Cover not available
Part of
Language Change at the Interfaces: Intrasentential and intersentential phenomena
Edited by Nicholas Catasso, Marco Coniglio and Chiara De Bastiani
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 275] 2022
► pp. 1–32

Interface phenomena and language change

Where we are and where we are going

 | University of Wuppertal
 | University of Göttingen
ORCID logo | Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Article outline
  • 1.The notion of interface
  • 2.Interfaces in language change
    • 2.1Intrasentential change phenomena
    • 2.2Intersentential change phenomena
  • 3.Contents of the volume
    • 3.1Part I, Interface phenomena at the intrasentential level
    • 3.2Part II, Interface phenomena at the intersentential level
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.275.int
References (140)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1990. Die Grammatikalisierung von Auxiliar- und Modalverben. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 112: 200–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Aktionsartsemantik und Auxiliarisierung im Deutschen. In Neue Fragen der Linguistik [Linguistische Arbeiten 270], Elisabeth Feldbusch, Reiner Pogarell & Cornelia Weiß (eds), 125–133. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Event structure accounting for the emerging periphrastic tenses and the passive voice in German. In Explanation in Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistics Theory 84], Garry W. Davis & Gregory K. Iverson (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German Syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and Verb Second [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 112]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Die Entstehung des dass-Satzes – ein neues Szenario. In Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 16], Veronika Ehrich, Christian Fortmann, Ingo Reich & Marga Reis (eds), 21–41. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Axel-Tober, Katrin. 2012. (Nicht-)kanonische Nebensätze im Deutschen. Synchrone und diachrone Aspekte [Linguistische Arbeiten 542]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The development of the declarative complementizers in German. Language 93(2): 39–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Origins of verb-second in Old High German. In Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 28], Agnes Jäger, Gisella Ferraresi & Helmut Weiß (eds), 22–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar
. 1932. Deutsche Syntax, Band 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Luigi Rizzi (ed), 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Structures and Strategies. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2006. A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics. Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini et al. (eds), 53–86. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, focus, and V2. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Luigi Rizzi (ed), 52–75.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 2007. Semantic form as interface. In Interfaces and Interface Conditions [Language, Context and Cognition 6], Andreas Späth (ed), 1–32. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano. 2008. On the syntax-prosody Interface: an analysis of the prosodic properties of postfocal material in Italian and its implications. Nanzan Linguistics, Special Issue 5: 13–42.Google Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne. 2014. The History of Low German Negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, Petra. 2005. The Syntax-Discourse Interface: Representing and Interpreting Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 80]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catasso, Nicholas. 2021. Generalized and specialized adverbial resumption in Middle High German and beyond. Journal of Historical Syntax 5, Article 2: 1–38.Google Scholar
Catasso, Nicholas, Coniglio, Marco, De Bastiani, Chiara & Fuß, Eric. 2021. He then said…: Understudied Deviations from V2 in Early Germanic. Journal of Historical Syntax 5, Article 17: 1–39.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 4 [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco, Linde, Sonja & Ruette, Tom. 2017. Relative clauses in Old High German: A corpus-based statistical investigation of their syntactic and information-structural properties. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29(2): 101–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2009. The syntactic role of discourse-related features. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 15–30.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta, Ledgeway, Adam & Roberts, Ian G. (eds). 2010. Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Acosta, Diego. 2011. Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect. Diachronica 28(2): 143–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara. 2020. Verb and Object Order in the History of English: A Language-Internal Account. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2020. On the syntax of object pronouns in Old English and Early Middle English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 43. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demske, Ulrike. 2020. Zur Grammatikalisierung von gehen im Deutschen. Forum japanisch-germanistischer Sprachforschung 2: 9–42.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristine Gunn. 2014. Studying word order differences in a historical parallel corpus. An example from Old Spanish and Old Portuguese. Oslo Studies in Language 6(1): 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, Kristine Gunn & Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2014. Contrastivity and information structure in the Old Ibero-Romance languages. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance languages [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 377–412. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella. 1991. Die Stellung des gotischen Verbs im Licht eines Vergleichs mit dem Althochdeutschen. M.A. thesis, University of Venice.
Ferraresi, Gisella & Goldbach, Maria. 2003. Some reflections on inertia: infinitive complements in Latin. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8, 240–251.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline. 2015. Extraposition and prosodic monsters in German. In Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing – Studies in Honor of Janet Dean Fodor [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 46], Lyn Frazier & Edward Gibson (eds), 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susann & Gabriel, Christoph. 2016. Grammatical interfaces in Romance languages: An introduction. In Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance [Manuals of Romance Linguistics 10], Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds), 1–20. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Schallert, Oliver. 2011. Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric. 2008. Word Order and Language Change. On the Interface Between Syntax and Morphology. Habilitation thesis, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.
. 2018. The OV/VO alternation in Early German: Diagnostics for basic word order. In Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 28], Agnes Jäger, Gisella Ferraresi & Helmut Weiß (eds) 230–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Trips, Carola. 2002. Variation and change in Old and Middle English. On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 171–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto. 2017. Partitive objects in negative contexts in Northern Italian dialects. Ms. University of Padova.Google Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo, & Poletto, Cecilia. 2018. Exploiting microvariation: How to make the best of your incomplete data. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementiser layer. Transactions of the Philological Society 107(2): 131–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 2009. Discourse relations and word order change. In Information structure and language change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 203], Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 91–120. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans, & Links, Meta. 2020. Discourse particles in early English: Clause structure, pragmatics and discourse management. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1), 3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los, (eds), 224–278. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and Information Structure: Verb Second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurmann-Solin, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso, Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara, Jäger, Agnes & Penka, Doris. 2015. Language change at the syntax-semantics interface. Perspectives and challenges. In Language change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 278], Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 1–32. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2013. Symmetry Breaking in Syntax [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 136]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina. 2013. Prosodic constraints on extraposition in German. In Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 200], Gert Webelhut, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker (eds), 439–472. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. PP-extraposition and nominal pitch in German. In Festschrift für Martin Prinzhorn, Clemens Mayr & Edwin Williams (eds), 99–107. Universität Wien: Wiener Linguistische Gazette.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2017. From OV to VO in English: how to Kroch the nut. In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in Honour of Ans van Kemenade [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 234], Bettelou Los & Pieter de Haan (eds), 9–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120: 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Prosodic and information-structural factors in word order variation, Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 28], 277–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland, Petrova, Svetlana & Solf, Michael. 2005. Diskurspragmatische Faktoren für Topikalität und Verbstellung in der althochdeutschen Tatianübersetzung (9. Jh.). In Approaches and Findings in Oral, Written and Gestural Language [Interdisciplinary Studies in Information Structure 3], Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds), 143–182. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elisabeth C. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation [The David Hume Series]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2000. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. OV languages: Expressions of cues. In Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 203], Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 67–90. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huang, James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2005. Negation in Old High German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 24: 227–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Agnes, Ferraresi, Gisella & Weiß, Helmut (eds). 2018. Clause Structure and Word Order in the History of German [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 28]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages [Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser 1]. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Movement and Silence [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective [Topics in English Linguistics 39], Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell (eds), 325–354. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, So-Young. 2007. Topics and null arguments in Korean: The syntax and discourse. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 63–76.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. Indo-European origins of Germanic Syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ku, Wei. 2013. Acquisition of the Syntax and Interpretation of Chinese Null Arguments: An Investigation of Child and Adult Second Language and Native Language Development. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.
Larson, Laurence. 1917. The King’s Mirror (Speculum Regale – Konungs Skuggsjá). In The Library of Scandinavian Literature. vol. 15, Erik J. Friis (ed.). New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2008. Satisfying V2 in early Romance: Merge vs. Move. Journal of Linguistics 44(2): 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 1992. Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der sprachlichen Kategorisierung [Studia Linguistica Germanica 31]. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linde, Sonja. 2009. Aspects of word order and information structure in Old Saxon. In Information structure and language change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 203], Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 367–389. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Links, Meta. 2018. Correlative Constructions in Earlier English: Clause Structure and Discourse Organisation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & van Kemenade, Ans. 2018. Syntax and the morphology of deixis. The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking. In Atypical Demonstratives: Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics [Linguistische Arbeiten 568], Marco Coniglio, Eva Schlachter, & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 1–31. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 2002. The loss of IP-Scrambling in Portuguese: Clause structure, word order variation and change. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change [Oxford Linguistics], David Lightfoot (ed), 232–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2012. The left periphery in Old French. In Research on Old French: The State of the Art, Deborah Arteaga (ed), 327–350. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg & Steinbach, Markus. 2007. Einleitung. In Schnittstellen der germanistischen Linguistik, Markus Steinbach et al. (eds), 1–14. Stuttgart & Weimar: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Meklenborg, Christine. 2020. Adverbial resumptive particles and Verb Second. In Rethinking Verb Second, Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds), 90–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meklenborg Salvesen, Christine. 2019. A micro-perspective on Verb-second in Romance and Germanic. Linguistic Variation 19(1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milicev, Tanja. 2016. Syntax and Information Structure of the Old English VP. PhD dissertation, University of Novi Sad.
Morris, Richard. 1880. The Blickling Homilies of the Tenth Century, Early English Text Society, os. 58, 63, and 73. London: N. Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Müller, Sonja. 2019. Die Syntax-Pragmatik-Schnittstelle. Ein Studienbuch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Neville, Helen, Nicol, Janet, Barss, Andrew, Forster, Kenneth & Garrett, Merrill F. 1991. Syntactically-based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2): 151–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Beijering, Karin. 2014. Facing interfaces. A clustering approach to grammaticalization and related changes. Folia Linguistica 48(2): 385–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öhl, Peter. 2009. Die Entstehung des periphrastischen Perfekts mit haben und sein im Deutschen – eine längst beantwortete Frage? Formale und funktionale Erklärungsansätze für die Auxiliarisierung. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28: 265–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana. 2009. Information structure and word order variation in the Old High German Tatian. In Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 203], Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 251–279. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. Typologie und Funktionen der Herausstellung nach links im Mittelniederdeutschen. In Niederdeutsche Syntax [Germanistische Linguistik 220], Robert Langhanke, Kristian Berg, Michael Elmentaler & Jörg Peters (eds), 15–31. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana & Solf, Michael. 2009. On the methods of information-structural analysis in texts from historical corpora: A case study on Old High German. In Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 203], Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 121–160. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. Word order in Old Italian [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 7]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. The possible positioning of negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal (eds), 135–151. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey. 2017. Feature inheritance in Old Spanish: (re)visiting V2. In Order and Structure in Syntax I: Word Order and Syntactic Structure [Open Generative Syntax 1], Laura R. Bailey & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 49–68. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Poschmann, Claudia & Wagner, Michael. 2016. Relative clause extraposition and prosody in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34: 1021–1066. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Reiss, Charles. 2007. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ries, John. 1907. Die Wortstellung im Beowulf. Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 100]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine. 2013. Topics and the left periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In In Search of Universal Grammar: from Old Norse to Zoque [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today 202], Terje Lohndal (ed), 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 1987. Syntactic restructuring in the evolution of Romance auxiliaries. In Historical Development of Auxiliaries, Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds), 226–236. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schallert, Oliver. 2007. Die Stellung von Verben und Objekten in der rechten Peripherie: OV- und VO-Strukturen im Althochdeutschen. Moderne Sprachen 51(2): 17–107.Google Scholar
. 2010. Als Deutsch noch nicht OV war. Althochdeutsch im Spannungsfeld zwischen OV und VO. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen. Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Christian Braun & Arne Ziegler (ed), 365–394. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlachter, Eva. 2004. Satzstruktur im Althochdeutschen. Eine Skizze zur Position des Verbs im Isidor-Traktat des 8. Jahrhunderts. In Beiträge zu Sprache & Sprachen 4. Vorträge der Bochumer Linguistik-Tage, Karin Pittner, Robert J. Pittner & Jan Schütte (eds), 179–188. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar
. 2010. Zum Verhältnis von Stil und Syntax. Die Verbfrüherstellung in Zitat- und Traktatsyntax des althochdeutschen Isidor. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen. Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Christian Braun & Arne Ziegler (eds), 409–426. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Syntax und Informationsstruktur im Althochdeutschen. Untersuchungen am Beispiel der Isidor-Gruppe [Germanistische Bibliothek 45]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2011. Word order and information structure in Old Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 159–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A comparative study of word order in Old Romance. Folia Linguistica 46(2): 553–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Serratrice, Ludovica. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Späth, Andreas. 2007. Introduction. In Interfaces and Interface Conditions [Language, Context and Cognition 6], Andreas Späth (ed), vii–xvi. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, Augustin. 2010. Topicalization and Stress Clash Avoidance in the History of English [Topics in English Linguistics 69]. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struik, Tara & van Kemenade, Ans. 2018. On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2010. Object position and information structure in Old English: an experiment in annotation. Paper presented at the Symposium on the History of English Syntax, York, May 2010.
. 2011. The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. In York Papers in Linguistics 12a: 29–52.Google Scholar
. 2012b. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 47–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra. 1995. Cases of Verb Third in Old High German. In Clause Structure and Language Change [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax], Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds), 345–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2011. Contrastive topics operate on speech acts. In Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives [Oxford Linguistics], Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 115–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (BLS), Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 406–416. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Heine, Bernd (eds) 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Extraposition from NP and prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 25, Jill N. Beckmann, (ed), 503–517. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and Recursion. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 2010. Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 183–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Phonological evidence in syntax. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis. An International Handbook [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 42.1], Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1154–1198. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2014. Object position and Heavy NP Shift in Old Saxon and beyond. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Tpday 2013], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 313–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Verb-third in early West Germanic: A comparative perspective. In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 15], Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds), 236–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 2006. Die rechte Satzperipherie im Althochdeutschen. Zur Verbstellung in dass-Sätzen. Ms., Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
. 2019. Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the Early Merge Principle. Diachronica 36(4): 509–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2016. A Comparative perspective on the evolution of Romance clausal structure. Diachronica 33(4): 461–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Verb Second in Medieval Romance [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 34]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 33]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar