Part of
When Data Challenges Theory: Unexpected and paradoxical evidence in information structureEdited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 39–56
Edited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 39–56
Distinguishing psychological Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things clearer
The paper suggests that there is no contradiction in
cleft sentences focalizing information which was already introduced
by the preceding context, because being already active in discourse
(i.e., Given) is not the same as being linguistically encoded as a
Topic, and Given information can be focalized in discourse. Clefts
should be explained precisely as constructions devoted mainly to
focalizing already active information. A side-effect of the analysis
is to assess that the role of syntax in expressing Information
Structure is a secondary one, because syntactic triggers of
Information Structure only work when accompanied by prosodic
triggers, whereas prosodic means can work alone.
Keywords: information structure, cleft sentences, topic and focus, given and new, syntax and prosody
Article outline
- 1.Two concepts of topic, and some useful definitions
- 2.Non-prototypical clefts?
- 3.Is syntax the real thing?
- 4.Information structure is independent on semantic content
-
Acknowledgments -
Notes -
References
References (36)
Brunetti, Lisa. 2009. On
links and tails in
Italian. Lingua 119(5): 756–781. 
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive
constraints on information
flow. In Coherence
and Grounding in Discourse, Russell Tomlin (ed), 21–51. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 1992. Information
flow in speaking and
writing. In The
Linguistics of Literacy, Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima & Michael Noonan (eds), 17–29. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus
di italiano
parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2017. Cleft
constructions. In Manual
of Romance Morphosyntax and
Syntax, Elisabeth Stark & Andreas Dufter (eds), 536–568. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
. This
volume. To be or not to be
focus adverbials? A corpus-driven study of It.
anche in spontaneous spoken
Italian. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds), Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Declerck, Renaat. 1984. The
pragmatics of it-clefts and
wh-clefts. Lingua 64(4): 251–289.
. 1988. Studies
on Copular Sentences, Clefts and
Pseudo-clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dufter, Andreas. 2009. Clefting
and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and
Romance. In Focus
and Background in Romance
Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2003. Topicalizzazione
e ripresa clitica. Analisi sincronica, confronto diacronico
e considerazioni
tipologiche. In Italia
linguistica anno Mille. Italia linguistica anno
Duemila, Nicoletta Maraschio & Nicoletta Maraschio Teresa (eds), 547–562. Roma: Bulzoni.
. 2017. Dislocations
and
Framings. In Manual
of Romance Morphosyntax and
Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
Garassino, Davide. This
volume. Translation as a
source of pragmatic interference? An empirical investigation
of French and Italian cleft
sentences. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Garassino, Davide & Jacob, Daniel. 2018. Polarity
focus and non-canonical syntax in Italian, French and
Spanish. Clitic left dislocation and sì che/ sí
que-constructions. In The
Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical,
Empirical, and Typological
Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 227–254. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
. This
volume. When data challenges
theory: The analysis of information structure and its
paradoxes. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hedberg, Nancy & Fadden, Lorna. 2007. The
information structure of it-clefts, wh-clefts and reverse
wh-clefts in
English. In The
Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K.
Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Robert Zacharski (eds), 49–76. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jacob, Daniel. 2015. Anaphorische
Spaltsätze im Französischen: Grammatik – Text –
Rhetorik. In Informationsstrukturen
im Kontrast, Séverine Adam, Michael Schecker & Daniel Jacob (eds), 101–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Karssenberg, Lena. 2016. French
il y a clefts, existential sentences
and the Focus-Marking
hypothesis. Journal of French
Language
Studies 27(3): 405–430.
. 2018. Non-prototypical
Clefts in French. A Corpus Analysis of “il y a”
Clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
Karssenberg, Lena & Lahousse, Karen. 2018. The
information structure of French il y a
& c’est clefts: A corpus-based
analysis. Linguistics 56(3): 513–548.
Lahousse, Karen. This
volume. Is focus a root
phenomenon? In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information
Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental
Representation of Discourse
Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2001. A
framework for the analysis of cleft
constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516.
Larrivée, Pierre. This
volume. The curious case of
the rare focus movement in
French. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping
in a language game. Journal
of Philosophical
Logic 8: 339–359.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 1996. A
simple test for Theme and Rheme in clause
complexes. Language
Sciences 17(4): 357–378.
. 2001a. La
teoria come separatrice di fatti di livello diverso.
L’esempio della struttura informativa
dell’enunciato. In Dati
empirici e teorie
linguistiche, Rosanna Sornicola, Eleonora Stenta Krosbakken & Carolina Stromboli (eds), 151–173. Roma: Bulzoni.
. 2001b. The
role of discourse, syntax and the lexicon in determining
focus nature and
extension. Linguisticae
Investigationes XXIII(2): 229–252.
. 2009. La
struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati
linguistici. Roma: Carocci.
. 2015. Positional
effects of prosodic prominence in spoken
Italian. Normas. Revista de
Estudios Lingüísticos
Hispánicos 7: 99–112.
. 2016. The
“exaptation” of linguistic implicit
strategies. SpringerPlus 5/1: 1106.
. 2019. La
lingua
disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Masia, Viviana. This
volume. Remarks on
Information Structure marking asymmetries: The
epistemological view on the micropragmatic profile of
utterances. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence
in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob (eds). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Matić, Dejan & Nikolaeva, Irina. 2018. From
polarity focus to salient polarity: From things to
processes. In The
Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical,
Empirical, and Typological
Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 9–53. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter.
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. A
comparison of wh-clefts and
it-clefts in
discourse. Language 54: 883–906.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common
ground. Linguistics and
Philosophy 25: 701–721.
Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1964. Identifying
reference and
truth-values. Theoria 30(2): 96–118.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob
2022. Introduction. When data challenges theory. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 2 ff. 
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 148 ff.
Masia, Viviana
2022. Remarks on information structure marking asymmetries. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 58 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte, Daniel Jacob & Lars Konieczny
2022. How alternatives are created. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 116 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.