Part of
Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 229254
References
AnderBois, Scott
2019Negation, alternatives, and negative polar questions in American English. In Questions in Discourse – Volume 1: Semantics [Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 35], Klaus von Heusinger, Malte Zimmermann & Edgar Onea (eds), 118–171. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
AnderBois, Scott, Brasoveanu, Adrian & Henderson, Robert
2015At-issue proposals and appositive impositions in discourse. Journal of Semantics 32(1): 93–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Obenauer, Hans-Georg
2011Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28: 449–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csipak, Eva & Zobel, Sarah
2014A condition on the distribution of discourse particles across types of questions. In Proceedings of NELS 44(1), Jyoti Iyer & Leland Kusmer (eds), 83–94. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Döring, Sophia
2016Modal Particles, Discourse Structure and Common Ground Management. PhD dissertation, HU Berlin.
Egg, Markus & Mursell, Johannes
2016The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics [Linguistische Arbeiten 564], Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier, 15–48. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka
2007The grammar of polarity particles in Romanian. Manuscript, [URL] (17 March 2021).
Farkas, Donka. & Bruce, Kim
2010On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gieselman, Simone & Caponigro, Ivano
2013Two sides of the same pragmatic move: the German discourse particles etwa and nicht. In Proceedings of NELS 40(1), Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds), 231–244. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Goodhue, Daniel
2019High negation questions and epistemic bias. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 23(1), M. Teresa Espinal, Elena Castroviejo, Manuel Leonetti, Louise McNally & Cristina Real-Puigdollers (eds), 469–486. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2014German doch: an element that triggers a contrast presupposition. In Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 46(1), Rebekah Baglini, Timothy Grinsell, Jon Keane, Adam Roth Singerman & Julia Thomas (eds), 163–177. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine
2008A question of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 101–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2016Modal particles ≠ modal particles (= modal particles). In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics [Linguistische Arbeiten 564], Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier, 144–172. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1991On the semantics of modal particles. In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Magdalena & Kaufmann, Stefan
2012Epistemic particles and performativity. In Proceedings of SALT 22, Anca Chereches (ed), 208–225. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1999Beyond ouch and oops: how descriptive and expressive meanings interact. Handout for a talk at the Cornell Conference on theories of context dependency, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY.
Kratzer, Angelika & Matthewson, Lisa
2009Anatomy of two discourse particles. Handout for a talk at SULA 5, Harvard.
Ladd, Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 17(1), Robert A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds), 164–171. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lindner, Katrin
1991‘Wir sind ja doch alte Bekannte’ The use of German ja and doch as modal particles. In Discourse Particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed), 163–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung-Hye
2004On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudin, Deniz
2020Intonational Commitments. Manuscript, USC, [URL] (17 March 2021).
Stalnaker, Robert
1978Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9: 315–332.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
1989Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viesel, Yvonne
2015Discourse structure and syntactic embedding: the German discourse particle ja. In Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium 20, Thomas Brochhagen, Floris Roelofsen & Nadine Theiler (eds), 418–427. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar