Chapter published in:
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey LiEdited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 249–292
Chinese comparatives
Commentary on clausal vs. phrasal analyses
This article aims to make a contribution to the
recent debate between the phrasal and clausal analyses of Chinese
comparatives, focusing on Lin
(2009) for the phrasal approach and Liu (2011, 2014), Hsieh (2017) and Erlewine (2018) for the clausal approach. I show that
problems such as lack of independent support for the rule of
backward predicate deletion, subcomparatives, embedded standards and
verbal comparatives remain difficult challenges to the new clausal
analyses and that counter-arguments against the phrasal approach do
not necessarily hold. To the contrary, a fine tuning of Lin’s
original phrasal analysis of bi not only avoids an
important criticism made by Liu
(2011) but can be extended to analyze verbal-comparatives
in a way that the clausal analyses cannot.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Recent analyses of Chinese comparatives
- 3.Challenges to the clausal approach
- 3.1Problems with comparative deletion
- 3.2Problems with subcomparatives and embedded standards
- 3.2.1Liu’s (2011) new answer and its problems
- 3.2.2Hsieh’s (2017) solution and its problems
- 4.3Erlewine’s (2018) account and problems
- 5.Remarks on arguments against the phrasal analysis
- 5.1Arguments based on complex predicate constructions
- 5.2Erlewine’s (2018) Arguments based on movement chains
- 6.Liu’s (2011) arguments
against Lin’s (2009)
analysis
- 6.1 Rang-constructions
- 6.2Reason clauses
- 6.3Object comparison in multiple standard comparatives
- 7.A Revision of Lin (2009)
- 8.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 13 April 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.09lin
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.09lin
References
Bartos, Huba
Bender, Emily
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana
Bhatt, Rajesh & Takahashi, Shoichi
Bresnan, Joan
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
Chomsky, Noam
Cresswell, M. J
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
2007 A New Syntax-Semantics for the Mandarin
Bi Comparative. MA thesis, University of Chicago.
Ernst, Thomas & Wang, Chengchi
Goodall, Grant
Gu, Yang & Guo, Jie
Guo, Jie
2012 Form and meaning: Chinese adjectives and
comparative constructions. PhD dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Guo, Jie & Gu, Yang
Heim, Irene
Hsieh, I-Ta Chris
Huang, C.-T. James
1982 Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of
grammar. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Li, Yafei
Kennedy, Christopher
1997 Projecting the adjective: The syntax and
semantics of gradability and comparison. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
Kennedy, Christopher
Koopman, Hilda
1984 The syntax of verbs: from verb movement rules in
the Kru languages to universal grammar. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.
Lechner, Winfried
Li, Shan
Li, Y.-H. Audrey
Li, Xiao
Lin, Jo-wang
Lin, Jo-Wang
Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther
Luo, Qiongpeng
Merchant, Jason
Montague, Richard
Paul, Waltraud
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
Rullmann, Hotze
1995 Maximality in the semantics of
wh-constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Schwarzschild, Roger & Wilkinson, Karina
Tang, Sze-wing
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and effects of word order
variation. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Tsao, Feng-fu
von Stechow, Arnim
Xiang, Ming
2005 Some topics in comparative
constructions. PhD dissertation, Michigan State University.
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne