Part of
Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 131156
References
Abney, Steven
1987The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Abraham, Werner
1991Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about. In Discourse particles: descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic, and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, Werner Abraham (ed), 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1996Swedish modal particles in a contrastive perspective. Language Sciences 18(1–2): 393–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Laura
2015Word order and the syntax of question particles. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 406–427. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Joseph & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. Linguistic Review 28(4): 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008Modal particles in Italian. Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129.Google Scholar
Corr, Alice
2016Ibero-Romance and the syntax of the utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uria, Larraitz
2016Microsyntactic variation in the Basque hearsay evidential. In Microparameters in the Grammar of Basque, Beatriz Fernández & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds), 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka & Bruce, Kim
2009On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goenaga, Patxi
2009Hauta-galderez. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”- International Journal of Basque linguistics and Philology 43: 381–404.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015Use Conditional Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddican, Bill
2008Euskal perpausaren oinarrizko espez-buru-osagarri hurrenkeraren aldeko argudio batzuk. In Antisimetriaren hipotesia vs. buru parametroa: euskararen oinarrizko hurrenkera ezbaian, Iñigo Arteatx, Xabier Artiagoitia & Arantzazu Elordieta (eds), 65–92. Bilbo: UPV/EHUren Argitalpen Zerbitzua.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2014West Flemish verb-based discourse particles and the articulation of the Speech Act layer. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Dietrich
1998Particles. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Jacob L. Mey (ed), 657–663. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2012Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of the common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 32(3): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2003World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2007aVocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua 117(12): 2077–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007bRomanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. The Linguistic Review 24 (1): 61–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2013Response particles as propositional anaphors. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 23, Todd Snider (ed), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuong, Io-Kei Joaquim
2008Yes/no question particles revisited: The grammatical functions of mo4, me1, and maa3. In Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), Marjorie K. M. Chan and Hana Kang (eds), 715–733. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki
2013Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 92–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Boya
2006Chinese Final Particles and the Syntax of Left Periphery. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Lizardi Ituarte, Aitor
2022On intonationally integrated complex speech acts: the Basque discourse particle ba in interrogatives. In Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 56. Chicago: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Malamud, Sophia & Stephenson, Tamina
2015Three ways to avoid commitments: declarative force in the conversational scoreboard. Journal of Semantics 32(2): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monforte, Sergio
2020Galderetako -a, al eta ote partikulak euskaraz: sintaxia, mikroaldakortasuna eta interpretazioa. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia
2002Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87–105.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, Jon
1999Focus Phrases, Force Phrases and Left Heads in Basque. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics Papers in honor of Mario Saltarelli, Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martín (eds), 179–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Pan Victor J.
2017What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementisers. In Discourse particles. Formal approaches to their syntax and semantics, Joseph Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 49–77. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schelfhout, Carla, Coppen, Peter-Arno, Oostdijk, Nelleke & van der Silk, Frans
2005Interjections in Dutch: a corpus-based approach. Nederlandistiek.nl. 05.05.Google Scholar
Scherf, Nathalie
2017The syntax of Swedish modal particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Joseph Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 78–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol
2003Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker
2014Ja doch wohl C? Modal Particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Lingüística 68(1): 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina & Heim, Johannes
2016The syntax of confirmationals. A neo-performative analysis. In Outside the Clause. Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituent, Gunther Kaltenbock, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann (eds), 303–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2017Ergative constellations in the structure of Speech Acts. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa De Mena Travis (eds), 419–446. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2011Discourse particles. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zubeldia, Larraitz
2010Omen partikularen azterketa semantikoa eta pragmatikoa. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU.

Corpus references

Mintegi, Migel Anjel
2002Denak du bere prezioa. Bilbao: Ibaizabal.Google Scholar
Morillo, Fernando
2003Ortzadarra sutan. Donostia: Elkar.Google Scholar
Rowling, Joanne K
2002Harry Potter eta Azkabango presoa. Translated by Iñaki Mendiguren. Donostia: Elkarlanean.Google Scholar