References
Aissen, J. (1999). Markedness
and subject choice in Optimality
Theory. Natural Language &
Linguistic
Theory, 17, 673–711. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential
object marking: Iconicity vs.
economy. Natural Language &
Linguistic
Theory, 21(3), 435–483. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andriani, L. (2011). Differential
object marking, clitic doubling and argumental structure in
Barese (Unpublished MA
thesis). University of Leiden.
Andriani, L. (2015). Semantic
and syntactic properties of the prepositional accusative in
Barese. Linguistica
Atlantica, 34, 61–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andriani, L. (2018). The
syntax and semantics of DOM in
Barese. Paper presented at
the Workshop Differential Object
Marking in Romance – towards
microvariation, Paris, 9–10
November.
Bárány, A. (2018). DOM
and dative case. Glossa: A Journal of
General
Linguistics, 3(1), 97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A. (2018). On
a-marking of object topics in the Italian left
periphery. In R. Petrosino, P. Cerrone, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.) From
sounds to structures: Beyond the Veil of
Maya (pp. 445–466). De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, P. (1988). L’ordine
degli elementi della frase. Costruzioni con ordine marcato degli
elementi. In L. Renzi (Ed.), Grande
grammatica italiana di consultazione, Volume I: La frase. I sintagmi
nominale e
preposizionale (pp. 129–194). Il Mulino.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, J. (2008a). English
th-
forms. In A. Klinge & H. Müller (Eds.), Essays
on nominal
determination (pp. 213–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, J. (2008b). Reformulating
the Determiner Phrase
analysis. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 2, 1–25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berretta, M. (1989). Sulla
presenza dell’accusativo preposizionale in italiano: Note
tipologiche. Vox
Romanica, 48, 13–37.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berretta, M. (1990a). E
a me chi mi consola? Italiano e
Oltre, 5, 31–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berretta, M. (1990b). Sull’accusativo
preposizionale in
italiano. In M. Berretta, P. Molinelli, & A. Valentini (Eds.), Parallela
4.
Morfologia/morphologie (179–189). Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berretta, M. (1991). Note
sulla sintassi dell’accusativo preposizionale in
italiano. Linguistica, 31, 211–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berruto, G. (1987). Sociolinguistica
dell’italiano contemporaneo. La Nuova Italia Scientifica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blake, B. J. (2001). Case. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1982). Der
prâpositionale Akkusativ im
Sardischen. In O. Winkelmann (Ed.), Festschrift
für Johannes Hubschmid zum 65. Geburstag. Beiträge zur allgemeinen,
indogermanischen und romanischen
Sprachwissenschaft (pp. 579–599). Franke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1985). Differentielle
Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen
Sprachen. Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential
object marking in Romance and
beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), Romance
linguistics: Selected papers from the XVIII linguistic symposium on
Romance languages, Urbana Champaign, April 7–9,
1998 (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1998). Le
marquage diffèrentiel de l’objet dans les langues
d’Europe. In J. Feuillet (Ed.), Actance
et valence dans les langues
d’Europe (pp. 193–258). Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (2003). Nominal
and/or verbal marking of central
actants. In G. Fiorentino (Ed.), Romance
objects. Transitivity in Romance
languages (pp. 17–47). Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Braitor, A.-M. (2017). Unità
e diversità nella marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto diretto in
rumeno e in siciliano. Studio
comparativo (Tesi di
Dottorato). Università di Palermo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brugè, L. (2000). Categorie
funzionali del nome nelle lingue
romanze. Cisalpino.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cennamo, M. (2003). (In)transitivity
and object
marking. In G. Fiorentino (Ed.), Romance
objects. Transitivity in Romance
languages (pp. 49–104). Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cennamo, M. (2019). (In)transitivity
and the marking of O in Italo-Romance and
Sardinian. Paper presented
at The Italo-Romance languages –
ALT
2019, Pavia, 3
September.
Cennamo, M., Andriani, L., & Ciconte, F. M. (this
volume). Syntactic and semantic
constraints on differential object marking in Old
Sardinian.
Chilà, A. (2017). Il
sincretismo genitivo-dativo nella varietà reggina di S.
Luca. L’Italia
Dialettale, 78, 57–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge
of
language. Praeger.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. (1979). Definite
and animate objects: A natural
class. Linguistica
Silesiana, 3, 15–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. (1989). Language
typology and linguistic universals: Syntax and
morphology. The Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contreras, H. (1986). Spanish
bare NPs and the
ECP. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras, & K. Zagona (Eds.), Generative
studies and Spanish
syntax (pp. 5–49). Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crisma, P., & Longobardi, G. (2020). The
parametric space associated with
D. In M. Wiltschko & S. Armoskaite (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
determiners. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crisma, P., Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2020). Syntactic
parameters and language
learnability. Studi e Saggi
Linguistici, 58, 99–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (2003). Typology
and universals. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Ö. (2008). Animacy
and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and
phylogeny. Lingua, 118, 141–150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darlymple, M., & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects
and information structure. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Angelis, A. (2019). Articolo
espletivo e marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto nel dialetto
reggino di San Luca. L’Italia
Dialettale, 80, 59–76.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Del Puente, P. (2003). L’accusativo
preposizionale nel dialetto
napoletano. In F. Sànchez (Ed.), Actas
del XXII Congreso Internacional de Linguistica y Filologia
Romànica (Vol. 2). Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979). Ergativity. Language, 55, 59–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Escandell-Vidal, V. (2007). Topics
from Ibiza: Differential object marking and
clitic-dislocation. In G. A. Kaiser & M. Leonetti (Eds.), Proceedings
of the workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in
Ibero-Romance
Languages” (pp. 23–43). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanciullo, F. (1997). Raddoppiamento
sintattico e ricostruzione linguistica nel Sud
italiano. ETS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrazzi, J. (2017). Prepositional
accusatives in contemporary standard
Italian (Unpublished MA
thesis). Università Ca’ Foscari.
Fiorentino, G. (2003). Prepositional
objects in
Neapolitan. In G. Fiorentino (Ed.), Romance
objects. Transitivity in Romance
languages (pp. 117–151). Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Floricic, F. (2003). Notes
sur l’“accusatif prépositionnel” en
Sarde. BSLP, 98, 247–303.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Franco, L. & Manzini, M. R. (2017). Genitive/‘of’
arguments in DOM contexts. Revue
Roumaine de
Linguistique, LXII, 427–444.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ganfi, V., & Pisano, S. (2020). La
marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto in alcune varietà
sarde. Paper presented
at Unimore,
Microwebinars.
García García, M. (2005). Differential
object marking and
informativeness. In K. von Heusinger, G. A. Kaiser, & E. Stark (Eds.) Proceedings
of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution /emergence of nominal
determination systems in
Romance” (pp. 17–32). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giorgi, A., & Longobardi, G. (1991). The
syntax of noun phrases: Configuration, parameters, and empty
categories. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C. (1999). Sull’oggetto
diretto preposizionale nel siciliano (Tesi
di laurea). Università di Pisa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C. (2000). Note
sull’oggetto diretto preposizionale nel
siciliano. L’Italia
Dialettale, 51, 1–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C. (2010). L’oggetto
preposizionale in siciliano. Una breve rassegna e qualche
domanda. Quaderni di Lavoro
ASIt, 11, 95–115.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C. (2019). The
history of Greek articles: A syntactic
approach. In D. King (Ed.), The
article in post-classical
Greek (pp. 57–81). SIL International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C., Cambria, M., & Stalfieri, V. (2022). Number
morphology and bare nouns in (some) Romance dialects of
Italy. Languages, 57: 255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Guardiano, C., & Koopman, H. (2016). From
O 01 1_Indef mass_can be bare, retrieved on 23 February 2023 from
[URL]; to O
09 5_PN+A_Order PN A, retrieved on 23 February 2023 from [URL]; and
From S01_Existential constructions, retrieved on 23 February 2023
from [URL]; to S
04 3_Indef Pl Ns (Subj) must have an article, retrieved on 23
February 2023 from [URL]. In H. Koopman (Ed.), Syntactic
structures of the world’s
languages. Retrieved
on 23
February from [URL]
Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G. (2006). The
underlying unity of reference and
quantification. Paper presented at
the 32mo Incontro di Grammatica
Generativa, Firenze, 2–4
March.
