Chapter 10
[N1 + N2], [N + A], and [N1 + de + N2]
Is there a tripartite competition in French endocentric naming
constructions?
[N1 + N2], [N1 + A], and [N1 + P + N2]
constructions have a function of naming subcategories of the concept
indicated by the N1. [N1 + A] and [N1 + P + N2] constructions are
considered as lexicalized syntactic units, whereas [N1 + N2]
constructions cannot be formed by syntactic rules. The formation of
[N1 + N2] constructions is based on a model created by an analogy
from existent binominal constructions. The three types of
constructions under investigation can establish a tripartite
competition, but such cases do not always occur, because of the
conditional productivity of [N1 + N2], the lack of adjectival form
and restrictions on the formation of [N1 + de +
N2].
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Internal structure of the three types of construction
- 2.1[N1 + N2]
- 2.2[N1 + A]
- 2.3[N1 + de + N2]
- 2.4Lexical nature of endocentric naming constructions
- 3.Theoretical status of the three types of construction
- 3.1Different approaches to compounding
- 3.2The non-restrictive approach
- 3.3The scalar approach
- 3.4The restrictive or lexicalist approach
- 3.5The constructionist approach
- 3.6Analogical formation and conditional productivity of [N1 +
N2]
- 3.7Productive constructions with a specific N2
- 3.8Summary
- 4.Complementarity and competition
- 4.1[N1 + N2] and [N1 + A]: Complementarity
- 4.2[N1 + N2] with specific N1 and [N1 + A]: Possible competition
- 4.3[N1 + de + N2] vs. [N1 + N2] and/or [N1 + A]
- 4.4Competition with constructions with other
prepositions
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References