Cover not available
Part of
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 357–394

Applied objects in Mandarin and the nature of selection

| Kasisto AI
This article examines a range of data involving non-canonical objects in Mandarin mono- and di-transitive sentences. It argues that these represent applied object constructions, in which an oblique argument is “promoted” to the status of a direct object. The core theoretical apparatus employed is that of Larson (2014), which recasts θ-roles as formal syntactic θ-features and θ-role assignment as θ-feature agreement and provides a general account of structure projection and argument inversions like those involved with applied objects. We show that this approach can bring together a wide range of constructions in Mandarin. We conclude with a discussion of these results for the broader understanding of selection. Mandarin non-canonical objects strongly suggest a purely syntactic approach to selection, rather than the semantic approach which is more typically assumed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Oblique arguments in Mandarin
    • 2.1Monotransitives with circumstantial roles
    • 2.2Monotransitives with possessive roles
    • 2.3Ditransitives
  • 3.Projection via θ-features
    • 3.1θ-roles as formal features
    • 3.2More on syntactic features (Pesetsky and Torrego 2007)
    • 3.3Further refinements
    • 3.4Argument inversion
      • 3.4.1Movement and minimality
      • 3.4.2“Transitive Agreement”
  • 4.Mandarin oblique arguments as applied objects
    • 4.1Monotransitives with canonical subjects and objects
    • 4.2Monotransitives with canonical subjects and circumstantial objects
    • 4.3Monotransitives with circumstantial subjects and objects
    • 4.4Ditransitives
      • 4.4.1PP Datives
      • 4.4.2Double object constructions
      • 4.4.3Preverbal datives
    • 4.5Monotransitives with possesor subjects and possessum objects
  • 5.Syntax, semantics and selection
    • 5.1Selection as semantic
    • 5.2Selection as syntactic
    • 5.3Cross-linguistic variation in selection
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.13lar
References (50)
References
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barrie, Michael. & Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2014. Analysis vs. synthesis: objects. In Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, Yen-Hui Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Jung-Hsing. 2007. Linking semantics and syntax in Mandarin serial verbs: a role and reference grammar account. Language and Linguistics. 8:235–266.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Djamouri, Redouane. & Paul, Waltraud. 2009. Verb-to-preposition reanalysis in Chinese. In Historical syntax and linguistic theory, Paola Crisma & Guisepi Longobardi (eds), 194 – 211. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emenanjo, ’Nolue. 1976. Elements of Modern Igbo grammar. Ibadan: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Feng, Sheng-Li. 2003. Light verb syntax in Classical Chinese. Paper presented at the Conference on Research and Pedagogy in Classical Chinese and Chinese Language History, March 28–30. New York: Columbia University.
. 2005. Light verb movement in Modern and Classical Chinese. Language Sciences 1:3–16. 顾阳 1999 双宾语结构，《徐烈炯主编 共性与个性：汉语语言学中的争议》。Google Scholar
Han, Jing-Quan. 2000. A study of possessor raising movement in relation to Case theory. Modern Foreign Languages 3: 3261–272.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. & Mo, Ruo-ping. 1992. Mandarin ditransitive constructions and the category of gei. Berkeley Linguistic Society 18: 109–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren. & Ahrens, Kathleen. 1999. The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions. Book of Chinese Linguistics 27: 1–26.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 2007. Thematic structures of verbs in Chinese and their syntactic projections. Linguistic Sciences 4: 3–21.Google Scholar
. 2008. Cong ‘ta de laoshi dang de hao’ tanqi. Language Sciences 7(3): 225–241.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. Li, Yen-Hui Audrey & Li, Ya-Fei. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. The status of theta-roles in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon. Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. “Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution,” in Lexical matters, Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–54. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 2014. On shell structure. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles & Thompson, Sandra. 1974. Co-verbs in Mandarin Chinese: verbs or prepositions? Book of Chinese Linguistics 2: 257–278.Google Scholar
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2011. Non-canonical objects and case. Korea Book of Chinese Language and Literature 1: 21–51.Google Scholar
. 2014. Thematic hierarchy and derivational economy. Language and Linguistics 15: 295–339.Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Irvine: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-Hsi. 2006. Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 7(4): 863–904.Google Scholar
陆俭明 2002 再谈 “吃了他三个苹果”一类结构的性质，《中国语文》第四期，317 – 325页。Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. The Nature of Grammatical Relations . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Hai-Hua. & Han, Jing-Quan. 2005. The syntax of surface unaccusative constructions. Linguistics Study 3.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. & Whitman, John. 2010. Applicative structure and Mandarin ditransitives. In Argument structure and syntactic relations from a cross-linguistic perspective. Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro & Nerea Madariaga (eds), 261–282. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: syntactic derivation and interpretation. Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ren, Ying. 2009. How the sentence Wángmiǎn sǐle fùqin is generated? − from the correlation of concepts to that of constructions. Chinese Teaching in the World 3: 4.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1991. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Jia-Xuan. 2006. The generative mechanism of sentences like “Wangmian died father” (王冕死了父亲): Sentence generation by blending in Chinese. Chinese Language 4.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-wing. 1998. On the ‘inverted’ double object construction. Studies in Cantonese Linguistics 1: 35–54. Google Scholar
邓思颖. 2004. 作格化和汉语被动句，《中国语文》第四期，291–301页。Google Scholar
Tao, Liang. 2009. Serial verb constructions in Mandarin Chinese: The interface of syntax and semantics. In Yun Xiao (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (naccl-21) Volume 2. 209–228. Smithfield, Rhode Island: Bryant University.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2007. Two types of light verbs in Chinese. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (iacl-15) in conjunction with the 19th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (naccl-19), May 25–27. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
, 2014. Syntax-semantics mismatches, focus movement and light verb syntax. In Language and Linguistic Monograph Series 54: Peaches and Plums. C.-T. James Huang & Feng-hsi Liu (eds), 203–226. Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie. 1999. Some theoretical issues of the two types of Chinese ‘retained-object’ constructions. Contemporary Linguistic, 1:16–29.Google Scholar
. 2001. Transitivity and four classes of relevant verbs. Linguistics Study, 3.Google Scholar
Yu, Li-Ming & Lu, Jian-Jun. 2011. The historical development of the construction as represented by the sentence wangmian sile fuqin (王冕死了父亲). Studies of the Chinese Language 1:32–42.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chong 2015a. A derivational account of datives in Mandarin. Unpublished ms. Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
2015b. Wangmian si le fuqin. Unpublished abstract. Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ren. 2005. Enriched composition and inference in the argument structure of Chinese. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Miao-Miao. 2012. Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Trondheim, Norway.
Zhu, De-Xi. 1979. “Yŭ dòngcí gei xiāngguān de jùfă wèntí [Sentences containing the verb gei].” pp. 81–87.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xing-Fan. 2005. Light verb syntax of intransitives containing objects. Modern Foreign Languages 28(3): 221–231.Google Scholar