Guardiano, C., Michelioudakis, D., Ceolin, A., Irimia, M. A., Longobardi, G., Radkevich, N., Silvestri, G., & Sitaridou, I. (2016). South
by south east. A syntactic approach to Greek and Romance
microvariation. L’Italia
Dialettale, 77, 96–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C., Michelioudakis, D., Cordoni, G., Irimia, M. A., Radkevich, N., & Sitaridou, I. (2018). Parametric
comparison and dialect variation: Insights from Southern
Italy. In L. Repetti & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Romance
languages and linguistic theory 14. Selected papers from the 46th
Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages
(LSRL) (pp. 103–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C., & Stavrou, M. (2014). Greek
and Romance in Southern Italy: History and contact in nominal
structures. L’Italia
Dialettale, 75, 121–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C., & Stavrou, M. (2020). Dialect
syntax between persistence and change. The case of Greek
demonstratives. L’Italia
Dialettale, 81, 121–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guardiano, C., & Stavrou, M. (2021). Modeling
syntactic change under contact: The case of Italiot
Greek. Languages, 6, 74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, H., & Ritter, E. (2002). Person
and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric
approach. Language, 78, 482–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von. (2008). Verbal
semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in
Spanish. Probus, 20, 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von, & Gáspár, E. O. (2008). Triggering
and blocking effects in the diachronic development of DOM in
Romanian. Probus, 20, 67–110. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. A. (2003). The
interaction of animacy, definiteness and specificity in
Spanish. In K. von Heusinger & G. A. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings
of the workshop “Semantic and Syntactic aspects of specificity in
Romance
languages” (pp. 41–65). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. A. (2005). The
evolution of differential object marking in
Spanish. In K. von Heusinger, G. A. Kaiser, & E. Stark (Eds.), Proceedings
of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution /emergence of nominal
determination systems in
Romance” (pp. 33–69). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity
in grammar and discourse: The transitivity
hypothesis. Language, 56, 251–299. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iemmolo, G. (2007). La
marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto in siciliano: Un’analisi
contrastiva. In Actes
du XXV Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie
Romanes, Innsbruck, 3–7 September
2007 (pp. 341–350). De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iemmolo, G. (2009). La
marcatura differenziale dell’oggetto in siciliano
antico. Archivio Glottologico
Italiano, 94, 185–225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2020). *ABA,
DOM and other accusatives. Paper
presented at GLOW
43, Berlin, 8–20
April.
Irimia, M. A., & Pineda, A. (2019). Differential
object marking and scales: Insights from
diachrony. Proceedings of the
Linguistic Society of
America, Vol. 4, 57: 1–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, R. (1936). Contribution
to the General Theory of Case: General meanings of the Russian
cases. In L. R. Waugh & M. Halle (Eds., 1984) Roman
Jakobson: Russian and Slavic grammar. Studies
1931–1981 (pp. 59–103). Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, M. (1993). Sardinian
syntax. Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, U., & de Swart, P. (2011). Case
and referential
properties. Lingua, 121(1), 3–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuryłowicz, J. (1949). Le
problème du classement des
cas. Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique, Kraków.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
La Fauci, N. (1990). L’oggetto
con preposizione nei “Confessionali” siciliani antichi. Risultati di
uno spoglio
sistematico. In L. Giannelli, N. Maraschio, T. Poggi Salani, & M. Vedovelli (Eds.), Tra
Rinascimento e strutture attuali. Atti del primo convegno della
Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, Siena
28–31 marzo
1989 (Vol. 1, pp. 387–398). Rosenberg & Sellier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laca, B. (2006). El
objeto directo. La marcación
preposicional. In C. Company (Ed.), Sintaxis
historica del español. Primera parte: La frase
verbal (Vol. 1, pp. 423–475). Fondode cultura económica/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, G. (1984). Actance,
variation and categories of the
object. In F. Plank (Ed.), Objects.
Towards a theory of grammatical
relations (pp. 269–292). Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, G. (2003). What
is an object in the crosslinguistic
perspective? In G. Fiorentino (Ed.), Romance
objects. Transitivity in Romance
languages (pp. 1–16). Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazzeroni, R. (1992). Genere
grammaticale e sistema nominale nel sanscrito: Per una
interpretazione della
deriva. Archivio Glottologico
Italiano, 57, 89–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazzeroni, R. (1993). Il
genere indoeuropeo. Una categoria
naturale? In M. Bettini (Ed.), Maschile/Femminile.
Generi e ruoli nelle culture
antiche (pp. 3–16). Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazzeroni, R. (1997). La
transitività come categoria linguistica: I nomi d’azione
indoeuropei. Incontri
Linguistici, 20, 71–82.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, A. (2000). A
comparative syntax of the dialects of southern Italy: A minimalist
approach. Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, A. (2004). Lo
sviluppo dei dimostrativi nei dialetti
centromeridionali. Lingua e
Stile, XXXIX, 65–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, A. (2009). Grammatica
diacronica del
napoletano. Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, A. (2016). The
dialects of Southern
Italy. In A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The
Oxford guide to the Romance
languages (pp. 246–269). Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ledgeway, A. (2018). Parametric
variation in DOM in
Italo-Romance. Paper presented at
the Workshop Differential Object
Marking in Romance – towards
microvariation, Paris, 9–10
November.
Ledgeway, A. (2019). L’accusativo
preposizionale: Parametri di
variazione. Paper presented at
the VI Convegno A.L.Ba.
Dialetti: Per parlare e
parlarne, 10–13
April.
Ledgeway, A. (this
volume). Parametric variation in
differential object marking in
Romance.
Ledgeway, A., Schifano, N., & Silvestri, G. (2019). Differential
object marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the
extreme south of Italy. Glossa: A
Journal of General
Linguistics, 4(1), 51, 1–25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leone, A. (1995). Profilo
di sintassi siciliana. Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, M. (2003). Specificity
and object marking: The case of
a. In K. von Heusinger & G. A. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings
of the workshop “Semantic and Syntactic aspects of specificity in
Romance
languages” (pp. 67–101). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, M. (2008). Specificity
in clitic doubling and in differential object
marking. Probus, 20, 33–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lima, A. (2003). Differential
object behaviour (Unpublished
undergraduate honours
thesis). University of Queensland.
Lima, A. (2006). A
minimalist view on differential object marking for
specificity. Paper presented
at the 36th Annual Meeting of
the Michigan Linguistics Society, Oakland
University, October.
Longobardi, G. (1987). Sulle
piccole isole. Italia
Dialettale, 50, 215–219.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference
and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical
form. Linguistic
Inquiry, 25, 609–665.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, G. (1996). The
syntax of N-raising: A minimalist theory (OTS Working
Papers). University of Utrecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, Giuseppe. (2005). Towards
a unified grammar of
reference. Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 24/1, 5–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, G., & Guardiano, C. (2009). Evidence
for syntax as a signal of historical
relatedness. Lingua, 119, 1679–1706. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lopez, L. (2016). (In)definiteness,
specificity and differential object
marking. In S. Fisher & C. Gabriel (Eds.), Manual
of grammatical interfaces in
Romance (pp. 241–266). De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loporcaro, M. (1997). L’origine
del raddoppiamento fonosintattico. Saggio di fonologia diacronica
romanza (Romanica Helvetic,
115). Francke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loporcaro, M. (2009). Profilo
linguistico dei dialetti
italiani. Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, A. L. (2005). Case
pattern splits, verb types and construction
competition. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (Eds.), Competition
and variation in natural languages: The case for
Case (pp. 73–117). Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, A. L. (2008). Animacy
and asymmetries in differential case
marking. Lingua, 118(2), 203–221. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L. (2005). I
dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi
generativa. Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L. (2016). Goal
and DOM datives. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 34(1), 197–240. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2008a). Microvariation
within differential object marking: Data from
Romance. Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique, LIII(4), 448–467.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2008b). Notes
on bare plurals and differential object marking in
Romance. In Hommage
à la Professeure Ioana
Vintilă-Rădulescu. Special issue
of Studii şi Cercetări
Lingvistice, LIX(2), 411–424.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2010). Éléments
d’analyse du marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues
romanes. Faits de Langues. Les
Cahiers, 2, 161–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2015). Differential
object marking in the first original Romanian
texts. In V. Hill (Ed.), Formal
approaches to DPs in Old
Romanian (pp. 200–245). Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2017). Le
marquage différentiel de l’object dans les langues romanes: Quelques
Nouvelles pieces du puzzle. Special issue
of Revue Roumaine de
Linguistique, 62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Næss, Åshild. (2004). What
markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct
objects. Lingua 114, 1186–1212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pensado, C. (Ed.). (1995). El
complemento directo
preposicional. Visos Libros.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peverini-Benson, C. (2004). The
prepositional accusative in
Marchigiano (Unpublished MPhil
thesis). University of Cambridge.
Piccitto, G., Tropea, G., & Trovato, S. (1977–2002). Vocabolario
Siciliano. Centro di Studi Linguistici e Filologici Siciliani.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pottier, B. (1968). L’emploi
de la preposition ‘a’ devant l’object in
Espagnol. Bulletin de la Societè de
Linguistique de
Paris, 63, 83–85.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodriguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2008). The
acquisition of differential object marking in
Spanish. Probus, 20, 111–145. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohlfs, G. (1969). Grammatica
storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol. III:
Sintassi e formazione delle
parole. Einaudi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohlfs, G. (1971). Autour
de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans les langues
romanes. Revue de Linguistique
Romaine, 35, 312–327.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohlfs, G. (1973). Panorama
de l’accusatif prépositionnel en
Italie. Studii i Cercetari
Lingvistice, 24, 617–621.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romagno, D. (2005). La
codificazione degli attanti nel Mediterraneo romanzo: Accordo del
participio e marcatura
dell’oggetto. Archivio Glottologico
Italiano, 90, 90–113.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romagno, D. (2006). Gradiente
di transitività e codifica dell’oggetto. Dall’accusativo
preposizionale al partitivo. Archivio
Glottologico
Italiano, 91, 203–222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy
of features and
ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical
categories in Australian
languages (pp. 112–171). Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sornicola, R. (1997a). L’oggetto
preposizionale in siciliano antico e in napoletano
antico. Italienische
Studien, 18, 66–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sornicola, R. (1997b). Campania. In M. Maiden & M. Parry (Eds.), The
dialects of
Italy (pp. 330–337). Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sornicola, R. (1998). Processi
di convergenza nella formazione di un tipo sintattico: La genesi
ibrida dell’oggetto
preposizionale. In A. Englebert, M. Pierrard, L. Rosier, & D. van Raemdonck (Eds.), Les
nouvelles ambitions de la linguistique diachronique, Actes du XXIIe
Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes
(Bruxelles 23–29 Juillet
1998) (pp. 419–427). Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stark, E. (2005). Typological
correlations in nominal determination in
Romance. In K. von Heusinger, G. A. Kaiser & E. Stark (Eds.), Proceedings
of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution /emergence of nominal
determination systems in
Romance” (pp. 123–138). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swart, P. de. (2007). Crosslinguistic
variation in object
marking. LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swart, P. de. (2008). Sense
and simplicity: Bidirectionality in differential case
marking (Unpublished
manuscript). Radboud University Nijmegen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swart, P. de, & de Hoop, H. (2007). Semantic
aspects of differential object
marking. In E. Puig-Wermueller (Ed.) Proceedings
of “Sinn und Bedeutung
11” (pp. 598–611). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tekavčić, P. (1972). Grammatica
storica dell’italiano. Il Mulino.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Telmon, T. (1993). Varietà
regionali. In A. Sobrero (Ed.), Introduzione
all’italiano contemporaneo. La variazione e gli
usi (pp. 93–149). Laterza.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terenghi, S. (2022). Demonstrative systems are not affected by contact: evidence from heritage Southern Italo-Romance. Languages 7(3), 201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomason, S. A., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language
contact, creolization, and genetic
linguistics. University of California Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torrego, E. (1999). El
complemento directo
preposicional. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática
descriptiva de la lengua
española (Vol. 2, pp. 1779–1805). Espasa Calpe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varvaro, A. (1988). Aree
linguistiche XII.
Sicilia. In G. Holtus, M. Metzeltin, & C. Schmitt (Eds.), Lexicon
der Romanistischen Linguistik
IV (pp. 716–731). Max Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vezzosi, M. (2019). Le
strutture nominali del casalasco: Analisi di comparazione
parametrica (Tesi di
laurea). Università di Modena e Reggio Emiiia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamboni, A. (1993). Postille
alla discussione sull’accusativo
preposizionale. In Actas
do XIX Congreso Internacional de Linguistica et Filoloxia Romanicas,
Fundacion Pedro Barriè de la Maza, Conde de
Fenoza (pp. 707–808). Fundación “Pedro Barrié de la Maza, Conde de Fenosa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)