Part of
Competition in Word-Formation
Edited by Alexandra Bagasheva, Akiko Nagano and Vincent Renner
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 284] 2024
► pp. 131
References (105)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo, Lenci, Alessandro, Paradis, Carita & Raffaelli, Ida. 2020. Models of lexical meaning. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-Disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon, Vito Pirrelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds), 353–404. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Murasugi, Keiko. 2022. Binomial adjectival doublets in Japanese: A Relational Morphology account. Morphology 32: 281–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andreou, Marios & Lieber, Rochelle. 2019. Aspectual and quantificational properties of deverbal conversion and ‑ing nominalizations: The power of context. English Language & Linguistics 24(2): 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2023. Different lexicons make different rivals. Word Structure 16(1): 24–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2019. Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 39–66. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. -less and -free. In Complex Words: Advances in Morphology, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 55–64. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Three ways of looking at morphological rivalry. Word Structure 16(1): 49–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Lindsay, Mark. 2014. Productivity, blocking, and lexicalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 67–83. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baeskow, Heike. 2015. Stacking as a reflex and indicator of (proto-)typical selectional restrictions. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 241–276. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bagasheva, Alexandra. 2017. Comparative semantic concepts in affixation. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 119–161. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001a. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Introducing Linguistic Morphology, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Competition in English word-formation. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 177–198. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Notions of paradigm and their value in word-formation. Word Structure 12(2): 153–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. The birth and death of affixes and other morphological processes in English derivation. Languages 8: 244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Valera, Salvador & Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2010. Affixation vs. conversion: The resolution of conflicting patterns. In Variation and Change in Morphology, Franz Rainer, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 15–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Körtvélyessy, Lívia & Štekauer, Pavol (eds). 2015. Semantics of Complex Words. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 2014. Competition as a unifying concept for the study of language. The Mental Lexicon 9 (2): 338–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobkova, Natalia & Montermini, Fabio. 2023. A quantitative approach to doublets in Russian denominal adjective construction. Word Structure 16(1): 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena. 1993. The Syntax, Semantics and Derivation of Bare Nominalisations in English. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 2011. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, D’hoedt, Frauke, Fonteyn, Lauren & Van Goethem, Kristel. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2): 197–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denistia, Karlina, Shafaei-Bajestan, Elnaz & Baayen, R. Harald. 2022. Exploring semantic differences between the Indonesian prefixes PE‑ and PEN‑ using a vector space model. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18(3): 573–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2014. Making New Words: Morphological Derivation in English. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Negrillo, Ana. 2017. On the identification of competition in English derivational morphemes: The case of ‑dom, -hood and ‑ship. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 119–161. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2010. A syntactic account of affix rivalry in Spanish nominalizations. In The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Artemis Alexiadou & Monika Rathert (eds), 67–92. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Structural sensitivity as an argument for semantic underspecification. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 217–240. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Deconstructing the non-episodic readings of Spanish deverbal adjectives. Word Structure 9(1): 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 2015. Lexical relations. In The Oxford Handbook of the Word, John R. Taylor (ed), 350–363. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, Cristina. 2017. Availability and unavailability in English word-formation. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 163–205. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fernández-Domínguez, Jésus. 2017. Methodological and procedural issues in the quantification of morphological competition. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 67–117. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2019. Competition in derivation: What can we learn from French doublets in ‑age and ‑ment? In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 67–93. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardani, Francesco, Rainer, Franz & Luschützky, Hans Christian. 2019. Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 3–38. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gause, Georgyi Frantsevich. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: PUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2004. Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates intentional morphological blends in English. In Language, Culture, and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 415–428. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 2012. Quantitative corpus data on blend formation: Psycho‑ and cognitive-linguistic perspectives. In Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Lexical Blending, Vincent Renner, François Maniez & Pierre J. L. Arnaud (eds), 145–167. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunkel, Lutz & Zifonun, Gisela. 2008. Constraints on relational-adjective noun constructions: A comparative view on English, German and French. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 56: 283–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Bonami, Olivier. 2023. A distributional assessment of rivalry in word formation. Word Structure 16(1): 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki. 2007. Suffixal Rivalry in Adjectival Formation: A Cognitive-Corpus Analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hegedűs, Irén. 2014. Affix doublets and affix rivalry in the history of English. Argumentum 10: 312–324.Google Scholar
Huyghe, Richard & Wauquier, Marine. 2021. Distributional semantics insights on agentive suffix rivalry in French. Word Structure 14(3): 354–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huyghe, Richard & Varvara, Rossella. 2023a. Affixal rivalry: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Word Structure 16(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2023b. Quantitative Approaches to Affix Rivalry, Thematic issue of Word Structure 16(1).Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Schlücker, Barbara. 2015. Multi-word expressions. In Word-formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1, Peter Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 450–467. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishida, Takashi & Naya, Ryohei. 2022. Presidential company vs. president company: Very subtle but crucial semantic differences between RA-N and N-N. Tsukuba English Studies 41: 19–32.Google Scholar
Kaunisto, Mark. 2007. Variation and Change in the Lexicon: A Corpus-based Analysis of Adjectives in English Ending in -ic and -ical. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawaletz, Lea & Plag, Ingo. 2015. Predicting the semantics of English nominalizations: A frame-based analysis of ‑ment suffixation. In The Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 289–319. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kikuchi, Yuki. 2020. An analysis of N-free X and N‑less X based on Construction Morphology. JELS 37: 59–65.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2010. Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language 86(2): 302–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehl, Aurore & Lignon, Stéphanie. 2014. Property nouns with ‑ité and ‑itude: Formal alternation and morphopragmatics or the sad-itude of the AitéN. Morphology 24: 351–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lara-Clares, Cristina. 2017. Competition in Present-day English nominalization by zero-affixation and ‑ation. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 207–244. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro. 2018. Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics 4: 151–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, Boban Arsenijevič, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds), 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Ping & MacWhinney, Brian. 2012. Competition model. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed), 1–5. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Ghost aspect and double plurality: On the aspectual semantics of eventive conversion and ‑ing nominalizations in English. In The Semantics of Derivational Morphology: Theory, Methods, Evidence, Sven Kotowski & Ingo Plag (eds), 15–36. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2024. Derivation and semantic theory: Foundations, frameworks, and outcomes. To appear in English Linguistics 40.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2022. The semantics of conversion nouns and ‑ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics 58(2): 307–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Mark & Aronoff, Mark. 2013. Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems. In Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7, Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds), 133–153. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Gretchen. 2019. Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Missud, Alice & Villoing, Florence. 2020. The morphology of rival ‑ion, -age and ‑ment selected verbal bases. Lexique 26: 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2014. Introduction. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, Brian MacWhinney, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 1–16. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Lynne M. 2010. Lexical Meaning. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naccarato, Chiara. 2019. Agentive (para)synthetic compounds in Russian: A quantitative study of rival constructions. Morphology 29(1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagano, Akiko. 2008. Conversion and Back-Formation in English. Kaitakusha: Tokyo.Google Scholar
. 2023. Affixal rivalry and its purely semantic resolution among English derived adjectives. Journal of Linguistics 59(3): 499–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagano, Akiko & Shimada, Masaharu. 2014. Morphological theory and orthography: Kanji as a representation of lexemes. Journal of Linguistics 50(2): 323–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naya, Ryohei. 2017. Competition in word-formation: Deverbal nominalization by ‑ment vs. conversion. JELS 34: 271–277.Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio & Nagano, Akiko. 2020. Keitairon to Rekisikon (Morphology and the Lexicon). Kaitakusha: Tokyo.Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary, online edition. [URL]
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo & Balling, Laura Winther. 2020. Derivational morphology: An integrated perspective on some fundamental questions. In Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon, Vito Pirrelli, Ingo Plag & Wolfgang U. Dressler (eds), 295–335. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 2002. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radimský, Jan & Štichauer, Pavel. 2021. Nomina actionis in the diachrony of Italian: A paradigm-based model of competition. Lingue e Linguaggio 20(1): 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raffelsiefen, Renate. 2010. Idiosyncrasy, regularity, and synonymy in derivational morphology: Evidence for default word interpretation strategies. In New Impulses in Word Formation, Susan Olsen (ed), 173–232. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 2013. Can relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological perspective. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10(1): 12–40.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz, Gardani, Francesco, Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Luschützky, Hans Christian (eds). 2019. Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renner, Vincent. 2020. An ecosystem view of English word-formation. The Mental Lexicon 15(1): 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Alexandra Soares. 2015. Semantic rivalry between affixes: the case of Portuguese nominalisers. In Mediterranean Morphology Meetings 9: 134–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santana-Lario, Juan & Valera, Salvador (eds). 2017. Competing Patterns in English Affixation. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schirakowski, Barbara. 2020. (No) competition between deverbal nouns and nominalized infinitives in Spanish. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 9(2): 257–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schulte, Marion. 2015a. The Semantics of Derivational Morphology: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation of the Suffixes -age and -ery in English. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2015b. Polysemy and synonymy in derivational affixation: A case study of the English suffixes ‑age and ‑ery. Morphology 25: 371–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimamura, Reiko. 1990. Eigo no Gokeisei to Sono Seisansei (Word-Formation in English and its Productivity). Tokyo: Liber Press.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol. 1998. An Onomasiological Theory of English Word-Formation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Onomasiological approach to word-formation. In Handbook of Word-Formation, Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 207–232. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2017. Competition in natural languages. In Competing Patterns in English Affixation, Juan Santana-Lario & Salvador Valera (eds), 15–32. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sugioka, Yoko. 2005. Multiple mechanisms underlying morphological productivity. In Polymorphous Linguistics: Jim McCawley’s Legacy, Salikoko S. Mufwene, Elaine J. Francis & Rebecca S. Wheeler, 203–224. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tribout, Delphine & Villoing, Florence. 2014. La composition VN et la conversion V>N en français: un nouveau cas de concurrence morphologique? In Foisonnements Morphologiques: Études en Hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, Florence Villoing, Sophie David & Sarah Leroy (eds), 75–108. Nanterre: Presses universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology: The Development of -hood, -dom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ueno, Yoshio. 2015. An Automodular View of Ellipsis. Tokyo: Waseda University Press.Google Scholar
Varvara, Rossella. 2020. Constraints on nominalizations: Investigating the productivity domain of Italian ‑mento and ‑zione. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung/Journal of Word Formation 4(2): 78–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varvara, Rossella, Lapesa, Gabriella & Padó, Sebastian. 2021. Grounding semantic transparency in context: A distributional semantic study of German event nominalizations. Morphology 31(4): 409–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varvara, Rossella & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2019. Competition between event-denoting deverbal nouns and nominal infinitives in Italian. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation, Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds), 169–193. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalva, Alina. 2022. Complex verbs: The interplay of suffixation, conversion, and parasynthesis in Portuguese and English. In Paradigms in Word Formation: Theory and Applications, Alba E. Ruz, Cristina Fernández-Alcaina & Cristina Lara-Clares (eds), 249–282. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2006. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva. 2022. Competing constructions construct complementary niches. Language Dynamics and Change 13(1): 34–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar