Part of
Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions
Edited by Giuliana Giusti, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro and Daniel Ross
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 274] 2022
► pp. 99128
References
Accattoli, Matilde & Todaro, Giuseppina
2017Verbes de mouvement et grammaticalisation: le cas du sicilien vaffazzu. In Normes et grammaticalisation: le cas des langues romanes, Malinka Velinova (ed.), Sofia: CU “Romanistika”.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ascoli, Graziadio I.
1898Un problema di sintassi comparata dialettale. Archivio glottologico italiano, 14: 453–468.Google Scholar
1901Appendice all’articolo Un problema di sintassi comparata dialettale. Archivio glottologico italiano, 15: 221–225.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2012Towards a Parameter Hierarchy for Auxiliaries: Diachronic Considerations. COPiL, 6: 267–294.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana
1998Motion verbs as functional heads. GenGenP 6: 50–60.Google Scholar
2001 “Semi-lexical” Motion Verbs in Romance and Germanic. In Semi-lexical categories, Norbert Corver & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds), 371–414. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Motion Verbs as Functional Heads. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 31–49. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020Multiple Agreement in Southern Italian Dialects. In Linguistic Variations: Structure and Interpretation – Studies in Honor of M. Rita Manzini [Studies in Generative Grammar 132], Ludovico Franco & Paolo Lorusso (eds), 125–148. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris, Guitard, Stephanie & Wood, Jim
2009Imposters: An online survey of grammaticality judgments. In Patricia Irwin & Violeta Vázquez Rojas Maldonado (eds), NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
CorDel: Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò
in preparation). Corpus del dialetto deliano.
Cremona, Antonino
1895Fonetica del caltagironese con riguardi alle principali parlate del siciliano. Acireale: Tip. Ed. Saro Donzuso (repr. 2020, with a preface by Salvatore Menza, Sesto Fiorentino: Apice libri).Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2013Beyond the Stem and Inflectional Morphology: an Irregular Pattern at the Level of Periphrasis. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 262–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damonte, Federico
2005La diffusione della particella ‘mi’ in alcune varietà messinesi: problemi di metodo. In Dialetti in città: Atti del convegno Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 30 giugno – 4 luglio 2004, Gianna Marcato (ed.), 237–242. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
2009La particella mu nei dialetti calabresi meridionali. In Quaderni di lavoro ASIt, 9. Studi sui dialetti della Calabria, Diego Pescarini (ed.), 101–117. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
2010Matching Moods: Mood Concord between CP and IP in Salentino and Southern Calabrian Subjunctive Complements. In Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 5, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 228–256. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Angelis, Alessandro
2013Strategie di complementazione frasale nell’estremo Meridione italiano. Messina: SGB Edizioni.Google Scholar
2016Origini formali e funzionali della particella (m)i, (m)u, ma nell’area messinese e calabrese centro-meridionale. In Dialetti: per parlare e parlarne. Atti del IV Convegno Internazionale di Dialettologia. Progetto A.L.Ba. (Potenza, Castelmezzano, Lagopesole, 6–8 novembre 2014), Patrizia Del Puente (ed.), 75–95. Venosa: Osanna Edizioni.Google Scholar
2017Between Greek and Romance: Competing complementation systems in Southern Italy. In Language and Identity in Multilingual Mediterranean settings. Challenges for Historical Sociolinguistics, Piera Molinelli (ed.), 135–156. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Dardel, Robert
1958Le parafait fort en roman commun. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo N.
2015Syntactic Constructions with Motion Verbs in Some Sicilian Dialects: a Comparative Analysis. Master’s Degree Dissertation. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò
2019aMultiple Agreement Constructions in Southern Italo-Romance. The Syntax of Sicilian Pseudo-Coordination. PhD dissertation, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
2019bThe Inflected Construction in the dialects of Sicily: parameters of micro-variation. In Italian Dialectology at the Interface, Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 63–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019cPerifrasi verbali deontiche e paradigmi difettivi nel dialetto di Delia, in Bollettino del Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani, 30: 217–244.Google Scholar
Di Caro, Vincenzo Nicolò & Giusti, Giuliana
2015A Protocol for the Inflected Construction in Sicilian Dialects. Annali di Ca’ Foscari, Serie Occidentale, vol. 49: 393–422.Google Scholar
2018Dimensions of variation: the Inflected Construction in the dialect of Delia (Caltanissetta). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14. Selected papers form the 46th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Stony Brook, New York, Lori Repetti & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), 54–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Thornton, Anna
1991Doppie basi e binarismo nella morfologia italiana, Rivista di Linguistica 3 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Fulci, Innocenzio
1855Lezioni filologiche sulla lingua siciliana. Catania: Tip. del Reale Ospizio di Beneficenza.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Günlog
1991Pseudocoordination – A VP + VP coordination. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 47. 130–156.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög
2014Pseudo-coordination in Swedish with gå ‘go’ and the ‘surprise effect’, in Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 93. Lund: Lund University Publications.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich
1969Romanische Sprachwissenschaft: Einleitung und Vokalismus, 3 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1998Variation in the Romance infinitive: the case of Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. In Transactions of the Philological Society, 96: 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016From Coordination to Subordination: the Grammaticalisation of Progressive and Andative Aspect in the Dialects of Salento. In Coordination and Subordination, Adriana Cardoso, Ana Maria Martins, Sandra Pereira, Clara Pinto & Fernanda Pratas (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, Alfonso
1973Vattel’a pesca, vieni a piglialo. Lingua Nostra, 34: 11–13.Google Scholar
1978Sullo scadimento semantico di andare. Lingua Nostra, 39: 50–54.Google Scholar
1980La morfologia del verbo nelle parlate della Sicilia sud-orientale. Palermo: Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani.Google Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta
2001Paradigm organization and lexical connections in the development of the Italian passato remoto, in Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds). Dordrecht: Springer 1999:75–96.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin
1995A Linguistic History of Italian. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2000Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: origini del tipo dissi, dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio glottologico italiano, 85: 137–171.Google Scholar
2001aPassato remoto e condizionale nella morfologia storica italoromanza. L’Italia dialettale, 62: 7–26.Google Scholar
2001bA Strange Affinity: ‘Perfecto y tiempos afines’. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 78: 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004When lexemes become allomorphs – on the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica, 38: 227–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Morphological autonomy and diachrony, in Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds). Dordrecht: Springer, 137–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Morphological persistence, in The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. 1, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–215.Google Scholar
2018bThe Romance Verb. Morphomic Structure and Diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. and O’Neill, P.
(2010) ‘On morphomic defectiveness: evidence from the Romance languages of the Iberian Peninsula’. In Baerman, M., Corbett, G. G., and Brown, D. (eds), Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us. 103–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press/British Academy. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2005I dialetti Italiani e Romanci: Morfosintassi Generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita, Lorusso, Paolo & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2017A/bare finite complements in Southern Italian varieties: Monoclausal or bi-clausal syntax? Quaderni di Linguistica e Studi Orientali (QULSO) 3: 11–59. Florence: Florence University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
1895 [1890–1902]Grammaire des langues romanes, vol. 2, Morphologie. Paris: E. Welter Editeur.Google Scholar
Palmer, Leonard R.
1954The Latin Language. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Pitrè, Giuseppe
1978a [1875]Saggio d’una grammatica del dialetto e delle parlate siciliane, in Fiabe, novella e racconti popolari siciliani, vol. I. Palermo: Il Vespro.Google Scholar
1978b [1875]Fiabe, novella e racconti popolari siciliani, vol. IV. Palermo: Il Vespro.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1968Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 2: Morfologia. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 3: Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel
2016Going to Surprise: the grammaticalization of itive as mirative. In Online Proceedings of Cognitive Linguistics in Wrocław Web Conference. Wrocław: Polish Cognitive Linguistics Association and University of Wrocław. Online at: [URL].
Schütze, Carson T. & Sprouse, Jon
2013Judgment data. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds), 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, John Charles
2013The morphome as a gradient phenomenon: evidence from Romance. In The Boundaries of Pure Morphology, Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds), 247–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas
1987The variable status of Comp-trace phenomena. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
1976Vado a dire o vaiu a ddico problema sintattico o problema semantico? Lingua Nostra, 37 (3–4): 65–74.Google Scholar
Sorrento, Luigi
1950Sintassi romanza: Ricerche e prospettive. Milan: Istituto editoriale cisalpino.Google Scholar
Stefanini, Ruggero
1970Imperativo per infinito in fiorentino. Lingua Nostra, 31: 19–20.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1980Grammatica storica dell’italiano, vol. 2. Morfosintassi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf
1974Manual för grammatisk beskrivning av talad och skriven svenska. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna
2007 “Is There a Partition in the Present Indicative of Italian Irregular Verbs?”. Annali Online di Ferrara – Lettere, 2: 43–61.Google Scholar
Todaro, Giuseppina & Del Prete, Fabio
2019The morphosyntax-semantics interface and the Sicilian Doubly Inflected Construction. In Italian Dialectology at the Interface, Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds). 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
1996« Pseudocoordination is subordination ». Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 58: 29–54.Google Scholar
2008Creating surprise in complex predication. Nordlyd 35, 163–187. Tromsoe University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar