Cover not available
Part of
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 331–356

Noncanonical arguments via the high applicative

| University of Wisconsin
This article develops a new account of Chinese NCAs. The representative analyses of the phenomenon in the literature were evaluated, accompanied with facts, some new, that help sort out the linguistic and extra-linguistic properties of the NCAs. The proposed account consists of two core elements: bare lexical roots without light verbs (in their popular sense) at either lexical or syntactic level of derivation, and the conditional use of the high applicative. All relevant facts are derived from the collaboration of these two elements once extra-linguistic factors are duly recognized and either incorporated into the analysis or set aside to avoid unnecessary distractions.
Article outline
  • 0.Introduction
  • 1.On the facts and the existing analyses
    • 1.1Lin’s (2001) original theory: Bare roots plus s-syntactic light verbs
    • 1.2My own analysis: Bare roots with no light verbs at all
    • 1.3A. Li’s theory: A thematic hierarchy via light verbs
    • 1.4Zhang’s (2018) ergative verb approach
  • 2.An applicative-based alternative account
    • 2.1High applicatives and their use in a low-applicative language
    • 2.2How does syntax deal with a bare lexical root?
    • 2.3ApplH vs. light verbs
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.12yaf
References (29)
References
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi. 1993. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. In Theoretical Aspects of Banta Grammar, Sam Mchombo (ed), 47–91. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chen, Zhe and Yafei Li. 2016. Looking at vP from the Chinese perspective. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 4: 483–497.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The views from Building 20, K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Her, One-soon. 2009. Apparent subject-object inversion in Chinese. Linguistics 47(5): 1143–1181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–593.Google Scholar
Huang, James, Audrey Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
Li, Audrey. Thematic hierarchy and derivational economy. Language & Linguistics 15(3): 295–339.
Li, Yafei. 2005. X0: A Theory of the Morphology-Syntax Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei. (2021) Universal Grammar and Iconicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei, Rebecca Shields and Vivian Lin. 2012. Adverb classes and the nature of minimality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 217–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Marantz, Alec. 1993. Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, Sam A. Mchombo (ed), 113–150. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar
Pacchiarotti, Sara. 2017. Bantu applicative construction types involving *-id: Form, function and diachrony. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2004. Tense, case and the nature of syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jaqueline Guéron and Jaqueline Lecarme (eds), 495–538. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Tianqi, and Yafei Li. 2010. Licensing non-core arguments in Chinese. Chinese Language Studies 334: 21–33.Google Scholar
. 2020. An analysis on the mechanism of oblique object constructions in Chinese: The monosyllabic constraint and the “bare root” theory. Contemporary Linguistics 22(2): 199–216.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina. 2018. Non-canonical objects as event kind-classifying elements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36: 1395–1437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lin, Jo-wang
2024. 名物化與「的」字結構. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 25:3 ► pp. 454 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.