalid (such as the possibility of extraction) or weak
(postverbal position).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The descriptive construction
- 1.2Two types of choice for an analysis
- 1.3Organization
- 2.Equivocal evidence
- 3.(Potentially) deciding evidence
- 3.1Selection
- 3.2Argument structure
- 4.Two non-arguments for the Complement Hypothesis
- 4.1Extraction from DES
- 4.2Postverbal position
- 5.Summary and conclusion
-
Notes
-
References