Cover not available
Part of
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 301–330

Constraints on the representation of anaphoric definiteness in Mandarin Chinese

A reassessment

| University of Southern California
| Pasadena City College
There is increasing evidence that languages may use distinct forms to encode definiteness in instances of anaphoric and non-anaphoric definiteness, for example, distinct determiners, or bare classifier vs. bare noun patterns. This chapter considers a recent, prominent claim in Jenks (2018) that such distinctions are systematically encoded in Mandarin Chinese via the presence vs. absence of demonstratives with a noun, and regulated by a principle Index!, which requires the use of overt marking of referential indices. The chapter argues that there is greater optionality in the forms used to represent definite NPs in Mandarin than assumed in Jenks’ characterization, and that alternations between definite bare nouns and demonstrative-marked nouns are affected by issues of discourse coherence and parsing expectations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two ways to encode definiteness
    • 2.1Jenks (2018) and Mandarin Chinese
  • 3.Probing the potential use of bare nouns as anaphoric definites in Mandarin
    • 3.1NPs introduced by ba 把
    • 3.2NPs introduced by ti 替
    • 3.3NPs introduced by gen 跟
    • 3.4NPs introduced by zai 在
    • 3.5Revisiting direct and indirect objects
    • 3.6Conclusions, consequences and extensions
    • 3.7Discourse constraints on the bare noun pattern in anaphoric definiteness
  • 4.The representation of anaphoric definites in Korean, Hindi, and Cantonese
    • 4.1Korean
    • 4.2Hindi
    • 4.3Cantonese
  • 5.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.11sim
References (38)
References
Arkoh, Ruby & Matthewson, Lisa. 2013. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua 123: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1993. Classifiers, quantifiers and class nouns in Hmong. Studies in Language 17. 1−51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1986. Referent introducing and tracking in Chinese narratives. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics 42:1129–1184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L-S. & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Richard Kayne and Guglielmo Cinque (eds), 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6:339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Matthew. 2000. Anaphoric reference in spoken and written Chinese narrative discourse. Book of Chinese Linguistics 28:2:303–336.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27:393–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Bare noun phrases. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner (eds), 1088–1109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1971a. Referenz, Sprechsituation und die bestimmten Artikel in einem Nordfriesischen Dialekt (Fering). [Reference, speech situation, and the definite article in a north Frisian dialect (Fering)] Studien und Materielen 4, Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Institut.Google Scholar
. 1971b. Zwei Formen des bestimmten Artikels. [Two forms of the definite article] In Probleme und Fortschritte der Transformationsgrammatik, [Problems and progress in transformational grammar] Dieter Wunderlich (ed), 159–74, Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: quantitative cross-linguistic studies. NewYork: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Philip. 1985. Factors governing the morphological coding of referents in Hausa narrative discourse. PhD dissertation,UCLA.
Jenks, Peter. 2018. Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry. 49:501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Li. 2012. Nominal arguments and language variation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
. 2014. A parametric analysis of nominal arguments. In Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson and Dylan Tsai (eds), 51–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Arum, & Park, Myung-Kwan. 2020. (In)definiteness in Korean without an article. Korean Book of Linguistics 45, 451–475.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles & Thompson, Sandra. 1979. Third person pronouns and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, Talmy Givon (ed), 311–335. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping & Bisang, Walter. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: from individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122:335–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 2011. Concept types and determination. Book of Semantics 28: 279–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, Albert. 2014. Definite article asymmetries and concept types: semantic and pragmatic uniqueness. In Frames and concept types, Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald, & Wiebke Petersen (eds), 293–321. New York: Springer.0. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pu, Ming-Ming. 1995. Anaphoric patterning in English and Mandarin narrative production. Discourse processes 19:279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Discourse anaphora: a cognitive functional approach. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
. 2013. Two types of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass, 534–558.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2017. Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness. Linguistics 55:2: 305–332.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Soh, Hooi Ling, & Nomoto, Hiroki. 2011. Bare classifiers and definiteness: a cross-linguistic investigation. Studies in Language 35:168–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew & Biswas, Priyanka. 2016. Bare nominals, classifiers, and the representation of definiteness in Bangla. Linguistic Analysis 40:3–4:167–198.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Li, Yan, & Wu, Zoe. 2016. Grammatical roles, Coherence Relations, and the interpretation of pronouns in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 2:2: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. 1978. Anaphoric restraints in Mandarin Chinese narrative discourse. In Anaphora in discourse, John Hinds (ed), 279–338. Edmonton, Alberta: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Yang, Rong. 2001. Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Huang, C.-T. James & Barry C.-Y. Yang
2024. Locality, focus and covert movement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics DOI logo
Kim, Min-Joo
2023. Anaphoric definiteness marking in Korean: focusing on subject definites. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.