Part of
Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions
Edited by Giuliana Giusti, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro and Daniel Ross
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 274] 2022
► pp. 132
References
Aasen, Ivar
1848Det norske Folkesprogs Grammatik. Kristiania: Trykt hos Werner & Comp.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2006Serial Verb Constructions in Typological Perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Airola, Anu
2007Coordinated Verb Pairs in Texts. University of Helsinki Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Andersson, Peter & Blensenius, Kristian
2018bEn historisk studie av pseudosamordning: konstruktionen gå och v i svenskan. In Harry Lönnroth, Bodil Haagensen, Maria Kvist & Kim Sandvad West (eds), Studier i svensk språkhistoria 14 (Vaasan Yliopiston Tutkimuksia 305), 80–101. Vaasan yliopisto. [URL]
Andrason, Alexander
2018The WZIĄĆ gram in Polish: A serial verb construction, or not? STUF – Language Typology and Universals 71, 577–629. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andriani, Luigi
2017The Syntax of the Dialect of Bari. University of Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation. DOI logo
Anward, Jan
1988Verb-Verb agreement in Swedish. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics (Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax). 1–34.Google Scholar
Arnaiz, Alfredo & Camacho, José
1999A Topic Auxiliary in Spanish. In Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Fernando Martínez Gil (eds), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, vol. 2, 317–331. Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio I.
1898Un problema di sintassi comparata dialettale. Archivio glottologico italiano, 14: 453–468.Google Scholar
Bachmann, Ingo
2013Has go-V ousted go-and-V? A study of the diachronic development of both constructions in American English. In Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), Corpus perspectives on patterns of lexis, 91–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badawi, El-Said, Carter, Michael G. & Gully, Adrian
2004Modern Written Arabic: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Bhatia, Archna & Polinsky, Maria
2009Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9. 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Ciucci, Luca
2012Parataxis, Hypotaxis and Para-Hypotaxis in the Zamucoan Languages. Linguistic Discovery 10(1). 89–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Vikner, Sten
2017Having the edge: a new perspective on pseudocoordination in Danish and Afrikaans. In Nicholas LaCara, Keir Moulton & Anne-Michelle Tessier (eds). A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson. Linguistics Open Access Publications 1. 77–90. [URL]
Bjerre, Anne & Bjerre, Tavs
2007Pseudocoordination in Danish. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG07. 6–24. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Blensenius, Kristian
2015Progressive constructions in Swedish. Göteborgs Universitet Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Bolton, Rosemary A.
1990A Preliminary Description of Nuaulu Phonology and Grammar. University of Texas at Arlington M.A. thesis.
Boneh, Nora
2020Pseudo-grammaticalization: The anatomy of “come” in Modern Hebrew pseudo-coordination constructions. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5(2): 16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Ana
2020On Pseudo-coordination in Spanish. Borealis – An international Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 9(1): 125–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jessica M. M.
2017Heads and adjuncts: An experimental study of subextraction from participials and coordination in English, German and Norwegian. University of Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation. DOI logo
Camilleri, Maris
2016Temporal and Aspectual auxiliaries in Maltese. University of Essex Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Carden, Guy & Pesetsky, David
1977Double-Verb Constructions, Markedness, and a Fake Coordination. Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 82–92.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti
1998Motion Verbs as Functional Heads. GenGenP (Geneva Generative Papers) 6(1). 50–60.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
2001“Semi-lexical” Motion Verbs in Romance and Germanic. In Semi-lexical categories, Norbert Corver & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds), 371–414. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Motion Verbs as Functional Heads. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 31–49. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020Multiple agreement in southern Italian dialects. In Linguistic variation: structure and interpretation [Studies in Generative Grammar 132] Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds), 125–148. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
1991The Morphology and Syntax of Determiner Phrases in Kiswahili. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
2001Multiple Agreement and Case Deletion: Against φ-incompleteness. Syntax 4(3). 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Rethinking Complementizer Agreement: Agree with a Case-Checked Goal. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 393–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2003The Interaction of Passive, Causative and “Restructuring” in Romance. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 50–66. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colaço, Madalena & Gonçalves, Anabela
2016<V-and-V> constructions in Portuguese: The case of <ir-and-V>. In Mary Aizawa Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 135–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2016Morphomic splits. In Ana Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds), The Morphome Debate, 64–88. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1966“Tomo y me voy”: ein Problem vergleichender europäischer Syntax. Vox Romanica, 25, 13–55.Google Scholar
1977« Tomo y me voy »: Un problema de sintaxis comparada europea. In Estudios de lingüística románica, 79–151. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, Magdalena, Guerrero, Silvana, González, Carlos, Jaque, Matías, Orqueda, Verónica & Hasler, Felipe
2020 Aquí llegas, pero allá coges: distribución dialectal de los auxiliares de las construcciones multiverbales de verbos finitos coordinados en español. Itinerarios 31. 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croitor, Blanca
2017Un tip special de coordonare. In Sintaxa ca mod de a fi: omagiu Gabrielei Pană Dindelegan, la aniversare [Colecția Personalități Ale Universității Din București], Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae, Camelia Stan & Rodica Zafiu (eds), 149–57. București: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2013Beyond the Stem and Inflectional Morphology: an Irregular Pattern at the Level of Periphrasis. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 262–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Calabrese, Andrea
2021Fifty shades of morphosyntactic microvariation: Motion verb constructions in southern Italian dialects. In Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, Natascha Pomino & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), Formal Approaches to Romance Morphosyntax, 145–198. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csató, Éva Ágnes
2001Turkic double verbs in a typological perspective. In Karen H. Ebert & Fernando Zúñiga (eds), Aktionsart and aspectotemporality in non-European languages: proceedings from a workshop held at the University of Zürich, June 23–25, 2000, 175–187. Zürich: Universität Zürich, Seminar für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
1997Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2). 195–217.Google Scholar
De Angelis, Alessandro
2016Origini formali e funzionali della particella (m)i, (m)u, ma nell’area messinese e calabrese centro-meridionale. In Patrizia Del Puente (ed.), Dialetti: per parlare e parlarne. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale di Dialettologia. Progetto A.L.Ba. (Potenza, Castelmezzano, Lagopesole, 6–8 novembre 2014). 75–95. Venosa: Osanna Edizioni.Google Scholar
2017 “Between Greek and Romance: Competing complementation systems in Southern Italy”. In Piera Molinelli (ed.) Language and Identity in Multilingual Mediterranean settings. Challenges for Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. 135–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, Alessandro & Krstić, Milena
2014 “Perdita dell’infinito e obviation effect in alcune varietà slave e italo-romanze: per un’analisi contrastiva”. In Ivica Pesa Matracki, Maslina Ljubicic, Nada Zupanovic Filipin, Vinko Kovacic (eds) Atti del Convegno internazionale in onore del Prof. Zarko Muljacic (1922–2009) Zagreb: FF-press. 249–260.Google Scholar
de Vos, Mark
2005The syntax of verbal pseudocoordination in English and Afrikaans. LOT Dissertation Series 114. Utrecht: LOT.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie
1993Serial Verb Constructions. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), Syntax: ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung [An International Handbook of Contemporary Research], vol. 1, 799–825. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Prete, Fabio & Todaro, Giuseppina
2020Building complex events: The case of Sicilian Doubly Inflected Construction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38(1). 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò
2015Syntactic constructions with motion verbs in some Sicilian dialects: a comparative analysis. Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia M.A. thesis. [URL]
2017Multiple Agreement Constructions: A Macro-Comparative Analysis of Pseudo-Coordination with the Motion Verb Go in the Arabic and Sicilian Dialects. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2).Google Scholar
2019aMultiple Agreement Constructions in Southern Italo-Romance. The Syntax of Sicilian Pseudo-Coordination. PhD dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
2019bThe Inflected Construction in the dialects of Sicily: parameters of micro-variation. In Italian Dialectology at the Interface, Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 63–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019cPerifrasi verbali deontiche e paradigmi difettivi nel dialetto di Delia, in Bollettino del Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani, 30: 217–244.Google Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò & Giusti, Giuliana
2015A Protocol for the Inflected Construction in Sicilian Dialects. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale 49. 393–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, Hakulinen, Auli, Heinemann, Trine, Niemi, Jarkko & Rossi, Giovanni
2021Hendiadys in naturally occurring interactions: A cross-linguistic study of double verb constructions. Journal of Pragmatics (article in press). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Helen
2018Coordination and Subordination in Sandawe Clauses (SIL Electronic Working Papers 2018–001). SIL International. [URL]
Ebert, Karen H.
2000Progressive Markers in Germanic Languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, 605–653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Edzard, Lutz
2014Complex Predicates and Circumstantial Clause Combining (CCC): Serial Verbs and Converbs in a Comparative Semitic Perspective. In Maria Persson & Bo Isaksson (eds), Strategies of Clause Linking in Semitic Languages: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Clause Linking in Semitic Languages, Kivik, Sweden, 5–7 August 2012, 207–230. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Lena
1993The cognitive basis of the meaning and function of cross-linguistic take and V. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 8, 21–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endresen, Rolf Theil
1995Norwegian og and å – a Cognitive View. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18(2), 201–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulci, Innocenzio
1855Lezioni filologiche sulla lingua siciliana, Catania, Tip. del Reale Ospizio di Beneficenza.Google Scholar
Gamliel, Ophira & Mar’i, Abd al-Rahman
2015Bleached Verbs as Aspectual Auxiliaries in Colloquial Modern Hebrew and Arabic Dialects. Journal of Jewish Languages 3(1–2). 51–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gesenius, Wilhelm
1844A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testamente Including the Biblical Chaldee. (Ed.) E. Robinson. Washington, D.C.: Crocker and Brewster.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R.
1965Coordinating Conjunctions in English. Language 41(2). 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guţu-Romalo, Valeria
1961Semiauxiliare de aspect? Limba Romînǎ 10. 3–15.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1983Paratactic if-clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 7(3). 263–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja-Riitta & Alho, Irja
2004Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. [URL]
Haslinger, Irene & van Koppen, Marjo
2002–2003De verbale hendiadys als pseudocoördinatie. Taal en Tongval 15–16. 102–122.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Andrea
2009Zur Grammatikalisierung der Pseudokoordination im Norwegischen und in den anderen skandinavischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Petersen, Hjalmar
2012Pseudo-coordinations in Faroese. in Kurt Braunmüller & Christoph Gabriel (eds), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies. Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, vol. 13. 259–280. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Koops, Christian
Hiraiwa, Ken
2001Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40. 67–80.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric
2017On the Origin and Development of an Embedded V-Initial Construction in Frisian. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 77(1–2). 171–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Robin
1997Semantic differentiation between three Tokelauan complementizers. Oceanic Linguistics 36(2). 208–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
2002Hendiadys and auxiliation in English. In Joan L. Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 145–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huehnergard, John
1997A grammar of Akkadian. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Hyams, Nina
1993On the Independence and Interdependence of Syntactic and Morphological Properties: English Aspectual Come and Go. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11. 313–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1895En sproglig værdiforskydning: og = at . Dania: Tidsskrift for Folkemål og Folkeminder 3. 145–183.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi
1998Coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Edzard, Lutz
2015Coordinated clause structures in Scandinavian and Semitic involving a finite verb form and an infinitive. In Lutz Edzard (ed.), Arabic and Semitic Linguistics Contextualized: A Festschrift for Jan Retsö, 486–505. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M.
2011Aspects of the Progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Johnsen, Lars G.
1988A note on subcoordination. Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 195–201.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre
2003La pseudocoordination verbale en norvégien et en espagnol. Revue Romane 38(1). 53–66.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Günlog
1991Pseudocoordination – A VP + VP coordination. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 47. 130–156.Google Scholar
2014Pseudo-coordination in Swedish with ‘go’ and the ‘surprise effect’. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93. 26–50.Google Scholar
Kanchev, Ivan
2010Семантика, типология и произход на конструкцията вземам/взема че (та, и) + глагол от свършен вид [On the semantics, typology and origin of the construction вземам/взема че (та, и) + perfective aspect verb]. Съпоставително езикознание [Contrastive Linguistics] 35(3). 40–44. [URL]
Kinn, Torodd, Blensenius, Kristian & Andersson, Peter
2018Posture, location, and activity in Mainland Scandinavian pseudocoordinations. CogniTextes: Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive 18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Valentin
1971« Взял и … л ». In Viktora Ivanoviča Borkovskogo (ed.), Problemy istorii i dialektologii slavjanskich jazykov, 134–139. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka.”Google Scholar
Kjeldahl, Anne
2010The syntax of quirky verbal morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
Kor Chahine, Irina
2007О Возможном Пути Грамматикализации Русского взять. Russian Linguistics 31(3). 231–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania A.
1999On sit/stand/lie auxiliation. Linguistics 37(2). 191–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
2019World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Julia
2006The first verb of pseudocoordination as an auxiliary. Presented at Slavic Linguistic Society 1, Indiana University Bloomington, 2006.
Kvist Darnell, Ulrika
2008Pseudosamordningar i Svenska: särskilt sådana med verben sitta, ligga och stå. Institutionen för lingvistik, Stockholms universitet Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Lakoff, George
1986Frame Semantic Control of the Coordinate Structure Constraint. Chicago Linguistic Society 22(2). 152–168.Google Scholar
Larsson, Lars-Gunnar
1992 “Ta och prata om ringfingret”. Om begränsningar i den jämförande språkforskningens möjligheter. Årsbok (Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskaps-Samfundets i Uppsala) 1991–1992 87–97.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1997Asyndetic complementation in Neapolitan dialect. The Italianist 17(1). 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016aClausal complementation. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, 1013–1028. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bFrom Coordination to Subordination: The Grammaticalisation of Progressive and Andative Aspect in the dialects of Salento. In Fernanda Pratas, Sandra Pereira & Clara Pinto (eds), Coordination and Subordination: Form and Meaning – Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014, 157–184. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2021Coming and going in Calabrian. Revue Roumain de Linguistique 66(1): 3–35.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam, Schifano, Norma & Silvestri, Giuseppina
2018The Expression Of Progressive Aspect In Grico: Mapping Morphosyntactic Isoglosses In An Endangered Italo-Greek Variety. Transactions of the Philological Society 116(2). 179–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leone, Alfonso
1995Profilo di sintassi siciliana. Palermo: Centro studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1983A Grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Lillas, Rosmari
2012Hendiadys in the Hebrew Bible. An Investigation of the Applications of the Term. University of Gothenburg Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Lillas-Schuil, Rosmari
2006A survey of syntagms in the Hebrew Bible classified as hendiadys. In Lutz Edzard & Jan Retsö (eds), Current issues in the analysis of Semitic grammar and lexicon II: Oslo-Göteborg Cooperation 4th-5th November 2005, 79–100. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge
2002The Syntactic Structures of Norwegian Pseudocoordinations. Studia Linguistica 56 (2). 121–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Pseudocoordination with posture verbs in Mainland Scandinavian: A grammaticalized progressive construction? Nordic Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 87–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lovestrand, Joseph & Ross, Daniel
2021Serial verb constructions and motion semantics. In Antoine Guillaume & Harold Koch (eds), Associated Motion, 87–128. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita, Lorusso, Paolo & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2017 a/bare finite complements in Southern Italian varieties: mono-clausal or bi-clausal syntax? Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali 3. 11–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita & Savoia, Leonardo
2005I dialetti Italiani e Romanci. Morfosintassi Generativa, vol. I: Introduzione – Il soggetto – La struttura del complementatore, frasi interrogative, relative e aspetti della subordinazione. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2007A Unification of Morphology and Syntax: Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masini, Francesca, Mattiola, Simone & Vecchi, Greta
2019La costruzione “prendere e V” nell’italiano contemporaneo. In Bruno Moretti, Aline Kunz, Silvia Natale & Etna Krakenberger (eds), In Le tendenze dell’italiano contemporaneo rivisitate: Atti del LII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Berna, 6–8 settembre 2018), 115–137. Milano: Società di Linguistica Italiana.Google Scholar
Merlan, Aurélia
1999Sobre as chamadas “perífrases verbais paratácticas” do tipo « PEGAR E+ V2 » nas línguas românicas (com referência especial ao português e romeno). Línguas e Literaturas, Revista da Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto 16. 159–205.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
1899 [1890–1902]Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen vol. 3, Romanische Syntax. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno
2014Morphosyntactic atoms of propositional logic: a philological programme. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
2021Superparticles: A Microsemantic Theory, Typology, and History of Logical Atoms (Studies in Natural Language & Linguistic Theory). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole, Kozhanov, Kirill, Lindström, Liina, Laugalienė, Asta & Brudzyński, Paweł
2019Pseudocoordination with “take” in Baltic and its neighbours. Baltic Linguistics 10. 237–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John
(ed.) 2002The linguistics of sitting, standing, and lying. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Peter Juul
2011Kongruenskonstruktion i dansk: en syntaktisk analyse af indhold og udtryk. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Nordström, Jackie
2010Modality and Subordinators. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orqueda, Verónica, González, Carlos, Guerrero, Silvana, Hasler, Felipe, Jaque, Matías, Garrido, Claudio & Covarrubias, Magdalena
2020 Llegar no es igual a coger. Dos momentos en la gramaticalización de las construcciones multiverbales en español. In Mar Garachana (ed.), La evolución de las perífrasis verbales en español. Una aproximación desde la gramática de construcciones diacrónica y la gramaticalización, 287–313. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1917Hendiadys in English: Together with some observations on the construction of certain verbs I & II. Neophilologus 2(1). 202–218, 284–292. DOI logo & DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roberge, Paul
1994On the origins of the Afrikaans verbal hendiadys. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 28. 45–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Angélica
2006 “Eu fui e fiz esta tese”: as construções do tipo foi fez no portugues do Brasil. São Paolo: Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, Universidade Estadual de Campinas Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Vol. 3, Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1977Grammatica storica dei dialetti italogreci: (Calabria, Salento). (Trans.) Salvatore Sicuro. Rev. and extended ed. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel
2013Dialectal variation and diachronic development of try-complementation. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Illinois Working papers 38. 108–147. [URL]
2014aEl origen de los estudios sobre la pseudocoordinación verbal [The origin of research on verbal pseudocoordination]. Diálogo de la Lengua 6. 116–132. [URL]
2014bThe importance of exhaustive description in measuring linguistic complexity: The case of English try and pseudocoordination. In Frederick J. Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), Measuring Grammatical Complexity, 202–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015What can Faroese pseudocoordination tell us about English inflection? LSO Working Papers in Linguistics (University of Wisconsin-Madison) 10: 74–91. [URL]
2016aBetween coordination and subordination: Typological, structural and diachronic perspectives on pseudocoordination. In Fernanda Pratas, Sandra Pereira & Clara Pinto (eds), Coordination and Subordination: Form and Meaning – Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014, 209–243. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2016bGoing to Surprise: the grammaticalization of itive as mirative. In Jacek Woźny (ed.), Online proceedings of Cognitive Linguistics in Wrocław Web Conference 2016. Wrocław: Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association & University of Wrocław. [URL]
2017Pseudocoordinación del tipo tomar y en Eurasia: 50 años después [Pseudocoordination with take and in Eurasia: 50 years later]. Presented August 3, 2017, at Lingüística Coseriana VI , Lima, Peru. [URL]
2018Small corpora and low-frequency phenomena: try and beyond contemporary, standard English. Corpus 18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Cambridge (Massachusetts): PhD dissertation, MIT.
Schmerling, Susan F.
1975Asymmetric coordination and rules of conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 211–231. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shopen, Timothy
1971 “Caught in the Act”. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 254–263.Google Scholar
Škodová, Svatava
2009Pseudokoordinace v syntaxi současné češtiny [Pseudo-coordination in the syntax of contemporary Czech]. Univerzita Karlova v Praze Ph.D. dissertation. [URL]
Sornicola, Rosanna
1976 Vado a dire, vaiu a ddicu: problema sintattico o problema semantico? Lingua Nostra 37(3–4). 65–74.Google Scholar
Soto Gómez, Juan Francisco
2021Pseudo-Coordination in Spanish: A two constructions analysis. Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia M.A. thesis. [URL]
Squillaci, Maria Olimpia
2016When Greek meets Romance: A morphosyntactic analysis of language contact in Aspromonte. University of Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
1999The go-and-Verb construction in a cross-linguistic perspective: image-schema blending and the construal of events. In Proceedings of the Second Annual High Desert Linguistics Society Conference 1999, Dawn Nordquist & Catie Berkenfield (eds), 123–34. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico: High Desert Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2000The English GO-(PRT)-AND-VERB Construction. Berkeley Linguistics Society 26(1). 259–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoynova, N. M.
2007Конструкция типа взять и сделать в русском языке. In Ф. И. Дудчук, Н. В. Ивлиева & А. В. Подобриаев (eds), Структуры и интерпретации: работы молодых исследователей по теоретической и прикладной лингвистике, 144–171. Moscow: Издательство Московского университета.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
2018aConstructional pressures on ‘sit’ in Modern Greek. In K. Aaron Smith & Dawn Nordquist (eds), Functionalist and Usage-based Approaches to the Study of Language: In honor of Joan L. Bybee, 17–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bMotion Verb Integration and Core Cosubordination in Modern Greek. In Rolf Kailuweit, Lisann Künkel & Eva Staudinger (eds), Applying and Expanding Role and Reference Grammar, 281–304. Freiburg: Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taube, Moshe
Forthcoming. Verbal hendiadys in Yiddish (2014 draft). In Neil G. Jacobs, Howard I. Aronson & T. Shannon eds Yiddish and Typology [URL]
Teleman, Ulf
1974Manual för grammatisk beskrivning av talad och skriven svenska. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Todaro, Giuseppina & Del Prete, Fabio
2019The morphosyntax-semantics interface and the Sicilian Doubly Inflected Construction. In Italian Dialectology at the Interface, Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds). 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2007Conjunctive Reduction and its Origin: A Comparative Study of Tsou, Amis, and Squliq Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 46(2). 585–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan & Wu, Chun-Ming
2012Conjunctive Reduction Revisited: Evidence from Mayrinax Atayal and Southern Paiwan. Oceanic Linguistics 51(1). 160–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vannebo, Kjell Ivar
2003 Ta og ro deg ned noen hakk: on pseudocoordination with the verb ta ‘take’ in a grammaticalization perspective. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(2). 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Max Leopold
1955Expletive Verbalformen in den Sprachen des Mittelmeeres. Romanische Forschungen 67(1/2). 1–8.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel
2007The Grammar of Surprise: The Russian Construction of the Type Koška vzjala da umerla ‚Suddenly, the cat died‘. In Kim Gerdes, Tilmann Reuther & Leo Wanner (eds.), MTT 2007: Meaning-Text Theory 2007: proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, Klagenfurt, May 20–24, 2007, 427–436. München: Otto Sagner. [URL]
2012Verb serialization in northeast Europe: The case of Russian and its Finno-Ugric neighbours. In Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli & Björn Hansen (eds), Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact, 611–646. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
1996Pseudocoordination is subordination. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58. 29–53.Google Scholar
2007The Syntax of Tenselessness. Tense/Mood/Aspect-agreeing Infinitivals. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The syntax of surprise: Unexpected event readings in complex predication. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84. 181–224.Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie
2006 Go-V and go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, 101–125. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuasa, Etsuyo & Sadock, Jerrold M.
2002Pseudo-subordination: a mismatch between syntax and semantics. Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 87–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
2003Go look at the modern language to test hypotheses about the past [Abstract]. [URL]