Cover not available
Part of
Language Change at the Interfaces: Intrasentential and intersentential phenomena
Edited by Nicholas Catasso, Marco Coniglio and Chiara De Bastiani
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 275] 2022
► pp. 61–94

The object position in Old Norwegian

An interplay between syntax, prosody, and information structure

ORCID logo | University of Bergen,
OV/VO variation in Germanic languages is a widely discussed subject. However, Old Norwegian has so far received little attention and is syntactically generally treated as one with Old Icelandic. However, in contrast to the findings of Hróarsdóttir (2000, 2009) for Old Icelandic, stating that OV orders are triggered mainly by the prosodic weight of the object, the present study shows that OV/VO variation in Old Norwegian is still more dependent on an interplay of both information status and prosodic weight of a constituent in a clause. I argue that the results for the information status of the object reflect the syntactic development in the history of Norwegian as a change in the way information-structural categories are displayed in the grammar.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Word order variation in Old Norse
    • 2.1Old Icelandic
    • 2.2Old Norwegian
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Information status
      • 3.1.1Given
      • 3.1.2New
    • 3.2Prosodic factors
    • 3.3Dataset
  • 4.Results and theoretical implications
    • 4.1Information status
    • 4.2Prosodic weight
  • 5.Some remarks on the data
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.275.02tie
References (55)
References
Aamodt Nielsen, Marit. 2013. Syntaktisk utvikling fra urnordisk til mellomnorsk. In Handbok i Norrøn Filologi, 2nd ed. Odd Einar Haugen (ed.), 556–599. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen.
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar
. 1932. Deutsche Syntax. Bd. 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2005. Changing EPP-parameters in the history of English: Accounting for variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 9(1): 5–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betti J. 2006. Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, Betti J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), 1–52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara. 2020. Verb and Object Order in the History of English: A Language-Internal Account. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan T. 2004. The Syntax of Old Norse. With a Survey of the Inflectional Morphology and a Complete Bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franco, Irene. 2010. Issues in the syntax of Scandinavian embedded clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86: 137–177.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Studies in Syntactic Typology, Michael Hammond, Edith A. Moravscik & Jessica Wirth (eds), 209–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugan, Jens. 2000. Old Norse Word Order and Information Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Trondheim.
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2010. Information structure and unmarked word order in (Older) Germanic. In Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 282–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. (Dis)harmonic word order and phase-based restrictions on phrasing and spell-out. In Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Order, Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 162–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2018. Prosodic and information-structural factors in word order variation. In Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German, Agnes Jäger, Gisella Ferraresi & Helmut Weiß (eds), 277–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 2008. The Scandinavian languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 420–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoop, Helen. 1992. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjørg. 1996. The decline of OV word order in the Icelandic VP: A diachronic study. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 92–141.Google Scholar
Hroársdóttir, Thorbjørg. 2000. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2009. Information structure and OV order. In Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 258–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Indriðason, Thorsteinn. 1987. Skýrsla um Orðaröð í Sagnlið. Ms., University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In Notes from the Linguistics Underground [Syntax and Semantics 7], James McCawley (ed), 363–385. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou (eds.). 2006. The Handbook of the History of English. Hoboken: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1994. Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye (eds), 140–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Thomas & Zeldes, Amir. 2016. ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (31): 118–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989a. Language learning and language change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 348–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989b. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change (1): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Laurence. 1917. The King’s Mirror (Speculum Regale – Konungs Skuggsjá). In The Library of Scandinavian Literature, vol. 15, Erik J. Friis (ed.). New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Milićev, Tanja. 2016. Syntax and Information Structure of the Old English VP. PhD dissertation, University of Novi Sad.
Mørck, Endre. 2016. Syntaks. In Norsk språkhistorie I. Mønster, Helge Sandøy (ed.), 317–445. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information structure and word order variation in the Old High German Tatian. In Information Structure and Language Change, Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 251–279. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. The impact of focusing and defocusing on word order: Changes at the periphery in Old English and Old High German. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Tarttu Nevalainan & Elisabeth Traugott (eds), 846–858. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1996. Old English verb-complement word order and the change from OV to VO. York Papers in Linguistics 17: 241–264.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2004. Objects in Old English: why and how Early English is not Icelandic. York Papers in Linguistics 2(1): 137–150.Google Scholar
. 2006. The loss of OV in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Hoboken: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed), 223–56. Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1994/1995. Breytileg orðaröð í sagnlið. Íslenskt Mál og Allmenn Málfræði 16–17: 27–66.Google Scholar
. 1996. Word order variation in the VP in Old Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 58: 55–86.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 1985. Diachronic Icelandic Syntax: Some Practical and Theoretical Problems. Ms., University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
1988. From OV to VO: Evidence from Old Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 34: 1–41.Google Scholar
1994. Um Frásagnarumröðun og Grundvallarorðaröð í Forníslensku. Reykjavík: Bókaverzlun Ársæls Árnasonar.Google Scholar
Struik, Tara & van Kemenade, Ans. 2018. On the givenness of OV word order: A (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language & Linguistics 24(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, John D. 2006. Syntactic variation in the history of Norwegian and the decline of XV word order. Diachronica 23(1): 105–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swerts, Marc & van Wijk, Carel. 2004. Prosodic, lexico-syntacic and regional influences on word order in Dutch verbal endgroups. Journal of Phonetics 33: 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012a. Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight, and information status In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Tarttu Nevalainen & Elisabeth Traugott (eds), 199–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2(12a): 29–52.Google Scholar
. 2014. Testing the theory: Information structure in Old English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages, Kristin Bech & Kristine G. Eide (eds), 53–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions, Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds), 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Larrivée, Pierre, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Montébran, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux, G. Merminod & G. Philippe
2024. Deux déterminismes du déclin des objets antéposés dans l’histoire du français. SHS Web of Conferences 191 ► pp. 03001 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.