Chapter published in:
When Data Challenges Theory: Unexpected and paradoxical evidence in information structure
Edited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 147182
References
Aelbrecht, Lobke, Haegeman, Liliane & Nye, Rachel
2012Main clause phenomena and the privilege of the root. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Authier, Jean-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane
2012An intervention account of the distribution of main clause phenomena: Evidence from ellipsis. Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 4(1): 61–91.Google Scholar
Belligh, Thomas
2020aDutch thetic and sentence-focus constructions on the semantics-pragmatics interface: A case study. Studies in Language, 44(4): 831–878. Crossref
2020bAre theticity and sentence-focus encoded grammatical categories of Dutch? In Thetics and Categoricals, Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss & Yasuhiro Fujinawa (eds), 34–68. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
2021Alternating Constructions on the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface: Theticity and Sentence-focus in Dutch and Italian. PhD dissertation, UGent.
Bentley, Delia & Cruschina, Silvio
2018The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 118. Crossref
Bianchi, Valentina
2013On ‘focus movement’ in Italian. In Information Structure and Agreement, Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 193–216. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Focus fronting and the syntax-semantics interface. In Beyond the Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed), 60–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
2012Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Piñón (ed), 1–18. Crossref
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara
2010Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2: 43–88.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2013, Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette C. Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
2016Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and the evaluative dimension. Semantics and Pragmatics 9: 1–54.Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire
2006Les clivées françaises de type: C’est comme ça que, C’est pour ça que, C’est là que tout a commencé. Moderna Språk 100(2): 273–287.Google Scholar
Bres, Jacques & Nowakowska, Aleksandra
2005Dis-moi avec qui tu “dialogues”, je te dirai qui tu es… De la pertinence de la notion de dialogisme pour l’analyse du discours. Marges Linguistiques 9. http://​www​.marges​-linguistiques​.com> (17 April 2021).
Brunetti, Lisa
2009On links and tails in Italian. Lingua 119: 756–781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2012Focus and intonation. In The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Gillian Russel & Delia Graff Fara (eds), 103–115. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Choi-Jonin, Injoo & Lagae, Véronique
2005Il y a des gens ils ont mauvais caractère. A propos du rôle de il y a . In Sens et références. Mélanges Georges Kleiber, Adolfo Murguía (ed), 39–66. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Clech-Darbon, Anne, Rebuschi, Georges & Rialland, Annie
1999Are there cleft sentences in French? In The Grammar of Focus, Laurice Tuller & Georges Rebuschi (eds), 83–118. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter C.
1991Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert
2009Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1): 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Focus structure. In Existentials and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy, Delia Bentley, Francesco Maria Ciconte & Silvio Cruschina (eds), 43–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Kimps, Ditte
2016Specificational there-clefts. Functional structure and information structure. English Text Construction 9(1): 115–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cat, Cécile
2012Towards an interface definition of root phenomena. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 135–158. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2014Cleft constructions in a contrastive perspective. Towards an operational taxonomy. In Frequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in Romance and Germanic. Contrastive, Corpus-Based Studies, Anna-Maria De Cesare (ed), 9–48. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Les phrases clivées de l’italien en contact avec le français. Une analyse basée sur les textes diffusés sur le portail swissinfo.ch. In Zwischen den Texten: die Übersetzung an der Schnittstelle von Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft [Romanische Sprachen und ihre Didaktik 57], Christina Ossenkop & Georgia Veldre-Gerner (eds), 121–136. Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
2017Cleft constructions. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds), 536–568. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Garassino, Davide
2018Adverbial cleft sentences in Italian, French and English. A comparative perspective. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond, Marco García García & Melanie Uth (eds), 255–286. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-clefts. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy & Oberlander, Jon
1995Syntactic constraints on discourse structure. The case of it-clefts. Linguistics 33(3): 465–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Destruel, Emilie & De Veaugh-Geiss, Joseph P.
2018On the interpretation and processing of exhaustivity: Evidence of variation in English and French clefts. Journal of Pragmatics 138: 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny, Rebuschi, Georges & Rialland, Annie
2004Cleft sentences. In Handbook of French semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte De Swart (eds), 529–552. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1984Le dire et le dit. Minuit: Paris.Google Scholar
Dufter, Andreas
2008On explaining the rise of c’est-clefts in French. In The Paradox of Grammatical Change: Perspectives from Romance, Ulrich Detges & Richard Waltereit (eds), 31–56. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1970Root and Structure Preserving Transformations. PhD Dissertation, MIT.
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Erteshik-Shir, Nomi
1997The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fournier, Nathalie
1997La place du sujet nominal dans les phrases à complément prépositionnel initial. In La place du sujet en français contemporain, Catherine Fuchs (ed), 97–132. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner & Meinunger, André
2019Topic marking and illocutionary force. In Architecture of Topic, Valéria Molnár, Verner Egerland & Susanne Winkler (eds), 95–138. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine
(ed) 1997La place du sujet en français contemporain. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Garassino, Davide
2014Cleft sentences in Italian and English. In Frequency, Forms and Functions of Cleft Constructions in Romance and Germanic. Contrastive, Corpus-based Studies, Anna-Maria De Cesare (ed), 101–138. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Using cleft sentences in Italian and English: A multifactorial analysis. In Current Issues in Italian, Romance and Germanic Non-canonical Word Orders: Syntax – Information Structure – Discourse Organization, Anna-Maria De Cesare & Davide Garassino (eds), 181–204. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
This volume. Translation as a source of pragmatic interference? An empirical investigation of French and Italian cleft sentences. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Green, Georgia
1976Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52: 387–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2004aTopicalisation, CLLD and the left periphery. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 157–192. Berlin: Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg.Google Scholar
2004bThe syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalisation. In Current Studies in Comparative Romance Linguistics: Proceedings of the International Conference Held at the Antwerp University (19–21 September 2002) to Honor Liliane Tasmowski, Martine Coene, Gretel De Cuyper & Yves D’Hulst (eds), 61–90. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
2006Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations, Raffaella Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 27–52. Georgetown: University Press.Google Scholar
2007Operator movement and topicalisation in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 41: 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman Liliane
2009The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses. English Language and Linguistics 13: 385–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2010The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3): 628–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Adverbial clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ürögdi, Barbara
2010aReferential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account. Theoretical Linguistics 36(2–3), 111–152. Crossref
2010bOperator movement, referentiality and intervention. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 233–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, Meinunger, André & Vercauteren, Aleksandra
2014The architecture of it-clefts. Journal of Linguistics, 50(2): 269–296. Crossref
2015The syntax of it-clefts and the left periphery of the clause. In Beyond Functional Sequence 10, Ur Shlonsky (ed), 73–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy Ann
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 76(4): 891–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax 2, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Jacob, Daniel
2015Anaphorische Spaltsätze im Französischen: Grammatik – Text – Rhetorik. In Informationsstrukturen in Kontrast: Strukturen, Kompositionen und Strategien, Séverine Adam, Daniel Jacob & Michael Schecker (eds), 101–122. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jullien, Stéphane
2007Prosodic, syntactic and semantico-pragmatic parameters as clues for projection: The case of “il y a”. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française 28: 283–297.Google Scholar
Karssenberg, Lena
2016French il y a clefts, existential sentences and the focus-marking hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27(3): 405–430. Crossref
2018Non-prototypical Clefts in French: A Corpus Analysis of “il y a” Clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karssenberg, Lena & Lahousse, Karen
2017Les SN définis et indéfinis dans les clivées en il y a . In Contraintes linguistiques. À propos de la complémentation nominale, Caroline Lachet, Luis Meneses-Lerín & Audrey Roig (eds), 197–210. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2018The information structure of French il y a clefts and c’est clefts: A corpus-based analysis. Linguistics, 56(3): 513–548. Crossref
Katz, Stacy
2000Categories of c’est-cleft constructions. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 45(3–4): 253–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6, Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
2017Assertions and judgments, epistemics and evidentials. Handout for the workshop Speech acts: Meanings, Uses, Syntactic and Prosodic Realization, 1–16. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972The categorical and the thetic judgment. Foundations of Language 9: 153–185.Google Scholar
1992Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lagae, Véronique & Rouget, Christine
1998Quelques réflexions sur les relatives prédicatives. In Analyse linguistique et approches de l’oral. Recueil d’études offert en hommage à Claire Blanche-Benveniste, Mireille Bilger, Karel Van den Eynde & Françoise Gadet (eds), 313–325. Leuven & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Lahousse, Karen
2003Le sujet nominal postverbal en français moderne. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
2006aNP subject inversion in French: Two types, two configurations. Lingua 116: 424–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bL’assertion et l’inversion du sujet nominal dans les subordonnées adverbiales. Linguisticae Investigationes 29(1): 13–124. Crossref
2010Information structure and epistemic modality in adverbial clauses in French. Studies in Language 34(2): 298–326. Crossref
2011Quand passent les cigognes: Le sujet nominal postverbal en français moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
2015A case of focal adverb preposing in French. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti, Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds), 209–236. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lahousse, Karen & Borremans, Marijke
2014The distribution of functional-pragmatic types of clefts in adverbial clauses. Linguistics 52(3): 793–836. Crossref
Lahousse, Karen & Lamiroy, Béatrice
2012Word order in French, Spanish and Italian: A grammaticalization account. Folia Linguistica 46(2): 387–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017C’est ainsi que: Grammaticalisation ou lexicalisation ou les deux à la fois? Journal of French Language Studies 27(2): 161–185. Crossref
Lahousse, Karen, Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela
2014Contrast and intervention at the periphery. Lingua 14(3): 56–85. Crossref
Lambrecht, Knud
1986Pragmatically motivated syntax. Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In 22nd Conference of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley & Karl-Eric McCullough (eds), 115–126. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1988Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 135–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516. Crossref
Larrivée, Pierre
2020Le focus initial en français vernaculaire. Scolia 34: 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
This volume. The curious case of the rare Focus movement in French. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino, Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Léard, Jean.-Marcel
1992Les gallicismes. Étude syntaxique et sémantique. Paris & Leuven: Duculot. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine
2001Focalization in French stylistic inversion. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999, Yves D’Hulst, Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten (eds), 143–166. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel
2013Information structure and the distribution of Spanish bare plurals. In New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond, Johannes Kabatek & Albert Wall (eds), 121–155. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2021Focus structure and assertion in relative clauses: Evidence from Spanish. In Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy, Dennis Ott & Ángel Gallego (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Querler, Nathalie
1997La place du sujet nominal dans les subordonnées percontatives. In La place du sujet en français contemporain, Catherine Fuchs (ed), 179–203. Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot.Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
This volume. Distinguishing psychological Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things clearer. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Masia, Viviana
This volume. Remarks on Information Structure marking asymmetries: The epistemological view on the micropragmatic profile of utterances. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins Crossref
Matić, Dejan, Van Gijn, Rik & Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2014Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences. An overview. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences, Rik Van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten, & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds), 1–42. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, Piet
2011Prosodie, syntaxe, discours: autour d’une approche prédicative. In Actes d’IDP 2009, Paris, Septembre 2009, Hi-Yon Yoo & Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie (eds), 19–32. Paris.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2012Agreements that occur only in the main clause. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 79–112. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nølke, Henning
1994Linguistique modulaire: De la forme au sens. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2006Pour une théorie linguistique de la polyphonie. Langue française 4(164): 3–9.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1978A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language 54(4): 883–906. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Riester, Arndt & Baumann, Stefan
2013Focus triggers and focus types from a corpus perspective. Dialogue & Discourse 4(2): 215–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roggia, Carlo Enrico
2008Frasi scisse in italiano e francese orale: evidenze dal C-ORAL-ROM. Cuadernos de filología italiana 15: 9–29.Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte, Jacob, Daniel & Konieczny, Lars
This volume. How alternatives are created: Specialized background knowledge affects the interpretation of clefts in discourse. In When Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins Crossref
Scappini, Sophie
2014La construction clivée: focus étroit ou focus large. Fiche Fracov. http://​www​.univ​-paris3​.fr​/index​-des​-fiches227311​.kjsp​?RH​=1373703153287> (17 April 2021).
Tasmowski, Liliane & Willems, Dominique
1987Les phrases à première position actancielle vide: Par la porte ouverte (il) entrait une odeur de nuit et de fleurs . Travaux de linguistique 14/15: 177–191.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verwimp, Lyan & Lahousse, Karen
2017Definite il y a ­clefts in spoken French. Journal of French Language Studies 27(3): 263–290. Crossref
Ward, Gregory L.
1988The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. New York: Garland.Google Scholar