Chapter published in:
When Data Challenges Theory: Unexpected and paradoxical evidence in information structure
Edited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 3956
References
Brunetti, Lisa
2009On links and tails in Italian. Lingua 119(5): 756–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, Russell Tomlin (ed), 21–51. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Information flow in speaking and writing. In The Linguistics of Literacy, Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds), 17–29. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2017Cleft constructions. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Elisabeth Stark & Andreas Dufter (eds), 536–568. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
This volume. To be or not to be focus adverbials? A corpus-driven study of It. anche in spontaneous spoken Italian. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Declerck, Renaat
1984The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 64(4): 251–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dufter, Andreas
2009Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2003Topicalizzazione e ripresa clitica. Analisi sincronica, confronto diacronico e considerazioni tipologiche. In Italia linguistica anno Mille. Italia linguistica anno Duemila, Nicoletta Maraschio & Nicoletta Maraschio Teresa (eds), 547–562. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2017Dislocations and Framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garassino, Davide
This volume. Translation as a source of pragmatic interference? An empirical investigation of French and Italian cleft sentences. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Garassino, Davide & Jacob, Daniel
2018Polarity focus and non-canonical syntax in Italian, French and Spanish. Clitic left dislocation and sì che/ sí que-constructions. In The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical, Empirical, and Typological Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 227–254. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
This volume. When data challenges theory: The analysis of information structure and its paradoxes. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Hedberg, Nancy & Fadden, Lorna
2007The information structure of it-clefts, wh-clefts and reverse wh-clefts in English. In The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Robert Zacharski (eds), 49–76. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Daniel
2015Anaphorische Spaltsätze im Französischen: Grammatik – Text – Rhetorik. In Informationsstrukturen im Kontrast, Séverine Adam, Michael Schecker & Daniel Jacob (eds), 101–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Karssenberg, Lena
2016French il y a clefts, existential sentences and the Focus-Marking hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27(3): 405–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Non-prototypical Clefts in French. A Corpus Analysis of “il y a” Clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karssenberg, Lena & Lahousse, Karen
2018The information structure of French il y a & c’est clefts: A corpus-based analysis. Linguistics 56(3): 513–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahousse, Karen
This volume. Is focus a root phenomenon? In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
This volume. The curious case of the rare focus movement in French. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins DOI logo
Lewis, David
1979Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
1996A simple test for Theme and Rheme in clause complexes. Language Sciences 17(4): 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001aLa teoria come separatrice di fatti di livello diverso. L’esempio della struttura informativa dell’enunciato. In Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche, Rosanna Sornicola, Eleonora Stenta Krosbakken & Carolina Stromboli (eds), 151–173. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2001bThe role of discourse, syntax and the lexicon in determining focus nature and extension. Linguisticae Investigationes XXIII(2): 229–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
2015Positional effects of prosodic prominence in spoken Italian. Normas. Revista de Estudios Lingüísticos Hispánicos 7: 99–112.Google Scholar
2016The “exaptation” of linguistic implicit strategies. SpringerPlus 5/1: 1106. DOI logo
2019La lingua disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana
This volume. Remarks on Information Structure marking asymmetries: The epistemological view on the micropragmatic profile of utterances. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Matić, Dejan & Nikolaeva, Irina
2018From polarity focus to salient polarity: From things to processes. In The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical, Empirical, and Typological Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 9–53. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1978A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54: 883–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter Frederick
1964Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30(2): 96–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob
2022. Introduction. When data challenges theory. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Masia, Viviana
2022. Remarks on information structure marking asymmetries. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte, Daniel Jacob & Lars Konieczny
2022. How alternatives are created. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.